[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
BADASSES

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 64967)
Message
File  []
close
kacey poster.jpg
649676496764967
>> No. 64967 YubYub
21st February 2020
Friday 7:23 pm
64967 spacer
what would happen if you got an illegal image tattooed?

could they force you have it lasered off?
Expand all images.
>> No. 64969 Searchfag
21st February 2020
Friday 7:40 pm
64969 spacer
>>64967
Probably not, but they would likely imprison you for it and then you'd have a bad time.
>> No. 64970 YubYub
21st February 2020
Friday 7:45 pm
64970 spacer
>>64969

what then after you're released? could they jail you again if you don't remove it?
>> No. 64971 Anonymous
21st February 2020
Friday 7:50 pm
64971 spacer
I wonder if anyone ever committed to getting the DeCSS code tattooed on their back.

I've seen some utterly illegal (in most countries) loli tattoos on the internets before. My guess is if they're not publicly viable then you probably won't be prosecuted for it as you (generally) need to be conveying the intent to cause offence for most of these charges to stick.

It'd be a bit like having a hitler tattoo with the 14 words, but on your upper thigh so it's always covered by your boxers. If a tattoo exists, but no one sees it, does a bear masturbate the pope in the woods?
>> No. 64973 Ambulancelad
21st February 2020
Friday 7:57 pm
64973 spacer
My guess is you'd be charged for something like a public order offence or whatever they would charge you with for walking around displaying an illegal image in any other way. You would, I imagine, be met with a court order to keep the tattoo covered in public, and would be punished for breach of said court order if you failed to do so.

If it was on your arse or somewhere else you kept covered, nothing would happen, though they'd probably want a word with the tattoo artist who did it.
>> No. 64976 Anonymous
21st February 2020
Friday 8:04 pm
64976 spacer
>>64973
> If it was on your arse or somewhere else you kept covered, nothing would happen

Basically. It's only a public order offence if it's visible in public (or in a situation where a reasonable person would take offense, thanks Blair).

Most likely, if you got convicted, you'd be bound over to keep the peace. If you have a lawyer worth even half his salt then the case probably wouldn't even make it to magistrates court unless you offended a guardian writing darkie or something.
>> No. 64977 Paedofag
21st February 2020
Friday 8:06 pm
64977 spacer
>>64970
I think they'd give you the opportunity to get it covered up with another tattoo while in prison. If you refused you wouldn't get released; you'd get re-arrested on the day of your release.
>> No. 64978 Moralfag
21st February 2020
Friday 8:08 pm
64978 spacer
>>64973
I have replied under the assumption that "illegal image" is shorthand for child abuse imagery. Courts don't fuck about with that.
>> No. 64979 Ambulancelad
21st February 2020
Friday 8:35 pm
64979 spacer
>>64978

Devil's advocate here, but is tattooing a photo of CSA causing harm to the child, to yourself, or both?

Does a tattoo constitute creating an image under current laws?
>> No. 64981 Auntiefucker
21st February 2020
Friday 8:39 pm
64981 spacer
>>64979
The law isn't concerned with harm coming to anybody. There could be no harm and it's still strictly illegal. IIRC downloading an image on a computer is going to get you slapped with a possession and a making charge, so it doesn't really matter. You don't want either.
>> No. 64985 R4GE
21st February 2020
Friday 8:44 pm
64985 spacer
>>64981

Yeah I'm aware that downloading an image (insanely) constitutes creation of an image because you are (tenuously) creating a copy of said image. I do wonder how that filters down to charcoal drawings and tattoos though.

Afaik there have been no successful prostitutions for illegal tattoos to test the waters but please inform me if I'm out of the loop.
>> No. 64986 Samefag
21st February 2020
Friday 9:07 pm
64986 spacer
>>64985
I'm reasonably sure drawings are explicitly illegal and a tattoo would very likely be treated as same.
>> No. 64987 Searchfag
21st February 2020
Friday 9:16 pm
64987 spacer
>>64986

But what happens after you've been prosecuted? Surely forcing you to laser it off and alter your body would be a human rights violation or something.
>> No. 64989 Are Moaty
21st February 2020
Friday 9:18 pm
64989 spacer
>>64987

MUCH LIKE TEACHING YOUR DOG TO HEIL HITLER, WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT WOULD HAPPEN UNTIL SOMEONE DOES IT And it goes through the courts.
>> No. 64990 Searchfag
21st February 2020
Friday 9:20 pm
64990 spacer
>>64987
>>64977
In the scenario I describe they're not forcing you to do anything.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password