[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 62249)
Message
File  []
close
>> No. 62249 YubYub
25th December 2018
Tuesday 12:13 am
62249 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZveA-NAIDI

Wat
Expand all images.
>> No. 62250 Searchfag
26th December 2018
Wednesday 11:04 pm
62250 spacer

442.png
622506225062250
I can't see it winning an academy award.
>> No. 62251 Ambulancelad
26th December 2018
Wednesday 11:14 pm
62251 spacer
>>62249
Oh m8.
>> No. 62252 Moralfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 8:38 am
62252 spacer
A young man who accused Kevin Spacey of sexually assaulting him at a seaside restaurant near Boston in 2016 filmed part of the incident, according to court filings obtained by AFP. The 59-year-old star of the "House of Cards" series, who has won two Oscars, is due to be formally charged on January 7 on the island of Nantucket with "indecent assault and battery on a person over 14 years of age."

The young man, identified as William Little and aged 18 at the time of the alleged assault in July 2016, told police he had sent messages, including a video, to his girlfriend via the Snapchat app from the "Club Car" restaurant in Nantucket, where he was working as a bus boy for the summer, according to the court filing. He had remained in the bar after his shift had finished to see Spacey, of whom he was a fan.

After meeting the actor and telling him he was 23 years old -- the legal drinking age is 21 in Massachusetts -- he started drinking first beer and then whiskey with Spacey. Spacey then allegedly invited him back to his place, along with some other friends. The young man declined, suspecting the actor was trying to seduce him. But he stayed in the bar in the hopes of getting a picture with Spacey.

"Will only lingered around because he wanted a picture with Spacey, something for Instagram," the filing said. "Spacey had told him, if you come back with me, I will take a picture with you." That was when Spacey began sexually molesting the young man, the filed charges said. "Will tried to shift away with his body and move Spacey's hands away with his hands but Spacey kept reaching down his pants," it said. "Will said his girlfriend did not believe him so that's when he Snapchatted the video," it said.

He then left the bar on the advice of a woman who reportedly saw "he was in distress." He returned to work the next day and informed the owner of the bar of the incident, the court documents said.


https://www.afp.com/en/news/15/alleged-victim-spacey-sexual-assault-filmed-part-incident-doc-1bu3l12

Caught on video trying to force his hand down someone's undercrackers. He's proper fucked.
>> No. 62253 Auntiefucker
27th December 2018
Thursday 8:52 am
62253 spacer
>>62249

That is pretty unsettling. What the fuck must be swimming around your head to think this is a good idea?
>> No. 62254 Ambulancelad
27th December 2018
Thursday 9:15 am
62254 spacer
>>62253
He's clearly some form or narcissist, sociopath or psychopath.

He's showing to the world the level of delusion that goes on in his head that enables him to believe he's in the right all along; he's justifying why it's righteous for him to diddle.
>> No. 62255 Moralfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 10:36 am
62255 spacer

Everett_UsualSuspects.jpg
622556225562255
Hand ME the cock, for fucking cock sucking.
>> No. 62256 Anonymous
27th December 2018
Thursday 12:36 pm
62256 spacer
I don't understand why he felt the need to molest the unwilling. I'm not even remotely famous but I know I could find hundreds of people who would let me pretend to rape them and be very much into it.
>> No. 62257 Searchfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 1:22 pm
62257 spacer
>>62256
Presumably he thought he's entitled to take whatever he wants or that nobody can resist the lure of a major celebrity.
>> No. 62258 Crabkiller
27th December 2018
Thursday 1:50 pm
62258 spacer
He's doing his best to not sound like a gay
>> No. 62259 Are Moaty
27th December 2018
Thursday 1:56 pm
62259 spacer
>>62256

Part of the thrill I expect was that they were unwilling.
>> No. 62260 R4GE
27th December 2018
Thursday 3:06 pm
62260 spacer
>>62259
I think more often people who commit sexual offences don't even consider the other party's objections.
>> No. 62261 Moralfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 3:37 pm
62261 spacer
Maybe he's horrific at knowing whether someone likes him or not. Some guys are.
>> No. 62262 Anonymous
27th December 2018
Thursday 3:38 pm
62262 spacer
>>62261

Although, if you think someone likes you, shoving your hand down their pants is a little forward.
>> No. 62263 Auntiefucker
27th December 2018
Thursday 3:38 pm
62263 spacer
>>62260
>DON'T EVEN CONSIDER THE OTHER PARTY'S OBJECTIONS

