[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / zoo ] [ g / e / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ o ]
logo
film/video

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 2611)
Message
File  []
close
alexander_armstron_1591141c.jpg
261126112611
>> No. 2611 Anonymous
15th April 2010
Thursday 8:17 pm
2611 spacer
Great game show or greatest game show?
>> No. 2612 Anonymous
15th April 2010
Thursday 10:23 pm
2612 spacer
I caught half of it, once, and it seemed actually quite intelligent. It certainly makes a lot more sense than Family Fortunes ever did.
>> No. 2613 Anonymous
16th April 2010
Friday 1:32 am
2613 spacer

b00pws9c_640_360.jpg
261326132613
It's an excellent idea, but I find the contestants are usually just not good enough. Sometimes they're great, but often the winning team got there on luck alone.

Also the last round where they have to get a 'pointless' answer to win anything decent is a bit harsh.
>> No. 2615 Anonymous
16th April 2010
Friday 11:16 am
2615 spacer
I hate game shows normally, but this is a lot of fun.
>> No. 2622 Anonymous
18th April 2010
Sunday 9:37 am
2622 spacer
>>2611

It's excellent. Richard Osman rules. This is probably the best daytime TV show ever.
>> No. 2623 Anonymous
18th April 2010
Sunday 9:33 pm
2623 spacer

countdown.jpg
262326232623
>>2622

I was going to shop this board into saying 'uwotm8' but I couldn't be arsed. Instead, I ask you to imagine I have.
>> No. 2624 Anonymous
19th April 2010
Monday 1:53 pm
2624 spacer
>>2623

I concede that Countdown was good. Pointless is on the same level I'd say.

>>2613
>they have to get a 'pointless' answer to win anything decent is a bit harsh.

I think this is because it's a BBC show - they're essentially giving out our (people who pay TV license's) money. I think it would draw considerable criticism if it was any easier.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password  


Quantcast