[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 59302)
Message
File  []
close
CP19176164.jpg
593025930259302
>> No. 59302 Ambulancelad
5th January 2018
Friday 5:53 pm
59302 spacer
BEEP! BEEP!

JOHN'S THA name.

Raping hundreds of women and getting released early from prison's tha game.
Expand all images.
>> No. 59303 Billbob
5th January 2018
Friday 5:55 pm
59303 spacer
CANT BELIEVE HE GOT RELEASED AFTER ALL THOSE A TAXI DID
>> No. 59304 Auntiefucker
5th January 2018
Friday 6:08 pm
59304 spacer
>>59302
>early
Go home Grayling, you're drunk.
>> No. 59305 Auntiefucker
5th January 2018
Friday 6:19 pm
59305 spacer
>>59304
Mate. Someone said on twitter that he's only served about 6 weeks per rape.
>> No. 59308 YubYub
5th January 2018
Friday 6:42 pm
59308 spacer
>>59305
Someone can fuck off back to the third world where they do stuff like that. If NASA can tweet from space, I'm sure she can keep twattering from wherever she ends up.
>> No. 59311 YubYub
5th January 2018
Friday 6:54 pm
59311 spacer
>>59305
MATE.
10 YEARS / 19 CONVICTIONS = 192.232736 DAYS = 6.3 MONTHS

IF THE POLICE BELIEVE THERE ARE ADDITIONAL CRIMES FOR WHICH THEY HAVE A REASONABLE CHANCE TO SECURE A CONVICTION THEY SHOULD PURSUE A PROSECUTION INNIT.

ESCAPING PROSECUTION IS NOT "GETTING RELEASED EARLY", IF INDEED HE HAS TO NEARLY THE EXTENT THE POLICE CLAIM.
>> No. 59314 Are Moaty
5th January 2018
Friday 7:04 pm
59314 spacer
>>59302
you don't get this shit from an uber driver.
>> No. 59316 Crabkiller
5th January 2018
Friday 7:06 pm
59316 spacer
>>59314
I don't know how nobody saw him coming. Raping women is a natural progression after years of raping wallets.
>> No. 59320 Searchfag
5th January 2018
Friday 7:25 pm
59320 spacer
>>59316
>NOBODY SAW HIM COMING

It sounds like plenty of women did, to be fair.
>> No. 59322 Anonymous
5th January 2018
Friday 7:43 pm
59322 spacer

Neil-Fox-outside-his-house-in-Fulham.jpg
593225932259322
IS THAT DOCTOR FOX
>> No. 59323 Crabkiller
5th January 2018
Friday 8:08 pm
59323 spacer
Worboys

never lose it

Worboys

never chose this way

Worboys

never close your eyes

Worboys

he's done his time
>> No. 59324 Samefag
5th January 2018
Friday 8:19 pm
59324 spacer

image.jpg
593245932459324
>>59322
Looks more like Keir Starmer's spasticated twin brother.
>> No. 59326 Anonymous
5th January 2018
Friday 8:54 pm
59326 spacer
>>59324
Definite sex offender hair vibe going on here.
>> No. 59330 R4GE
5th January 2018
Friday 9:33 pm
59330 spacer

hugh-fearnley-whittingstall-363184.jpg
593305933059330
>>59326
>SEX OFFENDER HAIR

I have it on good authority, i.e. someone who worked for the BBC in Bristol told me this, that High fearnley whittingstall has a penchant for spaffing in the hair/face of female crew members when they're asleep if they ever have to do filming which requires them staying overnight.
>> No. 59336 YubYub
6th January 2018
Saturday 11:48 am
59336 spacer
Anyone got a link to the porn he did?
>> No. 59340 Moralfag
6th January 2018
Saturday 2:15 pm
59340 spacer
>>59330
I also know people who have worked with him and confirm he is a right wrong'un.
>> No. 59378 Moralfag
7th January 2018
Sunday 4:39 pm
59378 spacer
>>59330
>>59340
I Googled for rumours about him and holy hell you're right. Everyone has heard he is a hair-wanker.
>> No. 59389 Anonymous
8th January 2018
Monday 2:08 am
59389 spacer

worboys.jpg
593895938959389
Why would a man this sexy need to rape?
>> No. 59390 YubYub
8th January 2018
Monday 4:01 am
59390 spacer

zILko3B.jpg
593905939059390
I think you can tell he's a Crim because his eyes are so close together.
>> No. 59401 Are Moaty
8th January 2018
Monday 7:33 pm
59401 spacer
>>59305
>>59311
https://www.crimeline.info/news/worboys-what-went-wrong
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2014/436.html

tl;dr systemic failures by the MET. Only convicted on 29 charges, not 200. May be charged further if new evidence comes to light.
>> No. 59407 Anonymous
8th January 2018
Monday 9:35 pm
59407 spacer
>>59401
What would have been the point in pursuing the rest? He was going to jail anyway.
>> No. 59408 Are Moaty
8th January 2018
Monday 11:20 pm
59408 spacer
>>59407
To stay in jail.
>> No. 59409 Billbob
9th January 2018
Tuesday 12:06 am
59409 spacer
>>59389
That is a ridiculous picture.
>> No. 59512 Are Moaty
15th January 2018
Monday 6:12 pm
59512 spacer

0107-social-azizansari-1477669-640x360.jpg
595125951259512
Aziz Ansari's the name

Writing overrated TV shows and pressuring women into sex acts they don't consent to's the game.
>> No. 59513 R4GE
15th January 2018
Monday 6:29 pm
59513 spacer
>>59512
No Doug. You raped Patti.

