>>65231
>KEEN EYE FOR A BARGAIN ARE LEMBIT, YOU DON'T TURN DOWN A BUY ONE GET ONE FREE.

"When I first met Lembit I told him to BOGOF. The next thing I know I'm being strapped onto an intergalactic rocket with my twin sister!"

>>65240
>BOGOF

>>65233

this is a popular misconception, but big dick energy is not a term to describe someone with an actual big dick. that's just someone with a big dick.

big dick energy is for someone with an average or small penis, or even no penis at all, in the case of women, but whom act with the presumed confidence and cockiness of someone with a big dick. hence big dick energy.

>>65242
Pretty sure it refers to a genuine confidence regardless of cock size.

>>65242

While it's true you can have big dick energy with any size of knob, or even none at all, the phrase does not preclude those with actual large penises.

>>65196

She has expressed interest in the past, or at least I believe so. I think I might have posted about it here once.

She's attractive, but not attractive enough to make it worth having my knob blown off first.

Depends if the frenulum is intact.

What about the balls? I think they're just as important.

>>65199

If you had your dad's balls surgically attached and then got a woman pregnant, would your child also be your sibling?

>>65198

Have you been following dick-burner?

>>65093
>TATERS
Precious.

>>65096

I've watched the entire trilogy three times this week, I ended up talking about the parallel between that and my life to my counsellor, and now I'm seeing it here.

>>65098
The taters song has ruined LOTR for me. The moment I hear "boil em, mash em, stick em in a stew" I lose all sense of immersion.

Get your pencils out, lads. Vorderman has started teaching maths online:

&

It's for ages 4-12 years but I reckon we could give those kids are run for their money on the medal count if we all work together.

>>65201
4-12 years? I could probably finish all the sums in that video in 9 months tops

>>65184
Well, it fluctuates because it's where highly-energised particles from the sun collide with the Earth's magnetic field. It's very sparse but can get very, very hot - superheated plasma temperature hot if you're unlucky. It veers between too cold for life and too hot for it, while having such a low density that any liquid water will instantly evaporate. Overall it's the last place you'd expect a microorganism to stick around. On top of everything you've got very little protection from cosmic radiation.

>>65185
A bit like the moon?

What I want to know is, why do the same people who refuse to believe that Covid-19 is a natural virus also refuse to believe that global warming is man-made?

>>65187

In both cases, they're choosing a psychologically easy lie over a difficult truth.

If COVID was man-made, we can track down the bastards who made it and torture the antidote out of them or something. It's easier to believe in a government conspiracy than the fact that our entire way of life can be disrupted by the random mutation of a microorganism.

If climate change is just a natural event caused by the sun or whatever, then there's nothing we can do and no point worrying about it. We don't have to take responsibility for our actions, deal with the guilt of having wrecked the climate and radically change our way of life to avert total disaster.

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/04/01/us/ap-us-hospital-ship-train-attack.html

“You only get this chance once. The whole world is watching. I had to," Moreno told investigators, according to the complaint. "People don’t know what’s going on here. Now they will.”

>>65174
u fuckin wot m8?

Only a carpet-bagger needs a quick response.

>>65150

I love the scots verdict of "Not proven". I always think it's the court saying "He dunnit and we know 'e dunnit but we can't prove it so on with yer".

>>65161

Which is pretty much what Michael Jackson's jurors said after his trial ..."We're sure he did it, we just couldn't prove it on this occasion."

>>65161
You seem to have completely misread the post you are replying to, which is itself a refutation of yours.

That post is saying that the verdict means the prosecution's case is so rubbish that there is virtually no charge to answer to begin with.

