[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
random

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 418316)
Message
File  []
close
Dgm2BXNXUAAuOyC[1].jpg
418316418316418316
>> No. 418316 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 9:50 pm
418316 Official Trump visit Thread
So The Tangerine Tyrant is gracing us with his presence, on the 13th of July. Friday the 13th in fact.

Coordinated mass protests are predicted and the met has drafted in reinforcements to "balance" free speech and security.

There's the admirable "Show your rump to trump", the coordinated mooning will if nothing offend POTUS, who is a self-confessed "germa-phobe".

Then there's the venerable "giant Trump Baby balloon". Though are Sadiq has forbidden its flying. Watch this space.

https://abcnews.go.com/International/activists-plan-giant-trump-baby-balloon-protest-uk/story?id=56195667

Buckle up, it's going to be one helluva ride.
Expand all images.
>> No. 418317 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 9:52 pm
418317 spacer
Let's see if he can handle the #BANTZ
>> No. 418318 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:03 pm
418318 spacer
>>418316
I will be marking the occasion by being self-obsessed, smothering myself in fake tan, making inappropriate and contradictory comments, and grabbing my female coworkers by their pussies.

Though if by some miracle I manage to shake his hand, I shall make sure to swipe it through my arse crack first.
>> No. 418319 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:11 pm
418319 spacer

Anon_London_Feb10_TCR_Protesters.jpg
418319418319418319
I think its more likely to just be a bit embarrassing.
>> No. 418320 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:26 pm
418320 spacer
>>418319
This. It'd be far more effective to simply ignore his visit. Then again, most protestors seem to be doing it for pure vanity.
>> No. 418321 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:35 pm
418321 spacer
>>418316

Why? What will this do other than further the negative stereotypes about us?

Besides, Trump isn't even particularily disliked anymore.
>> No. 418322 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:43 pm
418322 spacer
>>418320
Couldn't agree more.
>> No. 418324 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:48 pm
418324 spacer
>>418320

That's so true. From everything we know about the nature of the man, it'd be absolutely devastating for him to be met with empty streets and tumbleweeds.
>> No. 418325 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:56 pm
418325 spacer
I don't understand why showing your arse to a germaphobe would upset them, outside of the presumed unpleasantness of seeing lots of arses. Unless someone manages to launch a liquid projectile shit at him, I think he'll just call them some names and not be the least bit bothered.
>> No. 418326 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 10:59 pm
418326 spacer
>>418321
>Why? What will this do other than further the negative stereotypes about us?

Demonstrate that his presence is not wanted. As opposed to assuming we are entirely tacit though our inaction.

>Trump isn't even particularily disliked anymore.

Fake news
>> No. 418327 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 11:04 pm
418327 spacer
>>418320
> It'd be far more effective to simply ignore his visit.
How could that possibly be true?
Ignoring is easily confused with silent approval. Boos and jeers aren't.
>> No. 418328 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 11:07 pm
418328 spacer
>>418327

Trump is a textbook narcissist. He'll enjoy crowds of people getting worked up about him regardless if it's positive or negative.
>> No. 418329 Anonymous
2nd July 2018
Monday 11:32 pm
418329 spacer
>>418328

Then you need to turn him in on himself. Calmly standing there with signs like "You are the worst President" I think would probably get under his skin, screaming and shouting would feed him.
>> No. 418330 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 12:10 am
418330 spacer
>>418328
Ignoring him will piss him off much more. Whatever happens during his visit, he will claim that thousands of us came out to see him.
>> No. 418332 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:22 am
418332 spacer
Wasn't Trump already effectively deterred from visiting in the past by threat of demonstrations?

It would seem the OP is right, kicking up a fuss is the better course of action, regardless of whether it affects Trump personally. It expresses disapproval to our own government, which is the one we actually have the greatest degree of influence over.
>> No. 418333 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:43 am
418333 spacer
>>418332

>Wasn't Trump already effectively deterred from visiting in the past by threat of demonstrations?

I don't believe so. I can't find any reference to this, at least.

You're right though - we should be protesting our own government. We already got him knocked down from an official state visit.
>> No. 418334 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 6:07 am
418334 spacer
>>418333
How hard did you look?


