[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
news
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
whiteline
unnamed.jpg
184261842618426
>> No. 18426 Anonymous
28th February 2019
Thursday 7:04 am
18426 spacer
Strictly's Stacey Dooley SLAMMED by MP for her Comic Relief work

Strictly Come Dancing champion and TV documentary maker Stacey Dooley has been slammed by Labour MP David Lammy, who has criticised her for her trip to Uganda for Comic Relief.

The 31-year-old investigative reporter had travelled to Africa to film a documentary for the charity but the MP for Tottenham has accused Stacey of perpetuating "tired and unhelpful stereotypes".


Stacey had shared pictures on her social media from Uganda, with one snap showing her posing with a young child while another showed her during filming ahead of Red Nose Day.

Mr Lammy, who has been the MP for the north London borough since 2010, said on Twitter that Stacey was reinforcing unhelpful stereotypes about Africa. He said: "The world does not need any more white saviours. As I've said before, this just perpetuates tired and unhelpful stereotypes. Let's instead promote voices from across the continent of Africa and have serious debate."

Mr Lammy said his issue was not personal with Stacey and that he does not question her "good motives". Instead, he said he had a problem with 'British celebrities' being flown out to Africa by Comic Relief to make films which send "a distorted image" of the continent and perpetuate "an old idea from the colonial era".


https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/strictlys-stacey-dooley-slammed-mp-14065473

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
71 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18788 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 12:12 am
18788 spacer
>>18787

You seem knowledgeable.
>> No. 18789 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 6:42 am
18789 spacer
>>18786

I was walking round there yesterday and I obviously walked by the cottaging hot spot as I got some quite awkward looks from the random groups of men who were just hanging around the woodland in the twilight.
>> No. 18790 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 6:53 am
18790 spacer
>>18789
You're lucky they didn't pin you down and fill you up with beefy hot poz loads.
>> No. 18791 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 8:38 am
18791 spacer
>>18789
The gays have the Heath well sorted - men on the West Heath and women in their bathing ponds on the other side; all very organised.
>> No. 18792 Anonymous
22nd March 2019
Friday 11:25 pm
18792 spacer

ec6de6ff5a45162587ea187b3a971e8e.jpg
187921879218792
>>18790

Some people call that a day well spent.

whiteline
1502566227242.jpg
131681316813168
>> No. 13168 Anonymous
12th August 2017
Saturday 8:38 pm
13168 spacer
Violent clashes have erupted between white nationalists attending a far-right march and counter-protesters in the US state of Virginia.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40912509


Americans.
550 posts and 64 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18781 Anonymous
21st March 2019
Thursday 9:09 pm
18781 spacer
>>18780

>If you're ever down under, never order Foster's

I'd advise not ordering a Fosters even here.
>> No. 18782 Anonymous
21st March 2019
Thursday 9:18 pm
18782 spacer
Frankly I'm insulted you're assuming I'd want to order Fosters.
>> No. 18783 Anonymous
21st March 2019
Thursday 9:44 pm
18783 spacer
>>18782
I've never understood why you think every single post is personally aimed at you.
>> No. 18784 Anonymous
21st March 2019
Thursday 9:55 pm
18784 spacer
>>18783
No I think it's aimed at me actually. Crying.
>> No. 18785 Anonymous
21st March 2019
Thursday 9:59 pm
18785 spacer
>>18779

Crap beer, brilliantly homoerotic adverts.



whiteline
60be62ea8ef81774bda92a0d801cd438.jpg
180421804218042
>> No. 18042 Anonymous
14th February 2019
Thursday 7:08 am
18042 spacer
Shamima Begum: Bring me home, says Bethnal Green girl who left to join Isis

On the day the caliphate suffered a mortal blow the teenage London bride of an Islamic State fighter lifted her veil. Her two infant children were dead; her husband in captivity. Nineteen years old, nine months pregnant, weak and exhausted from her escape across the desert, she nevertheless looked calm and spoke with a collected voice.

