So that German lad didn't do it?

I don't think anyone in that rung of society is going to a british resort in the algarve, even to hunt for kids.

>>70160
They've got to get their kids from somewhere.

>>5364
That's stupid for a lot of reasons, but can you imagine a three year old giving you a massage? I just did, and I've immediately called the police on myself. Also they'd be shit at it. Not the Maxwell/Epstein MO at all.

>>70162
How did you manage to accidentally reply to a /boo/ thread in /iq/ when that particular post isn't even showing on /*/ because it wasn't one of the last five replies?

Not to forget these two.

>>70158
>>70172
These sketches look nothing like her parents.

>>70173
I have absolutely no doubt the parents inadvertently risked their childs safety, but that doesn't clear the posibility that others abused their choice.

>>70175

How did the "others" know that the option was there at that time and place?

>>70182
I told them.

>>70182
I imagine if you're going to steal a kid you do a bit of surveillance rather than just opportunistically trying doors and windows.

>>70184

Or just get someone to tell you.

>>70163
There are a few examples of this recently. I think it's that famous hacker who joined .gs recently and mentioned he managed to give the mods of a small image board 12 hours of work through spending a mere 45 minutes trying very hard to link posts and replies and generally be a nuisance.

I don't think he understands how linking works on .gs, either that or it's unrelated incidents of divvery.

>>70198
>the mods of a small image board
4chan?

>>70198
The WHO?

>>70201
Some randomer, I can't remember where I saw the boast but he was basically describing doing something that would be mildly amusing provided no-one knew about it and they didn't specifically boast about it.

>>70199
Are you implying that's the only issue with my post?

>>70201
No, they're playing later on.

>>70202
Operating this site is basically a one-banana problem. The UI is pretty fucking obvious when you think about it. I venture to suggest that your "famous hacker" is an idiot.

If you click "Reply" on a thread on /*/, type your reply, then don't submit it, it will still be in the Reply box when you try to reply to another thread. So perhaps our /boo/ friend just wanted to make a totally blank reply to this thread, and instead gave us a full reply to a different thread.