[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  []
close
whiteline
tonedeaf.png
835588355883558
>> No. 83558 Anonymous
22nd October 2017
Sunday 4:15 am
83558 spacer
He jokingly called a man "bitch".

He jokingly invited a man to play-act a blowie, and the "bitch" willingly complied.

That was an act that seriously undermines Parliament, but apparently fucking with the constitution to govern like a quasi-dictatorship is just fine.
40 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83606 Anonymous
29th October 2017
Sunday 5:51 pm
83606 spacer
>>83604
Play the ball, not the man.

>>83605
>Obscure internet posts seems like something O’Mara wouldn't be consciously aware of

He was making the posts around the time he became a Labour councillor, so he can't really use the excuse it was before he joined politics.
>> No. 83607 Anonymous
29th October 2017
Sunday 6:16 pm
83607 spacer
>>83605
You used to use your real name?

I guess I have to be thankful for my severe paranoia and schizophrenia. The voices are sometimes right.
>> No. 83608 Anonymous
29th October 2017
Sunday 7:17 pm
83608 spacer
>>83606
I'd say he can. In the early 00s it's not something that would pop into anyone's head given anonymity was still generally assumed and I'm still not even sure if terms like 'Marmite Motorway' count as homophobia given our cultures love of sex euphemisms.

Anyway, this is the point I was getting at, he signed a contract but 'past actions that could bring disrepute' is a rather nebulous and subjective clause that is largely decided upon retroactively. For example, if the Mrs occasionally pisses on me or I put her over my knee and spank her it can all seem like none of party business but it very much can be if we get labeled the Golden Showers or the police try and do me for BDSM -and that is stuff you would ordinarily flash across your mind. If this came up in a court of law it would be pretty easy to pick it apart on the red hand rule alone and if I were a party leader I would also be rather cautious with the whip anyway considering everyone has some skeletons in their closets.

>>83607
I had my MSN connected to my profile and later on added few of the other users on facebook. It probably wouldn't be too hard for the gutterpress to track me down even if I deleted all the posts or for old friends to blackmail me.

Fuck, and what about the chatlogs someone could well have on an old computer!
>> No. 83752 Anonymous
17th November 2017
Friday 11:28 am
83752 spacer
>>83608
"Fuck, and what about the chatlogs someone could well have on an old computer!"

I'm sure thats an issue for many early 2000's teenlads.
>> No. 83753 Anonymous
18th November 2017
Saturday 10:29 am
83753 spacer
They generally won't let people into parliament unless they've got some dirt on them. If you can't blackmail them by threat of character assassination then there's always a danger that someone principled might actually try to change things.

whiteline
image.jpg
835528355283552
>> No. 83552 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 1:11 am
83552 Internet Police
Amber Rudd: viewers of online daft militant wog material face 15 years in jail.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/03/amber-rudd-viewers-of-online-daft militant wog-material-face-15-years-in-jail

How long before they expand their powers to include any material they find distasteful?
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83747 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 6:30 pm
83747 spacer
My Dad, who is a fucking idiot, seem to think that "they're not even allowed to call them scaffolding poles anymore in case you offend the Polish, it's political correctness gone mead!" he dosne't want to provide me with a source for this information and says "just look it up" i can't find a source. He is an idiot as i said.
>> No. 83748 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 6:34 pm
83748 spacer
>>83747

I think this post was sponsored by > mead!
>> No. 83749 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 7:09 pm
83749 spacer
>>83747
You can't find a source, eh? I found one straight away at 23 minutes into this documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
>> No. 83750 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 7:11 pm
83750 spacer

twi1_2418771b.jpg
837508375083750
>>83748
Not sure if he's got the money to sponsor things, since they wrote his character out of Casualty.
>> No. 83751 Anonymous
16th November 2017
Thursday 12:22 am
83751 spacer
>>83749
I suspected as much

whiteline
westminster.jpg
835898358983589
>> No. 83589 Anonymous
27th October 2017
Friday 6:10 pm
83589 spacer
FEMALE STAFF AT WESTMINSTER ARE NAMING AND SHAMING SEX PEST MPS ON A SECRET WHATSAPP GROUP, IT HAS BEEN REVEALED.

