[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
literature
Subject   (new thread)
Message
File  [] []
close
whiteline
image.jpg
545654565456
>> No. 5456 Anonymous
4th April 2014
Friday 3:02 am
5456 Vurt
This was really good.
266 posts and 104 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6861 Anonymous
21st December 2018
Friday 9:08 pm
6861 spacer

good-omens-miniseries-700x300.png
686168616861
I'd forgotten how much I enjoy the works of Sir Terry. You can tell that Pratchett and Gaiman were challenging themselves to make the other laugh when they were writing it; it's the most fun I've had reading a book in quite some time.
>> No. 6981 Anonymous
3rd May 2019
Friday 10:51 am
6981 spacer

hurt.jpg
698169816981
Bar the typical American fashion self-help giddy bollocks it's been an interesting story so far (I'm 6-7 chapters in).
There about half a chapter where he muses about the reasons he'd got into this shit (namely BUD/S training). I still have a hard time fully grasping all the self-imposed suffering. Not that I don't understand it; three Hell Weeks and the rest of that spec ops training plus the 100 mile marathon in 24 hours without any bloody preparation - it's just so much for one human being that I cannot fully comprehend it as a grand scheme.
Stone tough and fucking mad.
>> No. 6982 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 1:08 pm
6982 spacer
>>6861

>> No. 6983 Anonymous
4th May 2019
Saturday 3:56 pm
6983 spacer
>>6982
It's annoying that it's not going to be on the BBC for another six or seven months.
>> No. 6984 Anonymous
5th May 2019
Sunday 4:41 pm
6984 spacer
>>6981

Yeah I liked his interview on Impact theory. As far as yanks go, he's a pretty interesting one.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78I9dTB9vqM

whiteline
virginia-woolf-people-page.jpg
696369636963
>> No. 6963 Anonymous
14th April 2019
Sunday 7:43 pm
6963 Books by women
It's dawned on me that, other than a novel written by a former work colleague, I haven't read a book written by a woman in over a decade. This hasn't been a conscious decision, it's just that the books I've tended to gravitate towards happen to have been written by men. However I feel I should make a conscious effort to read some, even if it's just to gain a different perspective on things.

Where should I start? Virginia Woolf? Jane Austen? Fleur Jaeggy? Dorothy Parker? Arundhati Roy? Olga Tokarczuk? Stella Gibbons?
5 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6969 Anonymous
15th April 2019
Monday 12:08 am
6969 spacer
Three great late twentieth century female writers: Muriel Spark the very quirky borderline insane Catholic convert, Kathy Acker the patron saint of all bad girls and adventuresses, Andrea Dworkin the intolerant anti-porn feminist who could put a sentence together like no-one else in the world whatever you may think of her views.

And I'd say the Bronte sisters are the absolute cornerstones of femaile literature, and all three of them are very much worth reading and surprisingly different in style and viewpoint.
>> No. 6970 Anonymous
15th April 2019
Monday 12:50 am
6970 spacer
Have you heard of a writer called J.K Rowling? She seems to be quite popular and is very cutting edge, she even releases errata’s to her books via twitter.

>Jane Austen

I never thought I would like Jane Austen purely based on the topics but there is a cynical sense of humour in her work I find wonderful. Plus you can read versions of her books with added monsters for the easily bored.
>> No. 6971 Anonymous
15th April 2019
Monday 12:52 am
6971 spacer
>>6970
>errata's

[sic]
>> No. 6979 Anonymous
29th April 2019
Monday 2:08 am
6979 spacer
>>6963
If you're into genre fiction, Ann Leckie (Ancillary Justice etc) and N.K Jemisen (probably mispelt her name, but it's close to that) are both very good.

For some kinder, softer, sci-fi have a look at Becky Chambers, starting with 'A long way to a small, angry, planet'
>> No. 6980 Anonymous
29th April 2019
Monday 7:11 am
6980 spacer
>>6963
Read Defiance and Gold In The Furnace by Savitri Devi.

whiteline
quentinblake15_2107428i.jpg
576157615761
>> No. 5761 Anonymous
8th October 2014
Wednesday 9:35 pm
5761 spacer
Evening, Mumsnet lads.