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/11/donald-trump-state-visit-delayed-president-told-pm-will-not/
>> No. 418335 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 6:49 am
418335 spacer
>>418334
>The American President is said to have told Theresa May he does not want to come if people do not welcome his visit.

Something that could have also been achieved by ignoring him, then. That would have also made him feel unwelcome. Trump has largely waited for the furore to die down following his comments about the London Bridge/Borough Market daft militant wog attack last year.

Anyway, people want to protest about Trump because it's fashionable. They want to go out and protest largely so they can let people know they're protesting and to take selfies of them doing so. They didn't protest about the Saudi state visit because it wasn't cool to do so and they'd earn few brownie points for it. Protesting Trump is a bandwagon they want to jump on.
>> No. 418336 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 6:51 am
418336 spacer
>>418334

But he is coming despite very public plans to protest him.
>> No. 418340 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 9:24 am
418340 spacer
Because Trump is a narcissist, he literally cannot perceive criticism of him. Calling him a massive bell end would just sounding like garbled gibberish to him. That's why he forces his staff to say nice things to him in meetings, because he can't properly perceive anything that doesn't congratulate him.
>> No. 418341 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 9:30 am
418341 spacer
>>418336

But if you read the thread you'll notice there is already a psy-ops campaign to convince those inclined to demonstrate not to show up. Because not showing up apparently sends a clear message as opposed to being assumed to be silent consent like it has every time in the past.
>> No. 418343 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 10:58 am
418343 spacer
>>418341
I don't think people shouldn't demonstrate, paranoia lad, I just think getting your bum out is a bit silly. One of the biggest criticisms of Trump is that he doesn't appear to take anything seriously, so we should moon him? It doesn't make sense to me.
>> No. 418344 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 12:01 pm
418344 spacer
It's fucking embarrassing.
>> No. 418348 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 4:27 pm
418348 spacer

769f561127d3d1c4296df513086003f5355a4159.jpg
418348418348418348
>>418343

I can already see Trump's tweets...

"England (sic) has become a nation of mooners. So sad."

"People mooning the U.S. President while immigrants take their jobs and rape their women. Disgusting."
>> No. 418349 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:08 pm
418349 spacer
>>418348

Yeah, he'll throw in a couple of "disgustings" and "shamefuls" too, but he won't actually care. Has no one noticed that yet? Just simply doesn't give a monkeys.

I think the slightly twee "hehe, rump" thing put me off too. Obviously they called it that because it rhymes, but if I properly hate someone, I want them to have to look deep into my Thai birthday suprise and never, ever forget it.
>> No. 418350 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:12 pm
418350 spacer
>>418341
> if you read the thread you'll notice there is already a psy-ops campaign to convince those inclined to demonstrate not to show up

WAKE. UP. SHEEPLE.
>> No. 418351 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:25 pm
418351 spacer
>>418350

Psy Ops telling people not to demonstrate. Shameful.
>> No. 418352 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:43 pm
418352 spacer
>>418351
How influential do you imagine Britfa.gs is? I know we used to be one of the top Google results for a certain beefy phrase, but people calling your protest ideas vacuous on here isn't going to result in thousands of people deciding not to do it.
>> No. 418353 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 5:44 pm
418353 spacer
Is there anything happening for us who want to show our support for him?
>> No. 418354 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 6:42 pm
418354 spacer
Christ this is embarrassing. Shall we have a large, dignified protest? Perhaps one with an echoing silence that would perfectly display how little we think of this childish, petulant, offensive, incompetent boor? No, let's call up the Rentamobs and show the world that when Brits make a point we like to do it like toddlers. Am I the only one who sees the irony in this?

I have been to two protests in my life. Both were well-behaved and somewhat successful, since we were, ya know, trying to raise awareness of issues that local politicians could actually do something about. And on both occasions I saw the same twat wearing a rubber pig mask calling himself 'Hardcastle' who had nothing to do with either and who just liked going along to any demo he could find if it gave him an excuse to yell at policemen and be all revolutionary innit. And also presumably to dribble on about it to his mates afterwards as a proud Anti-Whatever Warrior.
As stated above the perfect form of protest would be for nobody to show up. Trump is exactly the sort of person who thinks that if he's riling people up in large numbers then he must be doing something right and he won't distinguish between positive and negative responses; that kind of ego cares only for more, louder, more strident attention. Alternatively a large crowd standing in complete silence would definitely unsettle him and make a point far louder than screaming 'FUCK DRUMPF' while pointing buttcracks at the watching world.