All he has to do is apologise. And he hasn't. Why is it so difficult for men to admit they got it wrong? It's bizarre.
>> No. 59514 Billbob
15th January 2018
Monday 7:24 pm
59514 spacer

894d2174d3a1f73228305a5b955440c6--jim-carrey-movie.jpg
595145951459514
>>59513
>ALL HE HAS TO DO IS APOLOGISE. AND HE HASN'T. WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR MEN TO ADMIT THEY GOT IT WRONG? IT'S BIZARRE.

He did. His text back to her read:

"I'm so sad to hear this. All I can say is, it would never be my intention to make you or anyone feel the way you described. Clearly, I misread things in the moment and I'm truly sorry."

Misreading things in the moment = carrying on when you've clearly been denied consent.

>Ansari began making a move on her that he repeated during their encounter. “The move he kept doing was taking his two fingers in a V-shape and putting them in my mouth, in my throat to wet his fingers, because the moment he’d stick his fingers in my throat he’d go straight for my vagina and try to finger me.” Grace called the move “the claw.”
>> No. 59515 Auntiefucker
15th January 2018
Monday 7:30 pm
59515 spacer
>After arriving at his apartment in Manhattan on Monday evening, they exchanged small talk and drank wine. “It was white,” she said. “I didn’t get to choose and I prefer red, but it was white wine.”
What. A. Pig.
>> No. 59516 Anonymous
15th January 2018
Monday 9:50 pm
59516 spacer
>>59514
Maybe she should have made the denial a bit clearer. Like biting down or something. Though to be honest her mistake was sitting down with someone who went straight to pouring a glass of wine without even asking.
>> No. 59518 YubYub
15th January 2018
Monday 11:55 pm
59518 spacer
>>59515

You missed the most damning detail out.

>“It was white,” she said. “I didn’t get to choose and I prefer red, but it was white wine.” Then Ansari walked her to Grand Banks, an Oyster bar

She wanted to have red wine with fish! Red with fucking fish! James bond once killed a man for ordering red wine with fish . It's in "from Russia with love"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8S3WduxpZ0
>> No. 59519 Searchfag
16th January 2018
Tuesday 1:58 am
59519 spacer
>>59514
Yeah, I know. I meant publically. It's become a public thing now, and he's a made a public statement, but it doesn't say anything. It says he was "surprised and concerned". How fucking mealy-mouthed is that after being accused of sexual assault? Where's the horror at what he's done, if he really does realise the extent of it? He should be apologising in the strongest possible terms. Look at Dan Harmon.
>> No. 59520 Paedofag
16th January 2018
Tuesday 6:43 am
59520 spacer
>>59519
It's not really the same situation as Harmon's and in any other climate he might have considered responding by suing her for libel or defamation or some such thing, as she's simply dragging his name through the mud over viral media with no evidence or legal ruling.
>> No. 59521 R4GE
16th January 2018
Tuesday 7:06 am
59521 spacer
>>59520
Just wait until all the other women come forward to say that he shoved two fingers down their throats then rammed them up their fannies.
>> No. 59522 Moralfag
16th January 2018
Tuesday 6:46 pm
59522 spacer
>>59519
Dunno what the hell you think sexual assault is but it's not what she described and the "enthusiastic consent" shite hasn't made it onto any statute book I'm aware of.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4bAULTwAJU

I was reading on the BBC yesterday that it was unthinkable for anyone in America to swim against the tide on this issue and yet here's CNN of all places breaking cover.
>> No. 59524 Anonymous
16th January 2018
Tuesday 7:15 pm
59524 spacer
>>59522
So, to be clear, you're saying that what she described was an entirely consensual encounter?
>> No. 59527 Paedofag
16th January 2018
Tuesday 8:01 pm
59527 spacer
>>59524
I'm saying it's not sexual assault. If you like I'm saying running up against the edges of consent is not sexual assault.
>> No. 59529 YubYub
16th January 2018
Tuesday 8:16 pm
59529 spacer
>>59524
Most definitely rape

She took off all of her clothes and gave him oral, only she didn't want to really coz it is totally gross, but she didn't give any indication that she didn't like it, she just stated sucking the cock the way people do when they aren't consenting to something. Because we all know in real life unless you say "I give consent to this action at this current point" before you do anything it doesn't count as consent.

