[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
technology
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  [] []
close
whiteline
>> No. 23420 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 6:00 pm
23420 spacer
Can a robot, or a piece of software, be jailed if it commits a crime? Where does legal culpability lie if code is criminal by design or default? What if a robot buys drugs, weapons, or hacking equipment and has them sent to you, and police intercept the package?

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/05/software-bot-darknet-shopping-spree-random-shopper

Wow. Amazing article.
8 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23429 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 10:25 pm
23429 spacer
>>23428
Auntiefucker has probably relapsed and gone around for another nosh.
>> No. 23430 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 10:26 pm
23430 spacer
>>23428

He's godded his auntie or something. Usual .gs stuff.

I don't even know what I'm insinuating, really.
>> No. 23431 Anonymous
6th December 2014
Saturday 1:20 am
23431 spacer
>>23426
>Then the personal who programmed it is responsible. This is bloody obvious.
The person who writes a program is no more responsible for its use for criminal purposes than Ford are responsible for Transit drivers driving carelessly. The person using a program is considered to be committing the offence with the use of a tool. Not that any of that is relevant to what went on here, because last I heard it isn't actually illegal to buy drugs.

Where things get interesting is areas of law where agency doesn't apply, such as road traffic laws. Depending on what the underlying matter is, liability attaches specifically to one of the driver, the owner, the keeper, or the adult passenger (in the case of seatbelt offences). Consider a driverless car. If this automaton lands itself on double yellows, then the owner is responsible (unless one of the statutory exemptions applies). What if it is caught speeding (driver liability)? What if you're in the driving seat, but switched the vehicle to automatic some time earlier? What if you're in the back seat as a passenger? What if nobody's in it at all and you're sat in the office having summoned it from wherever it parked itself earlier in the day?
>> No. 23435 Anonymous
7th December 2014
Sunday 9:15 pm
23435 spacer
>>23431
>Not that any of that is relevant to what went on here, last I heard it isn't actually illegal to buy drugs.
Well, funny you should bring up what is and is not relevant, because the exhibition the bot bought drugs for is located outside of the jurisdiction of UK drug laws...

>Consider a driverless car.
Given the caution and high profile with which these things are being introduced, I imagine the law has plenty of time to catch up with them and that these questions are being asked and answered by the right people.
>> No. 23439 Anonymous
8th December 2014
Monday 12:35 am
23439 spacer
>>23435
>I imagine the law has plenty of time to catch up with them
If the talk I've been hearing is anything to go by, they've got about four to six weeks. There were trials here earlier this year, but they were limited to quieter roads and required a driver to retain control over the vehicle.

whiteline
>> No. 23408 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 2:29 am
23408 spacer
I've become paranoid that my outlook email account isn't receiving all emails properly. It's quite important as I'm in the process of applying for many different jobs, and up until now my inbox has been quite busy.

My mother sent me some things through the other day and they took a few days to arrive, and when trying to confirm my account on a website, the email didn't arrive. (Yet on my gmail account it arrived instantly)

I don't know if this is related, but when playing FIFA on the pc, I noticed that I had a NAT type restrictive message. That has never happened to me before, not sure if that NAT filter or whatever it is, can fuck with my emails .

Is there a way to check if my email account is receiving emails properly?
Expand all images.
>> No. 23412 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 5:16 pm
23412 spacer
>>23408

You're being watched and your e-mails are being filtered.
>> No. 23414 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 6:21 pm
23414 spacer
>>23408

I have an old hotmail account I still use a a junk account. It plays up all the time and I do think I get delays in receiving messages. Every now and then I get random "can't connect to outlook right now" messages, and the only way to fix it is to reload the page.
>> No. 23417 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 9:06 pm
23417 spacer
Could you send yourself a bunch of emails with temporary email addresses?