I'm running low on ideas of what to read to my son [7]. We're working our way through the Mr Gum books and if I can't think of something when we're finished my other half will probably subject him to Enid Blyton. We've read The Hobbit and all of Ronald Dahl's books for children but I don't know where to go next, possibly Harry Potter (although I've never read them so I don't know what they're like) or maybe something by Terry Deary as he's obsessed with ancient Egypt. Goosebumps?

I'd be grateful for any tips. Any books you were particularly fond of from your childhood?
150 posts and 20 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6960 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 10:25 pm
6960 spacer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eudsYr0iER0

It didn't fill me with trepidation, unlike the Artemis Fowl trailer, so I guess that's a plus.
>> No. 6961 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 11:07 am
6961 spacer
World Book Day: Parents spend more on outfits than they do on novels

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/world-book-day-parents-outfits-14097200

That doesn't surprise me. Most of the kids I've seen going to school this morning seemed to be dressed as superheroes or Disney princesses.
>> No. 6962 Anonymous
7th March 2019
Thursday 11:10 am
6962 spacer
>>6961
Carpet-bagger.
>> No. 6977 Anonymous
27th April 2019
Saturday 2:23 pm
6977 spacer
https://fairytale.ink/book/grimms-fairy-tales
>> No. 6978 Anonymous
27th April 2019
Saturday 3:20 pm
6978 spacer
>>6961
>Parents spend more on outfits than they do on novels
That's not really surprising. Clothes are expensive, books are not.

whiteline
Dickens_Gurney_head.jpg
688168816881
>> No. 6881 Anonymous
5th January 2019
Saturday 7:04 pm
6881 Why is British literature so shit?
Dickens literally sucks dick.
Why haven't we had a smash hit since good ol' Willy Shakespeare?
21 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6911 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 8:22 am
6911 spacer
>>6901
The Quiet American is a very good film. It's based on a work by Graham Greene, who, incidentally, is a superb British novelist.
>> No. 6912 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 3:25 pm
6912 spacer
>>6911
I've only read his Our Man in Havana. Midly amusing and just had some bits I could relate to.
>> No. 6913 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 5:26 pm
6913 spacer
>>6912

The Travels With My Aunt film was decent. I have the book but didn't get around to it yet.
>> No. 6914 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 6:53 pm
6914 spacer
>>6898
Fair points.
>> No. 6959 Anonymous
24th February 2019
Sunday 6:11 pm
6959 spacer
Dickens isn't a great example of prime British literature. IIRC, Orwell said that he (Dickens) was out of touch with real life because he'd done nothing but write for a living. So he needed to fill pages with melodrama and conversation in lieu of description, which is what I, and probably plenty of others, dislike about him.

I personally will look at a book by a British author before anything else. Not that there aren't plenty of stinkers out there, but other writers don't ever reach the same level of proficiency with their language. I'd even argue that they exceed the best writers in non-English languages, although of course I'm biased.

>Why haven't we had a smash hit since good ol' Willy Shakespeare?

That would be Harry Potter, whether you want to admit it or not.

whiteline
1_0G_m4-Oi9KA1Q_k43OoGmA.jpg
694369436943
>> No. 6943 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 12:03 pm
6943 spacer
How do I go about writing a book?

I've got a loose idea in my head an undercover officer infiltrates a group, possibly someone like the Democratic Football Lads Alliance, only for it descend into a farce as it turns out 90% of the members are undercover officers who don't want to blow their cover. So far the end result in my head is that the organisation ends up gaining lots of members because the officers make the group seem much larger than it would be otherwise and they're so adept at bureaucracy that they run the group far more efficiently than it would otherwise be. This is the point where you tell me this idea has already been done and far better than I could ever hope to write it. but I'm not entirely sure where to go from here.

Thanks, lads.
3 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6948 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 1:27 pm
6948 spacer
I'm no expert but there are two basic routes. Some people work on developing in-depth characters then put them into a situation and sort of write along to see where it goes. The other route is to start with a basic plot idea then start figuring out how that would work, breaking the premise down into component parts; scenes, setting and characters needed to pull it off. It has to follow a basic structure with character motivations and things fleshed out for at least the principle characters to seem real and distinct, with believable behaviours.

