[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 61223)
Message
File  []
close
_102880824_johnson_burqa_getty-2.jpg
612236122361223
>> No. 61223 Are Moaty
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:23 pm
61223 spacer
>If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you. If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree – and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the northern lights. I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letter boxes; and I thoroughly dislike any attempt by any – invariably male – government to encourage such demonstrations of “modesty”, notably the extraordinary exhortations of President Ramzan Kadyrov of Chechnya, who has told the men of his country to splat their women with paintballs if they fail to cover their heads.

>If a constituent came to my MP’s surgery with her face obscured, I should feel fully entitled – like Jack Straw – to ask her to remove it so that I could talk to her properly. If a female student turned up at school or at a university lecture looking like a bank robber then ditto: those in authority should be allowed to converse openly with those that they are being asked to instruct. As for individual businesses or branches of government – they should of course be able to enforce a dress code that enables their employees to interact with customers; and that means human beings must be able to see each other’s faces and read their expressions. It’s how we work.

>All that seems to me to be sensible. But such restrictions are not quite the same as telling a free-born adult woman what she may or may not wear, in a public place, when she is simply minding her own business.

>I am against a total ban because it is inevitably construed – rightly or wrongly – as being intended to make some point about Shamanism. If you go for a total ban, you play into the hands of those who want to politicise and dramatise the so-called clash of civilisations; and you fan the flames of grievance. You risk turning people into martyrs, and you risk a general crackdown on any public symbols of religious affiliation, and you may simply make the problem worse. Like a parent confronted by a rebellious teenager determined to wear a spike through her tongue, or a bolt through her nose, you run the risk that by your heavy-handed attempt to ban what you see as a bizarre and unattractive adornment you simply stiffen resistance.

So what's bozza meant to be apologising for? Has he actually done anything wrong or is it people pretending to be offended for political capital?
Expand all images.
>> No. 61224 R4GE
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:30 pm
61224 spacer
>>61223
The entire furore is focused on the use of the words "letter box" and "bank robber", the rest of the context has been swept out of the window.
>> No. 61225 Samefag
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:37 pm
61225 spacer
>>61224
They do look like letterboxes, though. Soon we won't be able to point out obvious truths, like the sky being blue or water being wet, without someone manufacturing outrage.

Are we heading in the direction that any criticism of Shamanism is seen as Shamanismaphobic, similar to how any criticism of Israel is apparently anti-Semitic?
>> No. 61226 Auntiefucker
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:44 pm
61226 spacer
>>61225

The sky being blue is a Eurocentric concept and describing it as such has no place in a modern, progressive, multicultural societal discourse. There are civilisations in Africa with no concept of 'blue', and to describe something as blue is discriminatory of their reality.
>> No. 61227 Moralfag
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:45 pm
61227 spacer
>>61224
The rest of the context is irrelevant. It would be like claiming someone is a nigger in the woodpile. Even if you're using the phrase correctly, it's the mark of an insensitive cunt. Saying they look like letterboxes or bank robbers takes a deep cultural wotsit and trivialises it like it's some kind of shit halloween costume.

On the upside, at this rate Alexander Boris deColumbo Impersonator is not likely to become PM any time this decade.
>> No. 61228 Crabkiller
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:58 pm
61228 spacer
>>61227
>DEEP CULTURAL WOTSIT

"Hey, we've come up with another way to oppress women."

Something being around for a long time doesn't mean that it's worthy and above scrutiny. Otherwise they'd never have cancelled the bill.
>> No. 61229 YubYub
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:59 pm
61229 spacer
It's fucking ridiculous. They do look like letterboxes. So what.
>> No. 61230 Paedofag
8th August 2018
Wednesday 8:59 pm
61230 spacer
>>61227
>it's the mark of an insensitive cunt. Saying they look like letterboxes or bank robbers takes a deep cultural wotsit and trivialises it like it's some kind of shit halloween costume.

PRECIOUS PRECIOUS PRECIOUS
>> No. 61231 YubYub
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:01 pm
61231 spacer
>>61228
>Something being around for a long time doesn't mean that it's worthy and above scrutiny.
True, but it does mean that random blokes off of t'internet don't get decide whether it's worthy.
>> No. 61232 Ambulancelad
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:08 pm
61232 spacer
>>61231
It's to do with the concept of honour. Encourage the burqa and your tacitly condoning honour killings and everything else which falls under that umbrella.

