>>837
There really is.

>>838

Youtube videos and people going 'yeah but it looks like a controlled demolition, yeah?' is not evidence. The official independent report of 'further research recommended' is the closest you have to conspiracy, but it doesn't exactly prove anything.

>>838
A bunch of YouTubes and some screeching from anti-Government types do not a case make. Come back when you've at least visited New York. Also, if the government/Jews/whoever have such project management skills to pull this off then frankly I'm happy they're in charge.

On a slight tangent, whilst searching for pictures of yakuza yesterday I found a pretty screechy website that decided the japs were behind it all along. People have too much time on their hands.

>>841

How on Earth did you excise "screeching from anti-government types" from the facts easily presented before you which have been gathered from scientists and eye-witnesses who were there on the day it happened, whilst it happened?

You weren't there, they were. Why should I believe you, simply because you have a chip on your shoulder about these presumed and mysterious "anti-government" types?

Funny the way the discussion went from "It was debris!" to "I don't care what you show me. I don't know you, therefore, all that is logical discussion against my point becomes unprovable".

What the hell have you sourced and counter-argued, besides "I've been to a visitor in New York" and "Trust me, despite all contrary signs, points, and multiple independent scientific findings, it was debris. And it was debris, because I've been to New York"?

Just admit that you haven't looked into it and save face. You repeatedly ignore the Fire vs. Debris, you refuse to address the other WTCs and their comparable damage.

On the "Oh, I can just make up that it was the Yakuza!" There's proof that most people involved in the key components of 9/11 have links to Israeli Intelligence. There is proof that Mossad agents were driving around with high-grade combustible residue in their vans and were arrested on the day. How is that unprovable when it is a fact?

If these guys were muslims, you'd most probably neither think it a coincidence nor false. Yet because it's Isreali, it must be wrong, despite it being right in-your-face true.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>843

I think you argue against yourself here.

That is odd, but resident skeptic here reckons it isn't anything more than an optical illusion. I could literally feel my eyes defocusing as the hand stopped.

it has to be an optical illusion other wise your other senses would experiance the distortion as well.

Just like perception during a sudden adrenaline rush.

Certainly very interesting. But second hands with jerky motions are just as bizarre; why, when I catch one in of the corner of my eye, is the second hand always going backwards?

So what, its based around religion?

>>822

It's a peculiar system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbol, to quote their own definition.

Belief in a Higher Power is the only prerequisite for membership, much like Alcoholics Anonymous, although there is also a strong humanist/enlightenment aspect to the rites.

Freemasonry, which once helped to secretly inspire both the French and Russian revolutions, is now a dusty and dull suburban fetish for tedious old men and it's functionally dead. Sage.

>>822

As well as reading this thread, it'd do you good to perform some of your studies. There are different rites within differing branches of Masonry.

The York Rite differs from the Scottish and the Grand Orient, for example.

>>823

Quite right about the Revolutions. And I concur; masonry has long since lost its purpose.

The only things I really remember about them is that the highers up like to think they know the true name of god.

>>828
derrick?

>>793
Oh. I was planning on doing that with some shorter things already, I'll add this to the list.

http://www.youtube.com/v/Apvxcl43n60

>>805
Read one about dolphins please

>>806
Write one and I will.

>>806 If you're refering to the halloween radio night then I tip my hat to you.

>>701
>>698
It's the work of some artist whose name I forget, but he does lots of similar things. You'll see them posted around the chans from time to time.

Reminds me of Jake and Dino Chapman's 'Fucking Hell' dioramas.

>>705
I saw the picture and the first comment and thought "This guy would like Fucking Hell." You beat me to it.

This one?

http://www.creepypasta.com/candle-cove/

>>676
I thought that image was from Pan's Labyrinth.

>>747
Beg the Americans for military help, that's the only way we've been able to defend ourselves in the last century.

>>760
>Falklands
>Ireland
>A war machine that conquered most of Europe

Guess which one is true.

Take Pete's car, go round to mums, kill Phillip (sorry Phillip) grab mum, go to Liz's, pick her up, go to the Winchester, have a nice cold pint, and wait for all of this to blow over.

>>747
IS that from the Zombie Walk in Richmond?

http://www.i-mockery.com/halloween/bag/zombiewalk06.php

>>765
Perfick.

I've read many of them. Most are embarrassingly written, especially the dialogue, but some are exceptionally creepy. Such is the condition of the channer.

>>781
SCP-173. It has 'the original' next to it in the list - presumably this was the first one written.

>>781

Perhaps you speak of these.

>>790
I think that's from Doctor Who, I doesn't have anything to do with this.

>>786
I remember this on /x/. Only a few of these were made - I didn't know there are over 1000!

This image and thread suggests that this poor woman has a haunted vagina.

>>783 then you would need a witch doctor condom.