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&source=hp&q=temporary+email&gbv=2&oq=temporary+email&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3..0l10.3083.10261.0.10850.15.11.0.4.4.0.360.1029.9j1j0j1.11.0....0...1ac.1.34.heirloom-hp..0.15.1071.86Cok_BWiJI
>> No. 23418 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 9:18 pm
23418 spacer
>>23412

Wouldn't be surprised.
>> No. 23419 Anonymous
5th December 2014
Friday 1:00 pm
23419 spacer
>>23418

Check your forwarding rules to make sure some dolt hasn't accidentally set your email to be forwarded to some address and be deleted/archived from your current inbox.

whiteline
Testcard_F.jpg
234092340923409
>> No. 23409 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 4:26 pm
23409 The Testcard
Anyone remember being scared of this?

https://www.youtube.com/v/lTzgMwi_SZ8
Expand all images.
>> No. 23410 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 4:29 pm
23410 spacer
I'm still scared by it. That clown thing is creepy as fuck.
>> No. 23413 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 5:43 pm
23413 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/RxJ7pu6SW_Y
>> No. 23415 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 7:54 pm
23415 spacer
>>23409
BANNED BY THE IBA
https://www.youtube.com/v/sHdOz1M1vs4
The IBA's rules required instrumental music for startups. All those chopper shots gone to waste.

Bonus points for anyone who can spot the obligatory vanity shot.
>> No. 23416 Anonymous
4th December 2014
Thursday 8:17 pm
23416 spacer
>>23410
I remember the cunt popping up in "Life on Mars". Weird storyline.

whiteline
blockings.png
233902339023390
>> No. 23390 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 11:29 pm
23390 spacer
I got this message a few minutes ago after browsing the website without issue maybe an hour earlier. http://watchseries.ag/

I also noticed that http://icefilms.info was blocked for me yesterday but got round it with the address : http://80.82.65.150/

Are these blocked for anyone else or is it part of an elaborate personalised trolling campaign by YMCAlad? Im with BT if that helps at all.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23391 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 11:37 pm
23391 spacer
Welp. This explains it, I guess.

http://torrentfreak.com/uk-piracy-blocklist-expands-with-demonoid-isohunt-iptorrents-and-more-141127/

The wordfilters are one of my favourite things here. Love you Purps x
>> No. 23392 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 11:42 pm
23392 spacer
>>23391

Pirate bay proxies are added to the global ban list on a near daily basis, I think. Big trouble soon come.
>> No. 23393 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 12:30 am
23393 spacer
Honestly I haven't noticed any difference with the streaming sites it's blocked. I always find what I want to watch up somewhere.
>> No. 23394 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 12:33 am
23394 spacer
Thank God for VPNs.
>> No. 23395 Anonymous
28th November 2014
Friday 9:30 am
23395 spacer
>>23394
You disgusting filthy pirate nonce militant daft wog, you.

whiteline
branded-baby[1].jpg
233862338623386
>> No. 23386 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 7:05 pm
23386 spacer
Is there any way I can retrieve a copy of yesterday's ITV News?

One would think I could use ITV Player on itv.com, but the 6pm news programme is absent. I found mention of this routine removal saying they'd "found people wanted more specific coverage of individual stories".

Could someone with Sky/VM please check whether their on-demand services carry it? Otherwise is there another avenue available?

If you're curious why I'm interested it's because a friend appears on it and he wants a copy.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23387 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 7:19 pm
23387 spacer
If you or your friend has access to some sort of academic institute, http://bobnational.net/ has an archive of pretty much all British TV as far back as 2007.
>> No. 23388 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 8:34 pm
23388 spacer
>>23387
That site is fucking awesome.
>> No. 23389 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 8:40 pm
23389 spacer
>>23386
>If you're curious why I'm interested it's because a friend appears on it and he wants a copy.
It used to be that if you were on a programme you could just ask for a copy. Do they not still do that?

whiteline
svvbs.jpg
233812338123381
>> No. 23381 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 8:47 am
23381 Openreach Loses Court Case on DLM Patent Infringement for ADSL Networks
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6726-assia-court-case-forces-openreach-to-turn-off-dlm.html

