[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 59925)
Message
File  []
close
gender-pay-1.jpg
599255992559925
>> No. 59925 R4GE
1st March 2018
Thursday 4:09 pm
59925 spacer
Do you know what I don't get about the gender pay gap?

If companies can get away with paying women less than men then why don't they only hire women and save themselves loadsa money?
Expand all images.
>> No. 59926 Are Moaty
1st March 2018
Thursday 4:23 pm
59926 spacer
>>59925
The gender pay gap doesn't really exist, women who demand more money get it. Most women don't ask for more. The glass ceiling is self imposed.

What boils my piss is when a women who gets paid less complains about the sum she agreed to, rather than just asking for a raise. If you're a professional there is always room to negotiate. If you don't get it and you're competent, then learn from your mistake and move on and remember to ask for more next time.

In jobs which aren't salaried, minimum wage jobs and service industry jobs, there is no pay gap.
>> No. 59927 Searchfag
1st March 2018
Thursday 4:57 pm
59927 spacer
>>59926
>There is no wage gap in minimum wage jobs.
Odd that.
>> No. 59928 Moralfag
1st March 2018
Thursday 5:49 pm
59928 spacer
>>59926

There's just no like-for-like pay gap. Funnily enough companies tend to avoid paying two people in the same role a different amount.

The who thing is perpetuated by the fact that women tend to work less hours, and that a lot of female dominated vocations are relatively low paying. Add into that women taking time off for kids etc, and you have a national average of women being payed less in their lifetime than men.

Whether those factors I've just mentioned are a product of a sexist society, or are just simply how these particular cards have fallen, is left as an exercise to the reader. Are women forced into 'girl jobs'? Are men given more/encouraged to work more hours or do they CHOOSE to work extra? I don't have the data to say either way.
>> No. 59933 YubYub
1st March 2018
Thursday 7:27 pm
59933 spacer
>>59928

There is also the detail you left out that up to the age of 30 women are paid more than men, which quite heavily suggests that at 30 they start settling down to start a family and take jobs with fewer hours and more connivance to look after kids. And men double down on working to provide for the family.
>> No. 59935 Samefag
1st March 2018
Thursday 8:14 pm
59935 spacer
>>59933

True, I had forgotten about that.
>> No. 59981 R4GE
4th March 2018
Sunday 7:53 pm
59981 spacer
>>59933
>THERE IS ALSO THE DETAIL YOU LEFT OUT THAT UP TO THE AGE OF 30 WOMEN ARE PAID MORE THAN MEN

That is quite a claim lad, show us your workings.
>> No. 59982 Samefag
4th March 2018
Sunday 8:11 pm
59982 spacer
>>59981
This is fairly common knowledge.

>Women in their 20s have reversed the gender pay gap, but their earning power is still overtaken by men later in life. Figures compiled by the Press Association have shown that between the ages of 22 and 29, a woman will typically earn £1,111 more per annum than her male counterparts.

>Using data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), PA analysed the comparative earnings of men and women between 2006 and 2013. Statistics for 2014 have yet to be verified and were excluded. While younger women in their 20s came out top in the earning stakes, the story was vastly different for workers in their 30s. A man turning 30 in 2006 would have brought in on average £8,775 more than a woman of the same age.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds

ONS figures. Women in their twenties on average earn more than men and are less likely to be unemployed. Women only start earning less on average when they start having babies.
>> No. 59983 Paedofag
4th March 2018
Sunday 8:24 pm
59983 spacer
>>59982
Perhaps they should stop having babies then.
>> No. 59984 Auntiefucker
4th March 2018
Sunday 8:28 pm
59984 spacer
>>59983
then perhaps men should stop depositing semen inside them
>> No. 59985 Moralfag
4th March 2018
Sunday 8:37 pm
59985 spacer
>>59983
It's the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's fault that they're the ones who look after them.
>> No. 59986 Paedofag
4th March 2018
Sunday 8:38 pm
59986 spacer
>>59984
Where else are we supposed to deposit it, at the bank?
>> No. 59988 Moralfag
4th March 2018
Sunday 11:10 pm
59988 spacer
>>59982
>WOMEN ONLY START EARNING LESS ON AVERAGE WHEN THEY START HAVING BABIES.