What we'll get instead is the usual bunch of paranoid drugged-up shouty refuseniks and obese shrieking acrobat harpies with badly dyed-hair. It will be humiliating for exactly the wrong people and won't change a fucking thing. Except of course, it will give these sorts of idiots the warm, comforting glow of Doing The Right Thing. I don't seem to recall them out in force when America's last president was committing extra-judicial killings on an industrial scale across the Middle East.

But what do I know, I'm just a junior officer in the YMCA's Psy-Op Division, carefully monitoring the hive of organised sedition that is .gs.
>> No. 418355 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 7:02 pm
418355 spacer
>>418352

Maybe we should go to the protests waving a banner with the letters ".gs/b/" on it.

So here is your challenge: Attend the protests, with a banner with ".gs/b/" on it, and then try to make it into the mainstream media's photo coverage of the event.

Make sure that it reads ".gs/b/" and not just "/b/". The paedos good people of 4chan can make their own banner.
>> No. 418356 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 7:09 pm
418356 spacer
>>418355
Just leave out the /b/ entirely. If we need a slash in there, use /IQ/ or /SHED/ instead.
>> No. 418361 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 8:43 pm
418361 spacer
>>418356

Still too on the nose.

I'll only be happy if I see a real deep cut britfa reference. "BAN TRUMP FROM THE CHIP SHOP" "ORANGE DONNY FELT MY MUSCLES" "JUSTICE FOR TEACOCK", that sort of thing.
>> No. 418362 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 8:45 pm
418362 spacer
>>418361
Aren't those all Britchan references?
>> No. 418363 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 9:08 pm
418363 spacer
>>418362
Not the first one I don't think. It was about a mod exiled from here.
>> No. 418364 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 9:14 pm
418364 spacer
>>418362

Now that I think about it Teacock might be, but Chipshop is from here, and are Aki is either from here, or simply so transcendent that it doesn't matter.

I'm fully supportive of a "don't let anyone dull your sparkle" sign, or maybe something to do with axe grinding. Or just half past two.
>> No. 418365 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 9:46 pm
418365 spacer
>>418351

Psy ops, or the genuine opinion that a reasonable, peaceful demonstration against an unreasonable, violent man is not a good option?

Either shoot him or stay at home ffs.
>> No. 418366 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 10:03 pm
418366 spacer

bad-donald-trump-tattoos-funny-face.jpg
418366418366418366
>>418361

How about this whole site's motto...

>"annoyingly elitist, reassuringly expansive"

I was going to say it's a good description both of this site and of Trump, but now that I think about it, in the case of Trump, being a big mouthed senile cunt with shedloads of money doesn't automatically make you elitist. However annoying you may be.
>> No. 418367 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 10:51 pm
418367 spacer
>>418361
Didn't ARE MOATY rob a chippy?
>> No. 418368 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 11:13 pm
418368 spacer
>>418366

>I was going to say it's a good description both of this site and of Trump

...and ARE STELLA of course.
>> No. 418369 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 11:16 pm
418369 spacer
>>418366
>reassuringly expansive

Provided you want to talk about coding, being a chef or hate on womenfolk.
>> No. 418371 Anonymous
3rd July 2018
Tuesday 11:29 pm
418371 spacer
>>418369

What if I am a coding whale poacher chef?
>> No. 418373 Anonymous
4th July 2018
Wednesday 1:42 am
418373 spacer
>>418369
And your experience as an alcoholic or maybe who your guilty crush is.
>> No. 418376 Anonymous
4th July 2018
Wednesday 1:03 pm
418376 spacer
>>418371>>418373
I felt all flushed with fever embarrassed by the crowd.
I felt he found my letters and read each one out loud.
I prayed that he would finish but he just kept right on.
Strumming my pain with his fingers
singing my life with his words
killing me softly with his song
killing me softly with his song telling my whole life
with his words killing me softly
with his song.
>> No. 418386 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 1:34 am
418386 spacer
>>418373
Or that time a bunch of reprobates on an internet messageboard egged you on into shagging your auntie.
>> No. 418387 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 1:38 am
418387 spacer
>>418386


>egged you on into shagging your auntie.

