[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / zoo ] [ g / e / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / com / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni ] [ bint / geez ] [ o ]
logo
politics
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
whiteline
anarchyfags.jpg
207282072820728
>> No. 20728 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 4:14 pm
20728 spacer
recycle
I've just seen the following event advertised on IM and wondered if Search, Commiefag or Anarchyfag were going?

It would be nice if there was a genuine return to mayday as something of value though.

http://meltdown.uk.net/election/The_Plan_Mayday.html
14 posts and 2 images omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20768 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 8:35 pm
20768 spacer
recycle
>>20757

>overthrow the world governments and banking with gardening

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
>> No. 20769 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 8:36 pm
20769 spacer
recycle
>>20765

I think you've mistaken me for someone else.
>> No. 20770 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 8:38 pm
20770 spacer
recycle
>>20768

Have a go at thinking about it a bit.
>> No. 20771 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 8:45 pm
20771 spacer
recycle
>>20769

There are only three of us here so that could happen.
>> No. 20772 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 8:54 pm
20772 spacer
recycle
Anyone who has any real chance of changing or challenging the system of banking as it stands now would be destroyed, one way or another. You have no chance whatsoever at success unless you are willing to risk or sacrifice everything in this effort.

whiteline
ukip_179674t.jpg
206352063520635
>> No. 20635 Anonymous
3rd March 2010
Wednesday 2:02 am
20635 spacer
recycle
1. It would keep him out of the European parliament.

2. It would kick Bercow in the nuts and show we mean business about expenses abuse.

3. It would be very very amusing.

(I hate myself for thinking this but)

VOTE NIGEL
5 posts omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20738 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 10:26 pm
20738 spacer
recycle
>>20637
Too bad UKIP has no intention of leaving it. Lol @ putting up PRO-EU candidates as EU MEPs because no other party would have them.

UKIP exists for those lucky enough to get to run for office to make money, that is all.
>>20646
There's really only one party committed to that. Too bad you're likely too big of a pussy to vote for them.
>> No. 20741 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 11:10 pm
20741 spacer
recycle
>>20738
>>There's really only one party committed to that. Too bad you're likely too big of a pussy to vote for them.

If there ever was an award for most obvious Simon post ever it would be yours. In fact it could not be more Simon if you posted a timestamped picture of Simon wanking along with it.
>> No. 20742 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 11:13 pm
20742 spacer
recycle
>>20741
No, he's obviously Texan...
>> No. 20755 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 6:00 am
20755 spacer
recycle
>>20741
http://ukipwatch.org/
Fun stuff.
>> No. 20767 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 7:48 pm
20767 spacer
recycle
>>20738
You fail.

whiteline
my-poster-from-cameronizer-dot-com.jpg
198061980619806
>> No. 19806 Anonymous
18th January 2010
Monday 2:36 pm
19806 spacer
recycle
Who will you be voting for in the General Election?

Lib Dem here
193 posts and 12 images omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
>> No. 20710 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 6:56 pm
20710 spacer
recycle
KingLouie.jpg
207102071020710
>>20677
hmm mugabe... I can't be the only one seeing this resemblance.
>> No. 20739 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 10:36 pm
20739 spacer
recycle
>>20578
>BNP = "Islamophobia" and propagation of unnecessary cross-ethnic distractions
>unnecessary cross-ethnic distractions
Because multi-ethnic states have worked out so well every other time they've been tried in history. Enjoy your Yugoslavia you blissfully ignorant cunt.
>> No. 20740 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 10:38 pm
20740 spacer
recycle
>>20739
Ah we've missed you. How have you been?

That Arlington, Texas proxy sticks out a mile BTW.
>> No. 20748 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 1:05 am
20748 spacer
recycle
>>20740
unless is Texan from /int/

also, Mugabe backwards?

Ee ba gum.
>> No. 20754 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 5:57 am
20754 spacer
recycle
>>20740
Quite well, thanks. Was on a week long cruise. Excellent food.