For a good while it won't mean anything, although some people are reporting stuck IP profiles already and there's a good chance connections will falter over time.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23382 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 12:20 pm
23382 spacer
>>23381
So, basically, company holds BT to ransom and fails to get the sale it hoped for. How did they not know that BT were the corporate equivalent of North Korea in having a reputation so tarnished it can't be degraded any further?
>> No. 23383 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 4:23 pm
23383 spacer
>>23381
I don't know what any of this means. Can someone explain it to me as if I were from the 1500s?
>> No. 23384 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 6:29 pm
23384 spacer
BT has made a statement now, that the effect is negligible.

>Update 27th November 2014: We have received a statement from BT which is reproduced in full below, and tells a slightly different story to the ASSIA release.

>"BT has been defending a claim brought by ASSIA since November 2011. They had asserted three patents against BT but during the proceedings, they had to narrow their allegations and withdraw one of these patents entirely.
>In January 2014, the High Court found BT was infringing on only a minor part of one patent, and the Court of Appeal, whilst invalidating the majority of the claims of ASSIA's other patent, ruled that BT's network infringes what remains of the other patent.
>Although BT was disappointed with the ruling, we have made minor changes to our programming which means these two decisions have no material effect on the operation or performance of our networks."

So it seems that ASSIA has pretty much spent millions in legal fees over the years, over what boils down to just a few insignificant lines of code.
>> No. 23385 Anonymous
27th November 2014
Thursday 6:30 pm
23385 spacer
So tl;dr software patents suck donkey balls?

whiteline
Front.jpg
233442334423344
>> No. 23344 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 7:56 pm
23344 RM
Anyone remember RM?
8 posts and 5 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23358 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 10:46 pm
23358 spacer
>>23357
>propitiatory OS
It may have been a lot of things, but it certainly wasn't that.
>> No. 23364 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 5:10 pm
23364 spacer
>>23344
>Nimbus

Early cloud computing?

I'll get my coat.
>> No. 23365 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 10:21 pm
23365 spacer
>>23357

RM are still around, although they stopped making computers last year to focus on education-specific software and services. I don't recall them ever using a proprietary OS, although they did have a variety of "learning environment" software that presented a simplified interface. RM were Wintel from almost the beginning, as you can see from the magazine adverts posted by OP.

>>23364

Funnily enough, you sort of hit the nail on the head. Along with Acorn, RM were well ahead of the curve in terms of networking. RM sold packages to schools which used a proprietary low-cost networking technology to share hard drives and printers; Using these shared resources substantially reduced the cost per computer. Acorn had similar technology (Econet), but they didn't provide the kind of complete service offered by RM. Schools were expected to go to local Acorn dealers for advice on procuring and installing a system, but the quality of that service was highly variable. In many ways, I think Acorn squandered the huge advantage they had gained through the BBC contract by failing to fully recognise the importance of supporting schools.

The first computer I ever owned was a cast-off RM 386, fished out of the skip at my school. If I remember rightly it wasn't perfectly IBM compatible, which necessitated various weird workarounds to run DOS games properly. The PE teacher at my secondary took a bit of a shine to me not like that, you rotten old cynics and tipped me off whenever the school was chucking stuff out, so I learned my trade by cobbling together computers from knackered old tat. I expect that there are still half a dozen old RM machines in my mum's loft, in various states of disrepair. Funny how little things like that can determine the course of your adult life.
>> No. 23366 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 11:05 pm
23366 spacer
>>23365
IIRC the early Nimbus line ran a slightly customised build of Windows. At one school I was at we had them running Windows 3.0, but with no green for some reason. DOS programs would happily show you green, but Windows programs would not. If you went into Excel 4.0 and set a cell background to (0,255,0), it would look just as white as the cells next to it.