Then after a bit she stopped and said 'maybe we should calm down for a sec' and they did then later she was like, I guess I'll start sucking your cock again, but it is totally gross and she definitely didn't want to, even though she didn't say anything about it, not even "I give consent to this action at this current point" then she sucked the cock, then later she said "no more tonight" and he said "okay sure no problem" then she left. And the worst part of the whole thing was that she didn't get to order red wine with fish and they left some of the bottle wine on the table when they left.
>> No. 59532 Ambulancelad
16th January 2018
Tuesday 8:31 pm
59532 spacer
>>59527
To be clearer, when you say sexual assault, you're using an entirely literal interpretation of the legal definition of sexual assault, right?
>> No. 59548 Auntiefucker
17th January 2018
Wednesday 1:11 am
59548 spacer
Apparently Margaret Atwood is an evil whale poacheric rape apologist now.
>> No. 59560 R4GE
17th January 2018
Wednesday 9:50 pm
59560 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeaGK-KVHaY

Is there a 'we defend out own' component going on with the media lash back? It is certainly beginning to feel like cronyism and "victim blaming".
>> No. 59561 Crabkiller
17th January 2018
Wednesday 9:58 pm
59561 spacer
>>59560
The accuser is certainly being slut shamed. Then again, it's the double standards we've come to accept from the regressive aspects of the modern left; it doesn't count when it's against one of their "allies".
>> No. 59564 Anonymous
17th January 2018
Wednesday 10:19 pm
59564 spacer
>>59561

I know exactly how this will sound, but if he was white this'd be a witch hunt yet again.

I struggle to see the difference between this and the Louis CK thing. Comedian meets woman in the industry, invites her to his place, attempts to do something she's not into, she declines and leaves.

One is a wierd old white bloke who is raked over the coals for abusing his position, the other is protected by the media, the New York Times no less, and the same people who lashed out at CKs defendants for victim blaming, are literally blaming and mocking the victim in this case.

I'm so glad I'm not in the media spotlight. I'd be terrified to fart on a train lest it be interpreted as an assault on the woman three rows down.
>> No. 59570 Anonymous
17th January 2018
Wednesday 11:24 pm
59570 spacer
>>59564

>I STRUGGLE TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND THE LOUIS CK THING.

Louis CK habitually wanked at young comedians after gigs, often in the dressing room. No preamble, no apparent expression of interest, just "is it OK if I get my dick out?" out of nowhere. He was the tastemaker in the comedy industry and had the power to make or break the careers of the young women he was wanking at. The behaviour was habitual, obviously inappropriate and there was a substantial power imbalance. It's almost certainly not sexual assault, but it's clearly exploitative - the women CK wanked at could have legitimately feared professional retribution if they said no.

The woman who made the allegations against Ansari had been on a date with him after a week of flirting by text. She doesn't work in TV or comedy, so there was no professional imbalance of power. Based on the account given in the Babe interview, Ansari's behaviour looks fairly sleazy, but there's enough grey area to suggest that he might deserve the benefit of the doubt. The main complaint is that he failed to appropriately interpret non-verbal cues that she wasn't fully consenting; Ansari can legitimately argue that these cues were subtle and unclear and he simply misread the situation. There are no other allegations against Ansari so far.

If there's a broader lesson to be learned from this incident, I think it isn't "Aziz Ansari is a sex pest", but "young women need to be given the confidence to clearly express their boundaries".
>> No. 59571 Are Moaty
17th January 2018
Wednesday 11:26 pm
59571 spacer
>>59570

>HABITUALLY

How many times did CK do this?
>> No. 59572 YubYub
17th January 2018
Wednesday 11:53 pm
59572 spacer
>>59570
A very good post lad.
>> No. 59573 Moralfag
17th January 2018
Wednesday 11:59 pm
59573 spacer
>>59571

There are five public allegations, spanning from the late 90s to 2005, all of which CK has admitted to. Industry insiders suggest that there have been many similar incidents, perhaps as recently as 2015.
>> No. 59574 Billbob
18th January 2018
Thursday 12:23 am
59574 spacer
>>59570

>but "young women need to be given the confidence to clearly express their boundaries"

There are plenty of who would happily twist that view into victim blaming or trout farming. The expectation for women to exercise agency and be accountable for it seems shookingly absent in modern politics.
>> No. 59576 Anonymous
18th January 2018
Thursday 12:50 pm
59576 spacer
>>59574
Fuck 'em. Or, actually, don't.
>> No. 59898 YubYub
24th February 2018
Saturday 7:59 am
59898 spacer

4987536700000578-0-image-a-6_1519423215402.jpg
598985989859898
Abdul's the name

Diddling British slags is the game
>> No. 60355 Billbob
28th March 2018
Wednesday 9:17 pm
60355 spacer
JOHN'S THA NAME

GETTING MY PAROLE QUASHED'S THA GAME.
>> No. 60357 Are Moaty
28th March 2018
Wednesday 9:39 pm
60357 spacer
>>60355
A SURPRISINGLY RIGHT DECISION FOR A CHANGE, AND IT IS EVEN MORE RIGHT THAT THE PROCESS OF PAROLE WILL BECOME OPEN AND TRANSPARENT, AND PERHAPS LED BY JUDGES THAN FUCKING SOCIAL WORKER DO-GOODERS.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password