[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 83552)
Message
File  []
close
image.jpg
835528355283552
>> No. 83552 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 1:11 am
83552 Internet Police
Amber Rudd: viewers of online daft militant wog material face 15 years in jail.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/03/amber-rudd-viewers-of-online-daft militant wog-material-face-15-years-in-jail

How long before they expand their powers to include any material they find distasteful?
Expand all images.
>> No. 83553 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 12:24 pm
83553 spacer
How long before dickheads like you realise the word filter makes certain links unusable?
>> No. 83554 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 2:09 pm
83554 spacer
>>83553
Bit harsh, even for a regular. Tell him how to fix it then you silly bugger.
>> No. 83555 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 2:54 pm
83555 spacer
>>83554

Yeah, I did go a bit overboard.

Just use that Tiny URL thing or whatever. Or post the article when I can still find it on the front page, not a week after it was published.
>> No. 83556 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 3:06 pm
83556 spacer
And while I'm having a moan, don't just post a link and your opinion on it, highlight some snippets from the article that might intrigue me enough into reading further.
>> No. 83557 Anonymous
11th October 2017
Wednesday 4:42 pm
83557 spacer
>>83555

Tinyurl is a Bad Thing for internet security in general. Word filters should be fixed so as not to modify URLs.

>>83556

Agreed on this.
>> No. 83740 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 8:34 pm
83740 spacer
>>83553
Percent encoding would be a far better workaround and really, if you haven't memorised alphanumeric ASCII, what business do you even have using a computer?
>> No. 83741 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 8:45 pm
83741 spacer
This is why it's best to use the Daily Mail, as altering the text has no impact.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5069245/i-am-going-to-type-any-old-bollocks-here-and-you-are-going-to-click-it.html
>> No. 83745 Anonymous
10th November 2017
Friday 10:37 pm
83745 spacer
>>83741

No, cunt.

>>83556
>> No. 83747 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 6:30 pm
83747 spacer
My Dad, who is a fucking idiot, seem to think that "they're not even allowed to call them scaffolding poles anymore in case you offend the Polish, it's political correctness gone mead!" he dosne't want to provide me with a source for this information and says "just look it up" i can't find a source. He is an idiot as i said.
>> No. 83748 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 6:34 pm
83748 spacer
>>83747

I think this post was sponsored by > mead!
>> No. 83749 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 7:09 pm
83749 spacer
>>83747
You can't find a source, eh? I found one straight away at 23 minutes into this documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
>> No. 83750 Anonymous
15th November 2017
Wednesday 7:11 pm
83750 spacer

twi1_2418771b.jpg
837508375083750
>>83748
Not sure if he's got the money to sponsor things, since they wrote his character out of Casualty.
>> No. 83751 Anonymous
16th November 2017
Thursday 12:22 am
83751 spacer
>>83749
I suspected as much

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password