No lad - the article says nothing like that, doesn't even mention childbearing, you are showing your own bias and faulty thinking. The article clearly postulates that men overtake women in their thirties because that is the point when men start getting all the promotions, which in the main, women are often excluded from.

This backs up my own observations at many of the places I have worked. I happen to work somewhere now where there is a pretty decent male/female ratio in the general work population, but none of them are in leadership positions.
>> No. 59989 Searchfag
4th March 2018
Sunday 11:44 pm
59989 spacer
>>59986
In a shoe box
>> No. 59990 Ambulancelad
4th March 2018
Sunday 11:46 pm
59990 spacer
>>59988
>women are often excluded from.

Is it exclusion if they choose not to seek promotion, as the evidence suggests is the case?
>> No. 59991 Are Moaty
4th March 2018
Sunday 11:49 pm
59991 spacer
>>59990
>AS THE EVIDENCE SUGGESTS

The evidence suggests they don't get the jobs - there is nothing to say about how many apply.
>> No. 60003 Anonymous
5th March 2018
Monday 11:24 pm
60003 spacer

based.jpg
600036000360003
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcDrE5YvqTs
>> No. 60010 Crabkiller
6th March 2018
Tuesday 12:27 am
60010 spacer
>>59988

Aw bless you, maybe if you at least worked as many hours as the men around you (like the data does say) might not be skipped over for promotion? you don't get rewarded for being lazy.

After all the data must be taken at face value and nothing else infered (apart from of course your dogma).
>> No. 60015 Samefag
6th March 2018
Tuesday 5:09 pm
60015 spacer
In today's episode of cutting edge journalism on the gender pay gap: a female teacher who has been employed by the same school since qualifying and doesn't even know what pay scale she is on is astounded to find out that a male colleague who was head-hunted is paid more than her.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/mar/06/classroom-gender-pay-gap-teaching

With such a wide sample we should be able to draw meaningful conclusions from this.
>> No. 60018 Searchfag
6th March 2018
Tuesday 11:11 pm
60018 spacer
>>60015
Oh come on I bet she isn't that fat.
>> No. 60019 Anonymous
7th March 2018
Wednesday 12:29 am
60019 spacer
>>60010
I am male and earn much more than you.
>> No. 60024 Moralfag
7th March 2018
Wednesday 4:13 pm
60024 spacer
>>60019

I doubt that very much sugar tits.
>> No. 60026 Paedofag
7th March 2018
Wednesday 6:16 pm
60026 spacer
Thing is statistics and averages and all that mean fuck all.

I'm male and I get paid dogshit for my job. So do the women. You just don't get paid very well in this field despite being relatively technical and demanding.

Yet again gender issues are being used as a divide and conquer strategy to keep people distracted from the real issue of overall wealth inequality between rich and poor. There's nothing we hate more in this country than poor people being made better off.
>> No. 60027 R4GE
7th March 2018
Wednesday 7:20 pm
60027 spacer
>>60026
>YET AGAIN GENDER ISSUES ARE BEING USED AS A DIVIDE AND CONQUER STRATEGY TO KEEP PEOPLE DISTRACTED FROM THE REAL ISSUE OF OVERALL WEALTH INEQUALITY BETWEEN RICH AND POOR. THERE'S NOTHING WE HATE MORE IN THIS COUNTRY THAN POOR PEOPLE BEING MADE BETTER OFF.

It's a good job that leftists aren't falling for this and doing silly things like, say, demanding we have ethnicity audits as well.
>> No. 60028 Are Moaty
7th March 2018
Wednesday 7:28 pm
60028 spacer
>>60024

Oh lad.

I'd like to know what you do just so I know how wrong you've been
>> No. 60035 Anonymous
8th March 2018
Thursday 12:30 am
60035 spacer
>>60028

Oh Honey, The fact that you think the height of measuring wealth is by what someone else pays you to do makes you adorable. You are like a little hairy armpitted Loadsamoney
>> No. 60036 Samefag
8th March 2018
Thursday 12:36 am
60036 spacer
>>60035

I'm not the person you were talking to, I'm just aware of what most people who post here earn.