A lot of people who've worked with paedophiles have found that the majority don't think they've actually done anything wrong; they convince themselves that the child wanted it and was enjoying it.
>> No. 62264 Crabkiller
27th December 2018
Thursday 4:14 pm
62264 spacer
>>62252
my m8 got a selfie with spacey a few years back. Do you reckon he got bummed?
>> No. 62265 Are Moaty
27th December 2018
Thursday 4:19 pm
62265 spacer
>>62264
Depends. Is your m8 ugly?
>> No. 62266 Ambulancelad
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:13 pm
62266 spacer

26696505_1558246164261913_623376767_n.jpg
622666226662266
Have a picture of a childrens' nursery in Manchester with a mural of Mr Spacey next to it, suitably daubed with corrective epithets.
>> No. 62267 Searchfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:15 pm
62267 spacer
>>62249
Award material right there. Golden Raspberry for worst on-screen couple: Kevin Spacey and those lines.
>> No. 62268 Ambulancelad
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:15 pm
62268 spacer
>>62266

I was just wondering what a cunk was but it clicked.
>> No. 62269 YubYub
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:21 pm
62269 spacer

maxresdefault.jpg
622696226962269
>>62268
>> No. 62270 Moralfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:34 pm
62270 spacer
>>62268>>62269
Every time I hear Diane Morgan I assume she's still in character as Cunk.
>> No. 62271 YubYub
27th December 2018
Thursday 6:37 pm
62271 spacer
>>62270

I want to shag Cunk but not Morgan
>> No. 62272 Searchfag
27th December 2018
Thursday 7:57 pm
62272 spacer
>>62260

That is part of my point although it seems on the surface like we are opposing. The thrill comes from taking what he wants when he wants with no restriction. All paths lead to his indulgence in that moment. He don't have time to plan or form long term plans that is boring. Everything plays out to the rythmn he sets.

And the ego damage from coming down from that now would break him it is much easier at this point to double down.
>> No. 62273 YubYub
27th December 2018
Thursday 7:58 pm
62273 spacer
>>62271

I think you should shag Brooker with a blindfold on then. Seems the logical next step.
>> No. 62274 R4GE
27th December 2018
Thursday 10:00 pm
62274 spacer
>>62273

I don't see how that makes sense. It just means I want to shag a really thick bird instead of a mildly clever one.
>> No. 62275 Billbob
28th December 2018
Friday 12:58 am
62275 spacer
>>62266
You have to wonder what was going through the heads of the people who did that. "This will be what the children want"? "The issue of the presence of this inappropriate mural is now solved"? "It is extremely important this artwork is labelled so as to prevent any confusion"?
>> No. 62276 R4GE
28th December 2018
Friday 11:11 am
62276 spacer
>>62275
It's now much more likely to frighten and upset the children as they enter, most of whom would previously be oblivious to some old actor's face.
>> No. 62277 Samefag
28th December 2018
Friday 2:21 pm
62277 spacer
>>62276

I think I was about seven when I had to ask my mum what "cunt" meant because an older kid was throwing batteries at us in the playground (he missed) and this girl shouted

>stop that, you tight cunt

Mum just said it was a bad word.

I don't remember how old I was when I learnt what a paedophile was.
>> No. 62278 YubYub
28th December 2018
Friday 2:24 pm
62278 spacer
>>62277

I was about five and my friend and I were contemplating brushing snow off a car's bonnet and a man shouted from an upstairs window

>If you touch that car, I'll smack your arses

We started speculating about what arses were and thought maybe it meant hearts since it sounded similar.
>> No. 62279 YubYub
28th December 2018
Friday 2:39 pm
62279 spacer
>>62277
I think I was in about year 4. We used to sing in primary school "...with a packet of crisps and a big cheesy smile, [person] is a great big paedophile." To the tune of walking in a winter wonderland. The person was usually arsene Wenger.
>> No. 62280 Auntiefucker
28th December 2018
Friday 3:30 pm
62280 spacer
I remember an older kid called my mate a spacker, and when I went home I told my mam and asked what it meant. She just told me it was a bad word but had a bit of a smirk on her face when I said that someone called my friend one, because he was a bit of a spacker to be fair.