“I’m not the same silly little 15-year-old schoolgirl who ran away from Bethnal Green four years ago,” she told me. “And I don’t regret coming here.”

With those words and the act of lifting her niqab, a mystery ended. The girl sitting before me, alone in a teeming Syrian refugee camp of 39,000 people where she is registered as No 28850, was Shamima Begum, the only known survivor of the three schoolgirls from Bethnal Green Academy whose fate has been unknown at home since they fled Britain together in 2015 to join Islamic State.

Ms Begum may have reached comparative safety, yet she chastised herself for leaving the last Isis territory as Kurd forces, backed by the West, closed in.

“I was weak,” she told me of her flight from the battle in Baghuz, with something akin to remorse. “I could not endure the suffering and hardship that staying on the battlefield involved. But I was also frightened that the child I am about to give birth to would die like my other children if I stayed on. So I fled the caliphate. Now all I want to do is come home to Britain.”


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/shamima-begum-bring-me-home-says-bethnal-green-girl-who-fled-to-join-isis-hgvqw765d

Should someone who quite clearly doesn't regret going to join ISIS and is still sympathetic to their plight be allowed back in this country? Then again, she'd already been 'radicalised' by those closest to her in this country.
264 posts and 15 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18751 Anonymous
19th March 2019
Tuesday 10:51 am
18751 spacer

2c4.png
187511875118751
>>18749
If you say so.
>> No. 18752 Anonymous
19th March 2019
Tuesday 11:10 am
18752 spacer
>>18742
That's nice, and all, but why are you posting it in this thread?
>> No. 18753 Anonymous
19th March 2019
Tuesday 11:14 am
18753 spacer
>>18749
The whole reason Mukbang is popular is so people can replicate the feeling of eating together as a part of a social group. You can have a conversation with people and pretend that the Pot Noodle, you're devouring in your pants is the ramen that the streamer is eating.
>> No. 18754 Anonymous
19th March 2019
Tuesday 12:20 pm
18754 spacer
>>18752
Why is a post that referenced previous posts talking about camwhores talking about camwhores?
>> No. 18755 Anonymous
19th March 2019
Tuesday 6:24 pm
18755 spacer
>>18754
Yes, in a thread that had hitherto contained no previous posts about camwhores.

whiteline
_77623460_breaking_image_large-3.png
943094309430
>> No. 9430 Anonymous
26th January 2016
Tuesday 10:09 pm
9430 spacer
Huddersfield charity shop finally says goodbye to a shutter which lasted 26 years


http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/west-yorkshire-news/huddersfield-charity-shop-finally-says-10780879

That's it. That's literally it. A charity shop has replaced one of its roller shutters after having the same one for 26 years. It's all go in Huddersfield.

I challenge you lads to find a more pointless news story than this.
1080 posts and 143 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18728 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 10:57 am
18728 spacer
Fuck me - auto-embed from an unmolested link. When did that happen?
>> No. 18729 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 11:15 am
18729 spacer
>>18728
About a year ago, but the way .gs distorts time means it could have been more like two.
>> No. 18730 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 12:23 pm
18730 spacer

1412264381817_Image_galleryImage_LONDON_UNITED_KIN.jpg
187301873018730
>>18729
>the way .gs distorts time

Half Past Yer Mam.
>> No. 18736 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 2:49 pm
18736 spacer
Do you meant you don't need to use the yt tags anymore?
>> No. 18737 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 3:04 pm
18737 spacer
>>18736
Haven't for a while, they're there as a legacy feature.

whiteline
uk-england-birmingham-47558766[1].png
185741857418574
>> No. 18574 Anonymous
13th March 2019
Wednesday 5:59 pm
18574 spacer
>A passenger says she was left "shaking and upset" when she was told to cover up on a flight.

>Emily O'Connor said cabin crew told her what she was wearing - a crop top and high-waisted trousers - was "inappropriate" and "caused offence".

>She said the manager of the Birmingham to Tenerife flight and staff surrounded her, saying she must put a jacket on.

