>>26835
Honestly where do these people find the energy? I can only assume their lives are boringly empty. Then again I'm not even sure I put as much energy as them into things I even like.

>>26841
Many of them are new to the internet - for them, trolling some wanker celebrity on Twitter is where many of us were about 15 years ago.

>>26842

Very good point. A lot of them are either very young or middle aged and only just discovering the internet.

I got into using the Steam Show website for a bit, but my interest tapered off quickly when I realised the reason behind a lot of the more idiotic "takes" was that the poster in question was probably about 17. At that age, I was only just waking up to the idea that TV licenses are a bit of a rip off- Imagine if I'd had all this to contend with.

The woke lot have their hearts in the right place but they're mostly young, suburban, middle class Americans, and what they don't realise yet is that a lot of their concepts and the paradigm through which they interpret politics, racial interactions, etc etc is mostly a function of their own specific demographic circumstances. Their idea of white privilege is just their own specific kind of suburban, affluent American privilege, that it doesn't occur to them not everybody shares. Their internet vitriol and twitter zealotry is a symptom of gradually realising their place in things.

Reassuringly, class based politics seems to be resurfacing among people who realise there's something not quite right about it all. The twitter hate mob haven't done themselves any favours by attempting to hypocritically cancel several high profile black people who have spoken out without sticking to the established narrative.

Anyway.

>>26783
>Their demands are so nebulous and unambitious they're either in it for the clout or a deeply insidious cult who daren't show the outside world even a little bit of what's behind the curtain lest the SBS get sent round for a cuppa and a chat. However, I find the latter option far less likely.

The Mail have been doing some digging into the social media of the leader of Foever Family Force, Khari McKenzie who goes by the rap name Raspect.

They've found anti-semitic posts, which seems to be increasingly common amongst rappers at the minute, anti-trans posts and anti-vaccination ones too.

I've seen a few posts suggesting the march was primarily a marketing exercise to funnel money into the company through PayPal donations, which apparently is to loan money and rent out office space to black businesses.

>>26875

It's an ancient conflict cycling back around on us for the modern age. If you buy into the whole historical whitewashing shtick and you think modern black people really wuz kangz n shiyet, which a lot of the most vocal groups seem to, then it's really no surprise they detest and see themselves as superior to the filthy Canaanites.

It's all incredibly daft. It's a lot like those pasty white lads who think they're the descendants of Vikings, as if the passing of over a thousand years of history doesn't render any tenuous link utterly irrelevant under hundreds of other factors over the years.

>>26881
I think in America a lot of it is related to Nation of Islam and its offshoots. They have a long history of blaming the struggles of black Americans on Jews.

>>26883
>>26881

I've said it before, but Pete Steele was right.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stjOxJuZfx4

>>26886
It seems like there might be an obvious reason for that, some sort of historical precedence that still has relevance today. Could be. I'm sure it's not though, just hilarity all round.

>>26884>>26886
Okay, retard.

BLM have held a rally in London to mark the anniversary of Mark Duggan's death.

I don't understand why they're calling for the police to be defunded. I get it in America but in this country the rozzers haven't been spared from austerity.

>>26892
Most folk in this country are happy to pretend to be Yanks, fight over Yank problems and generally pay no more attention to UK politics than calling Johnson a "prick". Actually they probably say "asshole" or "douchebag" now. I'm not against anti-racism protests, but "defund the police" is clearly the answer to America's problem of ultra-violent coppers who seem to have a force running every other street corner. I'm not going to sing the praises of this country's coppers, but to transplant Seppo problems directly onto our own is no way to solve anything.

I hate this country. It's just racists, pretend Americans, shit food and mishapen bits of tarmac in various stages of decay.

>>26893
Off you pop then.

>>26888

Not sure what your issue with the Carnivore track is. It's one of those that only a mouth breather takes at face value, which is of course part of the point.

Didn't see the other post since it's been deleted.