We don't tolerate honour killings because they're backwards and medieval. Why should we tolerate something that by rights should be illegal under domestic violence laws on coercive control?
>> No. 61233 YubYub
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:12 pm
61233 spacer
>>61232
You forgot to wipe after pulling that out of your arse m7.
>> No. 61234 Billbob
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:23 pm
61234 spacer
>>61233
If it isn't to do with the concept of avoiding bringing dishonour upon your family by restraining from virtue and tempting men with them being able to see your face then why do women wear them?
>> No. 61235 Searchfag
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:25 pm
61235 spacer
>>61234
No idea. Have you tried asking one?
>> No. 61236 R4GE
8th August 2018
Wednesday 9:28 pm
61236 spacer
>>61235
Tried it once, but someone from royal mail came and opened up her belly before removing a bunch of letters.
>> No. 61237 Auntiefucker
8th August 2018
Wednesday 10:08 pm
61237 spacer
"Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs."
>> No. 61238 Moralfag
8th August 2018
Wednesday 10:13 pm
61238 spacer
>>61234

Ask 10 eskimos, get 10 answers. A conservative Saudi cleric might tell you that it's to protect god-fearing men from being seduced by women of low virtue. A moderate Iranian might tell you that modest dress helps make women more equal, by signalling that they're not just an object to be gawped at by pervy men; it's worth noting that 70% of Iranian science and engineering graduates are female. A British eskimo woman might tell you that it's a symbol of her faith and culture, like a turban for a Sikh man.

Only a small minority of eskimo clerics think that face-coverings should be mandatory for women and it's not a legal requirement in any eskimo country.

There are many very grave issues facing women in Shamanism, but it seems perverse that so much attention is drawn to a piece of cloth. If UKIP and the Rassemblement national are so concerned about the rights of eskimo women, their efforts would be better spent on opposing FGM, providing comprehensive and culturally sensitive support for eskimo victims of domestic violence and encouraging racial and religious tolerance.
>> No. 61239 Anonymous
8th August 2018
Wednesday 10:33 pm
61239 spacer
>>61238
Probably because it's so visible. People would be more concerned about fgm if victims walked around with their mutilated fannies out.
>> No. 61240 R4GE
9th August 2018
Thursday 12:01 am
61240 spacer
>>61223
>"bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree"

But not to actually bully and mock them? Having his cake eating it too, as ever.
>> No. 61241 Moralfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 12:31 am
61241 spacer

cunt.png
612416124161241
Do you think it'd be headline news if he said these guys looked like Doctor Who monsters?
>> No. 61242 Are Moaty
9th August 2018
Thursday 12:37 am
61242 spacer
>>61241
Probably, given Old Who never had the money to make their monsters look as good as that.

Also the Yanks are slapping some pointless sanctions on the Soviets again. Fun times.
>> No. 61243 Moralfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 6:50 am
61243 spacer
>>61241
It's Boris so most likely.

A lot of this is manufactured by people who've got a grievance against him or the Tory party; Warsi, Labour politicians trying to divert attention away from their own implosion, Remain voters, Tories who want him as far away from the top jobs as possible. Then you just need to throw in the professionally offended Twitter mobs plus the lefty journalists at the BBC and the Guardian who are eternally more concerned with the way something is worded rather than the underlying message behind it.
>> No. 61244 Samefag
9th August 2018
Thursday 12:14 pm
61244 spacer
This outrage over what he has said is ridiculous. I can't imagine giving a shit about someone calling me childish names. I notice names like Gammon, or phrases like "Toxic masculinity" and "Mansplaining" in the paper sometimes, It's quite easy to write it off as childish rhetoric.
>> No. 61245 Searchfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 7:10 pm
61245 spacer
>>61244
They're getting played.

