[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 80531)
Message
File  []
close
bn_bean_comp1.jpg
805318053180531
>> No. 80531 Anonymous
27th November 2016
Sunday 11:01 am
80531 Corbyn Mk III: Electric Boogaloo
I think it's time for a new Corbyn thread.

The previous thread (>>73072) is reaching critical mass. In combination with the original thread (>>64990) we've had over 4,700 posts on Dear Leader since August last year. That's a lot of shitposting. Keep up the good work, lads.
1117 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> No. 83541 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 12:55 pm
83541 spacer

Lee-Nelson-649754.jpg
835418354183541
Meanwhile, at the Conservative conference:

>Boris asked me to give you this.
>> No. 83542 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 5:58 pm
83542 spacer
>>83541
Apparently she coughed a lot and some of the letters fell down.

Metaphorical.
>> No. 83543 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 6:08 pm
83543 spacer
>>83542
She said some quite interesting things in that speech, which of course nobody will remember.

Don't you think she looks tired?
>> No. 83544 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 7:26 pm
83544 spacer

Fair play though.png
835448354483544
Lads, what if you had to give one of the most important speeches of your career with the nations cameras watching but on the day you wake up with a cold?

I mean surely politicians have advanced beyond the point of strepsils and covonia by now. I'd at least reach for some lemon and ginger tea despite hardly ever thinking about such nightmare scenarios.

>>83543
The extra two billion for new social housing doesn't deserve comment if you ask me. We've had governments talk about this before while doing nothing in reality to sort it and translated into 25k more social housing by 2021 it seems like a drop in the bucket to the growth in demand.
>> No. 83545 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 7:58 pm
83545 spacer
>>83544
Making Organ Donation an Opt-Out rather than an Opt-In is causing uproar.
>> No. 83546 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 8:34 pm
83546 spacer
>>83545

Obviously, but it's basically the only thing I like.
>> No. 83547 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 8:46 pm
83547 spacer
>>83545

Sorry to double post, but you inspired me to go over to the Mail Online and have a gander at the comments; perhaps the most mental I've ever seen on there. It's like they're from the fourteenth century. I just have to remember they aren't representative.

Are they?
>> No. 83548 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 9:11 pm
83548 spacer
>>83547

Last time someone said "don't worry about the Daily Mail comments, they're not representative" we ended up with Brexit.
>> No. 83549 Anonymous
4th October 2017
Wednesday 10:57 pm
83549 spacer
>>83544
http://www.housing.org.uk/press/press-releases/national-housing-federations-response-to-theresa-mays-announcement-on-socia/
>> No. 83550 Anonymous
5th October 2017
Thursday 9:11 pm
83550 spacer
Now that people have got over the nonsense, they're actually paying attention to what she actually said. Some thought it sounded a bit like something out of The West Wing. Then they realised that it actually was something out of The West Wing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/04/has-theresa-may-lifted-speech-west-wing/
>> No. 83757 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 10:34 pm
83757 spacer

5a2057c6150000e67685ac2b[1].png
837578375783757
What in God's name have they done to him?
>> No. 83758 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 10:45 pm
83758 spacer

2555047-e3 2014 halo 2 anniversary cinematic - joh.jpg
837588375883758
>>83757

He looks like one of those uncanny valley but still very good looking game cutscenes. He could be the sympathetic antagonist in a new CoD, maybe?

>"No Blairites."
>*screams and gunfire*
>> No. 83759 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 11:28 pm
83759 spacer
>>83758
Wow. That man is CGI? I wouldn't have been able to tell.
>> No. 83760 Anonymous
30th November 2017
Thursday 11:50 pm
83760 spacer
>>83759
If you think that guy's good, you should see these rocks.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXouFfqSfxg
>> No. 83761 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 12:34 am
83761 spacer

bob.jpg
837618376183761
>>83757
>> No. 83762 Anonymous
1st December 2017
Friday 12:48 am
83762 Free speech
I'd like to see a debate in the Oxford Union with Owen Jones and Douglas Murray.

I'm sure Douglas would turn up.
>> No. 83905 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 5:21 pm
83905 spacer

DWB7I8jX0AUqgMX.jpg
839058390583905
Further proof, if it was needed, that Jeremy Corbyn hates our country.
>> No. 83906 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 6:04 pm
83906 spacer
>>83905

"Expert Prof Anthony Glees", pull the other one, he's a right wing hack as much as any of them. Being a professor is not barrier to entry in that gig. And who else met this diplomat? It seems pretty unlikely Corbyn was the only person he spoke to.
>> No. 83907 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 6:27 pm
83907 spacer

http _com.ft.imagepublish.prod.s3.amazonaws.com_92.png
839078390783907
>>83905
Who doesn't? It's a shithole.
>> No. 83908 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 6:28 pm
83908 spacer
https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/essex-drug-dealer-poo-custody-14292313?service=responsive
>> No. 83909 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 9:13 pm
83909 spacer
>>83907
Where'd you get this graph from best beloved?
>> No. 83910 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 9:14 pm
83910 spacer
Jesus they put a wordfilter on lad + m8? That's below the belt you fucking lizards.
>> No. 83911 Anonymous
15th February 2018
Thursday 9:24 pm
83911 spacer
>>83909
I'd wager that the 'FT' in the image name and in the corner of the image itself are clues.
>> No. 83912 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 12:13 pm
83912 spacer
>>83911
I can't fathom how anyone could deduce I found that image on /biz/ from its FT watermark.
>> No. 83913 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 8:32 pm
83913 spacer
>>83910

best beloved?

