[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 83552)
Message
File  []
close
image.jpg
835528355283552
>> No. 83552 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 1:11 am
83552 Internet Police
Amber Rudd: viewers of online daft militant wog material face 15 years in jail.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/03/amber-rudd-viewers-of-online-daft militant wog-material-face-15-years-in-jail

How long before they expand their powers to include any material they find distasteful?
Expand all images.
>> No. 83553 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 12:24 pm
83553 spacer
How long before dickheads like you realise the word filter makes certain links unusable?
>> No. 83554 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 2:09 pm
83554 spacer
>>83553
Bit harsh, even for a regular. Tell him how to fix it then you silly bugger.
>> No. 83555 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 2:54 pm
83555 spacer
>>83554

Yeah, I did go a bit overboard.

Just use that Tiny URL thing or whatever. Or post the article when I can still find it on the front page, not a week after it was published.
>> No. 83556 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 3:06 pm
83556 spacer
And while I'm having a moan, don't just post a link and your opinion on it, highlight some snippets from the article that might intrigue me enough into reading further.
>> No. 83557 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 4:42 pm
83557 spacer
>>83555

Tinyurl is a Bad Thing for internet security in general. Word filters should be fixed so as not to modify URLs.

>>83556

Agreed on this.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password