Johnson knows full well what he's up to. He's managed to create a media storm over some rather mild remarks; women should be free to wear the burqa but others should be free to state how ridiculous they look. He knows the usual suspects will feign outrage, they're getting something out of it as they'll get page views from all their clickbait, but it's playing exactly into his hands. He's managed to generate headlines by deliberately saying something relatively harmless; most people will quietly agree with him and think the matter is overblown. It was a targeted provocation and people have fallen for it hook, line and sinker.
>> No. 61246 Billbob
9th August 2018
Thursday 7:22 pm
61246 spacer
>>61245

>IT WAS A TARGETED PROVOCATION

To what end?
>> No. 61247 Moralfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 7:35 pm
61247 spacer
>>61246
It's a dog whistle to the extreme right wingers who think "he is just saying it how it is, which I agree with".
>> No. 61248 Searchfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 7:37 pm
61248 spacer
>>61246
Many things which Boris Johnson says or writes have been very carefully planned for the maximum possible gain in his own self interest.

He's testing the waters. Outside of the Westminster and media bubble the overwhelming majority of people are not offended by what he's said and actually agree with it. He's managed to make himself the centre of attention but he's deliberately picked something rather innocuous to say. He's making himself look a victim of Pc gawn mad culture. He's doing the whole plain talking not afraid to speak what's on his mind schtick.
>> No. 61249 Billbob
9th August 2018
Thursday 8:23 pm
61249 spacer
>>61248
>He's testing the waters. Outside of the Westminster and media bubble the overwhelming majority of people are not offended by what he's said and actually agree with it.
That's because outside of the Westminster and media bubble the overwhelming majority of people are at least a little bit racist.
>> No. 61250 Are Moaty
9th August 2018
Thursday 8:40 pm
61250 spacer
>>61249
What the fuck is wrong with somebody looks like a letterbox?
>> No. 61251 R4GE
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:09 pm
61251 spacer

Burqa-and-garbage-bags.png
612516125161251
>>61249
That's besides the point.

The point is that anyone wearing a burqa does look ridiculous. We're no longer living in the dark ages where religion should not be satirised. We should be free to state this obvious truth without fear of reprimand. In the grand scheme of things what Johnson said wasn't really offensive. I hear more offensive bad taste jokes and remarks at work, with my friends and what I read on Britfa.gs but I haven't had a sense of humour bypass so it doesn't bother me. Most people's reaction once they've got past the headline and seen what he's written will be along the lines of "is that it, really?"

He's hasn't come out with anything that's beyond the pale. He's deliberately chosen something he knows isn't really offensive to anyone capable of engaging their critical faculties but will garner attention and the reaction from majority of the populace will be to side with what he's said and feel he's being hard done by. He's probably at home right now going through old episodes of Top Gear to ape some form of sentiment uttered by Clarkson, finding something else to speak plainly about.
>> No. 61252 Billbob
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:11 pm
61252 spacer
>>61249


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RovF1zsDoeM
>> No. 61253 Auntiefucker
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:13 pm
61253 spacer

ONED_6646561_34457060A.jpg
612536125361253

>> No. 61254 YubYub
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:36 pm
61254 spacer
>>61251
>In the grand scheme of things what Johnson said wasn't really offensive.
Well there we have it. You said so, so it must be true.
>> No. 61255 Anonymous
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:45 pm
61255 spacer
>>61251

F.P. Dunne's idea that satire should "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" is relevant here. An MP mocking the religious garb of eskimo women in a broadsheet newspaper seems to be the diametric opposite of that principle. You might think that the niqab or burqa looks ridiculous, you might even be justified to think that, but who benefits and who suffers if you decide to say it publicly?

eskimo women are already marginalised on many fronts. They're treated as second-class citizens within their own religion. They're treated as powerless victims by elements of the left and dangerous proto-daft militant wogs by elements of the right. If Johnson chose to use his position of power to mock powerful figures within Shamanism, I'd fully support him. Instead, he chose to take a snide and bullying swipe at people who already have to deal with a mountain of shit and have no obvious means to strike back.
>> No. 61256 Anonymous
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:55 pm
61256 spacer
>>61254
He said it's ridiculous that someone would choose to go around looking like a letterbox.