I never used to hear about anything getting chucked out, but then that might have been because in the two secondary schools I was in nothing got chucked out while I was there. In the first they apparently got some new machines and a bunch of BBCs got replaced by the cascaded Nimbus boxes after I left. In the second a whole load of computers had been replaced before I got there, including a room full of A4000s over the summer before I started - though I did once manage to borrow a BBC Master for a couple of weeks for a project.
>> No. 23380 Anonymous
22nd November 2014
Saturday 7:41 am
23380 spacer
I remember them well since Windows 95. Before they started rolling them out, my old school mostly consisted of BBC Micro and Acorn Archimedes.

From what I recall, there was a custom login screen/shell and no admin access/access to certain settings. All programs were sorted into their own window and such for the end user. Can't remember if they had shipped with software preinstalled or if it had to be done manually.

whiteline
roxio-3d-photo-creator-16.jpg
233732337323373
>> No. 23373 Anonymous
3rd November 2014
Monday 11:55 pm
23373 Blender, 3d Max or cinema 4d
Hello my friend! I wish to learn 3d modeling, I've got a strong background with computer effects and motion graphics with programs like After Effects and it's various addons and plug ins. I know of many programs to produce 3d models with which of them would you recommend? Tah lads.
1 post omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23375 Anonymous
4th November 2014
Tuesday 9:28 pm
23375 spacer
>>23373
What are you doing it for? Game design? Movies/CGI? Do you intend to pay for the software? Are you doing this for a uni course or just as a hobby?

If it's just a hobby or bit of fun, Cinema 4D is easiest to get good results from and most fun to use. Cinema 4D is a bit limited though, so If you want to do it professionally you should think about using others. I think the industry standards for game design is 3DSMax, and Maya for movies (though you can use either really, it doesn't make much of a difference and are both made by the same company).
If you need it free, then you're stuck with blender; which in my experience is an absolute chore to use.

I haven't used any of it in 4-5 years though, so my opinions are probably a bit dated (though probably not by much, things move a bit slow in these industries). Also look into Z-Brush.
>> No. 23376 Anonymous
5th November 2014
Wednesday 3:41 am
23376 spacer
Blender is good if you're looking to learn as a hobby. It's free! And the interface is...interesting. Very hotkey focused as a design principle which makes it quite enjoyale to work with once you figure it out.
In all honesty I think it catches a lot of flack because it's not used as an industry standard so people aren't forced to learn its quirks as they would 3DSMax (which I mostly use) or Maya.

Blender does have one big flaw in that it doesn't have an option to use smoothing groups in the way that 3DSMax (and others) do. There are workarounds, but you're still left with a nuisance when it comes to sharing models between different programs in that case.

3DSMax or Maya are both useful if you're interested in professional work. Both are used in games, but other than that Maya tends to be used by animators and 3DSMax by visualisation people. I use 3DSMax myself.

The main thing to learn with 3D are the core workflows, after that it's just a case of figuring out how they work in a particular program.

Games industry (video games & tabletop games) has seriously shifted towards digital sculpting these days too. ZBrush is the key software for that.
>> No. 23377 Anonymous
5th November 2014
Wednesday 5:58 pm
23377 spacer
I'm on my last year of a university course although it would be for professional use for films and CGI. I've never used any sort of 3D creation software, So I'm thinking of using blender as entry level and working my way up, would you guys recommend that? or would it be best just to jump in to the deep end so to speak?
>> No. 23378 Anonymous
6th November 2014
Thursday 6:08 pm
23378 spacer
>>23377
I'd say start as you mean to go on. It'll just slow down your progress switching packages a year or two down the line. You'll have to learn new hotkeys, new ways of doing things you've done a hundred times before (like making textures), new names for tools etc
The whole thing would just be a bother you don't need, and offering no real advantage (other than you can use blender... which no one cares about).
>> No. 23379 Anonymous
6th November 2014
Thursday 9:22 pm
23379 spacer
>>23378
> The whole thing would just be a bother you don't need, and offering no real advantage (other than you can use blender... which no one cares about).