Phwoar!

Also I'd like to know gs's resident I'll-shag-anything-lad on this.
22 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18654 Anonymous
15th March 2019
Friday 9:40 pm
18654 spacer
>>18596
Spreading your arse is a fantastic type of art, that guy's an idiot.
>> No. 18657 Anonymous
15th March 2019
Friday 9:44 pm
18657 spacer

MrKate_OMG_WACO_BOSS-GIRLS-112-1280x853.jpg
186571865718657
>>18654
Spot on.
>> No. 18700 Anonymous
16th March 2019
Saturday 5:36 pm
18700 spacer
>>18588
> 'That is not a crop top, it's a BRA!'
And bugger with it, it's not like she has massive titties under it.
>> No. 18702 Anonymous
16th March 2019
Saturday 8:30 pm
18702 spacer

rs-134000-20140707-seinfeld3-x1800-1404749590.jpg
187021870218702

>> No. 18704 Anonymous
16th March 2019
Saturday 9:59 pm
18704 spacer
>>18702
I must have missed that episode of the X-Files.

whiteline
3000.jpg
140711407114071
>> No. 14071 Anonymous
26th November 2017
Sunday 1:32 pm
14071 spacer
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/22/self-taught-rocket-scientist-plans-launch-to-test-flat-earth-theory

>Self-taught rocket scientist plans launch to test flat Earth theory

>‘Mad’ Mike Hughes, 61, plans to reach an altitude of 1,800ft over California in his home-made steam-powered rocket

>Science is littered with tales of visionaries who paid for pioneering research to prove their theories, and this weekend “Mad” Mike Hughes is hoping to join them. He plans to launch a homemade rocket in California as part of a bid to eventually prove that the Earth is flat.

>Hughes has spent $20,000 (£15,000) building the steam-powered rocket in his spare time, and will be livestreaming the launch over the internet. The self-described daredevil says he switched his focus to rockets after twice breaking his back doing stunt jumps in cars.

>“I don’t believe in science,” declared the 61-year-old. “I know about aerodynamics and fluid dynamics and how things move through the air. But that’s not science, that’s just a formula.”



>‘Mad’ Mike
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
51 posts and 6 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 15062 Anonymous
10th May 2018
Thursday 7:37 pm
15062 spacer
>>15057
I'm going to leave it there, just for you. Can post it again, if you like?
>> No. 15064 Anonymous
10th May 2018
Thursday 7:44 pm
15064 spacer
>>15062
Post it again! Post it again!
>> No. 15079 Anonymous
10th May 2018
Thursday 11:09 pm
15079 spacer
>>15057

Well? Aren't there rules about not taking money off the vulnerable?
>> No. 18511 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 7:46 pm
18511 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMjDAzUFxX0

If you haven't watched Behind The Curve on Netflix then I recommend it; here's one of the flat earther experiments proving the curvature of the planet.
>> No. 18512 Anonymous
8th March 2019
Friday 12:51 pm
18512 spacer
>>14150
Why that white bastard has flown so far away from the Earth?

whiteline
D06NrzkWwAAAZ2y.jpg
184891848918489
>> No. 18489 Anonymous
5th March 2019
Tuesday 6:27 pm
18489 spacer
Counter-terror police are investigating three packages containing explosives found at Heathrow Airport, London City Airport and Waterloo station.

The "small improvised explosive devices" were found in A4 postal bags, the Metropolitan Police said. The Met's Counter Terrorism Command is treating it as a "linked series" and "keeping an open mind regarding motives".

No-one has been hurt, the force added.

