- Files: GIF, JPG, PNG, Maximum:10000 KB, Thumbnails: 600x600 pixels
- Currently 1604 unique user posts. View catalogue
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Posting mode: Reply [First 100 posts][ Reply ]
4 posts omitted. First 100 posts shown.
Expand all images.
|>>|| No. 20882
Gemma Watts: Woman posed as teenage boy on social media to sexually assault up to 50 girls, police reveal
A woman posed as a teenage boy to sexually assault up to 50 girls after grooming them on social media, police have revealed.
Gemma Watts, 21, pretended to be a boy called Jake as she preyed on girls aged between 14 and 16, wrapping her long hair into a baseball cap and wearing baggy clothes to cover her figure. She groomed victims on Instagram and Snapchat for weeks before finally setting up meetings, disguising herself so convincingly that the victims, their parents, and even some police officers did not realise she was female.
Watts, a former promising footballer, tricked the girls into sexual activity and sharing intimate photos as they believed she was their boyfriend. Some only discovered the truth about Watts’ gender when told by police. Detectives say as many as 50 teenage girls around the country may have fallen victim to Watts, who is facing a possible jail sentence today after being convicted of a string of sexual assault and grooming offences.
In November last year Watts admitted three charges of sexual assault, assault by penetration, and three counts of meeting a child following sexual grooming, but DC Phillippa Kenwright said she believes as many as 50 young girls around the UK may have been targeted.
|>>|| No. 20883
>Messages showed she showered young girls with complements
What is this, the Guardian?
|>>|| No. 20890
> disguising herself so convincingly that the victims, their parents, and even some police officers did not realise she was female
How the fuck does she look even remotely like a boy in the picture on the right. One without a hormone problem anyway.
It's depressing in its own way when you're an adult and you suddenly realise how utterly gullible teenage girls are, and when you then think that you could have had tonnes of shagging at that age with that knowledge.
|>>|| No. 20892
Honestly if someone walks into your house claiming to be a 16 year old boy, sort of looks like one and has someone else with them telling you they are a 16 year old boy, you'd probably buy it. Most adults don't want to tell a teenager how funny looking they are either.
|>>|| No. 20901
>Honestly if someone walks into your house claiming to be a 16 year old boy, sort of looks like one and has someone else with them telling you they are a 16 year old boy
I know you're not going to believe me, but I'm normally pretty good with spotting these things.
Most people evidently aren't, but I don't think you'd fool me.
|>>|| No. 20902
But are you going to mention it, and even if you did will your teenage child take notice? Especially in this age of 'gender as a social construct'.
|>>|| No. 20903
>Especially in this age of 'gender as a social construct'.
A girl dressed as a boy will still be physically a girl.
It occasionally still blows my mind that some people today think that that basic idea is no longer valid, or even offensive.
|>>|| No. 20906
Even a girl badly disguised as an ugly teenager boy gets more pussy than me!
|>>|| No. 20907
Even a girl badly disguised as an ugly teenager boy gets more pussy than me!
|>>|| No. 20909
Then maybe disguise yourself as a girl who's badly disguised as an ugly teenage boy.
When did .gs become third-rate gangsta rap or a shit American porn movie?
|>>|| No. 20911
You don't need a big mind if you can keep it nice and clean, and not pack it full of bullshit.
|>>|| No. 20914
Wouldn't it be more simple to let false ideas enter your hardware limited mind space in the first place?
|>>|| No. 20915
You'd need some sort of mechanism to keep them out which is an added complexity.
|>>|| No. 20916
I think we've had the critical thinking mechanism you're talking about since we first found a toxic berry similarly coloured to a nutritious berry.
|>>|| No. 20918
If I couldn't tell the difference between boys and girls how could I tell who to carpet-bagger and who to fart on?
|>>|| No. 20936
Tell who to carpet-bagger and who to fart on. Your reading comprehension is abysmal.
|>>|| No. 20937
That's just a fancy way of saying tell the difference between boys and girls you filthy carpet-bagger.
|>>|| No. 20939
I can't work out if I'd shag her or not. Looks like she'd be up for owt, including plunging a knife into you mid-sex.
|>>|| No. 20945
Yes, but as a fully fleshed out niche. Not just grainy footage of some council estate bint getting fucked.
|>>|| No. 20947
It wouldn't be authentically chav porn if it wasn't just grainy footage of some council estate bint getting fucked. "Fully fleshed out" in porn means some generic plastic surgery American looking tart wearing a brand new Addidas tracksuit while faking a Manc accent in a set done up to look like a bedroom with mis-matching football posters.
|>>|| No. 20949
Well, you can find a lot of deepfakes of Maislie Williams. That's as chavy as you could get without having to go into a council estate.
|>>|| No. 20950
There's plenty of that grainy stuff you're describing, but frankly any porn involving a UK bird is going to be de facto chav porn - not many upper class women tend to get into the industry.
|>>|| No. 20961
About fifteen years ago, I was walking around town and saw a very embarrassed and completely nude woman walk past me. I was a bit of a wreckhead at the time, so I wasn't entirely sure if I'd hallucinated it. Many years later, entirely by chance, I stumbled across that exact public nudism scene on PornHub.
