[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
Subject   (new thread)
File  []
>> No. 12648 Anonymous
19th May 2017
Friday 7:13 pm
12648 spacer

>Whilst Mr Assange was wanted on a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) for an extremely serious offence, the MPS response reflected the serious nature of that crime. Now that the situation has changed and the Swedish authorities have discontinued their investigation into that matter, Mr Assange remains wanted for a much less serious offence. The MPS will provide a level of resourcing which is proportionate to that offence.

>The MPS will not comment further on the operational plan.

>The priority for the MPS must continue to be arresting those who are currently wanted in the Capital in connection with serious violent or sexual offences for the protection of Londoners.
30 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12687 Anonymous
21st May 2017
Sunday 2:20 pm
12687 spacer
>All but one of his alleged victims recanted
No, the offences timed out. That's not the same thing at all.

>if the British authorities had gotten a hold of him he would have been put on a plane to the US, not Sweden.
Nonsense. The EAW was pretty much the only thing guaranteeing that wouldn't happen. The UK was bound by international law to turn him over to Sweden. They couldn't let him walk, and they couldn't send him anywhere else. Sweden unequivocably had first dibs. Anything else would have caused an international incident.

>If he can make it back to Sweden
... he will be arrested and questioned for the one allegation that remains. They've dropped it for now, but they're entirely entitled to pick it up again at any time until that too times out in 2020.
>> No. 12689 Anonymous
21st May 2017
Sunday 2:24 pm
12689 spacer
But all but one did recant, didn't they? Simply because the offense timed out doesn't have much (read: any) bearing on that.
>> No. 12691 Anonymous
21st May 2017
Sunday 2:32 pm
12691 spacer
>But all but one did recant, didn't they?
What is it with people just repeating themselves lately?
>> No. 12693 Anonymous
21st May 2017
Sunday 2:42 pm
12693 spacer
Different person. This is the nature of an anonymous imageboard, etc., etc.

Turns out then, that at least two people have noticed your "mistake".
>> No. 12695 Anonymous
21st May 2017
Sunday 2:57 pm
12695 spacer
>Turns out then, that at least two people have noticed your "mistake".
I think you mean "at least two people have made the same mistake".

>> No. 12547 Anonymous
7th May 2017
Sunday 1:40 pm
12547 spacer

>Under the Defamation Act 2009 a person who publishes or utters blasphemous material "shall be guilty of an offence". They are be liable upon conviction on indictment to a fine not exceeding €25,000.

>The specific complaint relates to an interview conducted on 'The Meaning of Life' with Mr Fry. During the show the comedian and writer was questioned about what he might say to God at the pearly gates.

>Mr Fry replied: "How dare you create a world in which there is such misery? It’s not our fault? It’s not right. It’s utterly, utterly evil. Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid god who creates a world which is so full of injustice and pain?"

>He went on to say that if he was met by the Greek gods he would accept them quicker because, "they didn’t present themselves as being all seeing, all wise, all beneficent."

>He added: "Because the god who created this universe, if it was created by god, is quite clearly a maniac, an utter maniac, totally selfish.

>"We have to spend our lives on our knees thanking him. What kind of god would do that?"
50 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12607 Anonymous
10th May 2017
Wednesday 3:21 pm
12607 spacer
Pretty tiresome to see well worn attacks on theism posed with such obvious and unmerited self-satisfaction. Congrats, you've made it past the part of your childhood when you didn't question anything. If you're interested in an actual response to the questions you're posing, there exists a wealth of apologetics freely available for your perusal which attempt to address them. If not, don't bother, you're not impressing anybody.
>> No. 12608 Anonymous
10th May 2017
Wednesday 3:42 pm
12608 spacer

I should have said that my degree isn't in European law. As part of my business degree, at some point I developed a tentative interest in European law, so I attended a lecture or two on it towards the end of uni.

The professor's point was much more to shed light on how a country started over, after a period of history as disruptive to its own self as the Third Reich.

We also talked about the new post-Apartheid South African constitution, btw. Again very interestingly, the post-war German constitution served as a blueprint for a number of aspects of the new South African constitution. You even had law professors from German universities helping in the process of writing it. Our professor said he was friends with a law professor from Hamburg (?), who was part of a delegation of seasoned constitutional law experts visiting South Africa numerous times in the early to mid 1990s.
>> No. 12645 Anonymous
14th May 2017
Sunday 2:32 pm
12645 spacer
I'm coming to like the idea that we've just replaced religion with a more postmodern sort of civic-religion. Where instead of not believing in the lies you're generally told by society, we come over more to being smugly sceptical of things even as we proceed with the rituals anyway.