The Compass Centre in Heathrow's grounds was evacuated after a package was reported to police at about 09:55 GMT. The device set alight when staff opened the bag.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47457477

The IRA are up to their old tricks, the little scamps.
15 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18506 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 12:33 am
18506 spacer
>>18501
I got that information directly from a Corporal in the Royal Irish Regiment who is in the same Masonic Lodge as me, so sadly no.
>> No. 18507 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 2:07 am
18507 spacer
>>18506
You can just say "who I know personally", ponce.
>> No. 18508 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 2:27 am
18508 spacer
>>18507

I'm quite convinced that the big Masonic secret is that they have to pretend there's loads of secrets to look more interesting, and also mention the lodge as often as possible despise the supposed secrecy.
>> No. 18509 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 2:44 am
18509 spacer
>>18508
I'm just going to say they touch kids, the secret is I don't actually think that, but when the Facebook groups spill onto the streets and launch the Wakefield infitada against Masonlad's lodge, it won't matter.
>> No. 18510 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 6:03 pm
18510 spacer
>>18507
I don’t really know him personally, though. He’s an aquiantance I sat beside once at a function and he told me his life story.

whiteline
dragqueens_0.jpg
150411504115041
>> No. 15041 Anonymous
10th May 2018
Thursday 5:43 pm
15041 spacer
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/drag-queens-banned-from-performing-at-free-pride-glasgow-event-over-fears-acts-will-offend-trans-10405214.html

>Drag queens banned from performing at Free Pride Glasgow event over fears acts will offend trans people

[...]

>The organisation said in a statement that it hopes to create a safe space for all members of the LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, intersex, asexual) community, and that while the decision may "disappoint" some people "the needs of the most marginalised groups within our community come first."

[...]

>Free Pride Glasgow said: “It was felt that it [drag performance] would make some of those who were transgender or questioning their gender uncomfortable. It was felt by the group within the Trans/Non Binary Caucus that some drag performance, particularly cis drag, hinges on the social view of gender and making it into a joke, however transgender individuals do not feel as though their gender identity is a joke.”


Life rarely takes the piss out of itself like this. It almost sounds like the plot of a South Park episode.
441 posts and 27 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18419 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 7:09 pm
18419 spacer
>>18418

The intersectionalists know the rhetoric well enough of the left yet they choose to ignore the greatest defining factor of power, wealth. The answer is simple; This is not empowerment for the masses but for the elite, the most telling factor is the obsession with CEOs a group so niche and powerful anyway that the idea I should weep for the female CEO that she isn't paid as much as the male should be laughably insulting, and yet this is the obsession. I dont know how everyone became brainwashed to take up their mantle, yet here we are.
>> No. 18420 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 8:03 pm
18420 spacer
>>18419

A female CEO who earns £10 million a year while a man in a similar position gets £15m is hardly below the poverty line. It's all a mater of perspective, as I think we are agreeing upon here.

Also, we have to ask ourselves whether it is really such a fundamental mark of equality of society that there exists such a thing as gender parity in boardrooms. What is true enough is that women should have the same opportunities as men. A woman who wants to assume a leadership role within a company should get to do so if she is qualified and puts in enough hard work to get there. Just as any man. But in the end, when you look at surveys, being at the top of a company or corporation just isn't a career goal that is as widespread among women as it is among men. A lot of women say they will be just as happy with a career that either doesn't demand quite as much of them, or where they have more time to spend with their family and all that kind of thing. So in essence the problem then isn't that there are too few women in top executive positions, but that it just isn't what as many women want for themselves as men tend to do.

The Norwegians were among the first countries to mandate gender parity in top executive positions, but the problem is that there just aren't enough qualified and ambitious women to fill all those positions, at least not up to actual parity. So the Norwegians have now coined the term "golden skirts", which means that women get to go to the top simply because otherwise there just wouldn't be enough women to fill the required quota.

But that's a problem you see on a lot of social political issues. The idea of equal opportunity gets confused with the idea of equal results. And having gender parity in boardrooms is not the same as equal opportunity. You've got equal results, but that doesn't mean everything's peachy. And if I remember correctly, the actual economic performance as a company or corporation has proved to not really be significantly better just because there are more women at the helm. At least there is no strong correlation indicating that companies with boardroom gender parity are doing better than others.
>> No. 18421 Anonymous
26th February 2019
Tuesday 11:09 pm
18421 spacer
>>18420

You've made three paragraphs trying to discredit an idea that really should be simpler to tackle to that. After all, when was the last time you heard of an executive, male or female, who wasn't a sleazy weasel bastard who back-stabbed and arse-licked their way to the top? These are the same people who drive companies bankrupt and run off with the pensions, it's hardly a laudable ideal in life.

