recent posts
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
guilty.jpg
238102381023810
>> No. 23810 Anonymous
31st December 2011
Saturday 10:22 pm
/x/23810 Guilty Would
Since this image wasn't that well received in The Ginger Thread, and by the recommendation of some lad in /b/: this is the "Guilty Would" thread.

Post women which aren't generically attractive, but which (for whatever reason) you'd shag the heck out of given the chance.
437 posts and 204 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 40422 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:39 pm
40422 spacer

07-08-Martha-Argerich-Ravello-Fest-2012.jpg
404224042240422
Does it count if you'd do a woman who's now quite old who was gorgeous when they were younger? I mean, age is a bit of a no-no for some, but I'd still love to boink Martha Argerich. She was stunning in her 20s.
>> No. 40424 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 6:59 pm
40424 spacer

A-4721-1341514840-1588.jpg
404244042440424
>>40422

76 is pushing it.

I would absolutely ruin Evelyn Glennie, no question.

I just spend a good five minutes trying and failing to think of a percussion-related double entendre. What the fuck am I doing with my life?
>> No. 40425 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 7:32 pm
40425 spacer
>>40424
She looks like your mates mum who you fancied. Does that really count?
>> No. 40426 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 11:18 pm
40426 spacer
>>40424
Definitely would. Older women kind of rule, actually.
>> No. 40427 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 11:59 pm
40427 spacer
>>40426

Yeah, they're like, totally bodacious, man.

whiteline

Pensions_saving.jpg
384038403840
>> No. 3840 Anonymous
19th September 2013
Thursday 10:03 pm
/£$€¥/3840 Pensions
The OFT have come out and said that many old (i.e. set up before 2001) pension schemes have high charges and offer savers poor value for money. They've also suggested a cap for auto-enrolment schemes, but it's going to be an almost meaningless gesture as you'd be very hard pressed to find a provider offering auto-enrolment terms with annual management charges greater than 1% anyway.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-24153012

The pension scheme I'm in at work (contribution: 5% employer, 5% employee gross) has management charges of 0.6%, which I'm alright with as it's less than I'd get if I was investing in collectives through an ISA.

However, I've put the charges and contribution details into Invidion's pension calculator for an idea of what I'd get when I'm 65, 40 years from now, and if my salary increases in line with National Average Earnings and I took the 25% tax-free lump sum I'd be looking at a pension in today's terms of 27.5% of my current salary. If I wanted a pension that would be about two-thirds of what I'm earning now then I'll need to contribute, assuming the employer contribution stays at 5%, 15% gross (12% net) of my salary every year for the next four decades. This does depend on what annuity rates will be like then and I'd also be getting the State Pension, as long as they haven't upped the age you receive it to 80 by then.

If it wasn't for the tax relief and my employer matching my contributions then I doubt I'd bother and I'd look into other ways to support myself while I'm in retirement. What about you lads? What are your thoughts on pensions? In my opinion to have any form of decent retirement income you're at the mercy of your employer offering a good pension scheme.
521 posts and 21 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 7074 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 8:21 pm
7074 spacer
The pension system is a literal ponzi scheme that might blow up at any moment
>> No. 7076 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 8:40 pm
7076 spacer
>>7073
They'd still be unaffordable for many, especially bearing in mind they say the percentage you should be contributing to your pension is half your age plus a quarter of all salary increases.

What's getting a lot of coverage recently is a flexible State Pension age. The current State Pension age is 65 and the average male has a life expectancy of 21 years. If they have, say, a State Pension of £8,000 per annum that's £168,000 they'll be paid. If someone chooses to take it at age 60 instead then that £168,000 over 26 years is a reduced State Pension of £6,461 per annum.

It's not going to be enough to retire on, depending on their private provision, but could enable someone to cut down their hours or get a less stressful job.