>YOU THINK THE HEIGHT OF MEASURING WEALTH IS BY WHAT SOMEONE ELSE PAYS YOU

So you're a trust fund kid? Well done.
>> No. 60037 Crabkiller
8th March 2018
Thursday 12:40 am
60037 spacer
>>60036
>I'm not the person you were talking to

Hush then. Men Speaking.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 60038 Crabkiller
8th March 2018
Thursday 1:07 am
60038 spacer
I make more money than you too.
>> No. 60040 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 4:46 am
60040 spacer
I'M TOO FRIGHTENED TO LOOK AT MY BANK STATEMENTS AND HAVE NO INCOME!
>> No. 60041 R4GE
8th March 2018
Thursday 1:40 pm
60041 spacer
>>60040

As we've learned in this thread, you don't measure wealth with money, so don't worry about it.
>> No. 60042 Paedofag
8th March 2018
Thursday 1:42 pm
60042 spacer
Is this whole issue being deliberately simplified and reduced to us vs them for the sake of courting women voters?
>> No. 60043 Are Moaty
8th March 2018
Thursday 1:50 pm
60043 spacer
>>60042
It's classic divide and conquer by the Tories to implement these gender audits.

The problem is that the so called progressives lap it up, particularly as they struggle to grasp how to interpret statistics and the concept that equality of opportunity does not equate to equality of outcome.

They're being played for the complete useful idiots that they are by the government. The Tories just need to light the touchpaper and then let these idiots run with it, blinded by their ever increasing desire to segment people into various groups of oppression and losing sight of the one that truly matters which is class.
>> No. 60044 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 2:14 pm
60044 spacer
>>60043

But then presumably the tories then have the lefties asking them to put money in to women?
>> No. 60045 Billbob
8th March 2018
Thursday 2:26 pm
60045 spacer
>>60043
>It's classic divide and conquer by the Tories to implement these gender audits.

Why on earth would you think this is a perfectly constructed right wing conspiracy? when it is easier to assume it to be a grass roots half baked idea crafted by idiots for idiots.
>> No. 60046 Crabkiller
8th March 2018
Thursday 2:30 pm
60046 spacer
>>60044
Nah, it's all the fault of the big bad corporations.

Dawn Butler has written in the Guardian today to say that Labour would fine companies who aren't tackling their gender pay gap, that is where the average man is paid more than the average woman and doesn't take into account things like length of service, hours worked, qualifications and what job they actually do.
>> No. 60047 Crabkiller
8th March 2018
Thursday 2:42 pm
60047 spacer
>>60045
It's a sop. It's a complete sop.

Theresa May has made a lot of noise about tackling corporate excess and doing gimmicks like putting workers on the company boards, but she doesn't really want to do anything about it.

These gender audits are a massive distraction but a) it makes Theresa look like she's doing something b) it allows the professionally offended to go into overdrive.
>> No. 60049 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 2:52 pm
60049 spacer
>simplified and reduced to us vs them for the sake of courting women voters?

Welcome to popularism.

That is all the average voter ever understands and cares about. When a person declares themselves a victim, or discriminated against, you don't get them to vote for you by telling them they are wrong, you need to indulge their fantasy.

The Obama administration ended up doing this, he announced they were going to conduct a huge investigation to right the wrongs of why women make only 77cents to the dollar, when the answer came back "they don't" they quietly buried the report and never spoke of it. Because no one wants to hear that kind of answer. People would probably protest him if he gave it.
>> No. 60050 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 3:43 pm
60050 spacer
But it's not "us vs them", it's employers vs employees. No one's blaming you for paying woman less. You're putting that victimisation on yourselves.
>> No. 60051 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 3:49 pm
60051 spacer
>>60050
Nah, m8. It's a huge patriarchal conspiracy.