You never hear that word anymore, it seemed to get quickly replaced with Retard because of septicism.
>> No. 62281 R4GE
28th December 2018
Friday 3:38 pm
62281 spacer
>>62280

I was about five and a dog started humping a girl's leg and another girl said

>It's shagging her. It going to shag her until she has a baby.

and we had no idea what that meant but felt it was an appropriate thing to say whenever we saw a dog humping someone's leg after.

Then an old lady heard us and said

>it's not very nice saying that

The next few times thereafter we would say "It's going to shag her until she has a baby" then instantly chastise ourselves by saying "It's not very nice that." Then the usage of that phrase petered out.
>> No. 62282 Paedofag
28th December 2018
Friday 3:45 pm
62282 spacer
>>62281

I heard a girl say

>girls suck boys willies

very rhythmically, like a chant, and thought it was the most repulsive thing I'd ever heard because i'd only seen flaccid little-boy-dicks at that time and sucking on one of those still seems about as appealing as sucking a slug.
>> No. 62283 Samefag
28th December 2018
Friday 3:51 pm
62283 spacer
I don't care if he's a paedo, i just want him to continue acting. Shame he's unemployable now.
>> No. 62284 Anonymous
28th December 2018
Friday 4:01 pm
62284 spacer
>>62283

I was more bothered by Louis CK. I can't imaging being so upset about seeing a dick (when you're not a minor or anything) that you feel the need to destroy someone's career decades later.
>> No. 62285 Auntiefucker
28th December 2018
Friday 4:07 pm
62285 spacer

lg.jpg
622856228562285
Leslie Grantham literally murdered someone and everyone was more shocked by this photo.

>On 3 December 1966, Grantham attempted to rob a taxi driver, Felix Reese, in Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, West Germany. In a struggle between the two men, Reese died from being shot in the head.[8][9][10] In his statement to the police following his arrest, Grantham said that he did not know the gun was loaded and it had gone off during the struggle, which would have resulted in a conviction for manslaughter if a jury believed this version of events. However, at his trial in 1967, he was subsequently convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. Although he had committed the murder in West Germany, he served the entirety of his imprisonment in various British prisons. This was because soldiers and officers convicted of any criminal offence that warrants a sentence of over two years are automatically transferred to Her Majesty's Prison Service, since they are also automatically dishonourably discharged.
>> No. 62286 YubYub
28th December 2018
Friday 4:30 pm
62286 spacer
>>62283
Let's hope he writes a prison memoir. Despite being a gay-carpet-bagger I can easily see him having a grand old time of his confinement.

>>62284
In fairness, I think Louis CK was on track to have a comeback until some piece of shit decided to resurface a video before Christmas where the word nigger was used. Sarah Silverman coming out that he used to beat off in-front of her all the time had made the already absurd story all the more ridiculous.
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/comedy/news/n-word-video-louis-ck-ricky-gervais-chris-rock-seinfeld-wayne-brady-a8697716.html
>> No. 62287 Paedofag
28th December 2018
Friday 4:36 pm
62287 spacer
>>62285
Maybe we can say the same about Spacey after he's been to prison and served his tariff.
>> No. 62288 Billbob
28th December 2018
Friday 5:49 pm
62288 spacer
>>62286

that's literally nothing. the entire context of it comes from one of chris rock's stand up bits about the difference between a black guy and a nigger- But of course, I doubt anybody who is offended by it knows chris rock as anything other than the zebra in madagascar.

if they would have been sat around just making jokes about basketball and crack cocaine fine, but there's literally nothing to be offended over in that video unless you are the worst kind of oversensetive cretin.

we're truly reaching around the horseshoe nowadays. so very liberally oppressive.
>> No. 62289 Auntiefucker
28th December 2018
Friday 6:27 pm
62289 spacer
>>62288
I think you've hit upon an appropriate name for these people: reacharounds.
>> No. 62290 Auntiefucker
28th December 2018
Friday 7:42 pm
62290 spacer
>>62285
IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME!
>> No. 62291 Anonymous
28th December 2018
Friday 7:58 pm
62291 spacer
Well season six was shit without him
>> No. 62292 Paedofag
28th December 2018
Friday 8:15 pm
62292 spacer

DrANbpYWkAMIYEw.jpg
622926229262292
>>62291
Isn't that more to do with the replacement being full on moonbat?
>> No. 62293 Searchfag
28th December 2018
Friday 9:06 pm
62293 spacer
>>62292

Claire was fantastic in the first few seasons, and it seemed like they were leading up to her being a much more focused and clever version of Spacey's character who was often tripped up by his own pride.