>>7074
Go on, lad. Explain how it is a literal Ponzi scheme.
>> No. 7078 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 9:01 pm
7078 spacer
>>7076
>unaffordable for many
Maybe the state pension shoudl subsidise it to an extent, but something's got to give. The universal state pensions days are limited.
>> No. 7079 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 9:27 pm
7079 spacer
>>7078
The wheels have been in motion with this for a number of years already.

Automatic enrolment into a company pension scheme has simply replaced the Additional State Pension/SERPS/State Second Pension which used to be on top of the basic State Pension. The only substantial difference is the onus has been shifted from the government to the individual.

People had the facility to opt out of the additional State Pensions, or it might have been compulsory as part of occupational pension scheme membership; those in final salary schemes would have an element of their pension known as guaranteed minimum pension and those in money purchase schemes would have DSS contracted out rebates paid in the following April. What the new State Pension has done, as a bit of an oversimplification, is move from having a basic amount with additional on top to having the additional amount already factored in with a deduction for periods of contracting out.

It's largely young people who will be hardest hit by this, as the additional pension they would have been able to accrue would almost certainly be considerably greater than the maximum available under the new system. However most people don't understand pensions and have little interest in doing so and the government have used levels of obfuscation about the new State Pension that even the most unscrupulous pension providers and financial advisers would think twice about so have been able to get away with greatly weakening the State Pension for future generations. Those close to State Pension age at the time were barely affected by this, in part due to being more likely to be contracted out at some point, so were unlikely to kick up a fuss whereas young people were unable to contract out so had the scope for accruing much higher additional pensions that has now effectively been capped.
>> No. 7080 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 9:33 pm
7080 spacer
>>7076
>Go on, lad. Explain how it is a literal Ponzi scheme.
A Ponzi scheme is one where the returns are paid from deposits. The State Pension is paid out from the same pot that taxpayers pay into. Of course, that it's technically true doesn't mean "pensions are a Ponzi scheme" isn't an utterly dumb thing to say.

whiteline

image.jpg
215882158821588
>> No. 21588 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 8:02 pm
/v/21588 New Dr.
Noncelad must be taking this pretty badly.
42 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 21651 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 11:49 pm
21651 spacer
>>21648
But it isn't, though, is it? Isn't that why we have political correctness - because we don't live in a state of perfect equality and devoid of prejudice?
>> No. 21652 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 12:30 am
21652 spacer
>>21648
Mental illness fundamentally affects how you interact with people though, I don't think it ever can be thought of in the same way. It's a part of your personality, to some degree inextricable.
>> No. 21653 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 12:33 am
21653 spacer
>>21648
>mentally ill should be equivalent to saying I've got a cold, or the flu, or I sprained my ankle.

Not really, mental health has a stigma for a good reason because it can mean that you are a danger to yourself and to society at large. Obviously not all mental illnesses are the same but there is a reason we associate manics with violence, schizophrenics will paranoid destructive behavior, depressives with wallowing and self destruction, and autists with actually caring about doctor who canon.

I'm saying this as a person who has friends and family crippled by all of the above. In all seriousness I've had to deal with manics and depressives who have used being open about their problems as a way to absolve themselves of guilt for their shitty behavior and lack of self control, and people think they are helping by being 'understanding' and shifting the burned of their behavior on to everyone in their path, but this is tacit to abuse. Your cause is more short sighted than you think.

I agree an openness about depression for the introverted is a positive as it is for anxiety, and any learning disorder where people need to admit they fall short would be a benefit and there are plenty of milder cases where it would be relevant, but you can't treat all mental illnesses as being helped by people being accepting and open, and like it would always be of benefit to the problem, sometimes the best thing is for people to feel they should solider on and strive for a life of managing normality without drawing attention to themselves and people moving the bar to excusing their failures.
>> No. 21654 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:08 pm
21654 spacer
Why is the main discussion in a Dr Who thread about mental health?
>> No. 21655 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:29 pm
21655 spacer
>>21654
Too easy.

whiteline

cults.jpg
103010301030
>> No. 1030 Anonymous
9th June 2010
Wednesday 11:59 pm
/boo/1030 spacer
Cults.

