- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:1000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 1657 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts][ Reply ]
27 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown.
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 13682
>California just reduced the penalty for knowingly exposing someone to HIV from a felony to a misdemeanour.
>Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill that also covers blood donors who did not disclose to a blood bank that they are HIV-positive.
>“HIV has been the only communicable disease for which exposure is a felony under California law,” the LA Times reported.
>“Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals,” on of the co-sponsors of the bill Democratic State Senator Scott Wiener said.
>Mr Wiener said the law finally treats HIV like any other infectious disease.
>The current law requires an element of intent to be proved in order for a felony charge. Mr Wiener said it discourages people from even getting tested for HIV so that the element of intent is not present and they do not risk a felony charge.
>He said this new law will actually end new HIV infections because instead of threatening people with jail time, the state is providing an opportunity to get tested and access necessary medical care.
>Other supporters also said the new bill reduces what they felt was a disproportionate target on women working in prostitution as well.
>Opponents like Republican State Senator Joel Anderson said “it’s absolutely crazy to me that we should go light on this.”
>Mr Anderson argued that a felony charge is appropriate in cases where a person intentionally “alters” another person’s entire lifestyle and puts them on a rigorous lifelong regimen of medication.
Legal poz loads, lads.
|>>|| No. 13712
If you're infected with HIV, your viral load skyrockets after the immediate infection, then plateaus at a much lower level during the incubation phase. The first 12 weeks after infection are absolutely critical, because that's when most people pass on the disease.
This pattern of infection is why we see such stark disparities in infection rates between different communities. A typical western heterosexual person who engages in serial monogamy has a relatively low probability of passing on the disease, because the chances are fairly good that the initial highly infection phase will have passed before they change sexual partners. Gay men are far more likely to have a very large number of sexual partners, so the risk of passing on the disease is far greater. Africans are much more likely than westerners to habitually engage in non-monogamous relationships, which drastically increases the risk of viral transmission.
|>>|| No. 13718
As a straight male who is unashamed of his buttplug usage and as such carrying no such Freudian interpretation baggage; I can state unequivocally that the graph does indeed resemble a butt plug.
|>>|| No. 13719
>As a straight male who is unashamed of his buttplug usage
This sounds so deep into the closet the white witch is offering you turkish delight.
to a man with a hammer everything looks like a nail as they say.
|>>|| No. 13721
Are you really saying you must be gay if you like stuff up your arse?
Would you be surprised to learn a lot of gay men have never had anything up their arse?
|>>|| No. 13723
>Just because I am a man and have sex with other men, and like having sex with other men, and have a partner who is a man and have sexual fantasies about having sex with other men, and play with myself sexually in a manner that simulates another man penetrating me, that doesn't mean I am gay.
If it walks like a duckie and quacks like a duckie.
|>>|| No. 13724
>You really think straight people saying a graph looks like a buttplug is a sign of them being closet gays?
No I think sticking things shaped like cocks up your arse might be a tell tale sign though.
|>>|| No. 13726
sticking feathers up your bum is not part of a chicken's Modus operandi. Sticking cocks and cock like things up your arse is for a homosexual gentlemen though.
If I fix a toilet that makes me a plumber, if I talk in a bad italian accent and kick turtles to death it does not, even if I wear red and blue clothes.
|>>|| No. 13729
To further add to your mental confusion, I will let you in on a secret: I also enjoy furry fetish pornography and roleplay, and in that context I am more or less pansexual. Gender means nothing to me as long as the scenario is arousing.
Yet, in real life, I don't find the physical form of a man, or the idea of a cock going in me, remotely appealing. I have a girlfriend whom I shag regularly and vigorously. Indeed, sometimes she puts things in my butt, which may or may not be plugs.
Sexuality is not black and white. It's not even a sliding scale. Yet for all intents and purposes, I'm straight. I can't be gay or even bi when I have no actual interest in men; even if you think a fondness for having one's prostate tickled somehow indicates as such.
|>>|| No. 13731
>Yet for all intents and purposes, I'm straight.
Well lets be fair you aren't 'for all intents and purposes' straight now are you. You are as bendy as a rubber hose you probably beat yourself with. No ones going to mistake your preferance for that of the man on the clapham omnibus with statements like "Gender means nothing to me as long as the scenario is arousing." are they.
|>>|| No. 13732
God... Tilda Swinton feeding me Turkish Delight while I shag men.
|>>|| No. 13734
>>13733 how come everything is so black and white for you? what's it like? I personally fit under fluid and let me just take the time to say what a pleasure it is to find someone so concrete in their sexuality it really is great.
|>>|| No. 13735
You are either straight or not. You like your bum to get a stuffing, so that makes you gay, or at the very least - not straight.
|>>|| No. 13736
> No ones going to mistake your preferance for that of the man on the clapham omnibus
What if the man on the Clapham omnibus is on his way home from an all night fetish party in Vauxhall?
|>>|| No. 13737
To be fair to furryfetishbumfunlad, I'm pretty sure the definition of being gay is to be someone who is attracted to persons of their own sex.
|>>|| No. 13739
A lot of poor confused children who don't understand sexuality in this thread. Especially comments like this >>13735.
