[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
stuffwehate
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  [] []
close
whiteline
arbitrary.png
178701787017870
>> No. 17870 Anonymous
27th January 2015
Tuesday 7:06 pm
17870 spacer
It's so fucking arbitrary in difference and it makes me want to cry that one is okay and the other one isn't okay.
37 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17942 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 1:55 am
17942 spacer

Capture.jpg
179421794217942
>>17934

It's American but the Oxford Dictionary thinks it's offensive too.
>> No. 17950 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 11:05 pm
17950 spacer
>>17932

Indians are clearly different-looking than Middle Easterns.
>> No. 17951 Anonymous
30th January 2015
Friday 11:26 pm
17951 spacer
>>17950

Thanks Sherlock. That solves everything.
>> No. 17952 Anonymous
31st January 2015
Saturday 1:07 am
17952 spacer
>>17950
'Murica though.
>> No. 17958 Anonymous
31st January 2015
Saturday 8:36 pm
17958 spacer
>>17942
I was all ready to take umbrage with the imposition of American offence upon our glorious tongue, so I looked up "cunt" only to find that it was listed merely as vulgar.

whiteline
jamie-sainsbury-twat.jpg
176141761417614
>> No. 17614 Anonymous
5th January 2015
Monday 3:08 pm
17614 spacer
>I'm just going to give this little ol' chicken a bit of a slap and a bit of a rub. Look at me I'm making propa nosh

How about I give you a fucking slap you gigantic fucking cock. You're a fucking hypocritical ball stroking cunt, I hate your voice and your fucking constant smug grin.
5 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17622 Anonymous
5th January 2015
Monday 6:52 pm
17622 spacer
>>17615
Was it b3ta who had an extended "Jamie Oliver is a cunt" photoshop meme thing going on way back in the day? Back even before we called them "memes". I remember a mate of mine had a bunch saved on his Pentium 2 PC which he thought were very funny.
>> No. 17623 Anonymous
5th January 2015
Monday 6:59 pm
17623 spacer
He's not even a real chef. I've seen him work, even with TV magic is has fuck all technique. Ramsey might be a cunt but he's a cunt that knows how to chop an onion.
>> No. 17626 Anonymous
6th January 2015
Tuesday 2:04 am
17626 spacer
>>17614
I like him. There is something friendly and homey about him. If I were on death row, the last thing I would ask for before my death would be to watch Jamie cook me something in 15 minutes or whatever LIVE, and then have him feed me while encouraging me for eating like a good boy after every bite. Like mothers do to their toddlers.
>> No. 17640 Anonymous
7th January 2015
Wednesday 12:08 am
17640 spacer
>>17626
If you were trying to come across as a mad looney nutter, you succeeded! Well done.
>> No. 17641 Anonymous
7th January 2015
Wednesday 1:39 am
17641 spacer
>>17622
>Back even before we called them "memes".
They were bandwagons, weren't they?

whiteline
>> No. 17464 Anonymous
17th December 2014
Wednesday 10:47 am
17464 spacer
This is something that gets me angrier than it probably should.

I went onto 4oD to watch yesterday's Black Mirror, and it asked me to disable my ad blocker. I though "find, just this once". At the first ad break, it asked me to PICK WHICH AD I WANTED TO WATCH FOR SOME FUCKING CHOCOLATE DRINK. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT?

I can just hear some sneering corporate exec. "Go on, you little consumer whore, pick your advert." Is this training for that other Black Mirror episode where we'll have to keep our eyes on the screen lest we hear a piercing tone?

I didn't click anything but there was a countdown timer that said "an ad will be selected for you in...".

I don't even know what I'm really ranting about, here. I just find it abhorrent that we're expected to enjoy ads so much we want to interact with them. I'm probably sounding like an edgy teenlad, I guess, but I hate advertising, and make every effort I can to scrub it from my life.