Haven't you been going to your local weekly meetings about how us menfolk can keep women firmly in their places?
>> No. 60052 Anonymous
8th March 2018
Thursday 4:16 pm
60052 spacer
>>60051

I'm not sure you understand me.
>> No. 60053 Searchfag
8th March 2018
Thursday 4:32 pm
60053 spacer
>>60052
I don't think you understand. Are you actually pale, male and stale enough?
>> No. 60054 Are Moaty
8th March 2018
Thursday 4:46 pm
60054 spacer
The current pay equality debate is being subtly manipulated by corporate interests. We're being drip-fed the idea that gender equality isn't about women learning to negotiate more aggressively on pay, but about men losing the ability to negotiate on pay.

Carrie Gracie was offered a pay rise almost immediately after complaining about the discrepancy, but she wasn't satisfied with that. After weeks of media kerfuffle, not a single woman got a pay increase, but several men had their pay cut.

Michael Sheen was recently lauded for saying that he'd be prepared to take a pay cut in the interests of gender equality. There are articles throughout the media with titles like "Closing the gender pay gap: should men take a pay cut?". Merely posing the question in a mainstream outlet widens the Overton window. We're being slowly softened up in a classic divide-and-rule attack. There's a growing subtext that if a man negotiates a better rate of pay, he's implicitly whale poacher. Feminist activists are being used as unwitting stooges in an assault on the proletariat.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43279124
https://www.institutelm.com/resourceLibrary/should-firms-persuade-men-to-take-wage-cuts-to-close-gender-pay-gap.html
https://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/voices/comment/male-employees-salary-cut-gender-pay-gap
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/read-this/closing-the-gender-pay-gap-should-men-take-a-pay-cut
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/easyjet-ceo-gender-pay-gap-cut-income-salary-johan-lundgren-carolyn-mccall-a8183976.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/02/ban-individual-salary-negotiations-gender-pay-equality
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/05/21/the-best-way-to-way-to-eliminate-the-gender-pay-gap-ban-salary-negotiations/
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2015/11/don_t_teach_women_to_negotiate_their_salaries_just_ban_salary_negotiations.html
>> No. 60055 R4GE
8th March 2018
Thursday 4:58 pm
60055 spacer
>>60053

You seem like the kind of lad to read a headline and get too teary to carry on.
>> No. 60056 YubYub
8th March 2018
Thursday 6:39 pm
60056 spacer
>>60054
I think that's why the Beeb were made to issue theirs first.

A lot of their staff, male and female, are overpaid so it softens the mentality of "the women shouldn't be paid more; the men should be paid less."
>> No. 60065 YubYub
9th March 2018
Friday 1:13 am
60065 spacer
>>60054
>Should men take a pay cut?
No.

>Ban salary negotiations
No thanks. Look at what's happened in the public sector in recent years, where the employer (the government) can dictate pay. What's that? You've got reliable data showing your market value? Fuck you, here's £16k and a 1% rise next year.
>> No. 60067 Moralfag
9th March 2018
Friday 11:51 pm
60067 spacer
>>60054

>Feminist[s] [are] unwitting stooges in an assault on the proletariat.

That's all any of this modern progressivism has ever been, lad.

The key difference between an "intersectional feminist" and a plain old Marxist is that the feminist pledges allegiance whole heartedly to the consumer capitalist economic system; and attempts to understand the injustice inflicted upon segments of society through the lens of that system's unquestioned moral neutrality.

Feminism has been, since its earliest days, co-opted by the industrialist bourgeois to exert downwards pressure on labour. Progressive politics as we know it exists to strangle the threat of any resurgence in genuine socialism, like a nest-invading parasite cuckoo.
>> No. 60068 Anonymous
10th March 2018
Saturday 12:24 pm
60068 spacer
>>60067
The older I get and the more time I spend with intersectional feminists the more this seems like it might be true. Follow the money, as they say.
>> No. 60069 Anonymous
10th March 2018
Saturday 1:36 pm
60069 spacer
>>60068
What does intersectional even mean? Is it just a new way to feel even more oppressed?
>> No. 60070 YubYub
10th March 2018
Saturday 4:04 pm
60070 spacer
>>60069

I've read several definitions of what it means and I still can't tell you. Every description of it feel like reading a glossary of buzzwords.