Modern feminism isn't about equality at all. It's not even about feminism. It's just another tool of division and manufactured consent.
>> No. 18422 Anonymous
27th February 2019
Wednesday 12:58 am
18422 spacer
>>18421
Yes! And the solution to this problem is to continue discouraging women from corporate careers whilst doing nothing to tackle corporate dominance in society. That'll show em.
>> No. 18423 Anonymous
27th February 2019
Wednesday 10:11 am
18423 spacer
>>18422

>And the solution to this problem is to continue discouraging women from corporate careers whilst doing nothing to tackle corporate dominance in society.

Are you deliberately being thick?

whiteline
359px-EuskadiTaAskatasunaMural.jpg
181081810818108
>> No. 18108 Anonymous
17th February 2019
Sunday 2:03 pm
18108 Clicking on terrorist propaganda even once could mean 15 years in prison
> Clicking on daft militant wog propaganda even once could mean 15 years in prison under new law

> Anyone who views daft militant wog propaganda once online can be jailed for up to 15 years under new laws that have sparked human rights concerns.

> MPs had urged the government to scrap plans to criminalise viewing “information useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism”, which goes further than much-used laws that made physically collecting, downloading or disseminating the material illegal.

> A United Nations inspector accused the government of straying towards “thought crime” with the proposal, which originally stated that people would have to access propaganda “on three or more different occasions” to commit a terror offence.

> But the benchmark was removed from the draft law, meaning a single click is now illegal.

> Journalists, academic researchers or people who had “no reason to believe” they were accessing daft militant wog propaganda are exempt.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/daft militant wog-propaganda-website-online-prison-sentence-uk-isis-a8776226.html

What is this bollocks?
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
46 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 18271 Anonymous
20th February 2019
Wednesday 1:10 am
18271 spacer
>>18270

Fair point - a lot of IoT stuff is complete dogshit in terms of security and maintainability.
>> No. 18272 Anonymous
20th February 2019
Wednesday 2:23 am
18272 spacer
>>18271
It's like they say, the "S" in IoT stands for "security".
>> No. 18283 Anonymous
21st February 2019
Thursday 12:47 pm
18283 spacer
>>18271
>>18272
I swear this seems to be general knowledge now and yet everybody is still buying all this crap.
>> No. 18284 Anonymous
21st February 2019
Thursday 5:19 pm
18284 spacer
>>18283

Because it's still convenient. My mum doesn't give a shit if the government listens to her, she's an old woman and just wants to be able to ask Alexa to play her music for her so she doesn't have to learn how Spotify works. Also in her words - "well they say my phone does the same thing don't they? What's the difference?" and she does sort of have a point, doesn't she? ECHELON is still a thing and even us paranoid nerds won't go as far as refusing to carry a GPS linked microphone in our pockets everywhere we go.
>> No. 18296 Anonymous
22nd February 2019
Friday 5:19 pm
18296 spacer
>>18245
Didn't someone get burnt once for ordering pressure cookers and something else?
All online purchases and cc transactions are most assuredly monitored by dozens of third parties anyway, for various reasons.

whiteline
skynews-salisbury-cathedral_4580879.jpg
181231812318123
>> No. 18123 Anonymous
17th February 2019
Sunday 5:58 pm
18123 Russian Flag on Salisbury Cathedral
That's some proper trolling.
Expand all images.
>> No. 18136 Anonymous
17th February 2019
Sunday 7:10 pm
18136 spacer
>>18123
Naturally the nutters are out in force suggesting a (literal) false flag.
https://twitter.com/ShoebridgeC/status/1097115589846466560
>> No. 18137 Anonymous
17th February 2019
Sunday 7:24 pm
18137 spacer

Screenshot 2019-02-17 at 19.23.16.png
181371813718137
>>18136
Miserable cunt doesn't know about Occams Razor.

