[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / zoo ] [ g / e / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ o ]
logo
random

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 158420)
Message
File  []
close
MoatSum2_1673559c.jpg
158420158420158420
>> No. 158420 Anonymous
11th July 2010
Sunday 9:53 pm
158420 spacer
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Raoul-Moat-Facebook-Group-Calls-Gunman-Legend-And-Gains-Thousands-Of-Members/Article/201007215663191?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15663191_Raoul_Moat%3A_Facebook_Group_Calls_Gunman_Legend_And_Gains_Thousands_Of_Members

JUSTICE FOR MOATY!
141 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown.
>> No. 159509 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 11:34 am
159509 spacer
I think the folk getting their nose out of joint are maybe taking the whole thing just a little too seriously, given that the statements made within the group seem increasingly intended to provoke a reaction.

Of course the events surrounding Moat's death are serious, but it's perfectly natural for human beings to make light of tragedy in this way, and imo a great deal more healthy than the misanthropic guff being spouted by those who consider themselves 'above' the likes of Siobhan O'Dowd. Thta's how the group seems to me - a bunch of regular folk making light of a horrible tragedy in the same way we make jokes about 9/11 or whatever. The irony being that this perfectly normal behaviour seems to have been (willfully and otherwise) misinterpreted by the 'easily offended brigade', who somehow consider it more palatable to call Moat all the names under the sun, dream up even more grotesque demises for him, and abuse fellow facebook users simply because they READ IT IN THE PAPERS HE WAS AN EVIL EVIL SIKO CAN YOU NOT READ?!!!

What amuses me the most though is how snobby those who are critical of the group have become, describing its supporters as 'sink estate scum' etc, all the while coming out with the aforementioned bile.

Personally, I was busy doing other things the last few weeks, and so didn't get caught up in the whole Moat saga, but what does irk me is when I see a bunch of fuckos taking the moral highground like this. To make matters worse, I've noticed a few (I assume) channers attempting to 'troll' the group in the cringiest manner possible. Perhaps when they're a bit older, they'll realise they sided with the cretins on this occasion. Perhaps not.

Oh well, I suppose if it annoys me that much I can always decide not to look at it.
>> No. 159512 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 11:43 am
159512 spacer
>>159501

Not sure if would...
>> No. 159513 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 11:50 am
159513 spacer
>>159512

I would've as I do find her group hilarious... but all her subsequent attention whoring has killed my boner.
>> No. 159514 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 11:51 am
159514 spacer
>>159512

I'd shoot her in the face, if you know what I mean
>> No. 159558 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 1:25 pm
159558 spacer
>>159509
Trolling isn't about siding with the most intelligent or most dim. The ones you like or dislike. It's about going against those who are most easily angered.

I'm not sure if this post is relevant, as I will not be looking at the shit trolling attempts. Shit trolls troll me, but only in the sense that they are often so poor at it they think trolling is simply arguing on the internet.
>> No. 159576 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 2:37 pm
159576 spacer
RIGHT, LADM8s, I'm running a little late but I have now come up with a possible wording for a postcard, subtle Gazza reference and all. Tell me what you think:

Granted, you made some foolish decisions, but you didn't deserve to be killed for them. Although you shot your ex's boyfriend, what happened to you in turn was not right. Zeal from the police is terribly laudable, but they are paid to exercise more restraint than would your average man, or we may as well revert to vigilanteism. Zapping you as they did, I might add, was exceptionally underhand; it doesn't take a genius to work out that tasering someone with a gun to their head is unwise. Anyway, I can now only hope that you're in a better place.
>> No. 159578 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 2:50 pm
159578 spacer
>>159576

>Tell me what you think

:/
>> No. 159580 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 2:53 pm
159580 spacer
>>159578
Fair play. How about 'I know it's awful, I want suggestions for improvement'?
>> No. 159587 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 3:27 pm
159587 spacer
>>159576
Trying a bit too hard. The boat has sailed, give it up.
>> No. 159588 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 3:32 pm
159588 spacer
>>159576
moist dicks in my face
>> No. 159613 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 5:31 pm
159613 spacer

article-1295134-0A7367E1000005DC-784_468x487.jpg
159613159613159613
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1295134/Traders-cash-Raoul-Moats-popularity-selling-sick-T-shirts-8.html
>> No. 159614 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 5:47 pm
159614 spacer
>>159613
Excellent.
>> No. 159625 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 7:12 pm
159625 spacer
>>159613

