self-dolphin rape

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Yqsm61KHuE

quality footpath

>>67579

Acceptable Avenue

>>67580
alright A-road

>>67581

MEDIOCRE MEWS

MORNINGTON CRESCENT

>>67564
Some of them probably had their jaws shaven. The pointy chin look is apparently considered quite beautiful over there.

>>67566

It is more likely a phone filter. Most chinese phones use these beautify beautify apps by default which whiten skin, embiggen eyes, and narrow jaws. I'm a pure pro at spotting them on Tinder or Tantan or whatever.

>>67567
It's very obviously plastic surgery and shedloads of make up.

>>67567
In my, uhh...empirical research, I've noticed that a lot of East Asian (mostly Korean and the Chinese) gender benders use these face filters for their videos. They're impossible to wank to because they give off strong uncanny valley vibes. The skin is too smooth and the eyes are too robotical. The Japanese were really on to something with their whole imperfect perfection/wabi sabi thing.

>>67562
My goodness, that is a stomach churning video.

>>67555
Yes.

This thread is pretty gay.

The bit you tend to miss as an atheist is that most religious people know on some level that religion isn't real, they just like it. you focus on all the absurdities and contradictions, because you take at face value what they know is just a weird collective live action role play.

eskimocs tend to be a bit more serious about their religion than the average Christian, but that really isn't saying much when you consider how watered down of a religion Christianity is nowadays. most of it is cultural etiquette, i'd argue most muslanders don't drink for roughly the same reason you didn't want your mam and dad finding out you smoked when you were 15.

acknowledging this though i think religious institutions/interest groups should be afforded less political clout. imagine if there was a political lobby for Warhammer enthusiasts or furries.

>>67558
Humans constantly try to exploit or harness any sort of natural forces they know exist; I think it's a fairly solid argument that nobody actually believes in YWH if they don't spend all their time trying to figure out how to hogtie him like Gulliver and force him to act as their own personal genie. Yeah people pray but you can pray to a river and it won't generate power until you put in the graft and build yourself a hydroelectric dam.

>>67545
Are you mad that the girl in your OP identifies as eskimo and gay, or are you mad that you think the eskimo community accept her as a eskimo?

>>67510
The blur makes her worryingly look like my mum.

>>67511

Is your mum single?

>>67512
No, but my dad is definitely punching with her.

>>67509
She's dead

Carol Vorderman with my future wife.

We know, lad. We discussed it when it was actually in the news last year.

>>67540
It is a particularly British thing to mentally link up "bored truckers" to "going dogging".

I've never been dogging, but is it a favourite of truck drivers?

>>67530

Appropriate for Labour then.

>>67530
Uncanny.

Would still make the sex to and/or with both of them.

They've cancelled some of her fines. The magna carta works!

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/kirklees-council-u-turn-plan-19345674

>>67536

How much does a hairdresser's make? I imagine it's a fair bit as they all seem to charge £40+ per haircut. I suppose she must have enough overhead to actually pay the 17k and this is an elaborate marketing scheme, otherwise her business partners/employees/parents/friends would have rugby tackled her to the ground and stuck a sock in her mouth by now.

>>67514

We're both citing the same study.

>>67516
But which one is correct? There's only one way to find out...

>>67516
The one in >>67488 is a lot older.

>>67518
Why has soldiers going mental gone up in six years when we haven't even done a war in this time? Do we need to keep blowing up brown people to keep them sane?

>>67519
>Do we need to keep blowing up brown people to keep them sane?
U DONT SUPPORT ARE TROOPS IF YOU DONT SUPPORT BOMBING BROWN PEOPLE. SIMPLE AS!

I think it depends on the vagina. The same way not ever pair of breast or legs turns me on. In general I am about the total composition. Face i think over rides all other body traits for me. It is the window of emotional expression and personality and those are stronger factors than how a vagina looks.

I don't think I would ever see a vagina and think wow look at that vagina I want her. But then social rules are set up in a way that that doesn't happen maybe there is a woman out there with a perfect one that I would fall in love with just by the look of it I don't know..

>>67502
>because they'd keep bringing it up unprompted
That's unfair, I've rarely seen that. Lassmates who lurk here seem content to lurk here.

>>67505
We're talking years and years ago here. I have trouble distinguishing between what was posted here 10 years ago and what was posted 10 weeks ago. It might have been why they created /bint/, who knows? My find is too fuzzy to remember.

Oh and there was also that fat lass that pissed in a shower on pictures of Are Si but that might have been Britchan.