I love reading and watching shows about the crazy shit they do. Things like shrines in forests and mysterious meeting places.

Post anything related.
114 posts and 15 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 2874 Anonymous
24th February 2014
Monday 8:38 pm
2874 spacer
>>2872

Aaauuugghhh, me and my speedy read-y ways. "Biggest loss of American life", quite clearly not necessarily meaning it took place on US soil.

I am a mallard.
>> No. 2875 Anonymous
24th February 2014
Monday 10:23 pm
2875 spacer
>>2874
You silly bollard.
>> No. 4460 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:04 am
4460 spacer

Untitledrrxscs.jpg
446044604460

>> No. 4461 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:54 am
4461 spacer
>>4460

Are these auditing questions from the Church of Nonsenseology?
>> No. 4462 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 2:05 pm
4462 spacer
>>4461
Yes, and they half made me laugh and half gave me the fear.

whiteline

3712[1].jpg
831128311283112
>> No. 83112 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 9:15 pm
/pol/83112 The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked
Not sure if I should have put this in /boo/ but:

>A shadowy global operation involving big data, billionaire friends of Trump and the disparate forces of the Leave campaign influenced the result of the EU referendum

>This is Britain in 2017. A Britain that increasingly looks like a “managed” democracy. Paid for by a US billionaire. Using military-style technology. Delivered by Facebook. And enabled by us. If we let this referendum result stand, we are giving it our implicit consent. This isn’t about Remain or Leave. It goes far beyond party politics. It’s about the first step into a brave, new, increasingly undemocratic world.

So it seems a British defense contractor helped the Leave campaign. Cambridge Analytica exploited the system for Vote Leave to get away with funding that would have normally broken electoral rules. All bankrolled by a billionaire hedge fund manager. Welcome to plutocracy.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
64 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83185 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 6:55 pm
83185 spacer
>>83184
Don't be fucking ridiculous. Why are you even on about deporting Asians? Nobody except you is claiming the Asians who diddled in the likes of Rotherham are representative of all Joe's.

The simple fact is that the climate the lefties created enabled the likes of Rotherham to happen for so long. It's part of the reason why lefties are their own worst enemies and their actions were a major contributor to Brexit happening.
>> No. 83186 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 7:05 pm
83186 spacer

JVC-projector.jpg
831868318683186
>>83185
>Nobody except you is claiming the Asians who diddled in the likes of Rotherham are representative of all Joe's.
No, I'm not the one claiming that. You're the one claiming that.
>> No. 83189 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 12:22 am
83189 spacer
>>83184

>But they don't have any more propensity towards diddling kids than the locals

With regards to grooming cases Asian males are disproportionately over represented. And the incest thing is an unpleasant, inarguable fact too.
>> No. 83190 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 1:26 am
83190 spacer
>>83189
That's not necessarily true. The numbers that normally go with this claim come from a report that specifically deals with street grooming.

>The data submitted refers only to the ‘localised grooming’ model of child sexual exploitation and does not include online
grooming, trafficking of children into the UK, peer-on-peer abuse or other forms of sexual exploitation.
>This assessment cannot be seen as fully representative of the nature and scale of child sexual exploitation in the U.K., or, indeed, of the 'localised grooming' model.

http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_101409-2.pdf

>In particular, the report raises concerns over its ethnic representation:
>"Caution should be taken in drawing conclusions about ethnicity due to the relatively small number of areas where agencies have been proactive around this particular type of crime. We do not draw national conclusions about ethnicity from the data available at this time because it is too inconsistent."

>We therefore need to be cautious about Keith Vaz's claim, as the source he uses explicitly warns against drawing any nationwide conclusions on the basis of its research.
>While both the HM Prison Service and CEOP datasets have problems associated with them, there is nevertheless some evidence to suggest that sex offenders are 'overwhelmingly white' in terms of the raw numbers.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 83191 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:27 am
83191 spacer
>>83190
Yeah yeah, spout facts, nerd.

whiteline

The_Crystal_Maze_2017_title_card[1].jpg
215862158621586
>> No. 21586 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 6:16 pm
/v/21586 spacer
I might be having a moment but can anyone tell me why the answer to the riddle is 3 bananas?