Once you've figured that out, you arrange the scenes into order in chapters and the chapters in order of the book itself then keep adding detail to each part, rearranging as you see fit, until you feel confident about putting it into prose. At which point you do that. Then you basically do the whole thing again over and over as you realise what you've done doesn't make sense or is missing a key character arc or that you've made a really stupid amateur writer's error and as it's not a YA novel remarkably similar to any of the most recent best selling novels the year you finish writing it (as opposed to started), nobody wants to publish it because they don't expect to bank on it.

Everyone does a weird mix of the two routes though, nothing's ever "purely" one or the other. You just figure out what you're doing as you go along.

It's best to write it second person, present tense or you'll be setting yourself at a disadvantage from the start, if you ever want it published. Oh, and remember to back it up constantly or you'll definitely lose enough of it at some point that getting back to where you were before it crashed seems insurmountable.

I can recommend pirating Scrivener to use as a word processor; it's pleasant to write into and has a file manager thing that makes it extremely easy to navigate and overview the work as a whole. It has all sorts of other bells and whistles you won't need but the first half hour in its tutorial thing should cover everything you will use.
>> No. 6949 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 1:44 pm
6949 spacer
>second person
Sorry, meant third person.
After you've finished, put the whole thing away without showing anyone and concentrate on other things for a year. Then get it out, re-read it and basically write it all over again, not entirely from scratch but you'll probably be making huge changes.

It helps a lot to be able to print out what you've done, preferably in a different font to the one you were writing in and read it out loud to yourself. It'll make it much easier to spot poor sentences, bad rhythm and flow, then you can fix it.
>> No. 6951 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 6:13 pm
6951 spacer
>>6943
A seditious group being humorously composed entirely of infiltrators does sound like a familiar conceit, I'm afraid.
>> No. 6952 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 7:18 pm
6952 spacer
>>6951
That's not a reason to not write his own version.
Everything's been done, you can't think about that.
>> No. 6953 Anonymous
8th February 2019
Friday 7:36 pm
6953 spacer
>>6952

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/07/the-six-main-arcs-in-storytelling-identified-by-a-computer/490733/

whiteline
16e9bc39a89497f4746c3bbb3bfb8d96.jpg
679667966796
>> No. 6796 Anonymous
4th October 2018
Thursday 12:37 am
6796 spacer
What features of book covers are a tip-off it's going to automatically be a terrible book? I think good-looking people, models and six-packs.
27 posts and 16 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6824 Anonymous
6th October 2018
Saturday 10:48 am
6824 spacer
>>6823

I've read this and it fully left out the best bit. I'm not trying to do spoilers but you know the bit where they're in the garden?
>> No. 6915 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 12:30 am
6915 spacer

download.png
691569156915
Oh boy.
>> No. 6916 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 1:10 pm
6916 spacer
>>6814
I think I remember this book.
>> No. 6917 Anonymous
22nd January 2019
Tuesday 1:31 pm
6917 spacer
It's hard to say what makes a book cover a red flag exactly. Ignoring the obvious things like "CLAN VAMPIRE CLASH" being written on it or it being a a stupid steampunk maship, it's something about the quality of the image.

In a lot of the examples here they have that same, cheap looking collage effect:
>>6796
>>6800
>>6801
Or look like a not-quite-professional deviantartist commission:
>>6802
>>6803
I think the biggest tell about >>6808 is the terrible choice of fonts and how they're resized. It's just the whole thing has been obviously done by someone with no idea about design. In the case of >>6817 whoever made and approved the cover having the mental age of a preteen.
>> No. 6938 Anonymous
1st February 2019
Friday 12:33 pm
6938 spacer