I'm not actually clever enough to reiterate it properly, but I still like it as a basic idea, and I don't think I'd be too wide of the mark to say it's essentially down to Christianity outliving it's usefulness to modern capitalism and getting the bullet. The randian superman shall inherit the earth -- BY WINNING THIS WEEK'S EPISODE OF THE GREAT BRITISH BAKE OFF!
>> No. 12646 Anonymous
17th May 2017
Wednesday 12:19 am
12646 spacer
Something not mentioned in this thread that I've seen elsewhere is that blasphemy is in the Irish constitution. There's a sort of meme going around which says that the 2009 law was introduced deliberately to be unenforceable, because to remove blasphemy from the constitution would take a referendum.

This is true enough, but it makes the law sound counter-intuitively brilliant, when it's not. The law needs to go, and the referendum needs to happen.

First, it doesn't matter if the law is enforceable or not if people are ignorant of its purpose and choose to self-censor. This is exactly what happened with the Scientology documentaries Going Clear and My Scientology Movie. Neither could find a distributor in Ireland because of fear of prosecution[1].

Second, under the government's 'Programme for Partnership', they pledge towards the end, section 8B on Constitutional Reform,

"We propose that a number of referenda be held. These include referenda on:
* The question of amending Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution to remove the offence
of blasphemy" [2]

This should be morally binding, more enforceable than a manifesto pledge. Obviously politicians lie and don't always fulfil every promise, but the current govt aren't supposed to be avoiding a referendum, as some people think.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 12647 Anonymous
17th May 2017
Wednesday 12:51 am
12647 spacer
These sorts of laws are tools. You'll sometimes hear them euphemistically referred to as "ways and means". On the one hand, they're there to provide a way of dealing with someone you might not otherwise be able to deal with. For example, if someone's getting a bit rough and a police officer happens to hear them swear, expect that person to be booked for s.5 Public Order Act, left in the cells to cool down and released without charge in the morning. Of course, since the law is there, the temptation exists to use it, as routinely happens in the case of s.5 across the country, where eventually either the CPS drops the charges before trial, or the court adds yet another case to the long list of decisions stating that, due to the nature of the job, front line officers have no business being alarmed or distressed by a bit of language.

Some of our older users may remember the time Iceland was briefly declared a terrorist state in order to freeze assets for a completely unrelated reason. It's the same problem that afflicts things like the Investigatory Powers Act, and should really have been at the heart of the Brexit legislation - once the powers exist, there's no effective check on how they can be used.

>> No. 12581 Anonymous
9th May 2017
Tuesday 11:23 am
12581 Kelvin Mackenzie to leave The Sun after Ross Barkley column
Sun sees sense shocker.

Of course, given how it came about, I get the feeling they still won't be buying it in Liverpool.
Expand all images.
>> No. 12583 Anonymous
9th May 2017
Tuesday 11:27 am
12583 spacer
It's just so odd to see a national paper that has it out for a city. Really weird.
>> No. 12584 Anonymous
9th May 2017
Tuesday 12:02 pm
12584 spacer
It doesn't really help that the man's an insufferable cunt.

There are suggestions that this is a token move to give Ofcom the impression that News Corp properties take things like this seriously, just as they have at Fox News.

>> No. 12450 Anonymous
2nd April 2017
Sunday 10:07 pm
12450 Which one of you bigots done this||?
>Croydon 'hate crime'

>The boy was with two friends late on Friday night at a bus stop in Croydon when he was approached by a group of about eight people, who demanded to know where he was from. After saying he was seeking asylum, the gang chased and attacked him.

>The teenager, a Kurdish Iranian aged 17, was left unconscious after receiving repeated blows to the head. On Sunday he was said to be in a serious but stable condition in hospital. The other two youths suffered minor injuries.