He didn't say that Hitler did nothing wrong. He didn't say we should commit genocide against Asians. He didn't say that black people have greater propensity to commit crime because they're more primitive. He didn't say he regretted that more poor people didn't die at Grenfell. He didn't say that he was going to buy a pair of tap shoes and dance on Stephen Lawrence's grave. He didn't say that race mixing was wrong because we shouldn't dilute pure white blood. He didn't say he hopes Graham Norton dies of aids.

Those things are actually offensive. Your sense of perspective is seriously warped.
>> No. 61257 Ambulancelad
9th August 2018
Thursday 9:56 pm
61257 spacer

Suicide-vest-615x300@2x.jpg
612576125761257
>>61255
>no obvious means to strike back
Apart from the obvious, obviously.
>> No. 61258 YubYub
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:05 pm
61258 spacer
>>61255
>. IF JOHNSON CHOSE TO USE HIS POSITION OF POWER TO MOCK POWERFUL FIGURES WITHIN SHAMANISM, I'D FULLY SUPPORT HIM. INSTEAD, HE CHOSE TO TAKE A SNIDE AND BULLYING SWIPE AT PEOPLE WHO ALREADY HAVE TO DEAL WITH A MOUNTAIN OF SHIT AND HAVE NO OBVIOUS MEANS TO STRIKE BACK.

He said that Denmark was wrong to join France, Germany, Austria and Germany in banning the burqa and niqab.

He said that it was wrong for men to force women to wear them.

He said it was wrong for men to try and rip them off women wearing them.

He said any attempt to ban the burqa would inevitably be construed as making a point about Shamanism and would play exactly into the hands of those who wish to politicise the so-called clash of civilisations.

I wish people would actually fucking read what they're getting worked up by.
>> No. 61259 Searchfag
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:08 pm
61259 spacer
>>61258
he said they look like bank robbing letterboxes.
>> No. 61260 Samefag
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:09 pm
61260 spacer
As this is /iq/ I want to say that I find the mysteries of the burka, niqab and pair of whale skin breeches highly attractive and much more interesting and enticing than what our own slappers wear, and would like to do a young and secretively infidel lady who is forced to wear this stuff up the muckchute in a igloo while we drip our fluids on pages of the Qu'ran.

And fuck Boris Johnson, he's a wanker.
>> No. 61261 YubYub
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:09 pm
61261 spacer
>>61259
So what
>> No. 61262 Are Moaty
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:13 pm
61262 spacer
>>61260
>PAIR OF WHALE SKIN BREECHES

Genuinely can't tell what is and what isn't a word filter anymore, especially given the subject matter.

I went to uni with a lass who wore a niqab. She had the most piercing and intense brown eyes. She used to give me a right filthy stonk on.
>> No. 61263 Crabkiller
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:16 pm
61263 spacer

eSNig_QJ67KMqYmXfCOFGmJ1prOHxbimFrrUObjQ4uQ.jpg
612636126361263
>>61261
He's obviously wrong. Burqas, bank robbers and letterboxes all look like hackers.
>> No. 61264 Paedofag
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:33 pm
61264 spacer
>>61263
Is that one middle right sniffing his computer?
>> No. 61265 Auntiefucker
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:33 pm
61265 spacer
>>61263
BANK ROBBERS DON'T HAVE A UNISLOT DO THEY M*
>> No. 61266 Samefag
9th August 2018
Thursday 10:35 pm
61266 spacer
>>61263
I like the Xmas themed one.
>> No. 61267 Billbob
9th August 2018
Thursday 11:08 pm
61267 spacer
>>61264
He's been counter-hacked by a paedophile.
>> No. 61268 Samefag
9th August 2018
Thursday 11:10 pm
61268 spacer
>>61267
I did think he was looking a bit suggestive.

Do you reckon a woman in a burqa could use it to go beekeeping?
>> No. 61269 R4GE
10th August 2018
Friday 1:33 am
61269 spacer
>>61268
Probably, though I'm not sure a computer would be much use to a beekeeping burqalass.
>> No. 61270 Auntiefucker
10th August 2018
Friday 2:15 am
61270 spacer
>>61251

I genuinely don't think it looks ridiculous, and I'm not just saying that to be a contrarian or a lefty or whathaveyou.
>> No. 61271 Paedofag
10th August 2018
Friday 5:00 am
61271 spacer

000_Hkg10109760-e1506859911100.jpg
612716127161271
>>61270
>I'M NOT JUST SAYING THAT TO BE A CONTRARIAN OR A LEFTY OR WHATHAVEYOU.