6.jpg
693869386938


whiteline
41hlrYQzfXL.png
691869186918
>> No. 6918 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 8:49 pm
6918 spacer
I'm tempted to get an Audible subscription for an hour commute every working day. Thing is, I'm a little unsure on how good it is in terms of selection and value-for-money as I'm a tight git with a fear of commitment. Either of you two tried it and can tell me how good the experience was?
Expand all images.
>> No. 6919 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 8:53 pm
6919 spacer
>>6918
My mate wont shut the fuck up about it, he doesn't have the attention span for books for some reason. He says it's great.
>> No. 6920 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 9:16 pm
6920 spacer
I find it's good for long walks where I would like to be reading, but obviously can't do that and cross the road safely at the same time. That and for falling asleep to, I have a small speaker that I connect my phone to and usually listen to a chapter in bed to wind down. It seems listening while lying down with my eyes closed in complete darkness is more effective for getting me to sleep than keeping my eyes open reading in bed, which usually turns into me reading a lot longer than I should and missing a sensible bedtime. I haven't cancelled my subscription since I got it but I try to really get the most out of the fee by buying audiobooks that are at least 20 hours or longer. Anything shorter than that and you'll have burned through that month's credit and be left with nothing to listen to.
>> No. 6921 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 9:20 pm
6921 spacer
>>6918

They seem to have a good range and they have a 30 day trial period, I don't see the harm in just trying.
>> No. 6922 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 11:14 pm
6922 spacer
>>6921
> I don't see the harm in just trying.
That's what Big Audiobook want you to think.
>> No. 6923 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 11:28 pm
6923 spacer
There are over 130,000 audiobooks available on Audible. That selection includes a surprisingly small amount of crap, because recording an audiobook to Audible's standards is relatively expensive.

The basic subscription is £7.99 a month, which gives you a credit to download one new audiobook per month. You can keep that audiobook forever and unused credits do roll over to the next month. It's not cheap, but it's reasonably good value. They have a very generous returns policy - if you don't like a book, you can get your credit back and choose another one, no questions asked.

If you're on a very tight budget, you might want to check out your local library. For the benefit of blind people, libraries tend to have a good selection of audiobooks, although you'll need to rip them from CD. Most libraries also have an online collection of e-books and audiobooks that you can borrow using the Libby app, but the selection is usually limited to a small number of popular titles. You just download the app and log in using your library card number.

Or you could just torrent stuff.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.overdrive.mobile.android.libby

https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/libby-by-overdrive/id1076402606?mt=8

whiteline
J7oyVhC.jpg
687868786878
>> No. 6878 Anonymous
2nd January 2019
Wednesday 6:24 pm
6878 spacer
Evening, lads.

I'm after recommendations, but I can't explain exactly what I'm after. I guess it can be called pop science/maths or perhaps even science/maths humour. Something that uses concepts to explain various matters rather than "Here's 20 wacky scientific facts to boggle your brain!"

I'm considering picking up The Indisputable Existence of Santa Claus by Hannah Fry and Thomas Evans.
5 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6893 Anonymous
6th January 2019
Sunday 10:38 am
6893 spacer
>>6892

It's a mildly amusing conceit - the book explains complicated bits of science using only the thousand most common words in the English language. It's a spin-off from the "Up-Goer Five" comic. Fine if you like that sort of thing, but I don't imagine it would be particularly illuminating.

https://xkcd.com/1133/
>> No. 6895 Anonymous
6th January 2019
Sunday 11:25 am
6895 spacer
I think you'll probably like The Simpsons and Their Mathematical Secrets . It's mostly average but quite enjoyable.

Genome: the Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters was good, though some of the science is dated and the author's awful politics shine through (more pop sci). I really liked Paradox: The Nine Greatest Enigmas in Physics and similarly 13 Things That Don't Make Sense: The Most Baffling Scientific Mysteries of Our Time. Though humour wise I imagine We Have No Idea: A Guide to the Unknown Universe would be better though I haven't read it yet.

A Short History of Nearly Everything and it's unofficial "sequel" An Optimist's Tour of the Future: One Curious Man Sets Out to Answer "What's Next?" were both good.

I actually really want to read The Code Book by Singh. It's about how they deciphered hieroglyphics.

>>6880
His other book I'll think you'll find it's more complicated than that is also good. It's a collection of his newspaper columns.
>> No. 6896 Anonymous
6th January 2019
Sunday 12:12 pm
6896 spacer
>>6893

Reading that comic made me feel like I was being patronised by someone much thicker than me. Sky bag air, indeed.
>> No. 6897 Anonymous
6th January 2019
Sunday 12:17 pm
6897 spacer

DNUQYxDWkAA_lRS.jpg
689768976897
>>6893
I don't think comic/webcomic illustrators translate well into books. For example, David Squires' weekly comic in The Guardian is brilliant and topical but I've got a couple of his books and it just quite doesn't work as well.

