>>5484
Why would you post that picture? I hope you never get up to twenty.

>>5485

I did 5 this morning, fuck you.

6 now

Down to 3 after stuffing myself over xmas.

>>5588
Still can't get up to 20? It has been months, lad.

>>5687
You mean the hands that are clearly nowhere near the joystick and buttons?

>>5688 Just admit it. You'd cum in her, I'd cum in her. We all want to cum in her. Hands or no hands.

>>5689
I would, but I wouldn't go far out of my way to.

>>5689

I'm not sure if I'd be comfortable ejaculating in a woman who had no hands. I suppose that makes me an ableist bastard.

Oh not again lads. Please stop.

I have to go now.

>>5532

We don't know who wrote the gospels, but we're damned sure it wasn't any of the apostles. The gospel of Luke literally admits to being a second-hand account in the first paragraph.

>Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word.

https://www.bible.com/en-GB/bible/111/LUK.1.NIV

>>5534

There are multiple references to swimming in the Old and New Testaments, but yeah, sure, whatever, your theory is perfectly reasonable.

>>5526
Jesus had miniature boats on his feet for buoyancy. He was a master carpenter, after all.

I think what this proves is that some pricks want to appear so intellectual from pouring scorn on religious scripture that they will make up explanations for miracles that are almost less believable than the miracles themselves.

>>5538
Indeed, I'm as irrelgious as they come, but thinking ancient Levantines had never seen a man swim before is straining credulity far more than even Genesis does. Also the fact the bloke who brought this up mentioned Christ traveling Europe makes me think it's some weird far-right thing, but I'm wired about that sort of thing.

Unless OP is unable to control his magical water walking abilities I don't think it needs discussing here anyway.

>>5459
I posted in that thread that my tips had also gone see-through, but I brush at least once a day. I wouldn't consider my mouth a disaster area like that OP's.

>>5454
>I can smell when my breath is a bit "off" way before any other method like licking the back of your hand.

A woman once sucked my finger seductively and when I got it back it smelled like tonsil stones.

>>5460

You shouldn't use mouthwash (or even rinse with water) immediately after brushing: it is better if the toothpaste stays on your teeth for a while.

>>5463
When should you use mouthwash?

>>5464

I use it to rinse the bits of food out of my teeth after a meal. Brushing your teeth after everything you eat is definitely a bit psychopathic, but most tooth decay is meant to start off from the bits of carbohydrate stuck to your teeth, which breaks down into sugar because of your mouth enzymes. Mouthwash feels like a good compromise, or a bit of sugar free chewing gum if you're out.

>>5444
Yeah maybe a couple of sets of this afterward:

* External or internal rotations, depending on where you're weakest (for most people who spend a lot of time at desks this is external rotation)
* Rear delt raises with light weight
* Rowing with as great a range of motion as you can do pain free

>>5447

Must be strange being absurdly strong and also a fat bitch.

>>5449
I've always found that one of the weirdest parts of being a body-builder - stop all the exercising and you quickly become a fatso.

>>5450

It is possible to not, but it requires a drastic drop in calorie consumption. and when people give up on something, their first instict isn't to think 'better make sure I feel constantly hungry for the next month'.

>>5409
Brain never do good even when I was up at 5am and heading out for a run. Stop being a GP and give me some answers.

>>5408
Don't you have Google?

Speed is what you need.

Get a referral to a psychiatrist (just tell your GP you have a long history of not being able to concentrate), get diagnosed with ADHD (which you probably have), and choose between extended release methylphenidate (Concerta) or extended release amphetamine (Elvanse).

>>5408
Are you depressed? I tick all the boxes for clinical depression and my concentration and attention span

Coke or speed depending on your preferences. That stuff they give to ADD kids is basically meth.

That's slightly more zinc than would be recommended, but it shouldn't cause you any real problems over the course of weeks or months. Lecithin and arginine are totally safe. I can't find good toxicology data on pygeum, but given the widespread use and the lack of reported adverse events it's probably reasonably safe.