I'm straight but there are some very pretty men out there and I wouldn't mind seeing what having their cock in my mouth is like. You could call me bicurious if you insist but my overarching point is that labels can be bullshit.
|>>|| No. 13740
He thinks wanting anything up your bum is gay . That's the level he's on. I don't think he has any hope of understanding the true complex nature of sexual preferences.
|>>|| No. 13741
So sucking cock makes you not gay? You can define whatever however you want, but the bottom line is, if you like any of your holes getting a stuffing, then you are not straight.
Make you are homophobic and are afraid of calling yourself gay?
|>>|| No. 13743
>So sucking cock makes you not gay?
There are people who are "prison gay", especially if they are in for long sentences and have no other hope of experiencing intimacy. Also, some men in the porn industry are "gay for pay", meaning they will suck cock on-camera if the money is right, even if they don't swing that way in their private lives.
Also, it's not uncommon in adolescence to have homosexual experiences, but which are then not repated when a young person realises it doesn't do much for them. I know we're on the subject of guys noshing cock, but one of my exes told me she had sex with one of her female friends at age 16. But, having had sex with boys even before that, she said it was nice but didn't do much for her in the end, "because it's just more exciting to play with someone's penis in bed" (her exact words).
|>>|| No. 13745
>>Mate you are homophobic and are afraid of calling yourself gay?
if the person is gay solely then yes they are gay but, like most of the general populous its a grey area. If you are comfortable with who you are then fine but don't push labels onto people who still haven't figured it out. I didn't accept my bisexuality till I was 28. I knew I was from 10 but repressed it. It has caused me a lot of issues I won't go into, but labels are for those who want labels like the FurryLad and I have a lot of respect for him for saying that. But in the end, I think you just need to understand that your input is pointless and you should for all intents and purposes. Shut up.
|>>|| No. 13747
Right. Let me explain to you how it works. There are only two ways for a guy to go. Straight or gay. At the very least, I will accept not straight instead of gay, since a lot of homophobic cunts in the closet in this thread are having a teary. So you have straight or not straight.
If all you do is fuck holes, then you are not gay. This includes if you fuck guys too. If you like any of your holes stuffed with anything, then you are gay.
Women can't be gay. They are all straight.
How does this not make sense? It looks very logical to me. Those binary classes hinge on penetration, nothing else. You can create as many metaclasses as you want, but those two classes won't change.
Mate, you can make as many labels or categories as you want. You can call yourself attack helicopter raper if you want to, I don't care, and it doesn't change the fact that you are gay. Whether you like it or not, you are gay.
|>>|| No. 13748
just to throw petrol on the fire I call myself Asexual because I have no sexual interest in real people, but I wank like crazy. This is fun because people are generally most willing to dispute the existence of asexuality, admitting that some form of sexuality is there but has no implications for real life sex would - in person - be crazy.
Always seen sex as something only enjoyable in fiction, and that only really happens to other people. (Both of which make for a great analogy to war, when you think about it.)
since the necessary information to communicate is "I'm not interested in sex with anyone here" asexual is the most functional label (and a subset of it, "autochorissexual", is basically bang on.) although around women I'm often tended to either say I'm gay, or "asexual leaning gay" just to drive the point home that I'm not interested in them. (Since otherwise I almost certainly give off "nice guy" after sex vibes to women, but most men are unlikely to assume you're gay.)
labels are arbitrary. sometimes fun, sometimes tedious, always likely to cause arguments.
|>>|| No. 13752
>Those binary classes hinge on penetration, nothing else
Why do you say that like it's not something you just made up?
|>>|| No. 13755
Doubtful. If I was ever to have a romantic relationship (sex to one side) I could only ever imagine it would be with a man.
There's an interesting aside to this though - what do you call someone with no interest in living things [or ex living things, you dirty bugger]/sexual penetration whatsoever? What is some deviantart gentleman who's only sexually attracted to pool floats - or the infamous tile poster on the other place called?
(The answer, presumably, is "unhinged" but trying to fit it into the gay/straight model should be food for thought.)
|>>|| No. 13756
I know you're trolling, but on the subject of women you literally couldn't be more wrong because a recent study suggested no women were straight, i.e. at least bisexual.
|>>|| No. 13757
It isn't that hard, lad. You are straight. All those weirdos with their weird fetishes are straight up until something penetrates them. So you are straight up until you get a good dicking.
I am not trolling. Women aren't gay and they can never be gay.
|>>|| No. 13759
OK you're just getting tiresome now. Peter Hitchens-tiresome. Can a mod please ban this cunt so we can get back to discussing poz loads?
(A good day to you Sir!)
|>>|| No. 13763
So when you get a rectal examination at the doctors, where he puts his fingers up your bum and massages out some secretions, does it instantly make you gay?
|>>|| No. 13767
Why the hell do you keep replying to him? Just call his posts "BRILLIANT" and ignore the wanker.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ Last 50 posts ]