Yeah, whoever it was in /iq/ that said this deserves to be a real thread is quite right. This is going to blow up badly for some people and I think we should share the details consider it carefully. I know that the odd politico type comes here, spill the fucking beans!
127 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83738 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 1:53 am
83738 spacer
>>83732
Phwoar she could be first past my post IYKWIM
>> No. 83739 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 8:25 pm
83739 spacer
>>83732
I'd have sex with her IYKWIM.
>> No. 83742 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 9:44 pm
83742 spacer
>>83739

Lad. Really.
>> No. 83743 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 9:54 pm
83743 spacer
>>83739
I'm not sure what you mean.
>> No. 83744 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 9:58 pm
83744 spacer
This is exactly what I expected in the thread about sexual harassment. Keep up the good work, lads.

whiteline
Edward Heath.jpg
835518355183551
>> No. 83551 Anonymous
5th October 2017
Thursday 9:16 pm
83551 spacer
>Sir Edward Heath 'would have been questioned' over abuse claims
>Sir Edward Heath would have been questioned over sex abuse claims if he was alive when they came to light, police have said. Wiltshire Police launched Operation Conifer in 2015 when the former PM was accused of historical child sex abuse.

>The Conservative politician would have been interviewed under caution over seven claims, including the alleged rape of an 11-year-old, they said. No inference of guilt should be drawn from this, police stressed. The allegations include one of rape of a male under 16, three of indecent assault on a male under 16, four of indecent assault on a male under 14, and two of indecent assault on a male over 16.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41503143

How in Gods name is this still going on? Operation Conifer has so far burnt through £1.5 million without a shred of evidence and the press are still going along with it instead of calling for Mike Veale to be sacked and possibly tarred and feathered.

I seem to remember a mythical time when if someone talked about satanic rituals they would be laughed at.

whiteline
bn_bean_comp1.jpg
805318053180531
>> No. 80531 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 11:01 am
80531 Corbyn Mk III: Electric Boogaloo
I think it's time for a new Corbyn thread.

The previous thread (>>73072) is reaching critical mass. In combination with the original thread (>>64990) we've had over 4,700 posts on Dear Leader since August last year. That's a lot of shitposting. Keep up the good work, lads.
1122 posts and 124 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83546 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 8:34 pm
83546 spacer
>>83545

Obviously, but it's basically the only thing I like.
>> No. 83547 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 8:46 pm
83547 spacer
>>83545

Sorry to double post, but you inspired me to go over to the Mail Online and have a gander at the comments; perhaps the most mental I've ever seen on there. It's like they're from the fourteenth century. I just have to remember they aren't representative.

Are they?
>> No. 83548 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 9:11 pm
83548 spacer
>>83547

Last time someone said "don't worry about the Daily Mail comments, they're not representative" we ended up with Brexit.
>> No. 83549 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 10:57 pm
83549 spacer
>>83544
http://www.housing.org.uk/press/press-releases/national-housing-federations-response-to-theresa-mays-announcement-on-socia/
>> No. 83550 Anonymous
5th October 2017
Thursday 9:11 pm
83550 spacer
Now that people have got over the nonsense, they're actually paying attention to what she actually said. Some thought it sounded a bit like something out of The West Wing. Then they realised that it actually was something out of The West Wing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/04/has-theresa-may-lifted-speech-west-wing/

whiteline
eddie-mul-jrm_3572149b.jpg
833828338283382
>> No. 83382 Anonymous
27th August 2017
Sunday 9:19 am
83382 spacer
Beleagured Theresa May 'to quit as Prime Minister on August 30, 2019 in a bid to stop a leadership challenge' - as she tries to calm rivals with a prosecco party at Chequers

Theresa May is said to have revealed the date she will quit as Prime Minister - giving herself two years to see Brexit through first.

She has chosen Friday August 30th 2019 as the day she will step down from 10 Downing Street, it has been reported.

It comes amid a major charm offensive by Mrs May in a bid to win the support of her MPs and avoid an awkward leadership challenge.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4826482/Theresa-sets-date-quit-Prime-Minister.html

This man is going to become Prime Minister on 1st September 2019 and it's going to be fucking awesome.
38 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83466 Anonymous
7th September 2017
Thursday 5:56 pm
83466 spacer
>>83460
I'd wait until the next census before you make a wild statement like that given even the most alarmist stories I can find put it at 53% in E+W (obviously the western isles etc. are still putting people in the wicker man).

My non-scientific opinion is that although most people wouldn't fit the definition of devout Christian they are more receptive to fluffy statements like 'everything happens for a reason' and 'something is watching over us'. The problem is as the majority are completely uneducated in theology they're shocked when they encounter doctrines that find sex a sin.