But then they stopped caring about the slow burning creep of her plans, and just reduced her to 'lol she's throwing him under the bus suddenly'. Then he touched some kids and they just had to roll with him dying and her just suddenly being the new Frank. With no actual Frank to react to her betrayals and machinations, it fell rather flat.
>> No. 62294 Crabkiller
29th December 2018
Saturday 12:18 am
62294 spacer
>>62279
Crisps? It's sweets. What kid will jump in the back of your Volvo for crisps?
>> No. 62332 YubYub
31st December 2018
Monday 10:50 am
62332 spacer

7960472-6540165-image-a-20_1546192457200.jpg
623326233262332
Kevin Spacey watches himself on the news whilst nude in an oxygen tent which he believes gives him sexual powers.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6540165/Disgraced-Oscar-winner-Kevin-Spacey-breaks-cover-second-time-dog.html
>> No. 62333 Paedofag
31st December 2018
Monday 11:32 am
62333 spacer
>>62332

...highlights include when he put the cat out, possibly because it was sexually harrassed, we don't know yet.

I feel like there should be a privacy law that makes this level of stalking in 'the public interest' illegal before the point where they are staring through the mans window all day with a telescope.
>> No. 62334 Moralfag
31st December 2018
Monday 12:48 pm
62334 spacer
>>62333
I have to agree. I can't believe they would be looking at the outside of his house like that. What pieces of shit. That's literally the worst thing I can imagine anyone ever doing.
>> No. 62335 Billbob
31st December 2018
Monday 2:08 pm
62335 spacer
>>62334

Is that really your point? That because someone does bad things that someone else shouldn't be prevented from also doing a bad thing?

Are you seven?
>> No. 62336 YubYub
31st December 2018
Monday 2:42 pm
62336 spacer
>>62335
My point is that Spacey deserves whatever he gets. Fuck him. How much privacy did he give to the kid whose bedroom he forced his way into?
>> No. 62337 Moralfag
31st December 2018
Monday 2:45 pm
62337 spacer
>>62336

Last time I checked we had due process. Dishing out punishment isn't the media's job.
>> No. 62338 Billbob
31st December 2018
Monday 3:04 pm
62338 spacer

89728387-10e9-486f-b1cb-ec7bdbf5d604-bestSizeAvail.jpg
623386233862338
>>62336

Then you're a reactionary cretin and entirely missing the point.

We should have privacy laws to protect everyone, including you. We shouldn't forgo them just so we can gawk at a paedo because he deserves it. That sort of thinking is primitive and self serving, and it also enables the media to destroy someone's reputation before they've even stepped foot in court. Just because this isn't the case for Spacey, doesn't mean you should be opposing restrictions on harassment in the name of journalism. It's pretty fucking disgusting that you're so bloodthirsty that you're happy for everyone to potentially suffer just so you can know that Kevin Spacey is having a slightly worse day than he was already, and you should have a long hard think about how short sighted that is.

I reckon I'm going to get a rant from you about how paedos deserve no mercy, and thus proving with certainty that you still don't get it.
>> No. 62339 Auntiefucker
31st December 2018
Monday 3:17 pm
62339 spacer
>>62336
This is just perpetuating actual maritime issues and male privilege. Dozens of women complain about Weinstein abusing them for decades and nobody does a thing. One man says Spacey abused him and suddenly he's being cut out of movies he's already shot.
>> No. 62340 R4GE
31st December 2018
Monday 3:32 pm
62340 spacer
>>62338
You've made a lot of leaps here about what I'm thinking but I'm going to respond in good faith if I may:

He is not being punished, he has some journalists outside his house. Anyone who does anything sufficiently in the public interest gets this treatment, not just paedophiles. If you want to oppose this generally I would probably agree with you but I'm not going to be MORE considerate of a paedophile's feelings than some actress whose just had a baby or a rapper with mental health issues.