You see far worse on .gs.
>> No. 418388 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 1:42 am
418388 spacer
>>418387
I...whuh...you mean we've done worse than actual incest?
>> No. 418389 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 2:14 am
418389 spacer
>>418388
There was that lad with the phone ...
>> No. 418390 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 2:50 am
418390 spacer
>>418388

I'm sure we had an Auntiefucker around here 2-3 years ago or so.
>> No. 418392 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 8:37 am
418392 spacer
>>418390
It was longer than that lad.
>> No. 418403 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 1:35 pm
418403 spacer

pbs_twimg_com_media_DhVmcxuW4AE_.jpg
418403418403418403
>A giant balloon dubbed "Trump baby" has been given the green light to fly near parliament during the president's UK visit.

>London mayor Sadiq Khan's Greater London Authority has approved a request for the flight after thousands signed a petition and a crowdfunding campaign raised more than £16,000 to get the six-metre inflatable off the ground.

https://news.sky.com/story/trump-angry-baby-blimp-gets-green-light-to-fly-
over-london-during-presidents-visit-11426665
>> No. 418404 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 1:41 pm
418404 spacer

donald-trump-huge-mouth-like-centipede-stack-of-ne.jpg
418404418404418404
>>418403

That's just going to be Twitter gold when Trump finds out and tweets about it.
>> No. 418407 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 2:26 pm
418407 spacer
>>418403

How long before one of our lot shoots it down?
>> No. 418410 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 2:53 pm
418410 spacer
>>418407

You mean somebody from .gs?
>> No. 418411 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 2:54 pm
418411 spacer
>>418407

I'm predicting US secret service will shoot it down, and will spark a national controversy just as insane as the current presidency.
>> No. 418413 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 3:13 pm
418413 spacer
>>418411 

They have a permit from the Mayor of London, and the U.S. Secret Service has no jurisdiction in the UK. All it is allowed to do is avert immediate threats to the safety or well being of the President. Its powers while they are here in Britain do not go beyond a citizen's arrest.
>> No. 418414 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 3:23 pm
418414 spacer
>>418413

They'll still shoot it and plant some crack on it mate. They're Americans.
>> No. 418419 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 8:13 pm
418419 spacer
>>418316
And this is why I can't feel sad anytime the grooming gangs routinely violate the local Chavette slags. Britain needs someone like Trump or Enoch Powell.
>> No. 418420 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 8:15 pm
418420 spacer
>>418419

What, so a different set of people can be oppressed?
>> No. 418424 Anonymous
5th July 2018
Thursday 9:14 pm
418424 spacer
>>418419

Well trolled, lad.
>> No. 418440 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:42 am
418440 spacer
>>418424

Why would he be trolling? He's right.
>> No. 418450 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 1:39 pm
418450 spacer
>>418440

Is he? You don't need rivers of blood to correct police handling of situations it shouldn't be that hard of concept for the police to grasp the idea of applying the law as it currently exists.

The most bewildering thing to me is that they don't in these situations.
>> No. 418451 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 1:58 pm
418451 spacer
>>418450
Do you know anything about Enoch Powell other than his name and 'rivers of blood sounds scary'?
>> No. 418452 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 2:07 pm
418452 spacer
>>418451

We know that what he foresaw did not happen.
>> No. 418454 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 2:53 pm
418454 spacer
>>418451

Yes I do. Do you have a point?
>> No. 418459 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 4:09 pm
418459 spacer
>>418452

I've got a pair of glasses here for you, mate.

>>418451

I hate that that speech got the name that it did. Lefty propaganda wins again "but he wants rivers of blood, running in the streets no doubt". Commie bastards, Thatcher should have had them all deported to France.
>> No. 418461 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 5:15 pm
418461 spacer
Owen Jones has endorsed it.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/06/trump-baby-blimp-snowflake-right-london

That's the kiss of death, then. It'll probably burst, fly away after the tethers snap, kill an elderly person or something like that.
>> No. 418466 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 5:43 pm
418466 spacer
Is it time to get into a cunt off about Enoch Powell?