Students on a Saturday night - probably a week in the planning.

whiteline
_105544964_nihilanand1.jpg
178271782717827
>> No. 17827 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 9:40 pm
17827 Indian man to sue parents for giving birth to him
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47154287

>A 27-year-old Indian man plans to sue his parents for giving birth to him without his consent.

>Mumbai businessman Raphael Samuel told the BBC that it's wrong to bring children into the world because they then have to put up with lifelong suffering.

>Mr Samuel, of course, understands that our consent can't be sought before we are born, but insists that "it was not our decision to be born".

>So as we didn't ask to be born, we should be paid for the rest of our lives to live, he argues.

>A demand like this could cause a rift within any family, but Mr Samuel says he gets along very well with his parents (both of whom are lawyers) and they appear to be dealing with it with a lot of humour.

>In a statement, his mother Kavita Karnad Samuel explained her response to "the recent upheaval my son has created".

>"I must admire my son's temerity to want to take his parents to court knowing both of us are lawyers. And if Raphael could come up with a rational explanation as to how we could have sought his consent to be born, I will accept my fault," she said.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
137 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17995 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 10:58 pm
17995 spacer
>>17994
My mind is also boggling at >>17992

Everyone go home, bear trap lad has won.
>> No. 17996 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 11:01 pm
17996 spacer
>>17995

>bear trap lad has won

I would like to see how he manages to bum a dog over a bear trap before I go.
>> No. 18002 Anonymous
10th February 2019
Sunday 4:55 pm
18002 spacer
>>17995

Looks like everybody did go home.

Did all the anti-natalists suddenly go and off themselves?


I'm bored and looking for cheap Sunday afternoon entertainment, as you can easily tell
>> No. 18003 Anonymous
10th February 2019
Sunday 5:16 pm
18003 spacer
>>18002

The winner was declared, so the cuntoff is officially over. Haven't you read the by-laws?
>> No. 18004 Anonymous
10th February 2019
Sunday 5:27 pm
18004 spacer
>>18003

I'll get my coat.

whiteline
TELEMMGLPICT000151194051_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqC_LLCXk.jpg
177461774617746
>> No. 17746 Anonymous
4th February 2019
Monday 6:43 pm
17746 spacer
PC gone mad. You can't even talk about wanting to kill innocent black men without people getting all uppity and offended by it.

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/liam-neeson-interview-rape-race-black-man-revenge-taken-cold-pursuit-a8760896.html

I apologise in advance if the word filters butcher that link.
65 posts and 9 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17821 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 12:14 pm
17821 spacer
>>17820
Every woman in that picture with black hair looks similar (or a combination made up of the other women there). They're effectively stereotyping themselves.
>> No. 17822 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 12:19 pm
17822 spacer
>>17821
Very important stuff. I'm glad you're focused on what really matters in this world.
>> No. 17823 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 12:27 pm
17823 spacer
>>17821

They're a literal fringe movement.
>> No. 17824 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 12:34 pm
17824 spacer
>>17822
>I'm glad you're focused on what really matters in this world.

It's a thread about people getting mad over Liam Neeson recounting something that happened 30/40 years ago. The bar was already low to begin with.
>> No. 17825 Anonymous
7th February 2019
Thursday 1:23 pm
17825 spacer

1456535712_Zoinks.gif
178251782517825
>The New York celebrity red carpet event on Tuesday for Liam Neeson’s new film Cold Pursuit has been cancelled in the wake of an interview in which the actor said he wanted to kill a black man in response to the rape of a friend who said her attacker was black.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/feb/05/liam-neeson-red-carpet-event-cancelled-following-remarks