I must know where to buy that.
>> No. 159627 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 7:19 pm
159627 spacer
>>159625

http://91495.spreadshirt.co.uk/
>> No. 159629 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 8:28 pm
159629 spacer
>>159627
Brilliant. Thank you, good sir! Off to order I go.
>> No. 159663 Anonymous
16th July 2010
Friday 10:40 pm
159663 spacer
>>159613
> Unscrupulous traders are cashing in on the sick wave of support for killer Roaul Moat by selling 'commemorative' T-shirts, it emerged today.
> On the website Ebay, one selling was offering garish orange T-shirts emblazoned with the murderer’s face over the word ‘Moaty’.
> The shirts were selling for £8 each and came in a range of sizes - including one aimed at children aged nine to ten.

what fabulous advertising! that's worth thousands!
>> No. 159769 Anonymous
17th July 2010
Saturday 3:54 am
159769 spacer

angus-moat-006.jpg
159769159769159769
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jul/17/raoul-moat-brother-angus-moat

This is just an excellent article. All trolling aside, it must be awful to be a member of Raouls family right now, for all sorts of reasons. As an older brother myself, imagining a sibling getting into this kind of caper, I admire Angus Moat very much. Good luck to him. He really is a legend.
>> No. 159807 Anonymous
17th July 2010
Saturday 11:05 am
159807 spacer
>>159769
Raoul and Angus?
>> No. 159816 Anonymous
17th July 2010
Saturday 12:04 pm
159816 spacer
>>159769
Bloody hell. That was a decent read.
>> No. 159856 Anonymous
17th July 2010
Saturday 2:20 pm
159856 spacer

thisisevenlessfunnythanIthoughtitwouldbe.jpg
159856159856159856
I'm selling t-shirts on ebay if anyone is interested.
>> No. 159865 Anonymous
17th July 2010
Saturday 3:44 pm
159865 spacer
>>159856
>I'm selling t-shirts on ebay

No. Not in the slightest.
>> No. 160110 Anonymous
18th July 2010
Sunday 1:01 pm
160110 spacer
>>158420
Oh Raouly, those Coppers were using unauthorised guns, and playing with them liked excited kiddies beforehand.

It gets worse & worse.
>> No. 160186 Anonymous
18th July 2010
Sunday 7:33 pm
160186 spacer
Moat deserved everything he got. Why are we still discussing this?
>> No. 160208 Anonymous
18th July 2010
Sunday 8:02 pm
160208 spacer
>>160186

Because not all of us agree with everything Murdoch.inc shoves down our throats .
>> No. 160209 Anonymous
18th July 2010
Sunday 8:08 pm
160209 spacer
>>160208
Lol, who said anything about Murdoch? I don't read or watch anything by News Inc.

Moat was an animal and he died like one.
>> No. 160226 Anonymous
18th July 2010
Sunday 9:55 pm
160226 spacer
>>160209

His brother paints a frank and honest picture of him that leads me to believe you are wrong. It's hard to say just how accurate his brother's testimony is though, I suppose.
>> No. 160263 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 12:07 am
160263 spacer
>>160209

I mention Murdoch because you are pretty much parroting everything his papers have been spouting the past few weeks. I also don't like you very much because you heavily critisise the man, without any sound reasoning or explanation.
>> No. 160279 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 1:57 am
160279 spacer
>>160263
What's there to like about a man who shoots people and threatens police with death? I'm sorry, even if you don't like the police, advocating their murder is an intensely hypocritical thing to do.

To be honest, it seems to me that the only reason people on this board like Raoul Moat is because he was shooting people that isn't them. Now I know this is a chan and thus full of pitiless misanthropes, but I still feel obliged to comment that the fact that your sympathy lies with a man who shot people and/or threatened to shoot people rather than the people he shot and/or threatened to shoot marks you as... well, a pitiless misanthrope.

The man was a prick and while I don't advocate killing where it can possibly be avoided, I feel absolutely no sympathy for the man. Regardless of what we think of the police, the world can hardly be considered worse off less one delinquent, trigger-happy skinhead.
>> No. 160317 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 1:11 pm
160317 spacer
>>160279

You speak as if all he'd ever done in life was the week we saw on the news, and that he did it for absolutely no reason other than to be a dick. To judge him on that alone without considering what made him to it is just as hypocritical.

I'm not condoning or defending what he did, of course I'm not - but this man didn't just wake up one day and think "I'm going to be a right bastard this week, teehee".

The man was unstable, he knew it, he asked for help a year ago and was refused it. Of course I sympathise with that, you'd have to be more of a cunt than he ever was not to. I don't sympathise with him because he shot a policeman or killed somebody, I sympathise with him because it got so bad in that man's head that this seemed to him to be the only reasonable course of action. That's a terrible state to get into.
>> No. 160510 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:23 pm
160510 spacer
>>160317
I've had depression so deep I've actually considered doing exactly the same sort of thing Moat did. Not even joking. Planned it out in my head and everything. Would have made the news in a big way - fuck this kill-a-copper shite, if I'd have been able to pull it off properly (big if, admittedly) I'd have been remembered as the next 7/7.