30 posts and 3 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12483 Anonymous
5th April 2017
Wednesday 2:02 pm
12483 spacer
I heard similar about that Polish fella who was killed last year by a gang of kids in another Southern shithole. They were up to no good and were going to gang up and attack someone regardless.
>> No. 12542 Anonymous
7th May 2017
Sunday 1:22 am
12542 spacer
>> No. 12543 Anonymous
7th May 2017
Sunday 1:30 am
12543 spacer

A post like this, on a month old thread? You seem like quite the refugee yourself, pal.
>> No. 12544 Anonymous
7th May 2017
Sunday 1:44 am
12544 spacer

They're not refugees, they're economic migrants.
>> No. 12545 Anonymous
7th May 2017
Sunday 4:29 am
12545 spacer

Then what's your cunting excuse, twat?

>> No. 12524 Anonymous
17th April 2017
Monday 1:48 pm
12524 Tukey Votes to Establish Presidial System

>What's in the new constitution?

> The president will have a five-year tenure, for a maximum of two terms
> The president will be able to directly appoint top public officials, including ministers and one or several vice-presidents
> The job of prime minister will be scrapped
> The president will have power to intervene in the judiciary, which Mr Erdogan has accused of being influenced by Fethullah Gulen, the Pennsylvania-based preacher he blames for the failed coup in July
> The president will decide whether or not impose a state of emergency
11 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12537 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 2:38 pm
12537 spacer
It is surely beyond doubt that they are. There are four Commissions, and the fact that they are supposedly independent doesn't matter. Like many other "independent" bodies, their terms of reference are set by the government, and just like the NHS Pay Review Body, the government have supplied terms favourable to themselves.
>> No. 12538 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 2:46 pm
12538 spacer
But would you rather be beyond Breitbart?
>> No. 12539 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 2:47 pm
12539 spacer

That, and I am not sure that these commissions will ever be truly "independent". It starts with the question of who gets to pick the members of such a commission. And people who will then end up serving as part of a political commission like that, if they are seasoned political experts, will themselves have had some sort of personal political history, and they will have, or have had some manner of ties to a political party. And thus, they will never be able to make truly independent decisions. It's all smoke and mirrors.
>> No. 12540 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 3:12 pm
12540 spacer
This isn't the US. Violations of electoral law and funding rules are rarely punished there because the FEC has three reds and three blues and they end up deadlocked every time.

We're great respecters of the rule of law in this country. Even party loyalists can be persuaded to do the right thing. The best way of locking that down over here is to lay down terms of reference that prevent it. It didn't matter how much the PRB members love the NHS, their terms of reference effectively amount to "justify 1%". It doesn't matter if the members of the Boundary Commissions can see that basing their constituencies on the rolls rather than the census is unfair, their terms of reference are to use the rolls and they'll do as they're told or risk exceeding their remit (and never working in such a position again).
>> No. 12541 Anonymous
18th April 2017
Tuesday 6:21 pm
12541 spacer

I'd rather pretend neither existed frankly. I've no time for echo chambers whether left or right, they're hugboxes for people too emotionally fragile to read a paragraph of anything they disagree with.

>> No. 12487 Anonymous
7th April 2017
Friday 10:36 am
12487 US Bombs Assad


>The US military has launched a cruise missile attack on a Syrian airfield in response to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons this week, marking the first time the US has become a direct combatant against the Syrian regime.

>Though Trump lacked congressional and international authorisation for the strike, prominent US politicians immediately gave him political cover.

>For years, defense analysts have warned the US against attacking Assad without a plan for what it seeks to achieve or what a post-Assad Syria might look like.

And the Russian's are none too happy.


>Under the memorandum, signed after Russia launched an air campaign in Syria in September 2015, Russia and the US had exchanged information about their flights to avoid incidents in the crowded skies over Syria — where Russia has several dozen warplanes and batteries of air-defense missiles.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
27 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12519 Anonymous
12th April 2017
Wednesday 4:48 pm
12519 spacer
>saying another world leader is literally worse than Hitler.
As opposed to figuratively worse than Hitler?
>> No. 12520 Anonymous
12th April 2017
Wednesday 5:03 pm
12520 spacer
First day on the Internet, grandad?
>> No. 12521 Anonymous
12th April 2017
Wednesday 5:06 pm
12521 spacer
You don't see why such a vague value judgement statement is weirder to qualify with literally/figuratively, as opposed to saying "literally is Hitler" or something along those lines?
>> No. 12522 Anonymous
12th April 2017
Wednesday 5:22 pm
12522 spacer
It's a shit internet meme. It's not supposed to make sense.
>> No. 12523 Anonymous
12th April 2017
Wednesday 7:07 pm
12523 spacer
I'm getting really fed up of Syria to be honest.