As for the proxy, I like to be consistent.

whiteline
broadcasters-step-up-debate-pressure-on-pm-$704160.jpg
207312073120731
>> No. 20731 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 5:29 pm
20731 spacer
recycle
Curiously, one thing that's left open to the broadcaster is the opening and closing credits. Rule 68 states that "each broadcaster [is] responsible for their own titles, music, branding etc". If I was running ITN – which, at the time of writing, I'm not – I'd make the most of this sole crumb of freedom by creating an insanely inappropriate title sequence in which a claymation Brown, Cameron and Clegg take turns performing sex acts on a cow, a kettle and a hole in the ground, all of it backed by the old It's a Knockout theme tune. Then it abruptly cuts live to the studio, where all three leaders have been waiting to speak, watching with mounting horror as this sickening cartoon unfolded on the monitors. As they storm out, a body language expert analyses their facial expressions, and the studio audience waves giant foam hands around. It might not affect the election either way, but who cares: that's entertainment.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/08/charlie-brooker-political-debates

I love him.
  View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20750 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 1:06 am
20750 spacer
recycle
>>20731

Jacob?
>> No. 20752 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 1:15 am
20752 spacer
recycle
>>20750
Jack?(I'm not op btw)
>> No. 20753 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 1:44 am
20753 spacer
recycle
Seeing as he's pictured - how on Earth did Nick manage to drive his party into such obscurity during a time that should be ideal for a third party? He's nicknamed "The Invisible Man" by his peers and his party seems to lack presence in the media. Are they being ignored by the media or are they sitting about just rotting and forgetting about the whole politics thing?

whiteline
david-cameron.jpg
207162071620716
>> No. 20716 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 10:42 am
20716 spacer
recycle
So Mr Cameron is going to roll into town in the near future and put on one of his "Cameron Direct" meetings.

I'm interested in politics but not political in the sense that I'm not a major fan of any party. I've applied to go along. If I get my name on the door, what shall I ask him?
6 posts omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20723 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 2:03 pm
20723 spacer
recycle
>>20719

Of course, Brown's doing a fantastic job.
>> No. 20735 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 9:03 pm
20735 spacer
recycle
You should find out about some local job losses, preferably in the wake of a foreign takeover, and ask him what he was going to do to save those jobs. Then, whenever he starts drifting into the generic, contradict 'no, the jobs in this water pistol factory in Mongdon on Trent' or wherever it is.
>> No. 20743 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 11:38 pm
20743 spacer
recycle
>>20716

ask him if he's got a sensible drugs policy up his sleeve or whether its the same bullshit from a different arsehole.
>> No. 20744 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 11:43 pm
20744 spacer
recycle
Ask him for details of how he plans to secure the future for the indigenous population or if it's just going to be more exporting British jobs abroad and funding foreign workers in this country.
>> No. 20746 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 12:16 am
20746 spacer
recycle
>>20744
I literally could not read what you wrote. Every time I tried this vivid image of featureless grey fog rolled into my head and I had to stop.

whiteline
ancyouthleague_logo2.gif
206482064820648
>> No. 20648 Anonymous
3rd March 2010
Wednesday 4:38 pm
20648 British racists 'disgust' ANCYL recycle
Hmmm....

>Johannesburg - The ANC Youth League was disgusted by the British media's reports on President Jacob Zuma during his official state visit to the country, a spokesperson said.

>Floyd Shivambu said the British media seemed to have developed a habit of rubbishing Zuma and constantly portraying him as barbaric and of inferior belonging.

>"It is quite apparent that the British media is one that is characterised and defined by the worst form of barbarism, backwardness and racism," said Shivambu.