Oh yes you are. The whole furore is a pissing contest for signalling ones virtue.
>> No. 61272 Searchfag
10th August 2018
Friday 8:33 am
61272 spacer
>>61271
Watch where you're pissing lads, I'm trying to eat my corn flakes.
>> No. 61273 Samefag
10th August 2018
Friday 9:54 am
61273 spacer
>>61262
Asking for it with them eyes M9. The amusing word filter is for the sexiest word in the world h1jab.
>> No. 61274 Ambulancelad
10th August 2018
Friday 10:47 am
61274 spacer
the only reason this is an issue is because having your face covered means you're not easily kept in the system. cctv and facial recognition can't keep track of you. in the surveillance state we live in the eskimoc veil is a threat to power.

imagine if a white lad went around wearing a balaclava everywhere he went. there's technically nothing illegal about it, but how well do you imagine it going down? do they fuck care about how oppressive it is for women.

Bojo didn't really say anything more ridiculous or offensive than he normally does, and I think the individuals playing it up are shooting themselves in the foot, because getting outraged at childish shite like this shows them up for the entirely disingenuous cunts they are.
>> No. 61275 Samefag
10th August 2018
Friday 1:22 pm
61275 spacer
>>61274
>HAVING YOUR FACE COVERED MEANS YOU'RE NOT EASILY KEPT IN THE SYSTEM

I was listening to Vanessa feltz on the radio, filling in for Jeremy vine. A listener claimed that house of Fraser going into administration was deliberate. 10 department store chains in America have apparently shut down in the past fortnight and it's all part of a deliberate plan to cause a massive global financial crisis so there will be a new world order where everyone will live in cashless societies.
>> No. 61276 Ambulancelad
10th August 2018
Friday 2:06 pm
61276 spacer
>>61271

I'm really not the shipping forecast. I have no opinion of muzzars apart from.that some of the blokes are right arseholes.

I just don't think they look that weird. You can continue to tell me I'm lying but I'm definitely not.
>> No. 61277 Crabkiller
10th August 2018
Friday 5:26 pm
61277 spacer

IMG_0585.png
612776127761277
The best thing about the Burka is that it leaves almost everything to the imagination. Its very sexy.

That is why I have joined a eskimo dating app. I have found my wife already.
>> No. 61278 YubYub
10th August 2018
Friday 5:51 pm
61278 spacer
>>61277
What the fuck does she need a dating app for? If she was a eskimo she'd let her parents dupe her into going to laplanderstan for a forced marriage to her cousin.
>> No. 61279 Paedofag
10th August 2018
Friday 5:53 pm
61279 spacer

_20180810_175251.jpg
612796127961279
>>61242

>OLD WHO NEVER HAD THE MONEY TO MAKE THEIR MONSTERS LOOK AS GOOD AS THAT.

I take it you have never seen the Vervoids
>> No. 61280 R4GE
10th August 2018
Friday 6:06 pm
61280 spacer
>>61279
They look like a right bunch of cunts.
>> No. 61281 Auntiefucker
10th August 2018
Friday 6:21 pm
61281 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGN8VsyIDgI
>> No. 61282 Paedofag
10th August 2018
Friday 6:36 pm
61282 spacer
>>61281
Yes, sure, but that's not the same as "I, as an MP and erstwhile Foreign Secretary, can make childish jibes at minority sections of society who already undergo undue harassment and not expect to be told off, and indeed asked to apologise, as if I were say, some kind of primary school student".