It's getting like that shit radio station your boring normal colleagues put on at work. The one where you've already heard Human by Rag'n'Bone Man once before morning coffee, and then twice more by your afternoon fag break.

It's just all starting to sound the same.

>> No. 12369 Anonymous
7th March 2017
Tuesday 1:32 pm
This is it lads, Teacon 1. I repeat, Teacon 1.

73 posts and 7 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12444 Anonymous
12th March 2017
Sunday 3:24 am
12444 spacer



(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 12445 Anonymous
12th March 2017
Sunday 3:52 am
12445 spacer

>> No. 12446 Anonymous
22nd March 2017
Wednesday 11:38 am
12446 spacer


Nine times.
>> No. 12507 Anonymous
8th April 2017
Saturday 9:47 pm
12507 spacer

Couple of big drops via The Shadow Brokers & Wikileaks:

>Today's revelation exposes hacking attacks on EU states, as well as Latin America, Russia, China, Japan and South East Asia. Among the contents one also finds the hacking configuration for China Mobile, the world's largest mobile telecom company by number of subscribers.


>WikiLeaks just dropped the CIA’s secret how-to for infecting Windows

>> No. 12508 Anonymous
8th April 2017
Saturday 10:16 pm
12508 spacer
Naturally the timing is entirely coincidental. Someone just happened to finish prepping this batch for release this week.

>> No. 11981 Anonymous
23rd January 2017
Monday 12:37 pm
11981 spacer

>Trump’s press secretary, Sean Spicer, used his first White House briefing to shout at journalists about what he incorrectly termed “deliberately false reporting” on Trump’s inauguration, declaring: “We’re going to hold the press accountable.”

>“This was the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period,” said Spicer, in one of several statements contradicted by photographs and transit data. “These attempts to lessen the enthusiasm of the inauguration are shameful and wrong.”

>Kellyanne Conway, a senior White House aide, told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday Spicer had merely been offering “alternative facts”, a phrase that was received with widespread astonishment.

Alternative facts, eh?

The buses don't run where those people live.
210 posts and 14 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12292 Anonymous
12th February 2017
Sunday 2:51 pm
12292 spacer

C4XgMYbWEAAfSxy.jpg large.jpg
Something about this picture doesn't seem right, but I can't quite place it.
>> No. 12293 Anonymous
12th February 2017
Sunday 4:28 pm
12293 spacer
Not him, but Obama's FP record is hardly impressive. His greatest achievement is probably deciding not to get too involved in Syria.
>> No. 12294 Anonymous
12th February 2017
Sunday 4:43 pm
12294 spacer
Cuba? Iran? Paris accord? IS in full retreat?
>> No. 12484 Anonymous
5th April 2017
Wednesday 2:09 pm
12484 spacer

Leaving the door open for Russia and letting Assad free to use chemical weapons against civilians? Not intervening in Syria is possibly his biggest failure. Red line my arse.
>> No. 12485 Anonymous
5th April 2017
Wednesday 2:21 pm
12485 spacer

> letting Assad free to use chemical weapons against civilians

Fake news. Sad!

>> No. 12295 Anonymous
17th February 2017
Friday 3:12 pm
12295 spacer
As a part of my general interest in current affairs, I dig around a lot on the subject of human rights and violence, including torture and so on.

Obviously some things are more difficult to read than others, but today I just didn't feel like I had the emotional capacity to go through a particular report.

I know it sounds fluffy as I'm not there to experience it myself, but truth be told I've been getting 'burn-out' more often lately.

Do any of you lads find you have to set some sensible limits on the media you expose yourself to? Any practical advice on how to avoid this sort of burn-out when reading about serious or distressing topics?
66 posts and 6 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12362 Anonymous
2nd March 2017
Thursday 1:14 am
12362 spacer
>And then when subsidies dry up, quite often it results in a near complete withdrawal of private capital. Just take the case of the Nokia plant in Hungary. It was heavily subsidised by the Hungarian government with tax incentives and whatnot, but as soon as those began to run out, Nokia upped sticks and left.
See, that just seems a further argument in favour of regulating capital flows.
>Most of them are now owned and operated by multinational industrial and investment conglomerates who, if at all, would not go quietly.
That's one of the problems. I mean, I tend to be hopeless about the future. We've handed too much power away to those who'd do us ill.