Sage for incoherent shouting at the internet.
17 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17489 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 3:24 pm
17489 spacer
>>17482
didn't have .gs down as fans of NerdCubed...
>> No. 17491 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 3:31 pm
17491 spacer
What kind of shitty adblocker are you using?

I use ABP, I disable it for the first ad, re-enable when the first one is playing and Bob's your uncle: no more ads. Dave on Demand is the worst and this technique does not work there.

There's no ads on http://bobnational.net/
>> No. 17492 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 5:18 pm
17492 spacer
>>17491
>There's no ads on http://bobnational.net/
There's also no access for grown-ups who left their student days long behind them.
>> No. 17493 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 6:51 pm
17493 spacer
>>17489
I'm not a fan. I knew about monetized views from elsewhere but that was the first thing I found with Google.
>> No. 17495 Anonymous
18th December 2014
Thursday 8:10 pm
17495 spacer
You know what?
I can tolerate shit ads.
I can tolerate being asked to actively participate in choosing an ad (i never do, mind)
I can tolerate being subjected to the same poorly-targeted turd of an advertisement every 15 minutes,
but what I cannot stand, is when I'm forced to WAIT while something i don't want to see and couldn't give a fuck about takes longer to buffer than the bloody program i'm watching. If you're going to force me to endure your overloud, gaudy, shite-hawking pap, at least have the decency to deliver it from a capable server.

I wouldn't even be surprised if there was some godawful "pschological" research that says it's more effective for advertisers to make their victims wait.

whiteline
Paul-Merton.jpg
173891738917389
>> No. 17389 Anonymous
10th December 2014
Wednesday 12:34 pm
17389 spacer
When I can't finish the cryptic crossword by the time the next Private Eye arrives.
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17402 Anonymous
11th December 2014
Thursday 11:17 am
17402 spacer
Has OP managed to successfully disguise a 'mfw' style comment?
>> No. 17408 Anonymous
11th December 2014
Thursday 7:15 pm
17408 spacer
>>17402

They've used an image to help set the context of their thread on an imageboard, yes.
>> No. 17453 Anonymous
15th December 2014
Monday 12:20 pm
17453 spacer
>>17408
I'd like to put the use of the plural pronoun to refer to a single person into room 101 please, Paul.

In other news I finished the crossword, and just in time to submit as well. I'll win that £100 one of these days I swear.
>> No. 17454 Anonymous
15th December 2014
Monday 12:45 pm
17454 spacer
>>17453
I'd like to put in idiots who think the singular "they" is somehow wrong. If it was good enough for Shakespeare, it's good enough for the rest of us.
>> No. 17455 Anonymous
15th December 2014
Monday 1:13 pm
17455 spacer

mw14177[1].jpg
174551745517455
>>17453
>I'd like to put the use of the plural pronoun to refer to a single person into room 101 please, Paul.
It was good enough for Shakespeare, and it's better than "zhey" and all that bollocks.

Denied.

whiteline
1332035429463.png
172511725117251
>> No. 17251 Anonymous
21st November 2014
Friday 12:06 am
17251 spacer
This post is problematic.
10 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17319 Anonymous
2nd December 2014
Tuesday 2:29 pm
17319 spacer
Problematic is a buzzword? Why? It's just a word.
>> No. 17320 Anonymous
2nd December 2014
Tuesday 2:39 pm
17320 spacer
I was unaware the word's meaning had shifted so I searched

site:tumblr.com problematic

and google's first page is mostly from http://yourfaveisproblematic.tumblr.com/

It's classic get-offended-by-absolutely-everything Tumblr.
>> No. 17321 Anonymous
2nd December 2014
Tuesday 2:39 pm
17321 spacer
>>17319
Well I have a fisherpersony friend who often uses it to describe things that are oppressive without being obvious or intentional, but it's apparently a well-established term in social justice circles - or so I assume, or the Anti-fisherperson League wouldn't be here on /101/ decrying the fact that they see it all the time on those websites that they never visit because they hate them.
>> No. 17390 Anonymous
10th December 2014
Wednesday 12:41 pm
17390 spacer
>>17319
Buzzword is my buzzword of the year.
>> No. 17391 Anonymous
10th December 2014
Wednesday 1:01 pm
17391 spacer
>>17390
BOTY every year, surely?

whiteline
iStock_000006502434XSmall-300x219.jpg
144921449214492
>> No. 14492 Anonymous
29th April 2014
Tuesday 1:15 am
14492 Minor rants and piss-offs. MK II Locked
As there are lot of threads with few replies - lets keep the small stuff in one place.