So yes you can "blaspheme", but equally your shit can be called. Saying sorry isn't a violation of someone's right to free speech, either.
>> No. 61283 R4GE
10th August 2018
Friday 6:44 pm
61283 spacer
>>61282
The whole point of freedom of speech is precisely that you should not have to fear the consequences of your words. If saying something is going to get you harassed, attacked physically, or put in jail, then you do not enjoy freedom of speech.
>> No. 61284 Samefag
10th August 2018
Friday 7:02 pm
61284 spacer
>>61283
>If saying something is going to get you harassed, attacked physically, or put in jail

Right, but that's not happening.
>> No. 61286 Searchfag
10th August 2018
Friday 7:18 pm
61286 spacer

trump-baby-balloon-london-3.jpg
612866128661286
>>61282
>SECTIONS OF SOCIETY WHO ALREADY UNDERGO UNDUE HARASSMENT

They should stop sticking out like a sore thumb, then.

If I dressed like one the lads in this picture then I'd expect comments and judgement on the street. Would they be passing comment because I'm gay? No, I'd be getting comments because I look fucking ridiculous.

Do nuns get harrassed? No. Do men in turbans get harrassed? No. Do men in Jew caps get harrassed? No. Do people in orange robes get harrassed? No. There are two reasons for this:-

1. They don't look like ridiculous. Women in burqas look ridiculous.

2. They attempt to integrate into society. Wearing a burqa is a bold statement that you are segregating yourself. You're making it clear that you adhere to a very regressive and reactionary sect of Shamanism.

I have a few eskimo mates and they all think burqas are ridiculous, similar to the way we view Amish people, and are detrimental to community cohesion. They lament things like how you'd barely see Burqas in Bradford decades ago in the actual densely populated eskimo areas but more recent arrivals have brought with them more backwards attitudes.

If you really cared about these women being harrassed then you'd call out the men in their religious sect who are the ones oppressing them.
>> No. 61287 Are Moaty
10th August 2018
Friday 7:39 pm
61287 spacer
>>61284
I can only assume you were still sleeping when this happened:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45130532
>> No. 61288 Paedofag
10th August 2018
Friday 8:17 pm
61288 spacer
>>61286
>SEGREGATING YOURSELF
>YOURSELF

This is the key point here.
If a eskimo woman is wearing a fishing net entirely of her own free will, then fair enough.
But I doubt you will find many like that, or at least they are so heavily indoctrinated into that way of life that it's highly doubtful that it counts as a choice.
In fact plenty of woman wearing sealskins would be at a real risk of horrific violence if they stopped wearing it.
>> No. 61289 YubYub
10th August 2018
Friday 8:22 pm
61289 spacer
>>61288
>In fact plenty of woman wearing sealskins would be at a real risk of horrific violence if they stopped wearing it.
Maybe they wouldn't need to cover up if they weren't so fucking ugly.
>> No. 61290 Ambulancelad
10th August 2018
Friday 8:27 pm
61290 spacer
>>61288
Yet somehow Johnson is the whale poacheric one and not the men forcing them to wear them.
>> No. 61291 R4GE
10th August 2018
Friday 8:54 pm
61291 spacer
>>61286
Fuckin ell think you're taking /iq/ seriously enough ladm9?
>> No. 61292 Paedofag
10th August 2018
Friday 9:27 pm
61292 spacer
>>61291
He's changing the world lad, one shitpost at a time.
>> No. 61293 Crabkiller
10th August 2018
Friday 9:57 pm
61293 spacer
>>61286

>DO MEN IN TURBANS GET HARRASSED?

Yes, yes they do.
>> No. 61294 Crabkiller
10th August 2018
Friday 10:15 pm
61294 spacer
>>61292
Worked for trump
>> No. 61295 Are Moaty
10th August 2018
Friday 11:05 pm
61295 spacer
>>61292
We must make the whole world lad, for the good of ladkind.
>> No. 61296 Anonymous
10th August 2018
Friday 11:12 pm
61296 spacer
>>61287
A Tory Party investigation into whether he breeched their code of conduct meets none of the three criteria you laid out.
>> No. 61297 Auntiefucker
10th August 2018
Friday 11:20 pm
61297 spacer
>>61296
Outsiders making a flood of complaints about you to your boss for your behaviour outside work is harassment m7.
>> No. 61298 Moralfag
11th August 2018
Saturday 3:46 am
61298 spacer
>>61297

True.