>>26894
Sorry, I didn't realise the UK itself was ITT, didn't mean to be impolite it's just that you're full of subnormal, non-people who'd be better off as fertiliser.

>>26896
Don't let the door hit you on the way out m7.

>>26892

Just imagine, if there was any intellectual honesty at all in this whole debate we'd have to start praising David Cameron and George Osbourne as socially progressive heroes.

I think I'd rather be shot by a policeman.

>>26897
What exactly upsets you so about what I said?

>>26893
Last night the police raided the premises of a, primarily black, youth anti-knife crime charity, on the grounds that they were going to take part in that rally. They arrested two youth workers for obstruction or something and a 14 year old on the grounds that they thought he smelled of weed.

This video gives you some idea of the work that charity does.

Here's an article with more information on what I'm on about:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/aug/07/london-police-station-blockaded-after-14-year-olds-arrest

It's probably quite easy to sit behind a keyboard and declare that it's just BLM are pretending to be Americans, and "our cops aren't racist see" but police actions like this are not all that different to Yank ones.

>>26903
Mate, I said in my post that I'm all for anti-racism protests. You won't hear me bellyaching about EPL players taking a knee or expressions of cross border solidarity. However, many people in this country are just as, if not more, invested in goings on in the US that problems that are facing the UK itself.

>>26904
Oh okay never mind then.

>>26903
What you've said happened and what the article says happened are different things.

>>26910
The order of some of the things has been garbled due to word of mouth but there's nothing in there that makes it less of a problem.

>>26912
>The order of some of the things has been garbled due to word of mouth

Oh, Anarchylad.

>>26913
Talking to people is anarchy? Does that make reading articles authoritarianism?

>>26912
According to the article the boy was arrested because he smelled of cannabis and they'd found drugs had been thrown nearby. The officers' vehicle was blockaded by people unhappy with what had happened so the police had to call in for reinforcements.

In your version there was a raid because of the Mark Duggan protest today and they arrested people for seemingly no reason.

I know there's issues with the Met, but your post is reminding me exactly of my work colleague who supports Tommy Robinson and spouts half-truths and absolute bollocks.

>>26915
That's fair. I was wrong and shouldn't have taken the hearsay I was told at face value.

>The BBC has received more than 18,000 complaints from the public after it broadcast a racial slur, amid growing internal staff discontent at the decision.

>A television news report on a racially aggravated hit-and-run attack on an NHS worker in Bristol featured a BBC journalist repeating the racist language allegedly shouted at the victim.

>“Just to warn you you’re about to hear highly offensive language,” said the reporter, before quoting the alleged attacker’s use of the N-word as they fled the scene. The report originally aired on the regional Points West bulletin, before being repeated on the national BBC News channel the following day.

>The BBC has defended its broadcast, saying the decision to report the racist language allegedly used in the attack was made following discussions with the victim and his family, who wanted viewers to appreciate the severity of the incident.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/aug/06/bbc-receives-18000-complaints-after-repeating-n-word-allegedly-used-in-attack

There seems to be more outrage over a BBC journalist repeating what was said during a racist attack than the actual racist attack itself.

>>26920

While I get the point, I also don't really see why the decision was made to have a reporter repeat it. Typically news reports just say "the N word" - is that not enough?

>>26923
Apparently the victim and family were determined that it should be used to let the public know the severity of the attack as it was initially reported as a hit and run without any racial motivation.

I can't ever recall the BBC quoting racial slurs during a news broadcast though.

>>26924
Yet the BBC also reported that the decision by senior staff to broadcast it did not include the family's wishes as a factor. Which means the BBC are only bringing it up as a cowardly excuse, it seems.

>>26937
Are you that thick-lad from yesterday?

>The BBC has defended its broadcast, saying the decision to report the racist language allegedly used in the attack was made following discussions with the victim and his family, who wanted viewers to appreciate the severity of the incident.

>“Notwithstanding the family’s wishes, we independently considered whether the use of the word was editorially justified given the context,” it said. “The word is used on air rarely, and in this case, as with all cases, the decision to use it in full was made by a team of people including a number of senior editorial figures.”