>>65169
that was my first post in the thread, i didn't bother to read the rest of it.

anyway:

"Both in the "solemn" and the "summary" acquittals, not proven is interpreted as indicating that the jury or judge, respectively, is not convinced of the innocence of the accused; in fact, they may be morally convinced that the accused is guilty, but do not find the proofs sufficient for a conviction. One reason for this is the rule that in such cases the evidence for the prosecution must be corroborated in order to permit a conviction. Thus, there might be a single plaintiff or witness for the prosecution, which the jury or judge believes is both truthful and trustworthy, but no other witness or circumstances against the accused. By Scottish law, the accused then should be acquitted, but often will be so by the verdict not proven.[1]"

that's not the same thing as having 'no charge to answer'. I think you're happily choosing your own interpretation here.

The prosecution gambit was to get him under the Moorov Doctorine - if a lot of people say he's a sexual criminal, then all of their claims (absent other evidence) can corroborate one another and be entered as evidence. What actually happened is when they went trawling for claims (interviewing over 400 women) they had to really reach, drawing in things like "tugging on hair" to try and get a reasonable number of cases in. I think including farcical charges like that undermined their whole case, the jury thought it was bollocks and threw the whole lot out.

The whole business with SNP factionalism around this is very interesting. Sturgeon clearly wasn't on his side and expressed no gladness he'd been found innocent (unlike some other SNP representatives), the Scottish Government has already been sued by Salmond for cocking up their internal investigation into his behaviour - but Sturgeon gets on with the civil servant who was in charge of it and re-appointed them. It'll be interesting to see what evidence of a conspiracy Salmond presents, having claimed he's got it but couldn't enter it into the trial.

>>65160
>His name is slightly exotic

How dare you! Idris is a traditional Welsh name, It is name it is the name of a red hot dragon not one of your lumping great fairy tale dragons but a small chime heraldic welsh dragon who lives on smoke hill he does. Jones the steam found him up there you see.

>>65162

I always associated Idris with Fiery Ginger Beer.

Idris sounds like a contagious skin disease that gives you flakey eczema on your eyelids.

>>65165
Not really, it's a really old name and one familiar to anyone with a passing knowledge of Shamanism.

>>65167
wotevs, idris

>>65133

m8 yer burds a nazi

I think I've realised why she gives me such a stonk on. She reminds me of a big titty alternative girl I had a huge crush on when I was 15.

>>65135

Alternative girl = chubby, not much of a looker but big tits trump that

>>65153

Don't forget pale. So delightfully pale.

>>65153
This one was actually quite a looker. She wasn't skinny but she certainly wasn't chubby, she was... in proportion.

What?

>>65136
Come back when the video is informed by physicists rather than theoretical physicists.

YOU HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN THE POOL, BUT YOU NEED TO GET OUT NOW BECAUSE IT'S CLOSED DUE TO AIDS.

>>65138

It's a bit rude to call them theoretical physicists, they all looked pretty real to me.

>>65136

Clickbait title that didn't even have anything to do with the title.

It seemed suspiciously close in format to an intelligence design propaganda film and that is what it is a propaganda film for a minority theory.

When I see things like this I have to ask myself who made this and why. Because it isn't accepted enough consensus for it to be a pure educational film. I assume someone made this to win some sort of argument not on the validity of their position but based on an appeal to popularism. Maybe they think they will get more funding if they can demonstrate people are interested in this idea? Maybe they just want other physicist to have heard of them so they get a seat at the table. It feels like I'm being taught to take a side in a debate I really have no authority to comment on.

what did these LV signs mean?

>>65119

Luis VuittonLuncheon Vouchers

>>65119

lesbian vaginas

>>65116
homos

>>65119

Lord Vader

>>65092
Frightened by women, eh? You some kind of bender?

>>65109
If you saw the pictures of this woman and thought she was an 8/10 but then met up with her and she's a 4/10 in the flesh you'd be quite rightly terrified.

>>65114

Definitely a bender.

>>65114

Everyone knows that what you do when a bird off tinder shows up seven stone heavier than she looked in her pics is to grit your teeth and shag her anyway.

>>65122

>SEVEN STONE HEAVIER

Those are rookie numbers. I've met birds off tinder that were absolutely unashamed to post pictures of themselves in their anorexic scene phase then turn up being 30 stone reality TV candidates.