The again, there's plenty of people who don't succeed when they try different formats; Lucy Worsley may be an excellent historian and TV presenter but her books are below par.
>> No. 6909 Anonymous
7th January 2019
Monday 1:55 am
6909 spacer
>>6878
The Drunkard's Walk by Leonard Mlodinow.

whiteline
GreeneRobert-48LawsOfPower.jpg
682568256825
>> No. 6825 Anonymous
26th October 2018
Friday 11:37 am
6825 The 48 Laws of Power
I'm vaguely intrigued by this book although I haven't finished it yet. Is there an argumentative criticism of it anywhere?
Some stuff in it I've witnessed myself, several points contradict other 'advice' in this book - which I find a bit ironic but I always can rationalise that different situations require different approaches - and some just feel contrived and overboard. Perhaps not at Hollywood though.
It seems to have attracted a noticeable following within the alt-right circles which is... well, curious.
17 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6844 Anonymous
27th October 2018
Saturday 5:03 pm
6844 spacer
Can the federation replicate latinum or do the space jews somehow make it un-replicatable?
>> No. 6845 Anonymous
27th October 2018
Saturday 5:08 pm
6845 spacer
>>6844
That energy has to come from somewhere, it's probably a net loss to replicate it.
>> No. 6846 Anonymous
27th October 2018
Saturday 11:17 pm
6846 spacer
>>6844

In my headcanon replicators can't replicate any elements heavier than iron, since anything heavier than that requires more energy to fuse than is released by its fusion. That's why it's possible to replicate food, but not, say, entire starships. Starships utilise heavier elements.
>> No. 6847 Anonymous
27th October 2018
Saturday 11:57 pm
6847 spacer
>>6846

Chakotay replicates Janeway a Pocket Watch for her birthday in the End of Time special and she chastises him for wasting power. It can be done, it's just greedy on the dilithium and at that time they were on rations which I think he saved up and spunked all at once.

What is interesting is that you can recycle replicated items, but I don't know what the loss conversion is. There will be a loss, that much is obvious. The Star Trek Encyclopaedia would probably know.
>> No. 6848 Anonymous
28th October 2018
Sunday 5:04 am
6848 spacer
>>6846

The gold in gold-pressed latinum is frequently referred to as "worthless" in DS9, so replicators are clearly capable of producing heavy elements economically. I assume that there's some kind of quantum handwaving that makes latinum uniquely difficult to replicate.

>>6847

Voyager is a bit of an edge case, because they're stranded light years from Federation territory. Within the Federation (even on the outer edges), it seems that most things are negligibly cheap - in Explorers (DS9 S03E22), Sisko and Jake built a Runabout-sized starship for shits and giggles.

whiteline
Book.png
678767876787
>> No. 6787 Anonymous
3rd September 2018
Monday 5:27 pm
6787 Self Publishers thread, list em.
I'll start,

Title: Memphis Megahertz and the Kansas City Fractal

What: Techno-Coffeetable/quote style book, follows 2 nostalgic computer systems through a Virtual American Empire.

Where: Amazon Sept. 7

PDF preview-download?: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FkK0NRe59EK2Chnw-lid6UToX3jweiKD/view?usp=sharing
2 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6790 Anonymous
5th September 2018
Wednesday 8:25 am
6790 spacer
>>6788
If you've written a book and want to show it off fine, but he honest about the fact you're advertising it.
>> No. 6791 Anonymous
5th September 2018
Wednesday 1:54 pm
6791 spacer
>>6790
At least he's not trying to crypto mine us...
>> No. 6792 Anonymous
5th September 2018
Wednesday 4:39 pm
6792 spacer
>>6791 Not that we can see, anyway...
Just pondering - I can't immediately find anyone who's written a miner in native postscript or pdf, rather than just crashing out of the reader and running it locally. Surely someone's done it, just because?