>Men In Black: International fans have threatened to boycott the yet-to-be-released film unless Liam Neeson’s scenes are scrapped entirely.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/06/men-black-fans-threaten-boycott-film-unless-liam-neeson-scrapped-following-black-bd-comments-8459316/

whiteline
dont-cross-the-streams-memes-1.jpg
176221762217622
>> No. 17622 Anonymous
30th January 2019
Wednesday 7:45 pm
17622 Leslie Jones Slams New 'Ghostbusters' Film: "It's Like Something Trump Woul Locked
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/leslie-jones-slams-new-ghostbusters-film-like-something-trump-would-do-1177578

In response to the news that Jason Reitman's new Ghostbusters project will continue the story that began with Ivan Reitman's 1984 original and its 1989 sequel — and ignore the female reboot from director Paul Feig in 2016 — Leslie Jones, a castmember from the latter, has voiced her disappointment on social media.

The comedian on Saturday took to Twitter in a post that said, "So insulting. Like fuck us. We dint count. It's like something trump would do. (Trump voice) "Gonna redo ghostbusteeeeers, better with men, will be huge. Those women ain't ghostbusteeeeers" ugh so annoying. Such a dick move. And I don't give fuck I'm saying something!!"

(A good day to you Sir!)
13 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17649 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 4:06 pm
17649 spacer
>>17648

It does prove that 'literally someone' said it, though.
>> No. 17652 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 4:22 pm
17652 spacer
Sorry lads something seems to have gone awry here because we actually appear to be discussing what the OP wants us to.

Can a brother get a lock?
>> No. 17654 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 4:42 pm
17654 spacer
>>17652
>awry

How do you pronounce this? A-wry? Aw-rie?
>> No. 17658 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 5:14 pm
17658 spacer
>>17654
> Aw-rie?
Aye, nae bad, yersel?
>> No. 17663 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 5:41 pm
17663 spacer
>>17648

>really counts


That was the first link I found in a 30 second web search of the relevant terms, I remember more around the time, but I don't care enough to look for more as I don't think they would be true scotsmen either.

whiteline
0_Nurse-arrested-over-US-care-home-patient-pregnan.jpg
174791747917479
>> No. 17479 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 11:28 pm
17479 Nurse who 'got patient in coma pregnant may have abused her countless times
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/nurse-who-got-patient-coma-13899076

A male nurse who allegedly got a severely disabled patient pregnant may have abused her countless times, police said.

Nathan Sutherland, 36, who was employed at the Hacienda HealthCare centre in Phoenix, Arizona, was arrested today after his DNA "matched the baby".

The 29-year-old mother was a patient at the 60-bed care facility and has been in a vegetative state for 14 years after nearly drowning.

A massive investigation was launched following the birth on December 29, with police gathering DNA samples from male employees at the facility as they tried to determine who had assaulted the patient.

Sutherland, a licensed practical nurse, has worked at the site since 2011 and was charged with sexual assault and vulnerable adult abuse.
76 posts and 6 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 17591 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 6:32 pm
17591 spacer
>>17589
I once participated in a protest against a number of companies. That group included one that was a substantial client of my then-employer. I wasn't particularly loud, and hadn't identified myself in any particular way, but did get caught in the background on some local news footage, which some busybody brought to the attention of management. A meeting with HR was scheduled to discuss the matter. I told them I'd accept the charge in return for 128 hours per week back pay, and a similar uplift going forward. The meeting was swiftly cancelled and the matter never spoken of again in the year before I left.
>> No. 17592 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 6:36 pm
17592 spacer
>>17591
Isn't this a scene from Mr Robot?
>> No. 17593 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 6:49 pm
17593 spacer
>>17591
>>17592
Jesus wept.
>> No. 17594 Anonymous
26th January 2019
Saturday 7:02 pm
17594 spacer
>>17591

Where did the CCJ come in?
>> No. 17595 Anonymous
27th January 2019
Sunday 1:20 pm
17595 spacer
>>17578
It isn't my company.
Thinking about it a bit, I might point out that employers implicitly commandeer people's online presence for their [employer's] benefit, implicitly or explicitly. Implicit grinds my gears more.
I'm done with pedantry for a while.

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
Previous[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]