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-crystal-maze-celebrity-specials

Also let's discuss the reboot. I like Ayoade but the hand thing is a bit weird but I get it, it's part of his schtick. Could they not get Ed Tudor-Pole back? He has not aged well
Expand all images.
>> No. 21608 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 1:12 am
21608 spacer
Tudor Pole doesn't like to even talk about it now. He was interviewed a while back and said he didn't really have much to say about what amounted to a few weeks' filming he did twenty odd years ago. He also rather snottily said "God didn't put me on this earth to be a gameshow host". Fuck him, he was never as good as Richard O'Brien
>> No. 21633 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 9:09 pm
21633 spacer
>>21586
>I might be having a moment but can anyone tell me why the answer to the riddle is 3 bananas?
2 peppers
3 aubergines
1 plum
4 cauliflowers

ba-na-nas = 3 syllables
>> No. 21638 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 2:22 am
21638 spacer
>>21633

You fucking clever dick
>> No. 21649 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 11:07 pm
21649 spacer
>>21638
He's just outed himself as the sort of person that passes the GCHQ/MI5 recruitment tests.
>> No. 21650 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 11:33 pm
21650 spacer
>>21649

The test seems to mostly be about not being the sort of person who talks about even considering a job with them and what is on the test, which is why I failed before I even started.

whiteline

whycantistopexisting.png
674467446744
>> No. 6744 Anonymous
8th December 2016
Thursday 11:54 pm
/£$€¥/6744 spacer
Lads who started their own businesses, could you give me a walk-through of some the things you did to make it? From the idea, to the settled daily grind and money making part?
7 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6872 Anonymous
1st February 2017
Wednesday 9:15 am
6872 spacer
>>6871
Currently trying to partner with an oil & gas company through accelerator programmes so I wouldn't have to worry about that among couple other things. Every bloody thing is regulated in this industry.
>> No. 6873 Anonymous
1st February 2017
Wednesday 10:15 am
6873 spacer
>>6872
If only they would let you make money with no restrictions. It's not like anything disastrous has ever happened on an oil rig.
>> No. 6874 Anonymous
1st February 2017
Wednesday 8:01 pm
6874 spacer
>>6872
If its going to be in open air or in a hazardous area on the rig then it will probably fall under the DSEAR regs and a significant source of ballache later down the line.

Completely off topic, but I can offer some pointers if you'd like.
>> No. 7055 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 12:47 pm
7055 spacer
This is probably relevant to this thread... How do I find a good accountant? Pick a reasonably priced one from google results and hope it works out?
>> No. 7056 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 2:54 pm
7056 spacer
>>7055

Personal recommendation. If you don't know any local businesspeople, get in touch with your local Chamber of Commerce. They will run free or cheap business networking and training events.

http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/find-your-chamber

whiteline

picture_one-1.png
327632763276
>> No. 3276 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 6:40 pm
/map/3276 spacer
After London, which is our best city?
40 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 3319 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 3:03 am
3319 spacer
>>3315

You sound like a fanny.
>> No. 3320 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 8:43 am
3320 spacer
>>3315

I bet you are fun at parties.
>> No. 3321 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 9:23 am
3321 spacer
>>3318
Careful, lad. That knee might hurt someone.
>> No. 3322 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 1:04 pm
3322 spacer
Chester looks traditionally nice, trees, rivers and classical British architecture. Got some great views, but it's basically a big town. One of those cities that is a city by technicality rather than population. The whole cathedral thing.

You'll meet a lot of middle class softies here, nice people and all, but they treat weed like it's heroin, bitch about one another a lot, generally they can come across as a bit snobbish.

I've lived in both the "bad" areas of Chester, and they've been better than any place I've lived previously.