>therefore don't really want political leaders who do

I doubt most people care. On the flip-side only a tiny minority gave a damn about Corbyn's floppy answer to religion despite it's potential to shape the last election given May's religious nationalism.

>>83461
You seem to struggle with the concept of compromise in politics. The PM is not a dictator nor does it seem like Mogg wants to create a theocracy -indeed, despite his religious views he has always come across as someone wedded to British natural law traditions.

I think there is something to be said of the nature of British culture where we can have evangelicals who don't presume to enforce their beliefs onto others.
>> No. 83467 Anonymous
7th September 2017
Thursday 7:26 pm
83467 spacer
>>83466
>You seem to struggle with the concept of compromise in politics.
No, I struggle with poor messaging. Better a liar than muddled.
>The PM is not a dictator nor does it seem like Mogg wants to create a theocracy
I don't see the relevance. It's not a theocracy to buzz it through with private members bills like an evil Roy Jenkins.

I'm not going to press too far on this. I just like making fun of Neil Kinnock.
>> No. 83468 Anonymous
8th September 2017
Friday 3:08 pm
83468 spacer
>>83466
>The PM is not a dictator
Not yet, but she's getting there.
>> No. 83480 Anonymous
13th September 2017
Wednesday 2:59 am
83480 spacer
So have we all said our fond farewells to democracy now ARE TERRI is building her dictatorship?
>> No. 83540 Anonymous
3rd October 2017
Tuesday 7:31 pm
83540 spacer
>Jacob Rees-Mogg has compared this year’s Conservative conference to a North Korea-style rally, saying the party will face a crisis unless members are given more stake in it.

>The backbencher, who has been packing out fringe meetings, said ordinary party members had no power to debate policy compared to when he entered politics.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/oct/03/rees-mogg-tory-conference-like-north-korea-rally

It says "power", but I think they meant "ability". Anyway, when's the Tory leadership deathmatch on?

whiteline
kid rock senate.png
834818348183481
>> No. 83481 Anonymous
14th September 2017
Thursday 5:53 am
83481 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY3zFblpM5s

This man is going to be the next Michigan state senator and it's going to be fucking awesome.
Expand all images.
>> No. 83482 Anonymous
14th September 2017
Thursday 10:00 am
83482 spacer
>>83481
>the next Michigan state senator
You mean the next senator from Michigan. A "state senator" is roughly on par with a county councillor.
>> No. 83483 Anonymous
16th September 2017
Saturday 2:50 am
83483 spacer
>>83481
He's a fucking cock. They deserve all they get.

whiteline
1a1a437fdc5a665d1024b4028b7e9fae.jpg
831928319283192
>> No. 83192 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 6:30 pm
83192 Pensions thought
So the pension age has been stuck up again, this is due to the argument that more old people, more pension, more money etc etc etc.

However, if people work longer and we have more old people in employment, then aren't they going to block up the job market resulting in less jobs for young people? If there's less jobs for young people they will end up being dependent on the state and claim benefits.

Does this not mean that regardless of what is done it's going to hit one budget or the other, essentially? Either it's going to cost more long term in pension or more long term in benefits and essentially cancel out any gains made.

I'm only putting this out there as a thought I've had for a while and never really heard anyone else putting the point across and I was wondering, is that because I'm making a fucking stupid point?
90 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83380 Anonymous
26th August 2017
Saturday 1:07 pm
83380 spacer
New industries create different kinds of jobs.
>> No. 83381 Anonymous
26th August 2017
Saturday 1:18 pm
83381 spacer
>>83376

Evolution isn't a force, you dipshit. Plus, force is the conversion of energy from one firm to another, so the question doesn't even make sense.

Just fuck off and educate yourself a bit, would you? If you're going to try to convince people you should at least have some idea what they believe.
>> No. 83422 Anonymous
1st September 2017
Friday 7:42 pm
83422 spacer
>>83381

>Evolution isn't a force

What is it then? Pretty sure evolution is the conversion of energy of one form to another. Educate me if not.
>> No. 83424 Anonymous
1st September 2017
Friday 9:15 pm
83424 spacer
>>83422

Evolution is the adaptation of an organism over time to its habitat, to facilitate a greater chance of successful reproduction.
>> No. 83425 Anonymous
1st September 2017
Friday 9:56 pm
83425 spacer
>>83424
Technically, evolution is the process of change in inherited traits over successive generations. What you're describing is natural selection.