Incidentally, here's his infamous speech in full:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09z08w3

Which he made in reaction to the race relations bill. Powell was kicked out of the Tory cabinet following this speech.
>> No. 418470 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 6:04 pm
418470 spacer
>>418466

We all have access to Wikipedia, lad.
>> No. 418474 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 6:47 pm
418474 spacer
>>418459

>I hate that that speech got the name that it did. Lefty propaganda wins again "but he wants rivers of blood, running in the streets no doubt".

"As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood" -from the rivers of blood speech.

Yes it was a total misrepresentation it should be called "the preexisting river filled with blood speech" calling it the rivers of blood speech is a totally inappropriate.
>> No. 418476 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 7:07 pm
418476 spacer
>>418474
It didn't help that having developed a solid argument he proceeded to jump off the deep end around two-thirds of the way through, and despite being one of the foremost classicists of his time he got the reference completely wrong.
>> No. 418481 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 8:04 pm
418481 spacer

trumpcunt800x546.jpg
418481418481418481
>>418316
Cleverly scheduled for the day before the World Cup final. Not so cleverly arranged to visit Scotland. I can see the football chant already.

HEEEEY HEY DONALD
I WANNA KNOOOW
WHY YOU'RE SUCH A CUNT
>> No. 418484 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 9:55 pm
418484 spacer
>>418474

> "As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood" -from the rivers of blood speech.

> Yes it was a total misrepresentation

The misinterpretation is all yours, Are Enoch was just being metaphorical, lad. What he really meant was "like the man in Rotherham, I seem to see the River Dearne foaming with much blood of deflowered virgins raped by organized gangs of immigrants that you lefty wankers are letting in".

I'm not saying I'm happy that he was right. I too wish we could all live together in peace and harmony but we can't, because the world is made up of two kinds of people; cunts and mugs. Old Enoch might have been a cunt but it's a damn sight better than being a mug.
>> No. 418486 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:10 pm
418486 spacer
>>418484
Back to the other /pol/, lad.
>> No. 418487 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:15 pm
418487 spacer
>>418486
> Back to the other /pol/, lad.

We're not even on /pol/, here, you total smeghead.
>> No. 418488 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:22 pm
418488 spacer
>>418487

Nobody said we were, you illiterate muppet.
>> No. 418490 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:28 pm
418490 spacer
>>418488

> Back to the other /pol/
> the other /pol/

This implies that we are on a /pol/ to begin with. What I think you were trying, in your simian way, smashing your keyboard with your ape like fists, was "Get back to /pol/ on the other place, lad.", but never mind, lad. Some of us have to be mugs, I guess.

Anyway, as you can't even form a sentence correctly I hereby veto any opinion you have on anything else.

There would be little point in going to /pol/ on the other place anyway, because even if I did want to discuss Enoch Powell with a bunch of ignorant yanks and fourteen year old idiots shitposting in between rounds of whatever online video game is flavour of the week, I wouldn't do it there.
>> No. 418491 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:41 pm
418491 spacer
>>418490
>This implies that we are on a /pol/ to begin with.
No, it implies that your dreck is so devoid of substance that it falls below the already low standards of our /pol/.
>> No. 418493 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:50 pm
418493 spacer
>>418481

No, there is only one true Scotsman taunt for the clothesless Emperor comes a calling.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6qoQ7UvEBk
>> No. 418494 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:52 pm
418494 spacer
>>418486
>>418488
>>418487
>>418490
>>418491

ITT: a thread about the world's biggest cunt turns into an entirely predictable .gs cunt off.
>> No. 418496 Anonymous
6th July 2018
Friday 10:57 pm
418496 spacer
>>418493

That clip looks like a paedo's wet dream.
>> No. 418505 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 12:01 am
418505 spacer

hmmmmm.jpg
418505418505418505
>>418484
>> No. 418512 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 1:40 am
418512 spacer
>>418505

I might just be a top lad*, but can you explain exactly which goalposts I'm moving and how?