Random things that have pissed you off lately.


(Sorry to the lad who posted, grammar is golden in these parts).
1346 posts and 81 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17292 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 8:09 pm
17292 spacer
>>17288
>It's not OK to shoot an unarmed man just because he's running at you.
On the contrary, it's Darwinism in action. The intelligent person generally decides not to run at a cop who's pointing a gun at them and says "stop or I'll shoot" in order to not get fucking shot.
>> No. 17293 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 8:20 pm
17293 spacer
>>17292
I heard that he shouted 'get down!' but he misunderstood and started boogie dancing towards him, such as black men are prone to do.
>> No. 17294 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 9:28 pm
17294 spacer
Could you lot not have made a shitty thread in /pol/ about all this? I could have just hidden it then. Thanks for fucking up an amusing /101/ thread though.
>> No. 17295 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 9:41 pm
17295 spacer
>>17294
Let's get back on track.

I hate when threads get derailed.
>> No. 17296 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 9:50 pm
17296 spacer
>>17295
If only Michael Brown had that option!

whiteline
>> No. 17261 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 11:08 am
17261 spacer
I really don't like it when people refer to other people at large as "humans" in a non-scientific context. The number of times I've seen people posting things like "Ugh, humans suck" online.

Sage because I know the solution is to just know less shit people.
4 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17266 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 12:58 pm
17266 spacer
>>17264
Urgh, brain damaged culturally demented bipedal domesticated primates with the supposed ability to self reflect fucking suck! Eff this ridiculous effeminate ball of spinning dirt and molten metal right in it's polar regions!
>> No. 17267 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 1:05 pm
17267 spacer
>>17266

Lengthier descriptions aren't necessarily more creative.
>> No. 17268 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 1:39 pm
17268 spacer
>>17267
Ugh, everything sucks.
>> No. 17269 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 1:42 pm
17269 spacer
>>17268
https://www.youtube.com/v/ZpUYjpKg9KY
>> No. 17270 Anonymous
25th November 2014
Tuesday 2:47 pm
17270 spacer
>>17269
An oddly comforting reminder that, whilst everything may indeed suck, not everything sucks as much as Limp Bizkit.

Britfa.gs: giving you an outlet for lazy, fifteen-year-old put-downs.

whiteline
tumblr_inline_n4v2f6hkLk1r65l0f.png
171951719517195
>> No. 17195 Anonymous
15th November 2014
Saturday 11:11 pm
17195 Hollyoaks Theme
They've butchered it.

https://www.youtube.com/v/bpnl9xvWG-U
3 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17199 Anonymous
16th November 2014
Sunday 10:45 am
17199 spacer
>>17197>>17198
You two should get yourself down to Lush, they do amazing soaps, they're all colourful and, uh, eco-friendly and so on. Very enjoyable.

Sorry
>> No. 17224 Anonymous
19th November 2014
Wednesday 12:41 pm
17224 spacer
>>17199

I shall never set foot in their stores again after noticing those passive-aggressive bits explaining how to use their products.
>> No. 17234 Anonymous
19th November 2014
Wednesday 8:59 pm
17234 spacer
>>17224
What, like, put soap on body? I don't get it.
>> No. 17235 Anonymous
19th November 2014
Wednesday 11:40 pm
17235 spacer
>>17234
Some of them need to be kept in the fridge or something because otherwise they start stinking of day old weed smoke and BO.

The hippie stench.
>> No. 17238 Anonymous
20th November 2014
Thursday 1:36 am
17238 spacer
>>17199

I hate lush because every fucking product in there looks like a delicious cake or confectionery.