Expensive as shit though. And there's the student masses as well.
>> No. 3323 Anonymous
18th July 2017
Tuesday 1:26 pm
3323 spacer
>>3322
All of our cities are cities by technicality. There's no such thing as a city by population in the UK. Lots of big places haven't been made cities, and lots of small places have, even in recent years.

whiteline

mqdefault.jpg
247742477424774
>> No. 24774 Anonymous
3rd November 2015
Tuesday 10:49 am
/g/24774 New phone
So my Three contract (24m One Plan at £33.50pm) is finally bloody ending and I'd rather not keep paying for this lacklustre Galaxy S4. It's caused me more bother than good.

Do any of you chaps have recommendations for a more modern handset, perhaps on contract at a lesser price? Stock Android is a bonus. Expandable memory is a must.
117 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 25979 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 7:28 pm
25979 spacer
>>25978
All the ones with Hauwei chipsets are well known to be backdoor-d to fuck. They have AT commands that allow you to turn on the microphone or camera, without any indication, for instance.
>> No. 25980 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 7:45 pm
25980 spacer
>>25979

Huawei don't make SoCs or baseband chipsets.
>> No. 25981 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 8:04 pm
25981 spacer
>>25979
That's an anti-Chinese myth.

Anyway, I'd rather the Chinese than Theresa knowing what kind of porn I watch.
>> No. 25985 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 10:49 pm
25985 spacer
>>25981
As has been addressed previously, there are numerous examples of popular imported handsets from China having backdoors identified and exploited by researchers. It's not just "the Chinese" who have access to your information, it's anyone with the knowledge and incentive.
>> No. 25986 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 10:52 pm
25986 spacer
>>25980
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiSilicon

whiteline

DC_spy1XUAAALyH[1].jpg
412109412109412109
>> No. 412109 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 9:18 pm
/b/412109 spacer
Lads, I think I've found are Nige's bike.

It's purple and yellow and got a union jack on it.
Expand all images.
>> No. 412110 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 1:14 am
412110 spacer
It looks like something somebody drew on a recreational acid trip.

The world is going to the dogs.
>> No. 412111 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 1:15 am
412111 spacer
It looks like something somebody drew on a recreational acid trip.

The world is going to the dogs.
>> No. 412113 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 7:30 pm
412113 spacer
>>412109
That is a desperate act.
>> No. 412114 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 8:17 pm
412114 spacer
>>412113
So is Nige himself.
>> No. 412115 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 9:21 pm
412115 spacer

2017-07-17-22-20-22-.jpg
412115412115412115
>>412114

How dare you speak that way about The Nige.

whiteline

Gregor.png
164551645516455
>> No. 16455 Anonymous
14th April 2014
Monday 11:11 am
/v/16455 Game of Thrones
Are you all just going to pretend this isn't happening?

I assume everyone's already illegally downloaded last nights episode? If so you'll definitely understand my next question...

WHO DONE THE DOINGS WHAT DID GET DONE!?

I'm reckoning Cersei at a daring 50/1.
416 posts and 26 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 20920 Anonymous
30th June 2016
Thursday 11:44 pm
20920 spacer
>>20919
I can't get over the fact that the country is called Abuddin (father of religion). It's like... Don't these screenwriters know any Arabic speakers?
>> No. 21612 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 5:43 am
21612 spacer
Apparently it's back.

What a difference three years makes.
>> No. 21613 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 9:27 am
21613 spacer
>>21612
Why must you tell me that I'm wasting away?
>> No. 21614 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 9:31 am
21614 spacer
>>21613

I'm sorry, I'm never going to die so I don't regard mortality with much reverence.
>> No. 21632 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 8:14 pm
21632 spacer
>>21614
May I drink your blood? Poz me babes.

whiteline

90s.jpg
215042150421504
>> No. 21504 Anonymous
12th March 2017
Sunday 10:36 pm
/v/21504 The 90s
Has anyone else noticed that over the past few months there's been a lot of 90s nostalgia "documentaries"? I swear I've seen 3 in the last few weeks.