I agree that the right to privacy is important, but it's also not relevant here. Wherever we as a society consider the line to be, a camera crew outside his house isn't over it.
>> No. 62342 YubYub
31st December 2018
Monday 3:35 pm
62342 spacer
>>62340
Especially not when he's still actively courting media attention, which is what the OP is about.

sage for double-post
>> No. 62343 Crabkiller
31st December 2018
Monday 3:43 pm
62343 spacer
>>62340
>He is not being punished, he has some journalists outside his house.
Given the shit you can pull with zoom lenses and ultra high res cameras, I'd say that having your privacy eroded in this way amounts to a punishment. You clearly take a different position on this. I'd agree with your position, but then we'd both be wrong, and we can't have that on .gs, can we?
>> No. 62344 R4GE
31st December 2018
Monday 3:54 pm
62344 spacer
>>62339
The difference is that with Weinstein there's the tacit understanding that a lot of actresses were prepared to suck his dick to be a film star. He abused his position but they clearly were getting something out of it and it is noticeable how certain actresses have seen work dry up since the whole Weinstein scandal broke because being the tart of choice for a producer was they only way they got roles.
>> No. 62345 Auntiefucker
31st December 2018
Monday 4:00 pm
62345 spacer
>>62344
>He abused his position but they clearly were getting something out of it
And the actors Spacey abused weren't?
>> No. 62347 R4GE
31st December 2018
Monday 4:16 pm
62347 spacer
>ANYONE WHO DOES ANYTHING SUFFICIENTLY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST GETS THIS TREATMENT, NOT JUST PAEDOPHILES. IF YOU WANT TO OPPOSE THIS GENERALLY I WOULD PROBABLY AGREE WITH YOU

THEN WE AGREE.

>I AGREE THAT THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS IMPORTANT, BUT IT'S ALSO NOT RELEVANT HERE.

THEY'RE POINTING HIGH POWERED LENSES INTO HIS LIVING ROOM AND CAMPING OUT WATCHING HIM. IF THEY WERE ANYONE BUT JOURNALISTS THEY'D BE CALLED STALKERS, AND I DON'T THINK THE RIGHTS OF THE PRESS should EXTEND TO STARING INTO SOMEONE'S WINDOW WAITING FOR THEM TO DO SOMETHING INTERESTING.

>>62342

"They were asking for it" is a fairly ironic way to defend Spacey being hounded by the press in particular, and I enjoy that, but I still don't think that should come into it. It really shouldn't be about individuals or a case by case basis, it should be that the press can't and shouldn't do this to anyone. I understand that a celebrity should never expect anonymity, but they should still expect privacy. When we bring legal issues into it I think it's even more important. We don't lose any information if the press has to just publish Spacey allegations and not him looking sad on his balcony.
>> No. 62348 Are Moaty
31st December 2018
Monday 4:19 pm
62348 spacer
>>62343
So when they take pictures of anyone's house they are punishing them? I don't see how you can believe that to be honest. When some journalists had tea in Boris Johnson's front garden earlier this year they were (rightly) called out for giving him an easy time and he wasn't accused of any kind of crime. This is how journalism works, they harass people and then write down what happens, its dirty and ugly and I wouldn't like it at all but society is obviously cool with it.

For it to be a punishment they'd have to have a general rule about not going to a person's residence that they have chosen to make an exception to for either Spacey in particular or paedos in general. No such rule exists, they are treating him just like anyone else.
>> No. 62349 YubYub
31st December 2018
Monday 4:28 pm
62349 spacer
>>62348

>THIS IS HOW JOURNALISM WORKS, THEY HARASS PEOPLE AND THEN WRITE DOWN WHAT HAPPENS, ITS DIRTY AND UGLY AND I WOULDN'T LIKE IT AT ALL BUT SOCIETY IS OBVIOUSLY COOL WITH IT.

Then the point is they should stop doing it and we should not be cool with it
You seem to agree that it must be an unpleasant experience, yet you think it should continue just because it's already happening?

>NO SUCH RULE EXISTS, THEY ARE TREATING HIM JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE.

Yes, they're harassing him just like they'd harass anyone else in a high profile case. The argument here is that they should stop doing that to everyone.
>> No. 62350 Ambulancelad
31st December 2018
Monday 4:34 pm
62350 spacer
>>62348
>No such rule exists, they are treating him just like anyone else.
So Weinstein wasn't doing anything wrong because he expected the same compliance from all the women he cast?