* Now let's see who remembers that one
>> No. 418513 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 1:41 am
418513 spacer
>>418512

Nice, it even got a word filter in the end I see.
>> No. 418515 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 2:09 am
418515 spacer
>>418392

Really? How long ago was it? .gs years blend into one giant timesink of a year.
>> No. 418519 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 6:37 am
418519 spacer

483102.jpg
418519418519418519
Counter protestors have raised £26,000 for a giant inflatable baby Sadiq Khan.

https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/giant-sadiq-khan-baby-balloon-to-fly-over-london/
>> No. 418521 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 6:44 am
418521 spacer
>>418519
I'm pretty sure that this is somewhere in the book of revelations.
>> No. 418530 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 10:19 am
418530 spacer
>>418505
I'll summarize.

"It shouldn't be called the rivers of blood speech, that's just left wing propaganda"

Quote from the speech where he describes a river filled with blood

"Oh you don't understand that's just a metaphor"


Seems to me the name rivers of blood is a perfectly reasonable title and not left wing propaganda. And that my understanding of the metaphor is entirely irrelevant to that point.
>> No. 418531 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 10:25 am
418531 spacer
>>418530

It was spelt wrong though, he really meant "rivers of blud".
>> No. 418539 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 2:15 pm
418539 spacer
>>418530
>>418530
> Seems to me the name rivers of blood is a perfectly reasonable title and not left wing propaganda.

Then you're a fucking idiot. There's no other way to say it. Calling a speech "Rivers of blood" gives the impressionable 90% who will never read it the convenient impression that it was an impassioned call to violence, when in fact the words "river Tiber" and "blood" were merely part of a throw-away reference at the end of the speech that had almost no impact at all on its overall message or content. A man of Enoch's education probably thought it added weight and gravitas to his words, while the average spanner who wouldn't have known the Tiber from his Khyber Pass cack-handledly calculated "conservative" + "rivers of blood" + "the word 'negro'" = "racist nazi brown shirt, boooooo".

And that, sir, is your basic definition of propaganda. The fact you are here and it is now and you are still under the its spell all these years later, despite posting on an internet full of academic explanations of why / how the name "rivers of blood" was used to deconstruct and ridicule ideas that were actually legitimate concerns only goes to show us all how powerful such propaganda is and that all Freuds should be put to the sword .

Anyway if you'll excuse me I've got to go and finish shaving my head in my limited edition Jimmy Saville shaving mirror and polishing my granddad's Dr Martins so I can kick some laplander heads in when England lose in a couple of hours.

>>418531

Possibly the best name for a grime track never recorded, "they tell me the Thames is just white folks and mud but all I can see is just rivers of blud [base drops] / Got yats in my yacht while I'm smoking my blunt / an all I can see is just rivers of blud"......
>> No. 418543 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 3:25 pm
418543 spacer
>>418539

>WHY IS IT CALLED RIVERS OF BLOOD/THE ST CRISPINS DAY/ I HAVE A DREAM/NEVER HAS SO MUCH BEEN OWED BY SO MANY TO SO FEW SPEECH! IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A RIVER OF BLOOD/ST CRISPIN/SLEEP/OWING PEOPLE THING IT IS JUST A REMEMABLE LINE FROM THE SPEECH NAMING IT THAT IS A DELIBERATE TACTIC TO MISLEAD THE SHEEPLE, YOU ARE SO STUPID FOR NOT KNOWING THAT!

I see. Firstly I doubt Powell or anyone of the same inclination ever had an issue, with that name for the speech otherwise he would have never used that imagery, clearly it was his intention to portray unchecked immigration as having horrific consequences i.e. rivers of blood, and secondly I have never misunderstood what the intent of the metaphor was, nor do most people who talk negatively about it, they and I, aren't spooked by the idea rivers of blood like what he is suggesting is a violent solution but disagree with the philosophy contained within you long term Dunning–Kruger sufferer.
If you have an issue with the title you should have taken it up with Powell at the time, because no one gives a shit now on either side of the fence apart from you since you got your infowars tinfoil hat and supplements in the post and decided it is a conspiracy 50 years after the fact.
>> No. 418544 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 5:05 pm
418544 spacer
>>418543