Pedant's sage.

whiteline
CR_at8hWwAAQNuf.jpg
833038330383303
>> No. 83303 Anonymous
24th August 2017
Thursday 6:46 pm
83303 spacer
I have met a couple of Tories who were genuinely really anxious for me to see that they weren’t horrible people and really believed putting everything into private enterprise will achieve better results.

Whatever type they are, I have absolutely no intention of being friends with any of them. I have friends I choose to spend time with. I go to parliament to be a mouthpiece for my constituents and class – I’m not interested in chatting on.

I feel disgusted at the way they’re running this country, it’s visceral – I’m not interested in being cosy. I hate those Tory questions that start with ‘Does the PM agree with me..?’ – when one Tory MP stood up and asked one I told him I think those questions are disgraceful. His response was ‘you mustn’t be a very good MP‘!

The idea that they’re not the enemy is simply delusional when you see the effect they have on people – a nation where lots of people live in a constant state of fear whether they even have enough to eat.


https://skwawkbox.org/2017/08/11/one-of-labours-new-rising-stars-talks-class-westminster-and-the-enemy/

I know politics is getting increasingly childish and divisive, but when we have an actual MP branding Tories as the enemy and saying she could never be friends with one I think we've reached a new low. Then again, I suppose all that virtue isn't going to signal itself.
33 posts and 4 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83362 Anonymous
25th August 2017
Friday 6:46 pm
83362 spacer
>>83358
Whatever way you look it it, packs of supermarket bacon have absolutely nothing to do with a bunch of rich toffs getting drunk on champagne, letting an army of dogs loose, and galloping after them on horses trampling everything in their way.
Fox hunting is just as big a steaming pile of crap whether a fox gets killed or not.

>>83360
Calling fox hunting inefficient at killing foxes is like calling boxing an inefficient cure for toothache.
The cost of keeping the horses and looking after the dogs, feeding them, stabling and kennelling them, paying the people to look after them etc. is so huge that it would be far more efficient for farmers to leave a few chickens out every night and hope that a fox gets hit by a car on the way there.
>> No. 83366 Anonymous
25th August 2017
Friday 8:16 pm
83366 spacer
I think it's safe to say that the "left" has well and truly disappeared up its own arse now.

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2017/aug/25/leftwing-edinburgh-comedy-fin-tayor
>> No. 83369 Anonymous
25th August 2017
Friday 9:22 pm
83369 spacer
>>83366

Oooh, degenerate art am I right, lad? Oooooh.
>> No. 83371 Anonymous
25th August 2017
Friday 9:47 pm
83371 spacer
>>83369
Did you even read the article otherlad posted?

Brian Logan is offended by comedians taking the piss out of their audience and (heaven forbid) going a little hyperbolic with it. He is reporting on a comedy festival and doesn't understand comedy.
>> No. 83373 Anonymous
25th August 2017
Friday 10:08 pm
83373 spacer
>>83371
>Brian Logan
Don't you mean 'the left'?

whiteline
1012336-System__Resources__Image-1197978.jpg
825738257382573
>> No. 82573 Anonymous
8th June 2017
Thursday 6:27 am
82573 2017 General Election polling day/results thread
Morning, lads.

As per .gs tradition, it's time for the separate polling day/results thread.

Results are expected slightly earlier than previous years as there's no local elections at the same time.
350 posts and 43 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83169 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 9:27 pm
83169 spacer
>>83168
>Does this mean immigration is bad, or the people who employ and take advantage of immigrants are bad?
It means >>83088 apparently can't do maths.
>> No. 83173 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 11:23 pm
83173 spacer
>>83089
>Actually, yes, you did. The exact word with which you disagreed were "doesn't make you any less of a person". By disagreeing, you are, in fact, saying that it does make you less of a person.

Is there really any point in talking to you when your position is automatically "anyone or anything that disagrees with me is racist" including widely recognised concepts like borders and nationality?

I mean I did just assume we were wasting our time here but here we go and the thread is back up.

>No, that report is not evidence of "significant detrimental impact". It even says so right there in the abstract.

Read the quote then do a Ctrl+f and understand the context. Abstract browsers are on par with people who try and bullshit you on what footnotes say.

>>83168
>Vesting power in a small group of people is better is it?