They are not delicious.

whiteline
th (1).jpg
171731717317173
>> No. 17173 Anonymous
13th November 2014
Thursday 11:14 am
17173 spacer
Fuck UPS in the ass with one thousand flaming dicks...

I got an important package delivered from the Motherland.

First, they gave it to a bloke living six miles from there. Then they picked it back. One week lost.

Then they tried to give the package to a shop in my road, number 65. Too bad that the delivery was clearly marked for 65B.

Spent two hours yelling at their customer service. First I got a chapatti who spoke like he had his mouth full of rancid curry (as it was, probably). He could not understand me, so I asked him to put me through somebody who could speak English. He just hung up.
Then, I spoke with a female chapatti with a decent English, she assured me that the mistake had been corrected and that the package will be delivered to my house.

Today I took another day off work, I checked the tracking page, they tried to deliver it to 65 again and they took it back, since the shop was closed.

After another half an hour, I managed to get another curryskin on the phone, she told me that her manager will call me back within one hour. He will probably be another idiot speaking like Apu from the Simpson.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
Expand all images.
>> No. 17176 Anonymous
13th November 2014
Thursday 11:52 am
17176 spacer
Delete your duplicate thread first, you fucking spam brained cunt.
>> No. 17185 Anonymous
13th November 2014
Thursday 2:02 pm
17185 spacer
ave a fuckin' whinge there, cuz

whiteline
grammar_nazi.png
170651706517065
>> No. 17065 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 8:18 am
17065 spacer
This is a fucking outrage.
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-29529578
1 post omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17067 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 8:33 am
17067 spacer
>>17066

For instance, the more I look at this the more I'm convinced I should have gone all out and, used a semi colon. That tends to get me banned though, watch...

;_;

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 17068 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 11:08 am
17068 spacer
>>17065
I shared your initial outrage, the title is misleading clickbait.

She goes on to say she has a hard time spelling people's names e.g. "Cheryl". I think that's the gist of it.
>> No. 17072 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 2:43 pm
17072 spacer
>"New York Times prints glaring typo on front page," crowed the Huffington Post.
Shouldn't the comma be on the outside of the quotation marks? I know the Yanks do it like this but it never made sense to me.
>> No. 17075 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 4:23 pm
17075 spacer
>>17072
For speech I was always taught it should be in the inside. I'm not sure if and how quotations, particularly quotations of written sources, differ from this though. Clearly when quoting speech the punctuation is added at the listener's interpretation but I'm not sure the correct practice when punctuation is already there (or not there).

Tangentially related, I've never understood the precise difference between "" marks and '' marks.
>> No. 17076 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 4:24 pm
17076 spacer
>>17068
Actually it's worse than that - the title says they're of little consequence, but all the examples she gives actually caused people to notice and comment.

Oh, and there actually was a bible that omitted the word 'not' from 'thou shalt not commit adultery', so it seems odd she'd use that as a hypothetical without mentioning that it actually happened (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible).

whiteline
sliced-ham-breaded-cooked-black-plastic-packaging-.jpg
170071700717007
>> No. 17007 Anonymous
28th October 2014
Tuesday 6:44 pm
17007 spacer
1. Flap to pull it open this corner
2. Ham angles the other way

Jesus Christ it don't half annoy me.


Yes I know the image is wrong but I couldn't find another one.
13 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17021 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 12:20 am
17021 spacer
>>17019
>They're not going to be made from the same cuts of pork though are they?
You realise this is Tesco you're talking about here? It literally comes off the same production lines. Of course they'll be made from the same mechanically recovered and processed meat. The expensive one will have 25% more meat for thrice the price.
>> No. 17022 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 12:23 am
17022 spacer
>>17021
>Of course they'll be made from the same mechanically recovered and processed meat.
The breaded ones tend to be sliced ham as opposed to reformed ham.