There's nothing that'll put you off your stroke like unexpectedly seeing your younger self shambling past Dixons in an intoxicated fug.
|>>|| No. 20964
I'm reminded suddenly of a bird I used to talk to as a teenlad on MSN, I'd met her on AOL or Yahoo chat or something, she was an asian goth bird who was into kink at an impossibly young age, and inevitably she got into doing porn. I'm not even sure if she was legal by the point she started, but I still have the image imprinted in my mind of a video she sent me of her pissing in an Amsterdam back-alley.
What is it with that type of seedy, predatory amateur porn and public pissing? Probably responsible for turning me into the deviant I am today.
|>>|| No. 20965
For whatever reason there was an absolute glut of birds on Yahoo chat in the late 90s who were into all kinds of filth and kink at a ridiculously young age. I don't know if it was just that the internet at the time attracted a larger percentage of weirdos or what but I remember meeting lasses who were into being vacuum-packed, mutual self harm and blood play and all kinds of weird shit in between.
Personally I blame that Slipknot lot and that Marilyn Manson. Corrupting our kiddies. Fucking two-pin din plugs the lot of them.
|>>|| No. 20966
MSN Messenger used to have its own chat rooms, with a number of them meant to be 18+ but I was using them from the age of about 13. I met a lot of weirdos that way, lots of cyber sex.
|>>|| No. 20967
I really miss those days. I realise half of the "girls" I spoke to will have been old pedos trying to groom me, but it just isn't the same these days. You don't get lasses on POF quite as eager to show you their fanny on a grainy 320x240 webcam.
|>>|| No. 20968
>You don't get lasses on POF quite as eager to show you their fanny on a grainy 320x240 webcam.
Girls aged between 11 and 13 are increasingly being tricked and coerced into performing sexually over their own webcams, data suggests. The Internet Watch Foundation said 80% of the sexual selfies it found in its relentless trawl for images of child sexual abuse were of children this age.
Unfortunately you've got to target the youngsters if you're into that sort of thing, which isn't recommended.
|>>|| No. 20969
Wish I'd known about that. When we got the internet, the first thing I looked for was the game I played on the school PC (Wolfenstein 3D).
I ended up at werewolf.com. AIM'd loads of people on there, one of them introduced me to a furry forum, and from there I ended up getting into the sex chatrooms at 13, posing as a 21 year old (because 18 would be too obvious, right?). Great times. Really fucked up but very interesting.
There were some absolute melts on there, I ended up getting banned at 17 for failing to provide ID after getting sick of people's shit and calling out the wrong people, but just bowed out and took it as a win.
Saw so many people get banned for being underage in that time.
Do you think getting into that stuff at 13 warped you? I'm wondering if it did me, but my actual fetish (incest) seemed to progress quite naturally from having a horrendously fit cousin I didn't meet until puberty.
|>>|| No. 20970
> The Internet Watch Foundation said 80% of the sexual selfies it found in its relentless trawl for images of child sexual abuse were of children this age.
I wonder how advanced the IWF's machine learning algorithms are that they can cyber-carbon-date fannies at 320x240 webcam resolution.
|>>|| No. 20971
>my actual fetish (incest) seemed to progress quite naturally from having a horrendously fit cousin I didn't meet until puberty
Seeing as 90% of porn these days seems to be step-mum or step-sister I reckon incest is going to become a lot more common.
|>>|| No. 20976
Perhaps it's all the trump voter septics wanting to see illegal alien mexican porn. Like, suck my dick or I'm calling ICE type scenarios.
|>>|| No. 20977
You wouldn't need to search for incest porn because it's constantly plastered all over the front page. But anyway, I suspect that list is
doctored curated to be quite honest. I mean it's bad optics even for a pornographer to put out an ad that says "hey everyone, we are world's leading purveyor of incest porn".
|>>|| No. 20978
This was back about 15 years ago, the only stuff I could get was on the Kristen Archives. Was quite nice to see it blow up in a way, but now it just makes it that much harder to find decent content in the sea of dross.
|>>|| No. 20983
Does having a big arse make you want to get shagged up the arse and/or watch other women get shagged up the arse?
|>>|| No. 20984
Does having a big belly mean you're more likely to want to be filled up with food?
|>>|| No. 20988
So why do Arabs like anal so much then?
Isn't porn censored completely in those countries?
|>>|| No. 20989
They just bugger everyone and everything. Look what happened to Gaddafi when he was captured.
|>>|| No. 20991
I just did a google picture search with the words "arab anal".
It's kind of disturbing to see women wearing nothing but a hijab engaged in hardcore porn.
Or maybe I'm just wondering what the point of a head scarf is if someone's got her minge and bumhole spread so wide that you can see up to her teeth.
|>>|| No. 20992
I went to uni with a lass who always wore a niqab. She gave me a right stonk on. There was something about her eyes, the only part of her I could see, that was fiery and passionate.