I wouldn't call the checks and balances we have in modern society small. Certainly it could be bigger in some areas but if cabinet tried to pass some nonsense today you can imagine the uphill battle they would face against backbenchers, the media, potential protests, facebook memes etc.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 83174 Anonymous
15th July 2017
Saturday 11:39 pm
83174 spacer
>>83173
>Is there really any point in talking to you when your position is automatically "anyone or anything that disagrees with me is racist" including widely recognised concepts like borders and nationality?
Put that straw man away, lad. My position is "anyone or anything that disagrees with me does not agree with me".

>Read the quote then do a Ctrl+f and understand the context
It's your argument. Chapter and verse to support your claim that the report claims "substantial detrimental impact". I suspect you can't provide one because either the report doesn't say what you think it says or you just can't add up.
>> No. 83209 Anonymous
7th August 2017
Monday 8:33 pm
83209 spacer
>I wouldn't call the checks and balances we have in modern society small. Certainly it could be bigger in some areas but if cabinet tried to pass some nonsense today you can imagine the uphill battle they would face against backbenchers, the media, potential protests, facebook memes etc.

They pass nonsense all the time, with the help of the media of course. Protests and facebook memes are laughable and change nothing.

>The rest just seems like some mental rant about people being thick or whatever which while I agree with I'm not entirely sure if it is relevant or that you understand what checks and balances mean.

It's not just that people have been conditioned to be thick, people have also been conditioned (by the media they consume) to think they know what's going on and what the correct decision is to be made on things like "Brexit".

>You see you start off well enough that yes, we must judge people for who they are not who they were born but then you start talking about how we should publish MPs medical records because they might be hiding cancer...

I'm struggling to see what the issue is with knowing an MP's medical record? I don't give a shit if they had gonorrhoea 20 years ago, but there are certain things which are important to know if they want to be in charge of a country.
>> No. 83210 Anonymous
7th August 2017
Monday 8:43 pm
83210 spacer
>>83209
Well worth the bump, mate.

whiteline
41KGimD.jpg
831958319583195
>> No. 83195 Anonymous
20th July 2017
Thursday 6:21 pm
83195 The Brexit Negotiations
We finally have some hard information on the specifics of the positions of both sides.

Today was the first joint technical document release, with each side's position on citizen's rights. It's patchy.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/eu-uk_table_cr.pdf

I will attempt to keep this thread updated as the weeks go by.
Expand all images.
>> No. 83196 Anonymous
20th July 2017
Thursday 7:39 pm
83196 spacer
>>83195
They're finally agreeing on at least something.

whiteline
3712[1].jpg
831128311283112
>> No. 83112 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 9:15 pm
83112 The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked
Not sure if I should have put this in /boo/ but:

>A shadowy global operation involving big data, billionaire friends of Trump and the disparate forces of the Leave campaign influenced the result of the EU referendum

>This is Britain in 2017. A Britain that increasingly looks like a “managed” democracy. Paid for by a US billionaire. Using military-style technology. Delivered by Facebook. And enabled by us. If we let this referendum result stand, we are giving it our implicit consent. This isn’t about Remain or Leave. It goes far beyond party politics. It’s about the first step into a brave, new, increasingly undemocratic world.

So it seems a British defense contractor helped the Leave campaign. Cambridge Analytica exploited the system for Vote Leave to get away with funding that would have normally broken electoral rules. All bankrolled by a billionaire hedge fund manager. Welcome to plutocracy.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
64 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83185 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 6:55 pm
83185 spacer
>>83184
Don't be fucking ridiculous. Why are you even on about deporting Asians? Nobody except you is claiming the Asians who diddled in the likes of Rotherham are representative of all Joe's.

The simple fact is that the climate the lefties created enabled the likes of Rotherham to happen for so long. It's part of the reason why lefties are their own worst enemies and their actions were a major contributor to Brexit happening.
>> No. 83186 Anonymous
16th July 2017
Sunday 7:05 pm
83186 spacer

JVC-projector.jpg
831868318683186
>>83185
>Nobody except you is claiming the Asians who diddled in the likes of Rotherham are representative of all Joe's.
No, I'm not the one claiming that. You're the one claiming that.
>> No. 83189 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 12:22 am
83189 spacer
>>83184

>But they don't have any more propensity towards diddling kids than the locals

With regards to grooming cases Asian males are disproportionately over represented. And the incest thing is an unpleasant, inarguable fact too.
>> No. 83190 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 1:26 am
83190 spacer
>>83189
That's not necessarily true. The numbers that normally go with this claim come from a report that specifically deals with street grooming.