(I don't remember ever seeing reformed ham sliced with breaded corners but I dare say it exists. Probably Polish.)
>> No. 17023 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 12:30 am
17023 spacer
>>17020

Depends on the washing. Consider yourself, given the choice would you rather eat a rinsed arse or a rinsed elbow, of a whatever for the sake of argument? Irradiated or acid washed arse or elbow? Probably no difference in the latter, but in the former I would certainly have a preference.

Anecdotally I was unfortunately unlucky enough to eat a pack of <local shop> basic ham. One of the pieces on my butty looked like an actual arse, all puckered with a hole in the middle. I was gagging for the rest of the day.
>> No. 17024 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 1:44 am
17024 spacer
I don't really care about your problem but I'd like you to know I'm now going to use "ham angles" as a euphemism for fannies.

eg:check out the ham angles on this mifter
>> No. 17025 Anonymous
29th October 2014
Wednesday 1:58 am
17025 spacer
>>17024
>eg:check out the ham angles on this mifter

I'm going to work that into a meeting tomorrow. Cheers ladm8.

whiteline
house.png
167491674916749
>> No. 16749 Anonymous
7th October 2014
Tuesday 11:11 pm
16749 Modern Houses
In my opinion most houses built in this country in the last hundred years are ugly. They are badly proportioned, the ceilings are too low, the windows are too small and awkwardly positioned. The walls are vast acres of flat brick with little or no detailing. The rooms are too small, the walls are too thin, the noise insulation is ineffective.

Picture related. This is a brand new house in the city where I live. It looks like something a child would draw in infant school.
16 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 16780 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 8:48 pm
16780 spacer
>>16776
>What, you think this is a development unique to the last 20 years?
Mostly, since it's a direct result of the right-to-buy/no-more-houses policies of the 1980s.

>If anything pressure to squeeze more rooms in has lessened, since A-B travel times have dropped so dramatically since this and the last century.
Nope. It's nothing to do with travel times and everything to do with profit. Taking a two-bedroom design and carving out a third bedroom within the existing footprint might result in a house that sells for £50k more for a small increase in the cost of materials. Today's builders can build smaller houses with smaller rooms (with substantial reductions in the cost of construction) without sacrificing much of the selling price.
>> No. 16781 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 9:39 pm
16781 spacer

JS47793787[1].jpg
167811678116781
>>16780
>Mostly, since it's a direct result of the right-to-buy/no-more-houses policies of the 1980s.

Then you're wrong. Cramming people in to under-capacity housing is Landlording 101. This shit comes up in Cicero's letters.

>It's nothing to do with travel times
It has everything to do with travel times. Property is all about location. Because it doesn't take long to get from A to B, the value of property in cities has rocketed up, regardless of whether it has one room or two. Location is overwhelmingly what sets how much money a property makes its owner.

> Today's builders can build smaller houses with smaller rooms (with substantial reductions in the cost of construction) without sacrificing much of the selling price.

This is nothing new. In fact, regulation of property of this sort is far more stringent than it ever was.
>> No. 16782 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 10:32 pm
16782 spacer
(IMHO...) The cost of property has gone up in the UK because of:

- We have a culture of banks being happy to loan lots of money, and customers happy to take on those loans.
- Foreign investment in (especially London) property fuelled by governments around the world printing money and a lack of profitable investment options.
- Population increases fuelled by immigration.

Sage because I am more interested in architecture than in how much houses cost.
>> No. 16858 Anonymous
15th October 2014
Wednesday 4:56 pm
16858 spacer
>>16761
I agree. Decently sized mid-rise apartments for all!
I remember having a bedroom and personal space the size of the entire upstairs of a post-war UK council build in Germany for ~60 Euros a week, excluding bills and owned by the local authority.
Remove the parasites from the equation and you ultimately pay less. Democratic statehood and all that, force these tits out of business with decent flats for all.
>> No. 16860 Anonymous
15th October 2014
Wednesday 5:55 pm
16860 spacer
>>16782
I'd add BTL landlords being fuelled by housing benefit and shite like Location, Location, Location encouraging people to spend more than they can realistically afford to your list.

whiteline
lazywhoringadvertisingslugs.png
167401674016740
>> No. 16740 Anonymous
7th October 2014
Tuesday 8:39 pm
16740 Advertising
In the spirit of the minor rants and piss-offs, can we have a thread dedicated to documenting the latest turd in my drink offered up by marketing types?