Indeed. Don't go into this thinking that blender is somehow an "easy" or "beginners" tool. The only advantage it offers a beginner is that it's well and truly free (which, if you'd rather not pirate things, does save you a pretty penny).

whiteline
353px-Chiptune-Setup-Game-Boys[1].jpg
233372333723337
>> No. 23337 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 11:52 am
23337 spacer
What's the demo scene like in the UK?

Is anyone here part of it?
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23340 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 1:49 pm
23340 spacer
>>23339
The demo scene that I think he's referring to isn't solely about music - it's about writing 'demos', to demonstrate ones coding prowess. These often feature music.
>> No. 23341 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 2:00 pm
23341 spacer
>>23340

Oh. I'll be quiet then.
>> No. 23342 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 5:18 pm
23342 spacer
>>23337

Didn't the demo scene die with the Amiga? I remember some of the old crews could do real magic with those little machines (you've actually just made me nostalgic for 'Jesus on Es' and one I can't quite remember the title of "[something] and sunflowers" maybe.
>> No. 23343 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 5:47 pm
23343 spacer
>>23342
The demoscene is alive. Sometimes older platforms still get demos, like this one for the Megadrive:

https://www.youtube.com/v/w54uNAuqE1Y

Or this for the Amstrad CPC:

https://www.youtube.com/v/dqjZNnjNu3Y

But perhaps the craziest are the PC ones that are size-limited. This demo, for instance, is 4KB:
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=52938
To put into perspective just how tiny 4KB is - you could fit three hundred and sixty copies of this onto a single floppy disk. It's absolutely minuscule.

There's loads at pouet, something for almost every platform you could name:
http://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php
>> No. 23370 Anonymous
30th October 2014
Thursday 7:25 pm
23370 spacer
https://www.youtube.com/v/zCfJPoKyn2w

whiteline
141253699732[1].png
233612336123361
>> No. 23361 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 8:03 am
23361 Disconnect
I'm trying to get the disconnect add-on working in Seamonkey 2.29

I've been following the instructions here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=1355415 and here https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SeaMonkey_2

And I added this code to the install.rdf file:

</Description>
<em:targetApplication>
<!-- SeaMonkey -->
<Description>
<em:id>{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}</em:id>
<em:minVersion>2.0</em:minVersion>
<em:maxVersion>2.*</em:maxVersion>
</Description>
</em:targetApplication>
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

whiteline
codelite errors.png
233592335923359
>> No. 23359 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 3:26 am
23359 spacer
How do you turn off these error messages in CodeLite? Because they are really, really fucking annoying and I've only been using it for 10 minutes.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23360 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 4:48 am
23360 spacer
Settings → Build Settings → Build Output Appearance

remove the option: "Compiler errors/warnings displayed inline"

As seen on https://github.com/eranif/codelite/issues/421[/spoiler]
>> No. 23362 Anonymous
24th October 2014
Friday 11:05 am
23362 spacer
>>23360

thanks.

whiteline
>> No. 23349 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 8:13 pm
23349 spacer
Do any of you happen to have a vodafone pay as you go SIM pack lying around? If so, could you post the set up instructions for the iPhone please? There's something about changing wap.xxx to pp.xxx and so on.
Expand all images.
>> No. 23354 Anonymous
23rd October 2014
Thursday 8:31 pm
23354 spacer
>>23353

Thanks but I've already spent a few hours on the internet trying that and similar. It used to work using the SIM pack details but I've recently reset it and can't find the pack. If nobody has one I'll get a pack from Argos tomorrow, I just wanted to be sure before I went out of my way.

whiteline
business-telephone-number.jpg
233282332823328
>> No. 23328 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 4:10 am
23328 spacer
I am somewhat already regretting not just bumping an older thread but I'm wondering whether I should get a new phone. My current phone is 5 years old (Blackberry 8520) and I am surprised at the disadvantage this gives me when usually I'd be fine with a phone that does the bare minimum. As a result I am very ignorant of the going rate for phones these days.

