|>>|| No. 23431
>Then the personal who programmed it is responsible. This is bloody obvious.
The person who writes a program is no more responsible for its use for criminal purposes than Ford are responsible for Transit drivers driving carelessly. The person using a program is considered to be committing the offence with the use of a tool. Not that any of that is relevant to what went on here, because last I heard it isn't actually illegal to buy drugs.
Where things get interesting is areas of law where agency doesn't apply, such as road traffic laws. Depending on what the underlying matter is, liability attaches specifically to one of the driver, the owner, the keeper, or the adult passenger (in the case of seatbelt offences). Consider a driverless car. If this automaton lands itself on double yellows, then the owner is responsible (unless one of the statutory exemptions applies). What if it is caught speeding (driver liability)? What if you're in the driving seat, but switched the vehicle to automatic some time earlier? What if you're in the back seat as a passenger? What if nobody's in it at all and you're sat in the office having summoned it from wherever it parked itself earlier in the day?