>"These British racists continue to live in a dreamland and sadly believe that Africans are still their colonial subjects, with no values and principles."

http://www.news24.com/Content/SouthAfrica/News/1059/1ce383b6a1fe4112a97c54b38e4605a8/03-03-2010-02-20/British_racists_disgust_ANCYL
13 posts and 1 image omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20686 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 7:33 pm
20686 spacer
recycle
>>20683

>Italy being one of the creators of National Socialism

Some mistake shurely?
>> No. 20696 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 7:02 pm
20696 spacer
recycle
>>20686

Sorry, a bit of a brainfart there. I meant to say facism but my mental programming from years of shitty media depicting a effective governmental system as evil because of a bunch of corrupt and depraved loonies that were incharge leaked through.
>> No. 20727 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 3:52 pm
20727 spacer
recycle
>>20696

You lump the media together as one entity?
>> No. 20729 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 4:55 pm
20729 spacer
recycle
>>20727
Don't we all?
>> No. 20737 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 10:24 pm
20737 spacer
recycle
>>20648
>The ANC Youth League
The same group that's repeatedly made death threats and racist comments against the few remaining white South Africans is calling the british media racist? If I remember correctly they even went as far as threatening genocide if the ANC was voted out of the southern bit of South Africa.

Awwww, how cute.

The ANC is about as anti-white as blacks can get. If any of you take them seriously I feel pity for you.

whiteline
1267967443526.jpg
207032070320703
>> No. 20703 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 1:36 pm
20703 spacer
recycle
Is anyone up to date with these two? There seems to be something going on but it's not obvious what.
6 posts omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20714 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 5:23 am
20714 spacer
recycle
The only thing that I think should be released is the crime he committed.
>> No. 20724 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 3:08 pm
20724 spacer
recycle
>>20709
>They've done their time, leave them alone; they are no-one's responsibility but the state's.
We are the state.
>> No. 20726 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 3:50 pm
20726 spacer
recycle
126453975691.jpg
207262072620726
>>20724

A state of sad affairs.
>> No. 20730 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 4:59 pm
20730 spacer
recycle
>>20724
No, you're not. You are a pleb posting on an imageboard. You are not a member of the police, or the judiciary, or the Ministry of Justice. In other words, you, and the rest of the public, are not qualified to legally mete out punishment for offenders fairly, sensibly and accountably.
>> No. 20745 Anonymous
9th March 2010
Tuesday 12:14 am
20745 spacer
recycle
please tell me none of you thought the fact the op image was a shoop was worth mentioning

whiteline
YBF.png
206892068920689
>> No. 20689 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 11:16 am
20689 Coming to a country near you... recycle
The link below seems to confirm at least a few of our suspicions about the influence of the USA on domestic politics. Certain Tories feel the way to proceed is to imitate the rejection of the 'reality based community' by the populist Republican wing. Details below of the training given to eleven new candidates:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/06/tory-madrasa-young-britons-foundation

In a related point, this story about the rise of 'patriot' groups in the USA -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/04/us-surge-rightwing-extremist-groups
4 posts and 1 image omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20697 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 7:05 pm
20697 spacer
recycle
>>20689

So basically it would be a system where your parents would need to be affected by Super Tax and require you to be from a pretigious family?

Only qualifications I can see the Conservatives ever needing.

I hope this is not moving forward because we have enough brain washing with our current tabloid papers which adults read that always back either Cons or Labour. This just makes sure that the party gets a certain amount of votes in a certain area thanks to programming youths that they are the best bet for the future.

Sort of like Labour and their welfare policy.
>> No. 20698 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 11:08 pm
20698 spacer
recycle
>>20689

Israel bears the heaviest influence on both the UK and US. Anything else is mindless, hot-button drivel.
>> No. 20702 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 12:06 pm
20702 spacer
recycle
>>20689
The Guardian is frothing at the mouth at the moment. As a probable Tory-voting Guardian-reader I find this very amusing indeed.