I believe New Zealand was the most socialist of western countries under Muldoon. The comparison of government spending and nationalisation seems an odd one though, since Sweden had functioning social democracy (where private ownership was sufficiently docile, rendering nationalisation unnecessary.) and Growth was also higher during the Breton-Woods period in nearly all countries, which leaves me with some impression that the level of regulation is something of a sidenote. (Especially when you factor that to find one who hasn't bowed to neoliberalism in one form or another, you're looking essentially at one country - North Korea.)

>And just how are you going to make labour scarcer?
Primarily with the aim of full employment being put high up on the policy proposal list. That might also include restrictions on immigration.
>Disregarding for a moment that in our globalised world
Ah, see, the primary purpose of the suggestion is to Disregard our globalised world and bring the whole thing under much stronger democratic and domestic control. Not total isolationism, just a much more managed system. Then you force domestic investment and (as a first world country, anyway) can more or less ignore foreign investment.

Fundamentally changing the nature of the global economy would be the aim. You'd almost certainly need to agree such a thing multilaterally. The fact it's impossible is accepted a-priori and used as a reason for me to become increasingly misanthropic and wish for an increasingly unstable world. I increasingly feel that there's nothing to lose.
>> No. 12363 Anonymous
2nd March 2017
Thursday 11:27 am
12363 spacer

>See, that just seems a further argument in favour of regulating capital flows.

Maybe to you. But in reality, you are simply not going to succeed at that. And just what was the Hungarian government supposed to do when Nokia withdrew after the subsidies ran out? Seize Nokia's assets? And would any foreign investor ever have invested in Hungaria again after that?

>I mean, I tend to be hopeless about the future. We've handed too much power away to those who'd do us ill.

Governments and countries around the globe are up to their necks in debt, slow growth and sluggish tax revenue. The last thing they will do at this point is renationalise industries that are worth trillions in assets alone, and buy out their private owners.

>The comparison of government spending and nationalisation seems an odd one though

Not at all. They're two sides of the same coin, and that is the degree of a government's involvement in its country's economic affairs. Whether the government then spends money through its fully owned industries or does so directly is in the end not really relevant.

>Disregard our globalised world and bring the whole thing under much stronger democratic and domestic control
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 12364 Anonymous
2nd March 2017
Thursday 2:32 pm
12364 spacer
>But in reality, you are simply not going to succeed at that.
Well yeah, as I say: That's accepted in advance. (Indeed if you want my entire political attitude nowadays in a sentence, it's "Things can only get worse, but let's look at how they could be better.")
>And just what was the Hungarian government supposed to do when Nokia withdrew after the subsidies ran out?
Taking over assets would be one option. Setting different terms for market access in advance would be another. Finally, the importance of foreign investment is downplayed, because domestic investors can always be nudged towards domestic investment. (Admittedly, I suspect Hungary isn't in quite so powerful a position in that regard.)
>Governments and countries around the globe are up to their necks in debt, slow growth and sluggish tax revenue
Hence the preference for fiscal repression. Debt plunged from WW2 until the early 70s because of the way we strung up the financial sector.
>and that is the degree of a government's involvement in its country's economic affairs
This seems the kind of thinking that would make the NHS fungible with single-payer healthcare + privately owned hospitals.
>Also, don't forget that globalisation, for all its negative effects on mature post-industrial societies such as ours, has brought prosperity to many people in developing countries.
I feel many of those benefits could still be delivered. Remember that the preference isn't for zero trade, but for balanced trade. Strictly speaking we could leave phone manufacturing to China, so long as we build something else here to maintain balance within a reasonable period. (i.e. say 5 years, and in that 5 years even if we've a huge trade deficit with China, maybe we've got a huge surplus with the US, so we're balanced, and maybe China's also running an equivalent with Russia)
>people will just laugh at those silly Brits thinking they have weight to throw around by wanting to make labour scarcer in their country
I did note that the whole thing has to be set up multilaterally. I mean, step 1 is the capital-control system, and if we can't all agree to that a-la Breton Woods then we're done at the first hurdle. (We can't.)
>strikes and misery of the 1970s?
Always drawn to an excuse to post this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3337143/Remember-1976-Britains-best-ever-year.html
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 12367 Anonymous
2nd March 2017
Thursday 6:14 pm
12367 spacer