Also, yes, OP - I downloaded your work. Sorry, but I'm clearly not the target audience. Washed straight over me in a wave of slightly annoyed indifference.
>> No. 6793 Anonymous
5th September 2018
Wednesday 7:48 pm
6793 spacer
>>6792
People have managed to stick miners in favicons, and some browsers have been dumb enough to execute them.
>> No. 6794 Anonymous
5th September 2018
Wednesday 8:00 pm
6794 spacer
>>6792

Postscript is definitely possible, PDF less so. That said, Adobe Reader handles embedded Postscript Type 3 fonts just fine meaning that you can happily embed any Postscript program you choose into a single character of your PDF.*

Obviously this is assuming you don't want to just be lazy and run the miner in embedded Javascript.

* I'm sure Arnold Rimmer would be chuffed.

whiteline
peterloo.jpg
678567856785
>> No. 6785 Anonymous
28th August 2018
Tuesday 7:13 pm
6785 History of British activism and social movements
I'm looking for a book on the history of the UK with the same kind of political thrust as Howard Zinn's 'People's History of the United States'.

Failing that, any other recommendations on the history of activism, social movements, how public rights were won in the UK, etc.? The more comprehensive the better.
Expand all images.
>> No. 6786 Anonymous
30th August 2018
Thursday 12:22 am
6786 spacer
>>6785
EP Thompson's Making of The English Working Class is the place to start. Very good overview, similar to Zinn, and will likely prompt you to research particular figures/groups (in my case it was William Cobbett, Bronterre O'Brien and Owenism).

You'll want to look into the Chartist movement - Dorothy Thompson is highly respected there. Related to that is Jonathan Rose's The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes, which has been recommended to me several times but I've yet to read.

I don't have a clue re: 20th century really though, sorry.

whiteline
reese-witherspoon-and-daughter-ava-are-total-twins.jpg
677567756775
>> No. 6775 Anonymous
2nd June 2018
Saturday 9:35 pm
6775 spacer
It's my birthday coming up soon and I have no real idea what I want, so usually in this scenario I suggest books. However, there's only a few I can think of:-

Cold Comfort Farm by Stella Gibbons
For Esmé - with Love and Squalor by J.D. Salinger
Under The Net by Iris Murdoch

Ideally, I'm looking for something similar to The Wasp Factory by Iain Banks with a fair bit of dark humour. I also seem to recall a book being mentioned on here years ago involving near misses with nukes which sounded interesting.

Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, lads.
Expand all images.
>> No. 6776 Anonymous
2nd June 2018
Saturday 10:14 pm
6776 spacer
>>6775
I'm reading a steampunk novel atm called Steal The Sky, if you like Sci-fi? The protag is basically Han Solo and I get a lot of outer rim vibes from it, but it's still good.
>> No. 6777 Anonymous
2nd June 2018
Saturday 11:06 pm
6777 spacer
>I also seem to recall a book being mentioned on here years ago involving near misses with nukes which sounded interesting.

That might have been Command and Control by Robert Schlosser.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Command-Control-Eric-Schlosser/dp/0141037911/
>> No. 6778 Anonymous
3rd June 2018
Sunday 9:23 pm
6778 spacer
>>6776
I read a fair bit of sci-fi, although steampunk has never appealed to me.

>>6777
It wasn't that one. It was something like accounts of several near misses down to sheer human ineptitude.

Thanks, anyway.
>> No. 6779 Anonymous
4th June 2018
Monday 6:55 am
6779 spacer
>>6777
https://www.humblebundle.com/books/brain-wave-books

A week left on this. One of the books in the 75p tier is 'Atomic Accidents: A History of Nuclear Meltdowns and Disasters'.

whiteline
19127165723_8017c95968_o-1d371c0a324dc21ddf564c14e.jpg
671167116711
>> No. 6711 Anonymous
17th December 2017
Sunday 2:09 pm
6711 Non-fiction adventure, exploration, science biography
After being impressed by the biographies of astronauts Scott Parazynski, Chris Hadfield and Scott Kelly, I'm searching for more biographies of adventurous and high-achieving people.

To narrow that down a bit, I'm especially interested in those who travel to unique or unusual places, and are driven more by science and desire for knowledge rather than military or diplomatic careers (though I can accept those line blurs depending on context).