When will the debate turn to some of the loonies who fund Labour? Ashcroft is odious but the Tories are taking a tactical line with him. Spend the money, win the election and then get rid.
>> No. 20712 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 8:29 pm
20712 spacer
recycle
>>20702

So you would think.......
>> No. 20713 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 9:08 pm
20713 spacer
recycle
>>20702
Five pounds says you're wrong.

whiteline
Falklands_585x350_689637a.jpg
205442054420544
>> No. 20544 Anonymous
25th February 2010
Thursday 7:07 pm
20544 spacer
recycle
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falkland Islands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London, Buenos Aires and at the UN.

Despite Britain’s close alliance with the US, the Obama Administration is determined not to be drawn into the issue. It has also declined to back Britain’s claim that oil exploration near the islands is sanctioned by international law, saying that the dispute is strictly a bilateral issue.


Part of me is glad that the US is taking a neutral stance. But I think they could have offered some help considering how many of our troops are out there fighting their war.
39 posts and 5 images omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20685 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 6:29 pm
20685 spacer
recycle
>>20684

You mean we need Submarines armed with cruise missiles? Check ... next?
>> No. 20688 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 10:04 pm
20688 spacer
recycle
>>20680
I meant pointedly assembling a back-up which, despite using electronics in standard service, has the capability to fall back entirely on mechanical systems should the need arise.
>> No. 20690 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 12:50 pm
20690 spacer
recycle
>>20688
What you're saying is we need to relaunch HMS Victory.
>> No. 20692 Anonymous
6th March 2010
Saturday 12:53 pm
20692 spacer
recycle
>>20690

No, he is saying something akin to HMS Belfast which is almost all mechanical apart from the modernisations they performed on her.
>> No. 20725 Anonymous
8th March 2010
Monday 3:11 pm
20725 spacer
recycle
>Part of me is glad that the US is taking a neutral stance. But I think they could have offered some help considering how many of our troops are out there fighting their war.
I thought that, but in fairness, someone needs to break the cycle. Maybe next time we won't be so eager to help out the US with its own oil interests.

whiteline
UnitedKingdom7JanuaryfromSpace.jpg
206572065720657
>> No. 20657 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 11:51 am
20657 spacer
recycle
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/04/lords-digital-economy-bill

The Liberal Democrats forced through a surprise amendment to the bill's notorious clause 17 on Wednesday – in a move that dealt a defeat to the government but troubled critics, who suggest it will have the opposite effect that its creators intend.

Instead of sweeping new powers that threatened sweeping alterations to British copyright law, the Lib Dems added a clause that gives extra oversight to the high court.

The new proposal – which was passed in the House of Lords by 165 votes to 140 – gives a high court judge the right to issue an injunction against a website accused of hosting a "substantial" amount of copyright infringing material, potentially forcing the entire site offline.


There goes my plan of voting for the lib dems.
Pic unrelated.
  View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20675 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 8:35 am
20675 spacer
recycle
>>20657

Wow. Seriously? What is our government thinking? Youtube already has rather strict copyright policies and if approached will remove any breach in the policy.

They seriously think of banning this is pretty unfair on the whole freedom of information thing. it isn'tthe same as torrenting or such since it is literally a T.V show on the intertubes open to everyone.

I fucking hate the House of Lords for their assholish dickery.
>> No. 20682 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 5:26 pm
20682 spacer
recycle
I remember reading around the time the Tories were proposing putting our health records online that Cameron's cronies are pretty cosy with Google. This could turn out to be a good thing if they lobby the Tories against the introduction of such legislation.

whiteline
some cunt.png
206522065220652
>> No. 20652 Anonymous
3rd March 2010
Wednesday 6:20 pm
20652 spacer
recycle
http://en.sevenload.com/videos/3DoEQKD-Dispatches-britains-islamic-republic

I'd have linked to youtube but Channel 4 are being bumdersn and chucking copyright bollocks everywhere.

If you don't want to watch it, it's basically Andrew Gilligan accusing the Islamic Forum of Europe of infiltrating Tower Hamlets council and Tower Hamlets Labour party and proceeding to dry bum the democratic process.
Anyone see it?
Thoughts?
  View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20664 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 6:16 pm
20664 Copy/Paste recycle
>>20652
Watched most of the documentary, nothing particularly surprising if you live in/near such an area.