Halal on the streets. Haram between the sheets.
|>>|| No. 20993
There was a group of girls, well, three or four of them, at my university who also always dressed in traditional eskimo garments, with few exceptions, and they largely stayed among themselves and didn't seem to have many non-Arab friends.
We referred to their clique as the suicide bombers. Which was of course massively politically incorrect, but it made for a few jokes about it between me and my friends, like, during a boring as fuck maths lecture, with those girls sitting ten feet behind us, my mate said to me, "Can't we just get this over with and have the girls push their button".
|>>|| No. 20994
>We referred to their clique as the suicide bombers.
>they largely stayed among themselves and didn't seem to have many non-Arab friends.
Weird, huh? Fucking moron.
|>>|| No. 20997
No, you're just not funny. The fact you're bringing up that joke your mate made, probably seven to twelve years after the fact tells me what kind of a cretin you are.
|>>|| No. 20999
Too right mate, not all eskimos are daft militant wogs. It's important we defend the rights of darkies to inspire fear wherever they go by isolating themselves and dressing in traditional daft militant wog garb. I bet that cunt didn't even think his mate's joke was funny, he was just doing it to be racist.
|>>|| No. 21000
So it's fine to objectify eskimo women, like otherlad did a few posts up, but heaven forbid you bring up one poor taste joke from one or two decades ago.
|>>|| No. 21002
Objectifying Asian women means you're treating them equally with normal women. It's difficult to see it as being prejudiced.
|>>|| No. 21003
So as long as you treat everybody equally badly, there's nothing wrong with it?
|>>|| No. 21011
Pretty much. Not every demographic is a monolith. If I take the piss out of Caitlyn Jenner, how's it punching down exactly? She's fucking loaded and has no shame about being a murderer.
|>>|| No. 21012
Depends if the joke is about her or if it's about trans women and you've just applied it to her.
So if you make a joke about her being a cunt then that's fine, but if you make a joke about how she has a penis and will never be a real woman then that's punching down.
|>>|| No. 21013
> but if you make a joke about how she has a penis and will never be a real woman
Hasn't she already gone ahead and had the ol' choppity chop chop?
|>>|| No. 21014
Might be contrarian, but 'real woman' seems a I won't argue she's not a woman, but she's a different type of woman. You can be born a woman, or transition to being a woman, and you're a woman either way, but they're not the same kind of thing. I can adopt a kid or spawn one. I'm still their dad, they're still my kid, but it's different. It's just a different kind of thing, but still under the same umbrella.
I think this might not be too relevant though, I originally made this argument on a post on a quagmire of a topic about how it can be transphobic to stop being attracted to a woman when you find out they used to be a man. I'm going to shut up now, this isn't an organic derailment.
|>>|| No. 21015
One could make the argument that an adoptive father could be seen as 'more' of a dad or more reasonably probably just a very good example of a dad, since he made the difficult and 'unnatural' choice to love and care for a child that is not genetically his.
So somebody willing to undergo invasive surgery and quite a bit of social stigma to be a woman, is probably about as 'real' and dedicated to womanhood as it gets.
|>>|| No. 21016
Isn't it a bit sexist and ableist to imply there's an ideal of womanhood that men are better at achieving than women?
|>>|| No. 21017
Not really, as I said 'dedicated to' not 'the best at' which are very different things.
My point is inherently ridiculous for other reasons, such as the implication that 'becoming' a woman is a choice you make, which isn't particularly congruous with our current understanding of gender dysphoria.
|>>|| No. 21020
>One could make the argument that an adoptive father could be seen as 'more' of a dad or more reasonably probably just a very good example of a dad, since he made the difficult and 'unnatural' choice to love and care for a child that is not genetically his.
One could, but then you'd be a troll or a fool - it takes a village to raise a child and all, I don't understand why you'd use inverted commas in 'unnatural', that's baity. People want to raise kids, it's how we've come this far.
It's also quite disgusting a premise, as your argument at face value explicates that a biological father is 'less' of a father than an adoptive one. That's absurd. These are things people *want* to do, it doesn't make them any less or more anything. They're still parents.
Every individual is just that, an individual, while you're talking about monolithic social constructs which I don't think is the right approach.
I didn't say anything about 'more' or 'less'. I said 'different'. You inferred that, which is why it's so fucking hard to discuss this topic reasonably. You had to bring 'more' or 'less' into this.
Why do you feel compelled to do that?
>So somebody willing to undergo invasive surgery and quite a bit of social stigma to be a woman, is probably about as 'real' and dedicated to womanhood as it gets.
And yet you've still got to use 'real', not real, when saying this because you're aware there's a difference. Isn't this some 'no true Scotsman' stuff at work here?
If what you're saying were actually the case, then it'd be a mark of pride to transition, yet the ultimate goal is to *pass* and to be integrated as such. Delving into the quagmire of trans discussions on reddit this is something I have never seen, so I think I've been proper stormfagged here. Oops.
I appreciate that you may be playing devils advocate, so I should probably tone down the opening of my response, but I won't, because two people playing devil's advocate at each other doesn't really work, so I'll give you my honest opinion and we can keep debating.
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]