Also, he's "actively courting" the media the same way a scantily-clad woman is "actively courting" rapists.
>> No. 62351 Anonymous
31st December 2018
Monday 4:40 pm
62351 spacer
>>62348
>So when they take pictures of anyone's house they are punishing them?
Er, yeah. There's no way they can argue in good faith that they're not encouraging people to track them down. "A private individual did something regrettable last week. Here's the front of their house, complete with their cars parked on it, in the Wankbridge area of Twatley, West Bumfuck, which you can clearly see from this 4K photo is number 22." There's literally no legitimate journalistic reason for that and it stews my piss slightly that they can get away with it.

>I don't see how you can believe that to be honest.
I think Specsavers have a deal on at the moment.
>> No. 62352 Auntiefucker
31st December 2018
Monday 4:49 pm
62352 spacer

DvGTkW0XcAA3VeK.jpg
623526235262352
>>62351
>THERE'S LITERALLY NO LEGITIMATE JOURNALISTIC REASON FOR THAT AND IT STEWS MY PISS SLIGHTLY THAT THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT

That never happens.
>> No. 62353 Anonymous
31st December 2018
Monday 5:01 pm
62353 spacer
>>62352
Betteridge's Law of Headlines in full effect.
>> No. 62357 Billbob
1st January 2019
Tuesday 4:47 pm
62357 spacer
How to fix British journalism #1: Legally require that corrections are printed in the same size and prominence as the original article. Front page lies mean a front page "oops, we're stupid thicko lying bastards."
How to fix British journalism #2: Question headlines are to be outright banned or treated the same as statements for the purposes of corrections, libel suits, etc.
>> No. 62358 Moralfag
1st January 2019
Tuesday 8:26 pm
62358 spacer

8018748-6544811-image-a-71_1546356641551.jpg
623586235862358
>>62334
>THAT'S LITERALLY THE WORST THING I CAN IMAGINE ANYONE EVER DOING.

If I was a paparazzo for the mail I'd much rather have the brief of "get lots of pictures of women taking a dip in the sea on New year's Day, especially when they've got erect nipples."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6544811/Intrepid-swimmers-country-brave-cold-traditional-New-Years-Day-dip.html
>> No. 62359 YubYub
1st January 2019
Tuesday 9:06 pm
62359 spacer
>>62357
I like this.
>> No. 62360 Crabkiller
1st January 2019
Tuesday 9:11 pm
62360 spacer
can you cunts stop linking to the daily mail
telling yourself you're doing it to laugh at it or doing it ironically isn't any better than doing it for other reasons
>> No. 62361 Anonymous
1st January 2019
Tuesday 9:17 pm
62361 spacer
>>62360
By that logic none of my many crimes, sins and miscellaneous moral failings can be justified!
>> No. 62362 Crabkiller
1st January 2019
Tuesday 9:36 pm
62362 spacer

8018742-6544811-image-a-32_1546355790140.jpg
623626236262362
>>62360
Nipples, lad. Nipples.
>> No. 62363 Are Moaty
1st January 2019
Tuesday 9:53 pm
62363 spacer
>>62362
You might actually be turning into Father Jack, mate. Take care.
>> No. 62364 Searchfag
1st January 2019
Tuesday 11:35 pm
62364 spacer
>>62357
>SLIDE IT IN DADDY STATE, UMF!

I HATE THE mentality we HAVE in this country THAT SOMEHOW every problem can and should be solved with an Act of Parliament. When it comes to privacy v. freedom of the press it's much more complicated and something Spacey can already make a good case for some compo being that everyone involved is a grown man.

Laws won't solve this problem because as usual it will just be circumvented (if not outright ignored while the police are busy logging everyone's porn id). Any given societies press is an extremely complex animal and knee-jerk reactions only hand the state more powers over what is in print despite what Hugh Grant may tell you. The real solution is one that recognises the British press to be an incestuous mess led by incompetent buffoons who remain in charge only because newer publications can't compete.

>>62360
GO OUT AND GET SOME AIR YOU brie-munching metrosexual guardian reader.