Channel 4’s Dispatches programme broadcast last night has confirmed the accuracy of Nick Griffin’s warning during his famous “free speech trial” six years ago, that the teachings of radical Islamist philosopher Abul A’la Mawdudi were being widely used in Britain as part of a subversion programme.

“I was put on trial for warning that radical Islamists posed a serious threat to Britain,” Mr Griffin told BNP News last night after watching the Channel 4 show.

During Mr Griffin’s trial — at which he was ultimately acquitted — he made reference to Abul A’la Mawdudi and his works, specifically the book Let us be Muslims published by the Islamic Foundation (UK) .

Mr Mawdudi’s teachings featured in the Channel 4 show which revealed how Islamists had used the pro-immigration and pro-multicultural positions of the establishment parties to seize control of Tower Hamlets borough council and to effectively take over parts of the Labour Party in East London.

The Islamists are also influencing the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats in particular, the show revealed.

“In my court case, I pointed out that even the so-called ‘moderate’ Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) was being influenced by Mr Mawdudi’s worldview,” Mr Griffin said.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 20665 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 7:21 pm
20665 spacer
recycle
Channel 4 are blowing this way out of proportion.
>> No. 20670 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 10:11 pm
20670 spacer
recycle
no. its not being acknowleged enough

islamists can fuck off back to their shithole countries and be oppresed over there
>> No. 20671 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 10:52 pm
20671 spacer
recycle
Watched it, and thought it was an interesting documentary (though undeserving of the Daily Mail-worthy title). Also reminded me of mutterings in Private Eye's Rotten Boroughs column along similar lines.
>> No. 20679 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 1:50 pm
20679 spacer
recycle
>>20670
I'll drink to that. Yes, drink. That'll show them...
sage for nowt of value.

whiteline
vote.jpg
206602066020660
>> No. 20660 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 1:41 pm
20660 spacer
recycle
>UK policies on climate change, trade and war affect millions of people around the world. They have no vote. Give them yours.
Why not give your vote to an Afghani?
http://themakingof.giveyourvote.org/about/
  View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20661 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 3:47 pm
20661 spacer
recycle
I don't get a say on Afghan governmental policy even though it affects me.
Why doesn't an Afghan give me their vote?
>> No. 20666 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 7:22 pm
20666 spacer
recycle
>>20661
It does not affect you. Don't be silly, lad.
>> No. 20668 Anonymous
4th March 2010
Thursday 9:30 pm
20668 spacer
recycle
>>20666
Did you type that with a straight face?

whiteline
Iraqi-prime-minister-Nuri-001.jpg
206052060520605
>> No. 20605 Anonymous
1st March 2010
Monday 12:30 pm
20605 spacer
recycle
A senior Iraqi spy has accused the prime minister, Nour al-Maliki, of handing out thousands of guns to tribal leaders in a bid to win votes. The claim was made by Iraqi National Intelligence Service former spokesman, Saad al-Alusi, a week before Iraq's general election, in which allegations of vote buying and exorbitant handouts have become widespread.

Maliki, who faces a bitterly contested final week of campaigning ahead of the7 March poll, has been photographed handing out guns to supporters in southern Iraq, engraved with a personal message from his office. However he denies that the delivery of weapons, along with cash payments, were improper.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/28/iraqi-prime-minister-nour-al-maliki

Awesome! This is how the Tories need to think if they're going to bag this election good and proper, hand out cash and automatic weapons!
  View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20606 Anonymous
1st March 2010
Monday 2:52 pm
20606 spacer
recycle
The Tories would certainly get my vote.
>> No. 20607 Anonymous
1st March 2010
Monday 2:57 pm
20607 spacer
recycle
Sounds like a plan, and I can totally see the untermensch locally known as chavs totally not abusing it.
>> No. 20621 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 10:56 am
20621 spacer
recycle
Now this is the kind of man we need in politics here.
>> No. 20640 Anonymous
3rd March 2010
Wednesday 7:56 am
20640 spacer
recycle
At the rate of things I wouldn't be surprised if someone related to him gets into the PM position, what with Labours mass citizenship thing.