I am a student and living off grants and after working out whether I can afford such an expense I have 60 quid I can spend without living off beans at aldi. Naturally I was going to not bother looking as my initial searches got me looking at phones that were £120 at the lowest.

I did then use google shopping and was pointed towards ebay. I am paranoid over the idea of buying a phone over ebay but there are some phones that are going for less than my budget and wondering whether I should take the plunge as the feedback on one seller is quite high.

My criteria for a good replacement is quite simple
Android (as there is no way I can afford an iphone) OS
Significantly better than my Blackberry
Unlocked (I already have a good sim card with a good contract)
Less than £60
3 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23332 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 12:02 pm
23332 spacer
I'll just add that it would be worth waiting a few months to make sure you can get android 5 on whatever phone you use. It should be worth it, especially on cheaper phones, as it's meant to have a noticeable improvement on both speed and battery life as there's a fairly major code overhaul.

All the newest Motorola phones will be updated to it in due time, but some budget phones from other manufacturers would be worth avoiding unless you know you'll get the upgrade.
>> No. 23333 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 3:27 pm
23333 spacer
>>23332

I doubt anything in his budget range will ever have Android 5. Most phones in that price range are still running 2.x.

Op's best bet is to hit ebay and find something nice that someone's replaced and no longer wants. New phones come out on such a regular basis that turnover is massive and you can get phones that are only a generation or two old for really cheap prices - especially on the bidding auctions.
>> No. 23334 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 4:17 pm
23334 spacer
>>23333
>Most phones in that price range are still running 2.x.
That's really not the case. You can get quite a bit of phone for £60 these days, if you go the cheapo Chinese route.
>> No. 23335 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 5:44 pm
23335 spacer
OP here.

Apologies but my dad may set me up with one of his old phones, the only issue being that I'd have to remove the blackberry part of my sim card which can take a month or so.
>> No. 23336 Anonymous
19th October 2014
Sunday 7:15 pm
23336 spacer
>>23335
Might be quicker to just order a new SIM and transfer your number over in that case.

whiteline
lli.jpg
232792327923279
>> No. 23279 Anonymous
11th October 2014
Saturday 12:00 am
23279 spacer
Is there a free way to find out what a domain's IP address used to be? My beloved Lossless Inside was taken down. They changed the domain to .org which worked for a couple of days but then it redirected to google then a parked domain page.

I'd just like to think they're still out there somewhere and I could bypass the domain name and find the site with its IP address. It's a vain hope I'm sure.
4 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 23323 Anonymous
17th October 2014
Friday 1:49 pm
23323 spacer
>>23321

Actually, one of them kind of is working

http://94.228.209.228/

and its internal links even work if you edit from

http://losslessinside.net/21166/we-invented-paris-rocket-spaceship-thing

to

http://94.228.209.228/21166/we-invented-paris-rocket-spaceship-thing

Obviously they've stopped updating though.
>> No. 23324 Anonymous
17th October 2014
Friday 1:54 pm
23324 spacer
>>23323

You can only get at the download providers where they didn't require a captcha though, and they required it for most of their older posts.

http://94.228.209.228/e5e57c/82278da077f9adee709a7b80931355223cf3817d
>> No. 23325 Anonymous
17th October 2014
Friday 3:07 pm
23325 spacer
>>23324
This is one of the reasons I run squidguard on my networks when I can. Among its many features, you can rewrite request URLs on the fly so that broken links end up going to the right place.
>> No. 23326 Anonymous
17th October 2014
Friday 3:35 pm
23326 spacer
>>23324

If I grab the source code of the page, replace all the losslessinside.nets with 94.228.209.228s, save it as HTML and open it, then the captcha works fine.
>> No. 23327 Anonymous
18th October 2014
Saturday 5:58 pm
23327 spacer
They've got their .net domain fully functional now. I'm not sure how long this will last.

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]