No obvious interactions with sertraline. Incidentally, your dose is rather low - not a problem if it's working for you, but if you have any latent symptoms then I'd suggest trying at least 100mg.

It does nothing. just cum less often and hydrate well, that'll make more difference.

>>5393
Excellent, thank you.

Oh and I was actually considering 25mg. I feel good at the minute. But it has severely impacted sensitivity during sex and my ability to climax...

>>5396
And weight gain on top of that. But that's probably due to lockdown.

>>5330
Most of the posts are going off on a tangent rather than giving OP attention.

Could these images of the Devil's dumplings please be replaced with something safe for work? I suggest superimposing Jaffa cakes over the offending nipples, at least.

>>5334

I'd jaff her cakes iykwim.

>>5305
Be specific, lad. The real question is is she an Ossettlass?

>>5338
If so she should tell them to fucking pack it in with the fireworks again.

That's it. Who owns a set of scales? The only way to resolve this is conducting our own research.

>>5270 Anyone who thinks that the mass will change, is unlikely to run a well designed experiment, but have at it.
If the scales read more, by about 250g, it's because the engorged fella is now holding a copy of razzle.
Does razzle even still exist? Do porn mags still exist?

>>5271
I think a spring scale attached to the penis would resolve those issues.

>>5272
No no the only scientific way to do it is through displacement. You have to stick your knob into a bucket of water and then weigh the bucket.

>>5273

Nonsense. You'd have to submerge your whole body excluding the knob; and then repeat the procedure when you have a lob on.

I would recommend a healthy dose of viagra to keep the chap up, because we'll need to repeat the test several dozen times at least to eliminate any variance at the accuracy levels we'll need.

>>5241
Do you drink a lot of alcohol?

>>5243
Not at all.

>>5241

Check out the five tibetan rites. Easy to pick up, do them daily and you'll feel a lot better.

Also look into natural anti-inflammatory agents like castor oil (for external use on joints) and black seed oil (nigella sativa, can be used externally and internally).

>>5241
CBD's pretty fantastic for joint pain.

>>5246
I prefer more THC in my joints.

>>5166
It does not go through.

Cheers thought as much. Used to hang a punch bag off it.

>>5167
If it does NOT go through, I would be a bit more careful hanging off it then. Is it just the garage door mounting?

I don't know about "sturdy enough", but it looks too tall and not being about to move your wrists seems like a pain in the arse when doing pull ups, but I'm no expert.

>>5168

Drat.

Yeah just the mounting.

>>5167
The wooden beam itself is easily strong enough to take your weight as long as it's not rotten.
If it doesn't go "through" the walls, it's hard to see what else is holding it up. It looks like it's physically resting on top of the breeze-blocks on the right hand side and is mortared in, I'd assume it's fitted the same on the left hand side with some plasterwork just boxing it in.
So as long as it's more than a couple of inches inside the blockwork it'll easily hold your weight.

As others have said though the biggest problem is being comfortable holding it. If you can get one, I'd try and find one of those over-door-frame pull up bars, and perhaps bodge it a little to mount onto that beam.

>>5152
Organised exercise classes have always worked for me; basically martial arts and yoga. Obviously I can't do any of that right now, and probably for the rest of the year.

At the moment I'm just doing a punch of push ups. I might be coming out of this a fat cunt with a liver like foie gras, but I'll be coming out of it as a fat cunt with a liver like foie gras who can do a lot of push ups.

>>5156

I died

>>5149
I'm used to climbing (V5-ish), but now I'm basically locked up in an attic. I still do all the stretches, but cardio is hard. I have a 2l bottle filled with water I use for calithenics. I don't have weights at home, and none of my doors are good enough for pull ups. Maybe I should try and climb the neighbours and and consider it route done if they don't shout at me.

>>5162

Do you have anywhere you could hang a campus board?

>>5162

If you have a sturdy table in your home you can do horizontal rows, hits the same muscles as pull ups. If you haven't got a table to use, put a broom/stick/bar over/between two chairs and do them that way. For weights, a litre of water weighs 2.2lbs, books can be fairly heavy too or just big rocks, fill a backpack with them and you can do double handed bicep curls, or weighted press ups/lunges/whatever else you can think of. It's mostly just down to how creative you can get.

