[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 63370)
Message
File  []
close
svtfmiuu0d031[1].jpg
633706337063370
>> No. 63370 Auntiefucker
28th May 2019
Tuesday 8:15 pm
63370 spacer

Expand all images.
>> No. 63371 Paedofag
28th May 2019
Tuesday 8:23 pm
63371 spacer
>>63370
Oh I absolutely love it.
>> No. 63373 R4GE
28th May 2019
Tuesday 8:26 pm
63373 spacer
Ridiculous, can't even be concerned about the Bradistani rape gangs without bein called a nazi by the queens own forces

next they'll be tellin us we can't wrap our bullets in bacon no more

typical
>> No. 63374 YubYub
28th May 2019
Tuesday 8:40 pm
63374 spacer
Thank goodness they're finally doing something about all those patriots in the armed forces.
>> No. 63375 YubYub
28th May 2019
Tuesday 9:18 pm
63375 spacer
As silly as things have gotten, I relly don't think this is real.
>> No. 63376 Anonymous
28th May 2019
Tuesday 9:30 pm
63376 spacer
>>63370
>Shamanismofacism
Are they saying it's "XRW" to say that Muzzers have mostly brown faces?
>> No. 63377 Anonymous
28th May 2019
Tuesday 9:57 pm
63377 spacer
Pff. As soon as I read this I realised what this thread was going to say and also whatever associated Daily Mail article will say too.

Yeah, it says people who describe themselves as patriots. That's one of twenty such "indicators and warnings". If it has been identified as common behaviour amongst blackshirts then it's on the list. I don't see the issue, but then maybe I would have to be a proto-fascist myself to think efforts to stop fascism are ridiculous.
>> No. 63378 Samefag
28th May 2019
Tuesday 10:09 pm
63378 spacer
BLOODY HELL. CAN'T EVEN MAKE OFFENSIVE REMARKS ABOUT OTHER RACES WITHOUT BEING CALLED A RACIST. IT'S POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD.
>> No. 63379 R4GE
28th May 2019
Tuesday 10:31 pm
63379 spacer
>>63378
Can't even advocate for a white ethnostate without being called ah you get the gist.
>> No. 63380 Anonymous
28th May 2019
Tuesday 10:40 pm
63380 spacer
Lads, it's obviously not real. I thought we we were pretending we didn't realise but it seems like some of you reckon this is an official document.

That isn't even the Army logo.
>> No. 63381 Are Moaty
28th May 2019
Tuesday 10:53 pm
63381 spacer
>>63380

If it's a fake, it's an extremely well crafted fake by someone with insider knowledge.

Yes, that is the army logo - they only use the "be the best" tagline for public communications.
>> No. 63382 YubYub
28th May 2019
Tuesday 11:02 pm
63382 spacer
>>63381

What exactly is so well crafted about it? It's clearly knocked up in publisher, and this would be the first appeal for internal whistleblowers I've ever seen with just an email address and no phone number for an anonymous tip line.

And the army do definitely use "be the best" internally, and the logo is invariably on the left hand side of a document, not the right. I'm also half convinced it's the wrong font but I'm probably imagining that.
>> No. 63383 Auntiefucker
28th May 2019
Tuesday 11:37 pm
63383 spacer
there's summat deeply shit about how the army is literally just called "army" now.

army

you know?
>> No. 63384 Anonymous
28th May 2019
Tuesday 11:49 pm
63384 spacer
>>63382

Because all army documents will be produced in the exact same way and no official army document has ever been 'knocked up in publisher' or had the logo on the right side

I'm not saying if it is real or fake I don't know, but if those are your arguments that it isn't you sound like a basket case who doesn't live in the real world.

Of course you could always email that address and ask them if it is real and see what happens. It is mod.gov.uk so one would presume if someone has spoofed the address that punishments would be severe.
>> No. 63385 Ambulancelad
29th May 2019
Wednesday 12:34 am
63385 spacer
>>63370
Fake or not it seems like pretty spot on advice.
>> No. 63386 Searchfag
29th May 2019
Wednesday 12:57 am
63386 spacer
>>63384

So it's not well crafted now?
>> No. 63387 Crabkiller
29th May 2019
Wednesday 1:01 am
63387 spacer

IhmE9XW.jpg
633876338763387
>>63383

It was a running joke in Arrested Development that Buster would refer to the US army as "army". Clearly army doesn't watch American television.
>> No. 63391 Paedofag
29th May 2019
Wednesday 9:18 am
63391 spacer

Capture.png
633916339163391
>>63384

It's a real email address.
>> No. 63392 Searchfag
29th May 2019
Wednesday 9:47 am
63392 spacer
>>63370
Haha who in this country calls themselves a patriot? I don't think I could stop myself laughing in the face of anyone proclaiming that.
>> No. 63393 Moralfag
29th May 2019
Wednesday 12:39 pm
63393 spacer
>>63392

You live a sheltered life London scum
.
>> No. 63394 Billbob
29th May 2019
Wednesday 1:03 pm
63394 spacer

millwall supporters.jpg
633946339463394
>>63393

What?
>> No. 63395 Paedofag
29th May 2019
Wednesday 2:28 pm
63395 spacer
>>63387

Bob loblaw lobs law bomb!
>> No. 63396 Anonymous
29th May 2019
Wednesday 4:02 pm
63396 spacer
>>63386

It is a well crafted forgery of a poorly crafted document. Keep up.
>> No. 63400 R4GE
30th May 2019
Thursday 1:20 pm
63400 spacer
The MoD have confirmed that it's legit.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/the-british-armys-guide-for-spotting-extreme-right-wing
>> No. 63401 Crabkiller
30th May 2019
Thursday 1:32 pm
63401 spacer
>>63400
Cue jokes about MOD being off their rocker.
>> No. 63402 Crabkiller
30th May 2019
Thursday 7:43 pm
63402 spacer

hqdefault (1).jpg
634026340263402
>>63400
> THE MOD
?
>> No. 63403 Auntiefucker
30th May 2019
Thursday 7:48 pm
63403 spacer
>>63400
I'm glad at least that all the outlets that seem to think it's ridiculous are themselves far-right.
>> No. 63404 Paedofag
30th May 2019
Thursday 7:49 pm
63404 spacer
>>63402
He doesn't look like he works at Furniture Village.
>> No. 63406 Auntiefucker
30th May 2019
Thursday 7:53 pm
63406 spacer
What exactly is wrong with soldiers being on the far right? Wouldn't it help with training them up to kill brown folk?
>> No. 63412 Anonymous
30th May 2019
Thursday 8:20 pm
63412 spacer
>>63406

because sometimes we want them not to kill and actually protect brown folk and that compromises their abbility to do that, and we don't want them deciding they 'should take matters into their own hands'.

The modern Army is just as much about it's public facing as killing people (they would probably say more if you asked them), they want people who set a good impression of what Britain and the british are like, as they want to defuse hostilities rather than escalate them. They want our boys to be seen as saviours and peace keepers by the natives.
>> No. 63413 Paedofag
30th May 2019
Thursday 8:25 pm
63413 spacer
>>63406

Because you only want them to kill the brown folks you tell them to, and not burn villages of civilians to keep them from moving to bradford and getting a free flat and a car and a GPS unit from the liberal elite government.

Also there's brown people in our army, so that presents a further issue.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password