One thing I will give you is that the global financial sector has got completely out of control. It is just a bloated cancer growth of markets and economies which contributes nearly nothing to real sector growth, and whose volatility and valuation bubbles in 2007/08 plunged us into the greatest real sector crisis since the 1930s. And a sizeable chunk of industrial output and profit is now siphoned off solely as interest for the mind-bogglingly vast financial assets that circle the globe always looking for the highest return on investment.

One reason why labour market conditions are so unfavourable for those who actually do the work within a company is the insatiable demands of the global financial caste. And lax and quantitative easing-focused monetary policy of central banks around the globe has only exacerbated the deluge of money desperately looking for profit. And major corporations now have all these additional hungry mouths to feed besides having to generate profit just to stay in business and be able to pay their employees. While smaller businesses are increasingly struggling to get loans approved at all.

How do we solve the problem of financial markets drowning in this liquidity that does more harm than good? Well, one way it is going to correct itself is that come the next financial market wide crash, much of that money will simply vanish into thin air again. But then we will have to deal with the next nightmare - commercial banks going tits up, blown central bank loans in the trillions, and zero-interest rates, which will leave no wiggle room for lowering, which was usually one of the key measures undertaken by central banks following a downturn to give the real sector a shot in the arm. If you're already at 0.25 percent, going down to zero will have next to no effect at all. Especially not if you've still got the financial sector in the loop.

We're fucked. Plain and simple. If you thought 2007/08 was bad, you better head for the hills before the current financial bubble starts bursting. If the 2008/08 financial crisis was a mega tsunami, then the next crisis is going to be the Chicxulub asteroid.
>> No. 12368 Anonymous
5th March 2017
Sunday 5:00 am
12368 spacer

Yer wot yer student yer like money jobs and stuff. Loads of poor people and that.

>> No. 11999 Anonymous
24th January 2017
Tuesday 9:53 am
11999 spacer
The enemies of the people Supreme Court have spoken. Article 50 requires an Act of Parliament, but Sewel is not enforceable so the devolved bodies can't veto it.

I'm calling it now. One-line bill imminent and Corbyn will three-line it.
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12093 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 7:07 pm
12093 spacer
Aren't amendments going to be debated?
>> No. 12094 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 7:19 pm
12094 spacer
For some value of "debate". The government will no doubt try to get that strictly limited. The sitting is apparently slated to go past midnight, but with upwards of 50 amendments threatened by the SNP alone, the full day sitting, starting after prayers at 11am, works out to a little over 15 minutes each, which is just about long enough for a division.
>> No. 12095 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 7:55 pm
12095 spacer
Why do you hate life?
>> No. 12233 Anonymous
5th February 2017
Sunday 3:43 am
12233 spacer
By 2018 - Geert Wilders and MLP to win.EU to collapse, Germany implodes. US, Russia and UK turn ISIS into jam.
>> No. 12234 Anonymous
5th February 2017
Sunday 10:32 am
12234 spacer
[citation needed]

>> No. 12096 Anonymous
28th January 2017
Saturday 11:54 am
12096 Mikhail Gorbachev: 'It All Looks as if the World Is Preparing for War'
Nice knowing you, otherlads.


>More troops, tanks and armored personnel carriers are being brought to Europe. NATO and Russian forces and weapons that used to be deployed at a distance are now placed closer to each other, as if to shoot point-blank.

>While state budgets are struggling to fund people’s essential social needs, military spending is growing. Money is easily found for sophisticated weapons whose destructive power is comparable to that of the weapons of mass destruction; for submarines whose single salvo is capable of devastating half a continent; for missile defense systems that undermine strategic stability.

>Politicians and military leaders sound increasingly belligerent and defense doctrines more dangerous. Commentators and TV personalities are joining the bellicose chorus. It all looks as if the world is preparing for war.
43 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12154 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 11:46 am
12154 spacer


Happy new yea, Glorious People's Ministry of Propagandalad.
>> No. 12155 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 4:07 pm
12155 spacer
My argument is that you're unable to write a coherent post, which you have just demonstrated for a second time. How that reflects on your ability to think in general I'll not extrapolate on.
>> No. 12157 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 4:50 pm
12157 spacer

Thanks. Please enjoy this medley of patriotic songs.