It's not like he holds public office or anything.
>> No. 61299 Crabkiller
11th August 2018
Saturday 8:59 am
61299 spacer
>>61298
Forget the investigation, he needs to be eaten as soon as possible. Imagine how much food one Boris could provide for a family on benefits.
>> No. 61300 Are Moaty
11th August 2018
Saturday 9:36 am
61300 spacer
>>61299
>IMAGINE HOW MUCH FOOD ONE BORIS COULD PROVIDE FOR A FAMILY ON BENEFITS

Families on benefits don't need to worry about affording food these days. Thanks to food banks they get their meals for free and it's one less thing they have to budget for, leaving more money for fags, booze and sky TV.
>> No. 61301 Moralfag
11th August 2018
Saturday 9:38 am
61301 spacer

20180811_093710.jpg
613016130161301
My news app today.
>> No. 61302 Are Moaty
11th August 2018
Saturday 10:02 am
61302 spacer
>>61300

And if they're foreign they get a free limousine to take them round because they can't read the road signs! it's ridiculous.
>> No. 61303 Moralfag
11th August 2018
Saturday 10:09 am
61303 spacer
>>61302
Our indigenous doleys have cottoned on to this. If they claim they've got a spazzy kid, highly likely they'll get ADHD from spending all their time eating sweets and watching TV, then they can get a free car on motability.
>> No. 61304 YubYub
11th August 2018
Saturday 9:55 pm
61304 spacer
"this foreign nonsense is ridiculous but shouldn't be banned" - quintessentially British view
>> No. 61305 Billbob
11th August 2018
Saturday 11:01 pm
61305 spacer

morons.jpg
613056130561305
Show your face or fuck off, get back to bongo bongo 4th century shitland and stop telling people it gets you closer to god. Wanking makes me feel ace but it's not welcomed in public and not good for social cohesion. Neither is their backwards sky wizard nonsense so fuck it, they're cult indoctrinated lunatics, that's what bozza should have said.
>> No. 61306 YubYub
12th August 2018
Sunday 12:52 am
61306 spacer
>>61305
>Wanking makes me feel ace but it's not welcomed in public
I'm not sure sure about that.

>> No. 61308 Are Moaty
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:18 am
61308 spacer
>>61306

SOUTHERN PUFFS
>> No. 61310 Searchfag
12th August 2018
Sunday 10:34 am
61310 spacer
Probably has something to do with his new strategist being Steve Bannon. It's a dog whistle to the right, in support of a future leadership bid.
>> No. 61311 YubYub
12th August 2018
Sunday 10:47 am
61311 spacer
>>61310
What's wrong with dog whistles? What have people got against them?
>> No. 61312 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 10:54 am
61312 spacer
>>61310
No, it's just saying something looks like letterboxes.

Because that's the most important thing you thick carpet-bagger.
>> No. 61313 YubYub
12th August 2018
Sunday 12:19 pm
61313 spacer
>>61312
Sure, it's "just" that, if you strip it of all its racial, political, and sociological context because you're mentally incapable of understanding the issue better than a Ladybird Book.
>> No. 61314 Crabkiller
12th August 2018
Sunday 12:27 pm
61314 spacer
>>61313
>RACIAL

How can you be racist against a religion? Would mocking a white woman in a burqa be fair game? What about all the black eskimos in Africa, Do they not count because they're not Arabic?
>> No. 61315 R4GE
12th August 2018
Sunday 12:42 pm
61315 spacer
>>61314
No, they don't count because they're in Africa.
>> No. 61316 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 12:48 pm
61316 spacer
>>61313
'Its bad because i want it to be bad'.
>> No. 61317 Searchfag
12th August 2018
Sunday 1:19 pm
61317 spacer
>>61314
>HOW CAN YOU BE RACIST AGAINST A RELIGION?

Like I said, you're operating at Ladybird level. Do your own research.
>> No. 61318 R4GE
12th August 2018
Sunday 2:33 pm
61318 spacer
>>61317
That's what is ultimately so depressing about the current discourse. Trump, Corbyn, Johnson - they're normalising thick people.
>> No. 61319 Auntiefucker
12th August 2018
Sunday 2:45 pm
61319 spacer
>>61318

Corbyn doesn't give the impression of being thick -- if anything he's sincere and speaks in a pretty measured way. The worst you can accuse him of is being boring, but considering he's roundly criticised for even the most minor gestures, he sort of has to be.