I didn't go through with it. I retained the presence of mind to realise that what I was planning was the result of my mental instability and I did what I could to mitigate it. Murder is never a reasonable course of action.
>> No. 160513 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:30 pm
160513 spacer

police-raid-a-house-in-norton-grange-132787618.jpg
160513160513160513
>>160510

Enjoy your dawn raid.
>> No. 160516 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:32 pm
160516 spacer
>>160510

You're a fucking idiot then.
>> No. 160517 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:32 pm
160517 spacer
>>160516

Why? For not doing it?
>> No. 160521 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:35 pm
160521 spacer
>>160516

There's a lot more to rage murders than daftness. Have a look at Ames' 'Going Postal'.
>> No. 160523 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:36 pm
160523 spacer
>>160510 Not even joking. Planned it out in my head and everything.

And everything, well sheesh aint we lucky sons of bitches thet you didn't.

>I'd have been remembered as the next 7/7.

I think depression is the least of your worries ladm8, Meglomania and paranoia being the most obvious.

>I didn't go through with it.

And if you did I really doubt you would have made the nationals, maybe your local rag would have ran a small article on page 19 'Local nutter attempts to blow up bus, burns lips on the exhaust pipe.'
>> No. 160524 Anonymous
19th July 2010
Monday 8:41 pm
160524 spacer
>>160523

>And if you did I really doubt you would have made the nationals

In this day and age, with the way the tabloids are? You reckon?
>> No. 161117 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 7:15 pm
161117 spacer

raybovril.jpg
161117161117161117
TV survival star Ray Mears was drafted in by police to help hunt down fugitive gunman Raoul Moat, it emerged yesterday.

Mears, 46, was asked to assist armed officers as they closed in on the killer during the extraordinary seven-day manhunt.

He is believed to have helped track Moat's movements after the gunman fled his makeshift camp in the Northumberland countryside.

>> No. 161118 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 7:18 pm
161118 spacer
>>161117
With Ray on his tail, he had no chance. Ray could have taken him down with two twigs and a couple of bungee cords.
>> No. 161129 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 7:58 pm
161129 spacer
>>161117

I remember when it were Lofty Wiseman and Barry Prudom. Eeeeh.
>> No. 161131 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 8:01 pm
161131 spacer
>>161117
Ray is the final boss of /eco/ and consequently my hero.
>> No. 161132 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 8:02 pm
161132 spacer
>>161129
>Lofty Wiseman

Yeah he was the SAS go-to man for this kind of TV survival for a while. Ray is a lot more photogenic.
>> No. 161161 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 9:50 pm
161161 spacer
>>161131

Alan Titchmarsh is the final boss of /eco/
>> No. 161195 Anonymous
21st July 2010
Wednesday 11:25 pm
161195 spacer

montyDonDM2504_468x692-1.jpg
161195161195161195
>>161161
Hmmm. You're wrong. /eco/ has yet to be frequented by menopausal women.

I think Ray rules the roost and will always do so. If we were to choose a TV gardner mascot, it would be Monty.
>> No. 161220 Anonymous
22nd July 2010
Thursday 2:44 am
161220 spacer
Fuck all of you, but I'd like to put my trowel in Charlie's Dimmock, if you know what I mean.
>> No. 161247 Anonymous
22nd July 2010
Thursday 12:52 pm
161247 spacer
>>161220

I'd plant my seed in her bush, if you know what I mean.
>> No. 163464 Anonymous
2nd August 2010
Monday 11:19 am
163464 spacer

nathan-flynn-pic-north-news-image-2-6675980.jpg
163464163464163464
>Raoul Moat pal has tribute tattoo - but gunman's name is wrongly spelt

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/08/02/raoul-moat-pal-has-tribute-tattoo-but-gunman-s-name-is-wrongly-spelt-115875-22457777/
>> No. 163474 Anonymous
2nd August 2010
Monday 12:07 pm
163474 spacer
>>163464
Christ alive
>> No. 163481 Anonymous
2nd August 2010
Monday 1:39 pm
163481 spacer
>>163464

A SPELLING MISTAKE IS NATIONAL NEWS NOW

KILL ME
>> No. 163483 Anonymous
2nd August 2010
Monday 1:48 pm
163483 spacer
>>163464

A SPELLING MISTAKE IS NATIONAL NEWS NOW.

I think we've won, chaps.
>> No. 163573 Anonymous
2nd August 2010
Monday 7:30 pm
163573 spacer
>>163483
I think that this has happened before. Didn't one of the papers have a strop about dear old Gordon and a condolence letter?

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password  


Quantcast