Is there any reason for this? Has everyone decided that one of the most bland, unexciting decades has suddenly become amazing halcyon days?
23 posts and 8 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 21605 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 11:25 pm
21605 spacer
>>21585>>21587

Now I understand this a lot better.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXfKVTq8i7k

The comments are definitely worth a gander.

>>21603

And I guess this was the genesis for Videogaiden.

I am learning so, so much right now.
>> No. 21609 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 2:02 am
21609 spacer
>>21605

It really is a pitch-perfect pisstake.

While we're on an obscure late-night vibe, does anyone remember Gaytime TV? It's amazing how far we've come in twenty-odd years.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn14pbJSFVo
>> No. 21610 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 2:43 am
21610 spacer
>>21609
The first five minutes talk about how this or that is the first ever such-and-such for gays and lesbians. I wonder if this is what they called the pink pound. "We've got a new perfume coming out, let's say it's the first one specifically for gays and it'll sell loads."
>> No. 21611 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 3:46 am
21611 spacer
>>21610

>I wonder if this is what they called the pink pound.

Very much so, but it marked a really important change for gay and lesbian people.

Back in 1995, Section 28 was still in force, a law stating that no local authority may "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship". Homosexuality had been officially decriminalised in 1967, but gay men were still being arrested well into the 80s on charges of "outraging public decency". The age of consent wouldn't be equalised until 2000. The trauma of the AIDS epidemic was still very raw - just a few years previously, an HIV diagnosis was a death sentence. A lot of people saw a lot of friends die, eaten away by tumours and infections and god knows what.

As laughable as it seems now, the idea of a gay advert or a gay perfume was genuinely thrilling. Those little tokens of acceptance really meant something. The attitude of "your money is as good as anyone else's" marked a real sea change. We weren't quite normal yet, but we weren't perverts or plague carriers any more.
>> No. 21630 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 7:29 pm
21630 spacer
>>21603
We need some GET STUFFED

whiteline

CUNT FUCK SHIT PISS.png
115451154511545
>> No. 11545 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 6:20 pm
/job/11545 spacer
Can anyone explain this bullshit? Who the hell actually does anything?
Expand all images.
>> No. 11546 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 6:22 pm
11546 spacer
>Who the hell actually does anything?

Foreigners.
>> No. 11547 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 6:22 pm
11547 spacer
>>11546

Also robots.
>> No. 11548 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 6:39 pm
11548 spacer
>>11547

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU-tuY0Z7nQ

whiteline

gettyimages-811294792.jpg
412061412061412061
>> No. 412061 Anonymous
13th July 2017
Thursday 8:55 pm
/b/412061 Charlie Gard
Should we a) keep him alive, b) send him abroad for a 10% therapy or c) let him die?

Why?
28 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 412105 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:53 pm
412105 spacer
>>412104
>I don't understand, and I don't want to understand.
Sums up everything wrong with the world today really.
>> No. 412106 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:56 pm
412106 spacer
>>412104
As far as I'm aware, they got all the money they needed through donations via gofundme or a kickstarter or something.
(I also assume they're doing a good job of spending all that money on their legal fees.)
>> No. 412107 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 2:44 pm
412107 spacer
>>412106
Why are they going to the courts? If they can afford it, can't they just fuck off to the USA or South Africa or whatever? Or is this a shitty overreach by the state about how you can't fly with your kid any more.

Fucking twats. The lot of them. They should do the kid a favour and just turn the lights out.