I think this site has officially jumped the shark now.
>> No. 83914 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 8:41 pm
83914 spacer
>>83913

Why because of daft word filter? What's changed to make that one abhorrent where the other five-hundred were fine?
>> No. 83915 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 9:51 pm
83915 spacer
>>83913

You must be new or have an incredibly short memory if you think having a word filter on something is the death knell of britfa.gs.

I'm pretty sure purps set up the filter list and built the rest of the site around it.
>> No. 83916 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 10:17 pm
83916 spacer
>>83915
Pretty much.
>> No. 83917 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 11:29 pm
83917 spacer
>>83916

What was the inaugural filter? Pork product?
>> No. 83919 Anonymous
16th February 2018
Friday 11:34 pm
83919 spacer
>>83917
Reconstituted pork product in gravy.
>> No. 83920 Anonymous
17th February 2018
Saturday 1:01 pm
83920 spacer
>>83919

Genuine nostalgia thinking about that.
>> No. 83921 Anonymous
17th February 2018
Saturday 7:52 pm
83921 spacer
>>83915

You're mistaken lad-mate, I've been around since S Club 7 was a word filter. That's just part of the lingo around here. It has been forever.

It's like when Sam Smith pubs tried banning swearing.
>> No. 83922 Anonymous
18th February 2018
Sunday 12:53 am
83922 spacer
>>83921
> It's like when Sam Smith pubs tried banning swearing.

They had to do something to stop everyone saying "Fuck me, that's a shit pint" every five minutes, I suppose.
>> No. 83924 Anonymous
18th February 2018
Sunday 12:55 am
83924 spacer
That shit singer owns a chain of pubs?
>> No. 83925 Anonymous
18th February 2018
Sunday 12:27 pm
83925 spacer
>>83924
Perhaps surprisingly, there is more than one person called Samuel Smith in the world.
>> No. 83926 Anonymous
18th February 2018
Sunday 1:24 pm
83926 spacer
>>83922

Are thy after a feyt lad? Nowt better than a pint o Taddy.
>> No. 83927 Anonymous
18th February 2018
Sunday 1:45 pm
83927 spacer
>>83925

Almost as if I was taking the piss...
>> No. 83928 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 6:22 pm
83928 spacer
>government has a strange fixed idea that the state only acts in the general and individual good.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/19/tories-data-protection-bill-safer

At least Diane Abbott is being frank and honest enough to admit it. The state under a Corbyn government wouldn't act in the general and individual good; such notions are strange to them because all that matters is ideological purity above all else.
>> No. 83929 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 6:30 pm
83929 spacer
>>83928
Obvious misquote is obvious.
>> No. 83930 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 6:35 pm
83930 spacer
>>83929
It's not a misquote. It's entirely her own words.

The notion of a government acting for the good of its people is evidently a strange notion to the Shadow Home Secretary.
>> No. 83931 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 6:58 pm
83931 spacer
>>83930
>The notion of [...] acting [...] is evidently [...] strange
I know, right? How did that Sally Hawkins get nominated for a BAFTA when she didn't even have any lines?
>> No. 83932 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:20 pm
83932 spacer
>>83930
You're obviously not intelligent enough to understand what she is saying so I'll try and explain it.

If you disagree with her, you are saying that the government has never done anything bad ever.
>> No. 83933 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:20 pm
83933 spacer
>>83930

>But there is a policy chasm between this government and those of us who believe that the protection of citizens includes protection from the state. The government has a strange fixed idea that the state only acts in the general and individual good. Every draconian measure is justified with the argument that only guilty people need to be worried. Yet decades of struggling for civil liberties, and fighting against specific instances of injustice, tell us that is simply not true.

I'm a Tory and wouldn't piss on Diane Abbott if she was on fire, but you can fuck right off.
>> No. 83934 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:21 pm
83934 spacer
>>83928

>government has a strange fixed idea that the state only acts in the general and individual good.

I struggle to work out what other capacity she is implying a government should be acting in. As I can't see why this is a pejorative.
>> No. 83935 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:40 pm
83935 spacer
>>83934
We heard you the first time, m7. It didn't work then either.
>> No. 83936 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:48 pm
83936 spacer
>>83935
Sigh, I'm not them, I'm looking for a sincere answer. All the rest of the surrounding paragraph makes sense to me but that statement seems really odd. How else should a government be acting?
>> No. 83937 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 7:58 pm
83937 spacer
>>83936
She's not saying the government should do otherwise. She's saying they're acting as if they can't do otherwise.
>> No. 83938 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 8:06 pm
83938 spacer
>>83937

Sorry I'm not getting the concept for some reason. Aren't those ideas essentially the same? and why is it bad the state only acts in the general and individual good.
>> No. 83939 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 8:29 pm
83939 spacer
>>83938
>Aren't those ideas essentially the same?
No, believing you should do no wrong is definitely not the same as believeing you can do no wrong.
>> No. 83940 Anonymous
19th February 2018
Monday 9:52 pm
83940 spacer
>>83939

Thanks, I don't know why it took me so long to process that.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password