The first result you get when trying to find out is this article:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/30/intersectional-feminism-jargon

It doesn't seem possible to explain it in a short sentence, which means it's academic wank.
>> No. 60071 Moralfag
10th March 2018
Saturday 5:00 pm
60071 spacer
>>60069
Intersectionality in a nutshell: Black women get it harder than white women.
>> No. 60072 Anonymous
10th March 2018
Saturday 5:03 pm
60072 spacer
>>60071

IYKWIM
>> No. 60073 Moralfag
10th March 2018
Saturday 5:42 pm
60073 spacer
>>60071
I would love to hear the better definition - my understanding is a bit like yours, intersectionality is the idea that oppressed people should stick together, so black people, women etc, all have a similar bag of spuds. Bit like how the gays and the miners got together in the miners strike. But I know nothing.
>> No. 60074 R4GE
10th March 2018
Saturday 6:12 pm
60074 spacer
>>60071
So it's the feminists coming up with their own terminology for the oppression Olympics whereby you're seeing who can claim to be the biggest victim?
>> No. 60075 Ambulancelad
10th March 2018
Saturday 6:19 pm
60075 spacer
>>60074
Exactly that lad.
>> No. 60077 Billbob
10th March 2018
Saturday 6:28 pm
60077 spacer
>>60073

It is the idea is that there are a range of qualities that mean a person is favoured or discriminated against, that can work in tandem with each other and we should strive to overcome them. The problem is in practice this is combined with a load of post-modern and cultural Marxist dogma that turns it into bollocks.
The logic follows that being able to speak clearly or make a coherent point is the result of privilege so we must strive to ignore that, and that personal experience and feelings are a 'truth' and therefore are an important and valid form or argument (more so then hard data and logic, that lacks the emotional consideration) what this leads to is a) that you have to listen to all manner of drivel the more incoherent the speaker the more 'valid' it is that you hear it and support it, and therefore more valid then the so called experts who are blinded by their privilege, b)That you cannot invalidate someone’s personal truth particularly if it is from a perspective you don't personally have.
This is what leads to the 'oppression Olympics’ [sic] and the absurd articles about men keeping their legs open on the tube is sexist. And actual maritime issues/dolphin rape of ‘you would believe that being a man/white’.
It also has significant flaws in that the unprivileged groups are dictated by predefined special class rather than by the fluid current circumstance which means the dogma is entirely dictated by the egocentrism of the United States. The idea that a black person isn’t a victim of slavery or that white Europeans are capable of discriminating against other white Europeans, or even a white person could be in a culture that discriminates against them is beyond the dogma.
>> No. 60078 Anonymous
10th March 2018
Saturday 6:53 pm
60078 spacer
>>60075
It reminds me of when I was a teenlad and joined a vegetarian society. It was full of insufferable people engaged in a never-ending game of one-upmanship to prove who was the most pure, saying things like that lemons are waxed with shellac so if you've ever eaten something with lemon juice as an ingredient you're scum and need to go and die in a fire.
>> No. 60079 Are Moaty
10th March 2018
Saturday 7:17 pm
60079 spacer
>>60077
>CULTURAL MARXIST DOGMA
I stopped reading.
>> No. 60080 Paedofag
10th March 2018
Saturday 8:07 pm
60080 spacer
>>60077

>IT IS THE IDEA IS THAT THERE ARE A RANGE OF QUALITIES THAT MEAN A PERSON IS FAVOURED OR DISCRIMINATED AGAINST

So we're a couple of steps from quantifying your discrimination levels. I wonder how much I score on the oppress-o-meter?

