|>>|| No. 24332
On Friday the High Court decided that the "private copying exemption" was unlawful because it didn't provide for compensation for rightsholders. Apparently rightsholders are harmed by individuals deciding to listen to music they have already purchased on another device.
On the upside, as we found out with the militant daft woggery Act, the government's options in response to this include "ignore it", because the High Court can't tell Parliament what to do (something the article leaves out).
Fair warning: the judgment itself makes for very dry reading.