That means a two-stage test took place:
1. A subjective assessment from BBC staff and the family
2. An objective test from independent people - likely a panel of experts - on editorial justification

Have a word with yourself, n-word (nincompoop).

>>26938
The BBC have now apologised, although it largely seems to be an admission that they didn't realise people would get so uppity and offended by the utterance of the word by a white person.

How many people saw the broadcast and were offended? Vs how many people read about the broadcast later on twitter and decided they were offended?

>>26938
>the decision to use it in full was made by a team of people including a number of senior editorial figures.

It would be fascinating to hear what goes on in these meetings.

jfc

>>26941
"Where do we stand on 'sambo' being used? "

What has surprised me is that the general consensus on rudgwicksteamshow.co.uk is that the BBC were right to broadcast it; it was used in a factual context, there was a warning that they weren't going to be censoring offensive language during the report and it's better to put their audience in a fully informed position where they know what happened rather than sugar coating it and adding ambiguity - people, particularly those going about their lives completely sheltered from this sort of thing, need to be confronted with the shocking and disgusting reality of what happened and not a sanitised version.

>>26943
Why do you keep mentioning this particular site?

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>26944
Haven't you ever visited r/Britfa before?

>>26943
If the attacker had said "I'm going to rape your arsehole with a spike, motherfucker", would the BBC have also broadcast it in full, judging that people need to be confronted and informed with the disgusting reality etc.?

>>26946
Context is everything. The racist abuse is how we know it was a racially motivated attack.

>>26946
Interesting fact; black gangs in London now engage in a practice called 'bagging' where the victim, having been knocked to the floor, is assaulted rectally using a sharp object like a bike wheel spoke or kebab skewer. The objective is to shred the intestinal lining in a way that can't be repaired surgically so the humiliated victim is forced to use a colostomy bag for the rest of their life.

>>26944
It's a wordfilter for something else.

>>26948

This is the worst gay racist propaganda I've ever read on this site the most obvious part is the weasel words.
>black gangs in London now engage
That means if it isn't completely made up it probably happened once.

>the objective is to shred the intestinal lining in a way that can't be repaired surgically so the humiliated victim is forced to use a colostomy bag for the rest of their life.

So we have to watch out for packs of rogue BAME Doctors now the same way that cows have to look out for your friend of a friend who definitely does cow tipping and killed one once eh?

>>26950
My apologies, I'm sure it's limited to those notorious white gangs in London.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/knife-gangs-aim-to-humiliate-victims-for-life-770853nt3

>>26951
Can you come up with any other evidence than the Times article you originally quoted almost word for word and doesn't cite any examples? Or maybe it does beyond its paywall?

>>26952
Not that lad, but the Times article is based off something in GQ magazine.

When I remarked that must have been some knife, Metcalf shrugged: “Sometimes they use a kebab skewer.”

The scan showed two major concerns. The first was the patient’s colon, which had been perforated and would require surgery. He would likely require a colostomy bag, at least in the short term. Yet, among gangs, Metcalf told me, stabbing victims in the bowel is increasingly common and done on purpose to humiliate their victim.

“If you stab someone in the guts and you perforate the bowel, as a surgeon you just can’t close it up. Because it’s contaminated with faeces, there is a risk of getting infected. Therefore you have a colostomy bag, so your bowel is brought out into a bag, at least temporarily. It may be joined at a future stage when the bowels are all sterilised and clean.” It even has a name: it’s called bagging. “So they will aim to try and not just kill someone, but permanently disable them.”

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/article/st-marys-hospital-london-knife-crime

>>26953
So that's one?

>>26954

How much evidence do you really expect to find for a recently developed street gang practice? It's not like they have a wiki.

(I'm not the lad you were replying to, lest this assumption cause a cuntoff)

>>26953
>So they will aim to try and not just kill someone, but permanently disable them.

>>26957
As much evidence as for anything else we're saying is fact.