>>412105
There is no real point.
>> No. 412108 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 3:14 pm
412108 spacer

insitu-emoji-poo.jpg
412108412108412108
>>412105
No.
Turd emoji cushions sum up everything wrong with the world today.
>> No. 412112 Anonymous
17th July 2017
Monday 1:26 am
412112 spacer
>>412108

Now that is some messed up shit.

whiteline

>> No. 58298 Billbob
16th July 2017
Sunday 11:52 am
/iq/58298 spacer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLyGe49vjnw

whiteline

Adobe.png
254742547425474
>> No. 25474 Anonymous
13th July 2017
Thursday 4:22 pm
/101/25474 Sod That!
I only signed for this because there was deadline coming at me like a freight train and I panicked, now I get this crap. God damn, what a load.
15 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 25492 Anonymous
14th July 2017
Friday 11:22 pm
25492 spacer
>>25489
Fuck sake.
>> No. 25493 Anonymous
14th July 2017
Friday 11:32 pm
25493 spacer
>>25492

How no to virus, man? How no to virus?
>> No. 25494 Anonymous
14th July 2017
Friday 11:56 pm
25494 spacer
>>25493

Windows XP. It's so old nobody makes viruses for it anymore.
>> No. 25495 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 2:39 pm
25495 spacer
>>25494
The NHS disagrees.

>>25474
Next time, don't leave it so late and just pirate the damn thing. I only buy applications from companies that aren't twats.
>> No. 25496 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 3:23 pm
25496 spacer
>>25495
https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/30/15712542/windows-xp-wannacry-protect-ransomware-blue-screen

whiteline

photo111.jpg
412096412096412096
>> No. 412096 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:02 am
/b/412096 BIG Phil Campion
Fuckin reyt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oNg_n_jUrQ
Expand all images.
>> No. 412097 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:18 am
412097 spacer
Embed your videos, you fucking moron, holy fucking shit, how fucking new are you, cunt?
>> No. 412098 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:51 am
412098 spacer

chair.jpg
412098412098412098
>>412097

OP here

Newer than you can possibly imagine.

Less of the swearing, lad.
>> No. 412102 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 8:49 am
412102 spacer
>>412096
He is great though. I love him.

whiteline

stephen rea.jpg
411867411867411867
>> No. 411867 Anonymous
29th June 2017
Thursday 4:18 am
/b/411867 Grindr, Tinder, and other such apps
I downloaded Grindr recently to look for traps and femboys, and although there are some, the selection is very limited and I'm sure quite a few of the trannies are prostitutes. Is there a better place to look for traps and femboys?

It's also quite a revelation to see the stereotype of gay promiscuity manifest itself so concretely. My profile is completely blank and in one day I've had 10 messages.

The best thing about Grindr's design is that there's no facebook bullshit to faff around with and that it presents you with a grid of people arranged by their proximity to you. Is there anything like that for the straight dating scene or is everyone still using Tinder?
60 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 412044 Anonymous
9th July 2017
Sunday 7:37 pm
412044 spacer
>>412042

Dating and hook ups can blur a bit if you end up shagging and it doesn't go anywhere. I know I'm too awkward to go for a straight hookup and only really ask girls out for drinks to see how things progress once we meet in person.
>> No. 412045 Anonymous
9th July 2017
Sunday 8:14 pm
412045 spacer
>>412044

>I know I'm too awkward to go for a straight hookup

Have you tried a gay one? Much more straightforward.
>> No. 412046 Anonymous
9th July 2017
Sunday 10:23 pm
412046 spacer
>>412045

Sometimes I wish I could.
>> No. 412047 Anonymous
9th July 2017
Sunday 10:50 pm
412047 spacer
>>412046


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh7W0U65gh8
>> No. 412099 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 2:06 am
412099 spacer
>>412045

>Have you tried a gay one? Much more straightforward.
>Much more straightforward.
>straightforward.
>straight

Do I win a prize

whiteline

manosmasterdoomed.jpg
582865828658286
>> No. 58286 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 10:03 pm
/iq/58286 Cool fact
I just found out horses are measured in hands
Expand all images.
>> No. 58288 YubYub
15th July 2017
Saturday 10:05 pm
58288 spacer
TIL: that TUL that horses are measured in hands.
>> No. 58295 Auntiefucker
16th July 2017
Sunday 12:35 am
58295 spacer

4_albino_african_clawed_frog.jpg
582955829558295
Hello
>> No. 58296 Searchfag
16th July 2017
Sunday 1:44 am
58296 spacer
>>58295
Fuck off back to France already.

whiteline

1012336-System__Resources__Image-1197978.jpg
825738257382573
>> No. 82573 Anonymous
8th June 2017
Thursday 6:27 am
/pol/82573 2017 General Election polling day/results thread
Morning, lads.