> you long term Dunning–Kruger sufferer

The irony here is palpable. I understand it's match day and you're probably 8 tins down but come back tomorrow when you're sober and try to 1) not use 4chan style "meme quoting" 2) make proper use of paragraphs and punctuation. Now go have a nap. There's a good lad.
>> No. 418545 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 5:38 pm
418545 spacer
>>418543

> Firstly I doubt Powell or anyone of the same inclination ever had an issue, with that name for the speech otherwise he would have never used that imagery

Then, again, you're a total idiot. Just because you make one reference doesn't mean you expect for your speech to be referred to by it any more than you would expect it to be referred to be any other aspect or part of the speech. Why wasn't it referred to as the "I spoke to a member of my constituancy speech"? Well, because that doesn't scare the mugs.

> and secondly I have never misunderstood what the intent of the metaphor was, nor do most people who talk negatively about it, they and I, aren't spooked by the idea rivers of blood like what he is suggesting is a violent solution but disagree with the philosophy contained within [SIC]

What a glorious snippet of a long and powerful run-on sentence that is!

> they and I, aren't spooked by the idea rivers of blood like what he is suggesting is a violent solution but disagree with the philosophy contained within

This part is almost parsable. We disagree. You think that he was suggesting "rivers of blood" as a violent solution. I think that that is what the popular use of that name was meant to make people think, and that what he actually would have preferred was a much more sensible solution; only that no one was doing anything to help bring that about. His reference to the river Tiber was more of a warning of what could come to pass (and has come to pass) if more sensible immigration policy was not put in place (which it wasn't, and hasn't been).

> If you have an issue with the title you should have taken it up with Powell at the time

You honestly think that Powell got to decide on the popular name given by the media to his speech, and yet I'm the one who suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect? Christ on a bike, lad.

> decided it is a conspiracy 50 years after the fact.

You honestly manage to conflate propaganda and conspiracy, and yet I'm the one who suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect? Two Christs on the same bike, lad.

Have a word.
>> No. 418546 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 5:45 pm
418546 spacer
YEASTY CUNTS
YOU'RE ALL ON BRITFA BEING YEASTY CUNTS
YEASTY CUNTS
WASTING SUNSHINE BEING YEASTY CUNTS
>> No. 418547 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 6:11 pm
418547 spacer
>>418545
>Why wasn't it referred to as the "I spoke to a member of my constituancy speech"?
That wouldn't distinguish it from the dozen or so such things that happen during almost every sitting in Parliament.
>> No. 418548 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 6:24 pm
418548 spacer
>>418547

I'll give you that, but the speech was utterly full of differentiating remarks and anecdotes, not to mention imagery. A more conservative media could easily have branded it the "Great betrayal" speech, for example.
>> No. 418550 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 7:33 pm
418550 spacer
>>418545

>You honestly manage to conflate propaganda and conspiracy, and yet I'm the one who suffers from the Dunning–Kruger effect? Two Christs on the same bike, lad.

We call believing something must be a piece of political propaganda with no evidence a conspiracy theory.
>> No. 418551 Anonymous
7th July 2018
Saturday 8:50 pm
418551 spacer
>>418545
>His reference to the river Tiber was more of a warning of what could come to pass (and has come to pass) if more sensible immigration policy was not put in place
His reference to the river Tiber was a quote from the Aeneid, referring to a prophesy that the Trojan immigrant Aeneas would see violence and war before peace and prosperity in what would become Rome. It's the complete opposite of what Powell was trying to use it to express.
>> No. 418552 Anonymous
8th July 2018
Sunday 1:04 am
418552 spacer

GettyImages-878274898.jpg
418552418552418552
>>418316


HEY GUYS, HOW DO I GET LEFTY WING VIRTUE SIGNALS, NO BEHEADED WOMAN BALLOON WHEN I ARRIVE, IS IT BECAUSE I'M BROWN

AAGH i SEE YOU ARE IGNORANT, LIKE pale demons from beyond the ice STUPID, LIKE WOMEN.
>> No. 418556 Anonymous
8th July 2018
Sunday 3:08 am
418556 spacer
>>418552
Have you gone and had a stroke, you delerious twat?
135 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password