Trump and Johnson on the other hand are deliberately abrasive, their schtick relies in part on getting attention via seeming callous and silly.
>> No. 61320 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 2:49 pm
61320 spacer
>>61319

>Corbyn doesn't give the impression of being thick

Really? He comes across as a naive idiot to me. You can be sincere and measured and also stupid.
>> No. 61321 Are Moaty
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:03 pm
61321 spacer
>>61320

I don't see it, he doesn't have any less a sophisticated world view than any other politician.
>> No. 61322 Crabkiller
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:06 pm
61322 spacer
>>61321

That's not a particularly high bar.
>> No. 61324 Paedofag
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:20 pm
61324 spacer
>>61318
Corbyn isn't a thicko, he's just boring.
Johnson isn't a thicko, he just plays one on TV.
Trump ... well two out of three ain't bad.
>> No. 61325 Samefag
12th August 2018
Sunday 3:50 pm
61325 spacer
Lads, I just saw two women on the bus wearing niqaabs and speaking foreign. Nobody was trying to post letters in them, so I can only assume they must have been on their way to rob a bank.
>> No. 61326 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 4:42 pm
61326 spacer
>>61317
>DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.

I've done some research and it's telling me you're talking out of your arse.
>> No. 61327 Searchfag
12th August 2018
Sunday 8:17 pm
61327 spacer
TRUE STORY. I KNOW SOMEONE WHO FOILED A BANK ROBBERY BY POSTING A WEIGHTY LETTER INTO WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS A POST BOX JUST OUTSIDE THE BANK, BUT IT WAS ACTUALLY A WOMAN IN A BURKA WHO WAS ABOUT TO ROB THE BANK.
>> No. 61328 R4GE
12th August 2018
Sunday 8:31 pm
61328 spacer

4F0B453B00000578-6052495-image-a-105_1534085149978.jpg
613286132861328

>> No. 61329 Anonymous
12th August 2018
Sunday 10:03 pm
61329 spacer
>>61328
>If sex with consent is ok then presumably sex without consent is too?
Oh Christine.
>> No. 61330 Ambulancelad
12th August 2018
Sunday 10:14 pm
61330 spacer

neil-hamilton-300-image-1-805185518.jpg
613306133061330
>>61329
What did they do? I know they did something rotten but I can't remember what it was.
>> No. 61331 Paedofag
12th August 2018
Sunday 11:42 pm
61331 spacer
>>61330
Well Neil took cash for questions in Parliament and had to resign as a minister, and then after that a slightly nutty woman alleged that they were involved in sex games in an East London flat, where she, allegedly, was raped.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/may/10/conservatives.politics1
>> No. 61332 Are Moaty
12th August 2018
Sunday 11:48 pm
61332 spacer
>>61331

I can't imagine a worse hell than finding yourself at a geriatric Tory MP sex party.
>> No. 61333 Ambulancelad
12th August 2018
Sunday 11:56 pm
61333 spacer
>>61332

Your stands of hell are too low, at the very least it is not boring. A labour party one would be much worse, It would take at least 3 hours to work out the fine print of the consent forms.
>> No. 61334 Anonymous
13th August 2018
Monday 1:48 am
61334 spacer
>>61332
I am right with you - I mean look at them in >>61330 - imagine their sex-faces.
>> No. 61335 Crabkiller
13th August 2018
Monday 2:45 am
61335 spacer
>>61334
Thanks for the image, lad. Now my dreams will be haunted by Chrissy and Mostyn's cum mugs.
>> No. 61337 Paedofag
13th August 2018
Monday 6:27 am
61337 spacer

Christine Hamilton Miss Great Britain t7kI6bJEIXKl.jpg
613376133761337
>>61334>>61335
I bet she's a game bird.
>> No. 61342 Billbob
14th August 2018
Tuesday 7:31 am
61342 spacer

31ab488a-5d9e-46bb-a420-7731a4627cfc.jpg
613426134261342
>>61337
They always say that repressed religious girls are the gamiest.

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password