>>62363
GO ON THEN M9. TELL US of THIS MYTHICAL BETTER JOB YOU GOT THAN TAKING PICTURES OF SLAGS.
>> No. 62365 YubYub
2nd January 2019
Wednesday 12:33 am
62365 spacer
>>62360
It's against the rules to be sincere on this board. You dirty laplander.
>> No. 62366 Anonymous
2nd January 2019
Wednesday 1:53 am
62366 spacer
>>62364
Nothing there is much more statist than the current system of requiring papers to print a correction. They've just got to print it a bit bigger.
>> No. 62367 YubYub
2nd January 2019
Wednesday 6:55 am
62367 spacer
What I don't get is why celebrity stalkers don't pretend to be paparazzi. It's the perfect excuse to be constantly following someone and all you have to do is invest in a camera.
>> No. 62368 Searchfag
2nd January 2019
Wednesday 9:04 am
62368 spacer
>>62367

I think what drives a stalker is typically their belief that they could have, or already do have, a personal or intimate relationship with the person they're stalking, so them actively deciding to pretend to be a pap would be like them admitting that the celeb isn't actually going to be their girlfriend.

Having said that I'm sure I read of some stalker pretending to be the celeb victims maid or housekeeper or whatever to get inside the house, so maybe more stalkers should be considering devious plans.
>> No. 62425 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 4:35 pm
62425 The trial starts today
There's only one Kevin Spacey
Only one Kevin Spacey
He'll mosey along
Have a tug on your dong
Which really isn't something that should be trivialised via the medium of a football chant.
>> No. 62426 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 4:45 pm
62426 spacer

8231738-6565235-image-m-40_1546877922723.jpg
624266242662426
Is the one sat down the person alleging Spacey touched him? I'm not buying it.
>> No. 62427 Samefag
8th January 2019
Tuesday 4:11 pm
62427 spacer
>>62426

The perfect crime.
>> No. 62432 Anonymous
8th January 2019
Tuesday 7:06 pm
62432 spacer

8278022-6569637-image-m-18_1546969646846.jpg
624326243262432
>The actor states in a motion obtained by DailyMail.com that the teenager 'claimed he was a 23-year-old student studying business at Wake Forest University' after he 'sought out a friend for the specific purpose of introducing him to [Spacey].'

>It goes on to state that the teen 'welcomed drinks from [Spacey], let [Spacey] put his arm around him near the piano while they did sing-a-longs and even left the bar to smoke with [Spacey].' That behavior, combined with the fact that the teen gave Spacey his number, suggests 'mutual and consensual flirting' states the motion.

>At no point does Spacey deny groping the young man.

>The motion states that once Spacey began to grope his accuser the teen 'did not object to the alleged touching, he did not ask [Spacey] to stop and he did not remove himself from the situation.' In the initial filing the accuser said that this was because he froze, and suggested his lack of an erection as proof he was not enjoying the sex act.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6569637/Kevin-Spacey-says-accuser-flirted-gave-actor-number-lying-age.html

Is an erection proof one way or another whether an assault occurred?
>> No. 63460 Crabkiller
14th June 2019
Friday 6:46 am
63460 spacer
Cuba Gooding Jr charged with forcible touching after incident in New York

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/jun/13/cuba-gooding-jr-charged-forcible-touching-new-york-club

I've watched the video and I can't see where the 'forcible touching' is. Do I need to go on some form of awareness course or is the accuser just trying it on?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVyh3cnybKM
>> No. 63461 Anonymous
14th June 2019
Friday 7:04 am
63461 spacer
>>63460
Well yes his Lawyer agrees.

>Video from Magic Hour Rooftop Bar and Lounge in Manhattan showed no criminality on Gooding’s part, lawyer Mark Heller told the Associated Press. “There is not the slightest scintilla of inappropriate conduct on his part,” Heller said.

>After reviewing the security video, Heller said he was hesitant to let Gooding surrender but decided to go through with it. He said he was surprised police and prosecutors were moving forward with the case.
>> No. 63748 Paedofag
18th July 2019
Thursday 7:14 am
63748 spacer
After all that the charges have been dropped.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49025487

It seems everyone was a bit hasty to condemn him.
>> No. 63749 R4GE
18th July 2019
Thursday 8:17 am
63749 spacer
>>63748

Everyone who cancelled Spacey is now cancelled.
>> No. 63750 Moralfag
18th July 2019
Thursday 10:08 am
63750 spacer
>>63749
Good. Netflix need taking down a peg or two.
>> No. 63751 Are Moaty
18th July 2019
Thursday 12:05 pm
63751 spacer
>>63748

I wonder if we'll get the headline of "Relieved Spacey" and 'actor relaxes after tense case and watches a bit of TV' with picture of him doing so taken through his window with a telescopic lenses
>> No. 63835 Auntiefucker
3rd August 2019
Saturday 9:49 am
63835 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUbbH4Jr_3E

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password