As per .gs tradition, it's time for the separate polling day/results thread.

Results are expected slightly earlier than previous years as there's no local elections at the same time.
348 posts and 43 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83089 Anonymous
2nd July 2017
Sunday 11:41 am
83089 spacer
>>83088
>I'm sure you are aware that being out in the public is a position where you can do harm to others
Yes, but then I'm sure you are aware that you're taking the piss, since we're talking specifically about being in a position of power.

>No I did not, calm yourself
Actually, yes, you did. The exact word with which you disagreed were "doesn't make you any less of a person". By disagreeing, you are, in fact, saying that it does make you less of a person.

>10 seconds on google.
No, that report is not evidence of "significant detrimental impact". It even says so right there in the abstract.
>> No. 83168 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 9:23 pm
83168 spacer
>>83088

Vesting power in a small group of people is better is it?

Did you know that the supposed democracy we have in this country is actually a vote to give away democracy for 4 years?

From time to time you get some bullshit referendum like leaving the EU - it was amazing how many people were suddenly experts on the EU and knew exactly what was going to happen. No one fucking knows! Why are we suddenly voting for these extremely complicated and abstract ideas? Because you're not allowed to vote on anything you truly understand or want. Where's the referendum to erase all debt?

The public can vote for reality TV stars on Big Brother, or for performers on Britain's Got Talent - these programmes provide enough illusion of democracy and power to satisfy the public and keep them apathetic.

>"The static results suggest that the statistically significant negative effects of immigration on wages are concentrated among skilled production workers, and semi/unskilled service workers. In the latter cases, the coefficients indicates that a 10 percentage point rise in the proportion of immigrants working in semi/unskilled services — that is, in care homes, bars, shops, restaurants, cleaning, for example — leads to a 1.88 percent reduction in pay."

Does this mean immigration is bad, or the people who employ and take advantage of immigrants are bad?

>No they differ diagnostically for reasons I have outlined that psychopathy is open to subjectivity and furthermore ASPD operates on a spectrum. That someone is advocating denying someone the right to stand for office based on a criteria they clearly don't understand it is significant.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 83169 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 9:27 pm
83169 spacer
>>83168
>Does this mean immigration is bad, or the people who employ and take advantage of immigrants are bad?
It means >>83088 apparently can't do maths.
>> No. 83173 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 11:23 pm
83173 spacer
>>83089
>Actually, yes, you did. The exact word with which you disagreed were "doesn't make you any less of a person". By disagreeing, you are, in fact, saying that it does make you less of a person.

Is there really any point in talking to you when your position is automatically "anyone or anything that disagrees with me is racist" including widely recognised concepts like borders and nationality?

I mean I did just assume we were wasting our time here but here we go and the thread is back up.

>No, that report is not evidence of "significant detrimental impact". It even says so right there in the abstract.

Read the quote then do a Ctrl+f and understand the context. Abstract browsers are on par with people who try and bullshit you on what footnotes say.

>>83168
>Vesting power in a small group of people is better is it?

I wouldn't call the checks and balances we have in modern society small. Certainly it could be bigger in some areas but if cabinet tried to pass some nonsense today you can imagine the uphill battle they would face against backbenchers, the media, potential protests, facebook memes etc.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 83174 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 11:39 pm
83174 spacer
>>83173
>Is there really any point in talking to you when your position is automatically "anyone or anything that disagrees with me is racist" including widely recognised concepts like borders and nationality?
Put that straw man away, lad. My position is "anyone or anything that disagrees with me does not agree with me".

>Read the quote then do a Ctrl+f and understand the context
It's your argument. Chapter and verse to support your claim that the report claims "substantial detrimental impact". I suspect you can't provide one because either the report doesn't say what you think it says or you just can't add up.

whiteline

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]