>>67507

That was here but I am 90% certain it was something posted by her dom and she had no idea what any of this was. Assuming my guess work of who posted it is correct.

>>67392
Lol they're interdimensional beings made of energy traveling in intelligent plasma ships, you absolute rub. Miss me with this hybrid shit.

>>67393
Lol no, they're definitely hybrid with brand loyalty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaYfsxbiKsM

>>67409
Is that Michael Gove? He looks different without his glasses.

>>67457
>SHE ALREADY MENTIONED THAT SHE HOPES I DON'T REACT LIKE THAT AT SEEING CLITORIS IN REAL LIFE

If you're more of a bumder encourage her to visit r/GrowYourClit. The bigger the clit, the more it's like a dick.

>>67465
>R/GROWYOURCLIT
Good god.

>>67466
Why grow your clitoris?

[/I]Two reasons seem to be of greatest interest: to make it easier to find by the owner or partner and to make it easier to stimulate. Some want to orgasm quicker, some want stronger orgasms, and a few just want to be able to orgasm. Finding that tiny sensitive organ can be a serious matter because about half range from rice grain to small pea size – most of the remainder are no larger than a corn kernel (about ¼ inch). Many women have never seen their clits because they are simply too small and buried under or in other tissue – another reason to enlarge your clit. A few want a “mini-penis” that can be stroked similarly to an intact penis. The good news is you can grow a much larger clitoris and you can do it reasonably quickly.[/I]

>>67457
Yes, that's probably it. I'm in my late 20s but If I shave clean I'll get ID'd for energy drinks.

>>67468
Weird to read this after all the discussion on clits. Was thinking you have to present your vag at the bar.

>>67340
Why would Emily reappear now, at this stage in the ILL CULT game?

>>67340
I've only just come across her just now.

She seems relatively sane to me.

https://blackrabbitblackrabbitblackrabbit.blogspot.com/2010/

>>67410
Richard Herring doesn't blog this much, Jesus.

>>67417
That's not her only blog either - there are many many others. Poor lass is disturbed.

>>67419
>Poor lass is disturbed.
Oh, really?!

>>67405

I've never once heard anyone being called a captainess, it might be a real word but it is never, ever fucking used - and yes I do encounter females with the title of captain, daily.

>>67406

>That's not how people work no matter your relative wealth and it presumes that rational actors are at work when people are perfectly willing to play against their own interests.

I have absolutely nothing to back this up but I'm willing to bet that if you could somehow study it, people from a wealthier background are better at pursuing "rational" self interest than people from poorer backgrounds, whatever the definition of rational self interest is.

>>67407
Where do you work, either the forces or somewhere that processes lots of ships/planes?

Is there even much demand for fisherman these days? I looked into it and it turns out that only a significant portion of the elderly are getting their recommended two portions of fish a week while there's a decline every year in other demographics.

Turns out you're supposed to have two portions a week for your health which I've certainly not been doing. I should look into this but aside from baked Salmon really don't know where to start.

>>67408
>I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO BACK THIS UP

Well that explains your politics.

Thing is the biggest determining factor in altruism isn't wealth but community inequality and relative distance. I'd guess that all of us here would save a drowning child (and tut at anyone doesn't) but the amount of good you could do with even a modest western income is shameful. It's a tired argument but there's much more going on when we're all the global 1% and something philosophies of life continually smash into like a brick-wall because we don't operate consistently or rationally.

To return to the point, the ineffectual solutions pushed by the bourgeoisie is one thing but to call it a deliberate plan or suggest that they don't care at all is nonsense. I'm sure if there was a magic fanny-trawler wand they'd use it but the real solution is hard and with all gender politics liable to get you burned at the stake. Certainly harder still than some 'eat the rich' solution aimed at giving people bennies until they hear the call of the sea.

>>67416

>Well that explains your politics

And what would those be then, based off one post to make assumptions on? you great big berk.

>To return to the point, the ineffectual solutions pushed by the bourgeoisie is one thing but to call it a deliberate plan or suggest that they don't care at all is nonsense

I'm fairly certain that was actually the point of the post you are so laboriously disagreeing with mate. Good grief.

For my own view: I wouldn't call it a stretch to say throwing all this shite out and starting with cold hard measurable quantitative inequalities like income disparity across the board, would both do a lot more to address all the soft, wishy washy inequalities that only exist qualitatively as well as be much, much easier than any of the current crop of people in charge would ever like to admit. it is not at all conspiracy talk to suggest that the ruling class of our time is committed to prevent material solutions to inequality being implemented, hence why so many meaningless gestural ones must be found.