>The data submitted refers only to the ‘localised grooming’ model of child sexual exploitation and does not include online
grooming, trafficking of children into the UK, peer-on-peer abuse or other forms of sexual exploitation.
>This assessment cannot be seen as fully representative of the nature and scale of child sexual exploitation in the U.K., or, indeed, of the 'localised grooming' model.

http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_101409-2.pdf

>In particular, the report raises concerns over its ethnic representation:
>"Caution should be taken in drawing conclusions about ethnicity due to the relatively small number of areas where agencies have been proactive around this particular type of crime. We do not draw national conclusions about ethnicity from the data available at this time because it is too inconsistent."

>We therefore need to be cautious about Keith Vaz's claim, as the source he uses explicitly warns against drawing any nationwide conclusions on the basis of its research.
>While both the HM Prison Service and CEOP datasets have problems associated with them, there is nevertheless some evidence to suggest that sex offenders are 'overwhelmingly white' in terms of the raw numbers.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 83191 Anonymous
19th July 2017
Wednesday 3:27 am
83191 spacer
>>83190
Yeah yeah, spout facts, nerd.

whiteline
fine.jpg
830978309783097
>> No. 83097 Anonymous
10th July 2017
Monday 10:59 pm
83097 spacer
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/climate-change-earth-too-hot-for-humans.html

I challenge anyone to read this and still oppose the need for radical social change.
10 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 83108 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 3:25 pm
83108 spacer

Capture.png
831088310883108
>>83107
It appears that the people in control of the remaining 'Anonymous' news channels have sunk to the level of Godlike Productions, that's not particularly interesting, seems inevitable in retrospect. That is what you meant, right? I tried to skip through the chemtrails rubbish at the start but it seemed to go on for the entire video, so I can only conclude ...
>> No. 83109 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 5:51 pm
83109 spacer
>>83105
>None of what I said is wrong.
You're right there, albeit not in the way you were thinking.
>> No. 83110 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 6:49 pm
83110 spacer
>>83109

Were you always a smug cunt or did they send you to a public school for socially abrasive children?
>> No. 83111 Anonymous
11th July 2017
Tuesday 9:09 pm
83111 spacer
>>83097
The especially scariest part of that article for me, is the ancient plagues being released.
>> No. 83124 Anonymous
12th July 2017
Wednesday 7:32 pm
83124 spacer
>>83108

I thought Anonymous specifically didn't believe in Xenu?

whiteline
trump intelligence.png
824978249782497
>> No. 82497 Anonymous
16th May 2017
Tuesday 2:19 pm
82497 Trump impeachement... pending
What exactly is it that the man needs to do to get impeached? There seems to be a scandal that would damn any other leader every week.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-revealed-highly-classified-information-to-russian-foreign-minister-and-ambassador/ar-BBBaWuJ
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 82544 Anonymous
24th May 2017
Wednesday 9:14 pm
82544 spacer
>>82543
You haven't quite grasped how this works. Let me translate some of those terms for you:

>impeachable offence
Anything that will pass the House by simple majority.

>can stand up in court
Senators can bring themselves to vote for it.

While the Supreme Court haven't entirely ruled it out, they have declined to hear every appeal against impeachment that has been put to them, and if one takes the Constitution at its face then there is no right of appeal against conviction. However, to convict requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate and, unlike the filibuster, it's not a procedural rule but mandated by the Constitution.
>> No. 83092 Anonymous
8th July 2017
Saturday 3:14 am
83092 Trump accepts Putin's claims that Russia did not meddle in US election
Well I'm glad they settled that for us.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world-0/us-politics/trump-putin-election-meddling-accepts-claims-russian-hacking-g20-meeting-rex-tillerson-a7829871.html
>> No. 83093 Anonymous
8th July 2017
Saturday 12:42 pm
83093 spacer
>>83092
Yeah, but even after 6 months of harping on about Trump/Russia they'll carry on doing it and people will carry on believing it's true.
>> No. 83095 Anonymous
8th July 2017
Saturday 2:52 pm
83095 spacer
>>83093
This. It's just like Jimmy Savile. Years after his death people keep harping on about him supposedly being a kiddy fiddler even though he said he couldn't have done it because he didn't like kids.
>> No. 83096 Anonymous
9th July 2017
Sunday 11:26 am
83096 spacer
>>83093

To clarify, by people, you mean multiple intelligence services right?

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
Previous[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]