Thank you to the popular rye-based cracker people for ripping the song from quite a fun, whimsical moment of the film Beetlejuice to peddle a slightly narrower slice of cardboard.

I'm thinking it's not just because the song is catchy, but also that the demographic who were likely to have enjoyed Beetlejuice in their adolescence have now slipped down a box on application forms and are expected to care about dietary replacements. For the record, rye is fairly good for you, provided you don't dunk it in a jar full of mayonnaise like the disembodied hands in the advert.
6 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 16747 Anonymous
7th October 2014
Tuesday 10:02 pm
16747 spacer

howtogetaheadinadvertising2[1].png
167471674716747
How to get Ahead in Advertising is one of my favourite films, it's criminally underdiscussed on the internet. I think it's better than Withnail and I.

https://www.youtube.com/v/pQc-zD7WrzA
>> No. 16748 Anonymous
7th October 2014
Tuesday 10:45 pm
16748 spacer
>>16745

Occasionally I happen to use a borrowed computer that doesn't have Adblock installed. The sheer bombardment of advertising makes me slightly nauseous - on most sites, only a minority of the page is actual content, hemmed into the bottom left corner by ads.
>> No. 16751 Anonymous
7th October 2014
Tuesday 11:28 pm
16751 spacer
>>16744
>it's all artistically null since Mr Lyndon started selling butter.
No, lad. Later twattishness doesn't discount youthful brilliance, any more than youthful stupidity invalidates later wisdom. The Sex Pistols were brilliant in their time, as were PiL, but it's a long time since Lydon was anything other than a cartoon rebel, because he's middle aged and used to a certain level of luxury now. That's fine, though - at least he's been open about it (Filthy Lucre, I'm a Celebrity, Country Life ads, etc) rather than being, to pick the most obvious example, Bono.
>> No. 16760 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 12:20 am
16760 spacer
>>16751

In fairness, he only did the butter ads because he got fucked by his record label and needed the money:

http://www.nme.com/news/john-lydon/74198
>> No. 16762 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 12:46 am
16762 spacer
>>16760
Oh aye, and Filthy Lucre was for similar reasons, and I don't begrudge him that at all; he's still an entertaining old sod, after all. I just don't pay much attention when he pretends to be an anti-establishment figure any more, but then most of us haven't for several years now.

whiteline
Delete.png
166991669916699
>> No. 16699 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 11:36 am
16699 spacer
Am I the only one who copies, deletes then re-posts an edited version of posts I make if I find a mistake in the original? You know, other than those people who actually proofread.

I've been thinking this for a while and decided to post about it now after finding someone refer to themselves as 'Phonelad'. I'm not exactly complaining about the 'meme', its nice to see that progression, just the fact that there's a simple way to edit posts without messing up the board and people don't seem to use it.
12 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 16713 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 2:34 pm
16713 spacer
>>16709
If you can't write a decent post, do something else. Like shitting. Or Angry Birds.
>> No. 16714 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 3:07 pm
16714 spacer
>>16713
Sadly not all of us have fancy machines with massive screens we can post from with proper keyboards at our disposal 24/7, mainly because we have to go to work, where we are stuck with our phones instead.
>> No. 16715 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 5:52 pm
16715 spacer
It's easier to write a post using a dedicated notemaking app and then paste the content into the post form in my experience.
>> No. 16716 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 5:59 pm
16716 spacer
>>16713
You don't have computers at work?
>> No. 16717 Anonymous
3rd October 2014
Friday 6:33 pm
16717 spacer
>>16716
Not ones we can use to post here, no.

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]