I feel a dystopian novel coming on.
>> No. 60081 Anonymous
10th March 2018
Saturday 8:50 pm
60081 spacer
>>60080

A lot of discussions in the social justice community descend into a game of oppression top trumps. There'll probably be an app out soon that scans your Facebook page and gives you an oppression score.
>> No. 60083 Anonymous
11th March 2018
Sunday 4:50 am
60083 spacer
>>60081
See: fats vs small fats
>> No. 60084 Crabkiller
11th March 2018
Sunday 12:03 pm
60084 spacer
>>60083

Don't forget white parsing. The broad brushstroke dolphin rape isn't even well hidden.
>> No. 60086 Paedofag
11th March 2018
Sunday 4:21 pm
60086 spacer
I'VE NEVER WORKED IN HR OR HIRED AT A COMPANY BIG ENOUGH TO HAVE AN APPLICATIONS SYSTEM, BUT SAY IF I WAS APPLYING FOR A JOB AT CORPORATION X AND AT THE BIT ON THEIR SITE THAT ASKS ME WHAT COLOUR AND SEX AND THAT I AM, IF I PUT THAT I'M A DISABLED BLACK LESBIAN AM I MORE LIKELY TO GET THE JOB? OBVIOUSLY WHEN I GET TO THE INTERVIEW AND THEY REALISE I'M A WHITE BLOKE THEY CAN'T SAY ANYTHING IN CASE THAT'S JUST HOW I IDENTIFY.

IS THIS THE PERFECT CRIME?
>> No. 60087 YubYub
11th March 2018
Sunday 5:04 pm
60087 spacer
>>60086
Black lesbian might be a stretch, but if you tick the disabled box (for a guaranteed interview) it's not for them to decide otherwise. Though to be honest if you're as much of a mouth-breathing autist as your post suggests it wouldn't exactly be a lie.
>> No. 60088 Anonymous
11th March 2018
Sunday 5:34 pm
60088 spacer
>>60086
They'll just not hire you for lying on the application.
>> No. 60089 Samefag
11th March 2018
Sunday 7:00 pm
60089 spacer
>>60088

I wasn't lying, I identify as a black lesbian, here is my Tumblr to prove it, give me £15m in damages thanks.
>> No. 60090 Ambulancelad
11th March 2018
Sunday 7:05 pm
60090 spacer
>If companies can get away with paying women less than men then why don't they only hire women and save themselves loadsa money?

Because women are crap.
>> No. 60104 Are Moaty
11th March 2018
Sunday 10:36 pm
60104 spacer
>>60087
I've ticked the disabled box on several applications which apparently offer a guaranteed interview to mongs (of which I am diagnosed as one), only to be rejected before interview.
>> No. 60106 Anonymous
11th March 2018
Sunday 11:03 pm
60106 spacer
>>60104
Maybe you were out-disabled. Maybe you're intersectionality wasn't intersected enough.
>> No. 60111 Ambulancelad
12th March 2018
Monday 1:33 am
60111 spacer
What happens if you tick the box that asks if you're a pedo?
>> No. 60112 Paedofag
12th March 2018
Monday 1:44 am
60112 spacer
>>60111
You get fast-tracked into a high-ranking position.
>> No. 60114 R4GE
12th March 2018
Monday 10:22 am
60114 spacer
>>60087

>T IF YOU'RE AS MUCH OF A MOUTH-BREATHING AUTIST AS YOUR POST SUGGESTS

I know this is IQ but what was it that made you feel this way?
>> No. 60127 Moralfag
13th March 2018
Tuesday 8:06 pm
60127 spacer
Women must act now, or male-designed robots will take over our lives

I think the next fight for us women is to ensure artificial intelligence does not become the ultimate expression of masculinity.

There are many reasons to fear this could happen. First, the algorithms that codify human choices about how decisions should be made. It is not possible for algorithms to remain immune from the human values of their creators. If a non-diverse workforce is creating them, they are more prone to be implanted with unexamined, undiscussed, often unconscious assumptions and biases about things such as race, gender and class. What if the workforce designing those algorithms is male-dominated? This is the first major problem: the lack of female scientists and, even worse, the lack of true intersectional thinking behind the creation of algorithms.


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/13/women-robots-ai-male-artificial-intelligence-automation

There's nothing worse than a lack of true intersectional thinking.
>> No. 60128 Crabkiller
13th March 2018
Tuesday 8:11 pm
60128 spacer
>>60127

From the comments:

AIs have no votes. They have no rights. they can be switched off with no appeals process. On an intersectional basis they probably come up top trumps. So we have to listen to what they say without judging. I think.

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password