>>5140

I just think he has a very limited vision of what fiction encompasses. If I wrote an autobiography and I made a load of stuff up it would be a work of fiction but it wouldn't be any more or less believable than if I wrote the truth.

Likewise if I wrote about an imaginary fight that happened in my local pub last December it would also be a work of fiction, but it'd be entirely believable because there are often fights in my local.

Not all fiction fits within the format of the novel.

>>5141
> Not all fiction fits within the format of the novel.

While I'm here I might as well go full on robot moon oven and point out that not all novels are written in the first person, and that not all third person accounts are fictional.

Let's imagine that I follow you around for the day and write down everything you do, all the conversations you have, while chatting with you all the while about what you think about the things that are happening to you.

Upon reading, given the criteria of >>5137, this account is going to be quite utterly unrealistic. The focus will be on a single person, all the other characters will seem empty and not have their motivations explained, all the minor characters will only ever be seen talking to the main character or, perhaps, friends of his and the only real motivation explained will be that of the main character (as only his thoughts are revealed to the author.

Really all of this is a function of narrative, not of fiction.

>>5140
>he's chosen specific examples that would probably be indicative of a poor author, but it happens in almost any work of fiction.

Sure the point was to spell it out for people, and to do that you need examples people will understand and by definition those are simplistic and obvious.

>>5143
>Upon reading, given the criteria of >>5137, this account is going to be quite utterly unrealistic. The focus will be on a single person, all the other characters will seem empty and not have their motivations explained, all the minor characters will only ever be seen talking to the main character or, perhaps, friends of his and the only real motivation explained will be that of the main character (as only his thoughts are revealed to the author.

If you record all of it, isn't going to be unrealistic at all, but it will probably be a dull meandering mess though because real life regularly is.

As soon as you start editing it down and picking parts to weave a story though you are creating a fiction. You can call that a narrative instead if you like that is just semantics.

Even if you never add anything new, it is a fiction, because you have inserted an intent.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5144
> As soon as you start editing it down and picking parts to weave a story though you are creating a fiction.

So by your definition all (auto)biographies and memoirs are works of fiction? The idea indeed may have some merit, just interested if that's exactly what you mean.

> For a given value of believable, believability is just about how deeply you are willing to dig. If you are willing to go to the really anal layers the details at some point will be wrong

I think you're right about this. The thing about most fiction is that it's designed to be entertaining. The dull day to day that most of us experience isn't exactly exciting or entertaining so things have to be tweaked or changed to make it so.

To take an example that I know a lot about, it's always fairly obvious to me how utterly fake all computer hacking/security stuff on TV and in films is; exactly because I know what computer hacking really looks like (someone in their underwear staring at a laptop for weeks at a time, for up to 96 hours at a go, swearing a lot, drinking metric shit tons of coffee or booze, smoking a ton of fags, potentially ingesting other drugs, until eventually he somehow figures it out) and it isn't entertaining at all.

>>5146

>So by your definition all (auto)biographies and memoirs are works of fiction? The idea indeed may have some merit, just interested if that's exactly what you mean.

That is exactly what I mean. It might be based on a true story, but it is always 'sexed up' in some way, boring bits are cut out, it is focused in to a story. It is at that point to me a work of fiction.

>>5113

>>5107
I find Logan Paul's antics really unpleasant (same for the brother whose name escapes me) but I'm not sure it's really that different to Jackass or those cokehead Saturday morning kids' TV presenters we used to have.

I did hear that one of those Pauls was getting into some kind of a Youtuber boxing match, no matter who wins we should all get to have a good laugh at that one.

>>5115
Oh, I thought he meant Paul Joseph Watson. That makes more sense.

>>5115
>I did hear that one of those Pauls was getting into some kind of a Youtuber boxing match, no matter who wins we should all get to have a good laugh at that one.
I love boxing news, me. But I can never find the time to follow it. Can you let us know how Lewis vs Tyson goes as well?

>>5117
Lewis is a racecar driver you dumbfuck.