[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / zoo ] [ g / e / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ o ]
logo
film/video

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 1983)
Message
File  []
close
Harrison Morgan.jpg
198319831983
>> No. 1983 Anonymous
17th December 2009
Thursday 10:16 pm
1983 Dexter
OH SHI-
>> No. 1991 Anonymous
18th December 2009
Friday 9:15 pm
1991 spacer

do want.jpg
199119911991
>> No. 2006 Anonymous
19th December 2009
Saturday 10:16 pm
2006 spacer
>>1991

nicely done sir
>> No. 2007 Anonymous
19th December 2009
Saturday 11:47 pm
2007 spacer

shutup.jpg
200720072007
>>2006

Shut up cunt.
>> No. 2016 Anonymous
21st December 2009
Monday 2:48 am
2016 spacer

vlcsnap-2009-12-21-02h47m19s6.png
201620162016
lol deb this is my impression of steven hawking
>> No. 2075 Anonymous
31st December 2009
Thursday 7:52 pm
2075 spacer
Watched all of season 4 at US pace....I never saw that ending coming AT ALL. And my prediction for the end of the series, made 4 episodes in, never happened.

John Lithgow- he's still got it. That man is awesome.

I'm onto the fourth book, if you haven't read any of them then you should
>> No. 2101 Anonymous
3rd January 2010
Sunday 6:09 pm
2101 spacer
I must admit, I'm relieved that Rita is dead as she was nothing but a nagging burden. What does concern me is the effect when Dexter holds the child at the end, it's the same effect as the dream sequences with Harry. I'm praying they don't pull the "IT WAS ALL A DREAM" bullshit.
>> No. 2117 Anonymous
4th January 2010
Monday 7:11 pm
2117 spacer
>>2101
I think it's only dreamyhighcontrast because he's experiencing a lot of flashback when he picks up the child.
>> No. 2486 Anonymous
22nd February 2010
Monday 1:40 pm
2486 spacer
Just watched series 1 to 4 in about a week. Aww yeah.

The finale was incredible. John Lithgow is a GOD.

But one thing that seemed odd at the end, why didn't Dexter hear Harrison crying when he first came in?
>> No. 2489 Anonymous
24th February 2010
Wednesday 6:49 pm
2489 spacer
Meh. Originally it was supposed to be Cody who killed things- they started in that direction in a previous series when he killed something. I guess the writers decided an actual son for Dexter would work better.

For once, I'll forgive them. The TV series surpasses the books by far.
>Dexter soon begins to question the dark voice... and begins to slowly realize that his Dark Passenger is ... an offspring of the ancient god Moloch.
I refuse to read the latest book, unless there's been a shitload of retcon.
>> No. 2493 Anonymous
25th February 2010
Thursday 3:34 pm
2493 spacer
If anybody here was wondering about the books, allow me to sum them up for you:

Miami drivers are murderous haha parallels are funny..."Dark Passenger"...blah blah the moon...some shitty alliteration repeated ad nauseum...mention the dark passenger some more, possibly mix it up by talking about a dark back seat or a dark companion, but make sure to keep it repetitive and boring...rambling internal monologue...people are dumb and I am clever...I don't have emotions but then I do.

The show far outstrips it, I agree.
>> No. 2494 Anonymous
25th February 2010
Thursday 3:50 pm
2494 spacer
>>2489

I'd personally find it hilarious if the next season were to use this as the main twist.
>> No. 2495 Anonymous
25th February 2010
Thursday 7:02 pm
2495 spacer
>>2493

Are the books that bad? I am disappoint.
The series is fantastic however. The most i've enjoyed a drama since I first started watching House.
>> No. 2498 Anonymous
26th February 2010
Friday 12:08 am
2498 spacer
USE SPOILER TAGS YOU UTTER COCKS
>> No. 2523 Anonymous
5th March 2010
Friday 5:19 pm
2523 spacer
I like the first two books, but didn't read the third because of what I read on Wikipedia (generally disliked for supernatural elements, ect)

>>2489

>Dexter soon begins to question the dark voice... and begins to slowly realize that his Dark Passenger is ... an offspring of the ancient god Moloch.

I hope to Christ that is an impression rather than an actual quote.
>> No. 2524 Anonymous
7th March 2010
Sunday 4:54 pm
2524 spacer
>>2523
I can't find a digital copy of the book to copy-paste from and I threw my copy away, but that is genuinely the reason given. That quote is from a wiki or something however.
>> No. 2586 Anonymous
9th April 2010
Friday 4:02 am
2586 spacer
>>2524
"For example, Solomon built a temple to something called Moloch, apparently one of the naughty elder gods, and he killed his brother because "wickedness" was found inside him. I could certainly see that, from a biblical perspective, interior wickedness might be a fine description of a Dark Passenger. But if there was a connection here, did it really make sense that someone with an "inner king" would kill somebody inhabited by wickedness?

It was making my head spin. Was I to believe that King Solomon himself actually had a Dark Passenger of his own? Or because he was supposedly one of the Bible's good guys, should I interpret it to mean that he found one in his brother and killed him because of it? And contrary to what we had all been led to believe, did he really mean it when he offered to cut the baby in half?

Most important of all, did it really matter what had happened several thousand years ago on the far side of the world? Even supposing that King Solomon had one of the original Dark Passengers, how did that help me get back to being lovable deadly me? What did I actually do with all this fascinating historical lore? None of it told me where the Passenger came from, what it was, or how to get it back."

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password  


Quantcast