>> No. 12161 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 9:21 pm
12161 spacer

>> No. 12162 Anonymous
30th January 2017
Monday 12:40 pm
12162 spacer

What. the fuck. is this.

>> No. 12036 Anonymous
26th January 2017
Thursday 11:54 am
12036 Explosion in Central Russian City
No concrete information yet, but from what I glean from google translating tweets about it Saratov Hydroelectric Power Station may have exploded.
9 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 12080 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 1:29 am
12080 spacer
The Tianjin videos are quite amazing. One of the weirdest, scariest things I've ever seen.
>> No. 12081 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 8:04 am
12081 spacer
One thing I learned from Tianjin and that Russian meteor - if there's a bloody great flash, don't look out the window...
>> No. 12084 Anonymous
27th January 2017
Friday 9:58 am
12084 spacer
I remember Buncefield making the windows shake and waking me up at 5am. I live 40 miles away.
>> No. 12132 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 1:09 am
12132 spacer
This video of the meteor gives me a hearty chuckle every time:

>> No. 12140 Anonymous
29th January 2017
Sunday 2:22 am
12140 spacer

Cz0GxkZWgAEN6Db.jpg large.jpg
>> No. 11885 Anonymous
17th December 2016
Saturday 4:32 pm
11885 PLU Have Failed
Not really news, but from a newspaper of sorts.
19 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 11912 Anonymous
22nd December 2016
Thursday 4:35 pm
11912 spacer
fuck neoliberalism
fuck socialism
fuck everything but the bancor and a return to the golden age of capitalism with mixed economies, but free from America fucking it up this time. give me that or give me death.

>but she got one thing right when she said that the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.
She then proceed to increase government spending and tax burden as a % of GDP. Ha!

Anyway: Socialism doesn't have to be centrally planned as it was in the USSR and the rest of it. You can (in theory) have an economy of co-operatives, or otherwise use market forces to direct investment while still keeping ownership with the workers instead of with the individual. (It doesn't even have to kill small or family businesses.)

But like I said earlier, fuck socialism anyway. get KEYNES'D
>> No. 11975 Anonymous
30th December 2016
Friday 2:01 pm
11975 spacer

NO it's much much more about a combination of SOCIALISM AND CAPITALISM because we can't we really exist properly without both. We need to succeed individually and together at the same time, as some people can and some people can't. We need to take care of the lessers and enable the performers...
>> No. 11976 Anonymous
3rd January 2017
Tuesday 4:54 pm
11976 spacer
>She then proceed to increase government spending and tax burden as a % of GDP. Ha!

She obviously meant that it's the money of the wealthy that you run out of.

It's fine if the downtrodden wage slaves run out of money. After all, they must always be reminded of their place in life.
>> No. 11977 Anonymous
3rd January 2017
Tuesday 9:50 pm
11977 spacer
They don't have anything to tax anyway, which is why nobody really bothers.
>> No. 11978 Anonymous
4th January 2017
Wednesday 1:32 am
11978 spacer
A combination of the workers owning the means of production and capital owning the means of production?

>> No. 11942 Anonymous
27th December 2016
Tuesday 6:51 pm
11942 Carrie Fisher 1956-2016

Good night, sweet princess.

Would it be wrong to crack one out in memorial?
10 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 11970 Anonymous
29th December 2016
Thursday 1:16 pm
11970 spacer
The conspiracy theorists must be struggling to keep up.
>> No. 11971 Anonymous
29th December 2016
Thursday 5:07 pm
11971 spacer
It's the Trump curse, hopefully 2017 will see the reaping of Jon Oliver and Bill Maher.
>> No. 11972 Anonymous
29th December 2016
Thursday 5:13 pm
11972 spacer

It seems our financial board is keeping them busy.
>> No. 11973 Anonymous
29th December 2016
Thursday 5:32 pm
11973 spacer

To be fair it is a bit suspicious. First George Michael, now this - I wonder what they knew about Hillary?
>> No. 11974 Anonymous
29th December 2016
Thursday 6:27 pm
11974 spacer

She doesn't have long left herself m8.

Delete Post []
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]