>>766

The first one just made me wonder why we weren't seeing video footage of this supposed event. The second one made me think "oh, some spooky knocking noises in an old, empty building?" and then I turned it off.

>>783

I'd give her my bell book and candle if you know what I mean

>>788
Sod off, you'd shit your pants too in you were in a tunnel underground at 2AM with no one else.

>>773
Hmm that link disproves what I said about the ionosphere but never mind. I still don't believe meddling with that will cause an earthquake.

>>773
I don't know enough about the details of Teslas work, but it stems from that. Some people believe that Tesla managed to "move" or "direct" energy from one place to another (I'm grossly paraphrasing). The tinfoil hats believe (more or less) that you charge up the ionosphere and then somehow cause all that "charge" to be directed into the ground at a certain point.

There was also a film in the past couple of years that alluded to this idea and Teslas work (and mentioned HAARP). The plot to it was that HAARP had gone wrong, caused a huge tidal wave and that engulfed New York - I can picture the film poster but can't remember it's name.....

>>775
I think it was The Day After Tomorrow where NY is hit by an ice-age.

>>773
Using the ionosphere to create earthquakes, from Tesla's work, has been going on for over 100 years, since he allegedly caused the 1906 San Francisco earth quake with his "teleforce weapon" that the press at the time called a "death ray". These earthquake lights don't seem to have any basis in ancient history even though this seems to be the kind of shit that people from that era would lap up and proclaim it as an act of god.

Pretty flimsy theory but tbh I don't care, its a conspiracy theory and if it wasn't flimsy it'd be a well believed fact.

>>773 The stress on rocks generates an electric current, it's been tested by some scientist.

>>743
wiki URL fail. You'll have to manually amend those.

>>744
Don't be a prick.

I never knew about such things, very interesting indeed. Thanks Op.

>>748

That seems a little harsh.

Hey /boo/, photographer here. I've been into researching creepy photos for awhile now and would like your opinion. I'm wondering what are the common themes within photos or art that we find creepy. Although 'creepiness' is relative from person to person, it would be good to find connections between different people's viewpoints on the matter. Has anyone noticed any running traits in some of the pictures you've come across?

>>689

I've noticed that most creepy photos have, like yours, a massive void. They have a point of interest that is a bit weird, like a spectre or an orb or something, but if there's a lot of blackness in the picture too. Your picture and many others like it would not be nearly as scary without the blackness that makes us feel like something is about to jump out at us.

Notice also that the void is following the rule of thirds. I don't doubt that this is intentional.

Picture related, less scary now, don't you think?

>>738
I'm finding this pic just if not more scary that the previous, but I think it's because you can make out the ghoulish face better. Its freaking me out.

>>755

Bang goes that theory then. I do suppose fear is pretty subjective. I'd be more scared if that was a photograph of a giant pigeon in broad daylight, for example.

Can't be proved wrong, but there are conditions under which the thread connecting the two can be very fine and difficult to discern.

Some years ago I was drugged, raped and tortured. No, I haven't written a tacky fucking 'painful lives' memoir about it. I developed the condition of trauma-based dissociative disorder as a result of the experience. When I'm poorly with this the body can act like a kind of zombie and fulfill everyday tasks leaving no conscious memory of what happened that day. The actual dissociation that the 'mind' part does is best compared to descriptions of astral projection or lucid dreaming.

Psychologists tell me that it's a split between parts of 'mind' rather than a mind-body split but the fundamental absence of what I usually experience as 'mind' during the zombie days is so intense that it seems to be that unconscious/robotic/somatic functions take over the body at that time, and I'm elsewhere.

The brain is part of the body. I don't disagree with you.

I'm not sold on the idea of the mind being seperate from the body, but I find it facinating how 'mind' and abstract thought are supposedly just biological when they seem completely intangible.

>>679
I don't, I believe in science. But I stil get shit scared being in dark old houses, but that's natural I think. I sdon't believe you can talk to ythe dead or owt like that.

>>679
I don't because it would challenge my world view. If I found proof of the super natural I might go mad.

my experiences still scare the shit out of me.

one was a 7 foot dark shape with a rusted colour.. kind of dark glow outline standing under a tree that I afterwards found out was used for hanging in my old home town, which proceeded to chase me all the home.
and as a child there where white flashes, elongated shapes, that would sit on my windowsill or outside my bedroom door, never scared me but kept me feeling very safe, secure and calm as a child... still scares the shit out me now.
i used to work in a pub that had priest holes in it, myself and four other workers witnessed a shape moving through walls and watching us from one of the priest holes on a nightly basis, when we called for it to come down thinking it was a friend up there dusting, two glasses on the bar shattered....

oh and my grandads photo is haunted, in a 'whatever room it hangs in smells of pipe tobacco way, not so much scary as interesting that one.