I don't mind muslims in the slightest but when you have a religion that bands together on this sort of thing then I would put my moneyof a muslim PM getting record numbers of votes from muslim constituents, just like Obama did for Blak Amurika.
>> No. 20644 Anonymous
3rd March 2010
Wednesday 12:18 pm
20644 spacer
recycle
>>20640

Obama won because he had a majority of white voters. Yes he may have had 90% of the black vote but Blacks are a minority of voters (especially in the states Obama needed in order to win the presidency).

In fact the more I think about this post the more retarded I realise it is.

whiteline
124899516783.jpg
203942039420394
>> No. 20394 Anonymous
13th February 2010
Saturday 3:17 pm
20394 spacer
recycle
http://www.youtube.com/v/dzj_EMwZ4Bc

David Cameron pretending to be as Old Labour as possible.

I hate this piece of shit. I hate how be pretends to be down with DA YOUF. I hate how he was against all the things he now 'supports', like Sure Start and the minimum wage. I hate how he uses Daily Mail talking points of benefit scroungers and a BROKEN BRITAIN. Britain isn't broken. The right-wing have been saying this as long as they have existed. I hate how a privaledged Old Etonian talks about ending poverty in this country. He says poverty stems from 'family breakdown' but it's actually stems from the lack of social mobility and a dire education system; something the right-wing like to pretend they care about but don't really. I hate how he still supports marrige as some magical solution to family breakdown. Marriages are increasingly breaking down because women have become more independant, and feel they don't have to stay in a marrige for the sake of it. I hate how he talks about improving health services in the poorest areas, while he plans to privatise as much of the NHS as possible.

And why is there absolutly no talk of climate change? Is it because this wanker rides a bike around in front of teh cameras while a bunch of 4X4s carrying his stuff follow him?

To top it off, he only talks about the Labour Party; both parties are intent on keeping this a two-horse race because its in their and the ruling class's best interest. Whoever gets elected, THEY WIN.

Why are the 'modern' conservative party trying to be as Old Labour as possible?
34 posts and 7 images omitted.   View ]Hide ]Expand ]Reply ]
>> No. 20630 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 7:07 pm
20630 spacer
recycle
>>20629

Why on earth do you care? It doesn't remotely matter if Nicholas Winterton wipes his chin on his servants, wears a monocle and calls everyone who hasn't been knighted "plebs".

Labour has failed spectacularly, more than any government in the last 40 years. The figures of youth unemployment and economic inactivity are extremely worrying for the long-term future of this country.

The fact that you're remotely interested in some ponce MP's train travels rather than the deep-rooted economic problems this country has, massively exacerbated by 12 years of Labour, shows that you're frankly a bit deluded.

If you don't want to accept that the stats show that Labour has done far more damage than any Tory government, you need to go elsewhere.
>> No. 20631 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 7:09 pm
20631 spacer
recycle
>>20629

Hilariously, you attack Tory Toffs when youth unemployment was higher under them. You attack Tory Toffs when more people were working under them. You're not making any sense.
>> No. 20632 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 7:56 pm
20632 spacer
recycle
ITT: WAG gets trolled to tears. Get back to your bottle of Cider, I've heard you talking shit on that shitty "Anarchist" podcast. You're funny at best and tiresome at worst.
>> No. 20633 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 10:37 pm
20633 spacer
recycle
>>20631

What're you talking about?
>> No. 20634 Anonymous
2nd March 2010
Tuesday 10:40 pm
20634 spacer
recycle
>>20630

Yes, it matters a great deal. The tories are the best alternative, but that doesn't exempt them from criticism, whatsoever. Stop being a cunt. Read words.

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
Previous[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]