Historical and contemporary examples welcome.
8 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6721 Anonymous
19th December 2017
Tuesday 8:54 pm
6721 spacer

GeneralOfTheArmy-Marshall.png
672167216721
I am enjoying this very much. Marshall was the US Army's chief
of staff during World War 2 and went on to create the European Recovery Act also known as the Marshall Plan. He is highlighted as one of these very successful people who eschewed promotions and never sought the limelight.
>> No. 6741 Anonymous
12th March 2018
Monday 11:46 am
6741 spacer

250px-Dakar-dvd.jpg
674167416741
This wasn't bad: "Race to Dakar" by Charley Boorman, the rich, obnoxious twat who accompanied Ewan McGregor on his motorbike trip in "Long Way Round". The book chronicles his attempt to run the Dakar Rally with a small support team and a cameraman, with the idea of making a TV series about it later.

I've always enjoyed watching the Rally, but details about the rules, day-to-day life, etc. are hard to come by. The book gives more of an inside perspective that you don't see on Eurosport or the Youtube channel. I was worried that Boorman's cuntishness would ruin it, but this doesn't really come through in the book.
>> No. 6742 Anonymous
13th March 2018
Tuesday 2:58 am
6742 spacer
>>6741

Is Boorman that bad? I enjoyed some of Long Way Round.
>> No. 6743 Anonymous
13th March 2018
Tuesday 4:55 am
6743 spacer
>>6742
Mate, he's rich. That means he's practically Satan.
>> No. 6755 Anonymous
16th April 2018
Monday 9:25 pm
6755 spacer
>>6742

The "rich and obnoxious" part is by his own admission. He actually comes across as pretty chill and interesting.

whiteline
girl_n_bike_by_aspectusfuturus-d4m45qr.jpg
668666866686
>> No. 6686 Anonymous
13th October 2017
Friday 1:47 pm
6686 Cyberpunk
I just finished reading most of William Gibson's work. I love his creativity and scene building, but most of his stories are quite horribly written, and he obviously has issues with women.

Are there any cyberpunk novels with a somewhat more realistic view of human nature? The only other author I know is Neal Stephenson, and his stuff is fedora tier.
13 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 6705 Anonymous
27th October 2017
Friday 3:23 am
6705 spacer
>>6699

> I'm not sure why everyone like to suck Gibson's dick for Neuromancer (1984), considering Blade Runner and Tron (1982).
> Gibson didn't innovate anything in particular, he just got lucky and was made into a symbol.

What Gibson really achieved with the sprawl trilogy, far beyond his unrealistic imaginings of cyberspace or his prediction of the Internet of Things was capturing the hearts and minds of an entire subculture of teenage hackers and phreaks. Gibson was able to capture both the thrill of hacking and drive and desire to hack incredibly well, while also fueling the fires of many a teenage fantasy that they could one day be a "cyberspace cowboy" or a "digital samurai" selling their hacking talents to the highest bidder (which, to be fair, most of us actually are).

Essentially the "cyberpunk dystopia" setting was entirely arbitrary and interchangable; other than the silly bit where the AIs merge and become the matrix, Case and Bobby's stories could have been transplanted into any setting with technology advanced enough for Gibson's mumbo jumbo to pass muster and the trilogy would still have had the same success.

>>6701
> Snowcrash a couple of years ago I thought they were just simply bad. Terrible pacing, trite characterisation... just badly written in general.

Did Stephenson ever really write any sincere cyberpunk fiction? Snowcrash was an on-point lampoon of cyberpunk for the most part, with every character, idea and scenario stereotyped and turned up to 11 for (admittedly negligible) comedic effect (Hiro Protagonist? Come on).
>> No. 6722 Anonymous
23rd December 2017
Saturday 7:53 am
6722 spacer
>>6699
I liked those movies, although the Sprawl novels are much longer and have a lot more details. I might check out Judge Dredd again, it was very similar to Gibson's world but didn't take itself as seriously IIRC.

The '60s novels are not bad. One I enjoyed was "Player Piano" by Kurt Vonnegut. He is not as imaginative as William Gibson, but his characters are a lot better, except for the poor people. You can tell that he was a little too bourgeois to let his imagination run wild, or get into the heads of real poor people. I also enjoyed seeing a novel from over 50 years ago deal with the "robots will steal our jobs" nonsense.
>> No. 6723 Anonymous
23rd December 2017
Saturday 2:54 pm
6723 spacer
>>6701
I enjoyed the first half of Snow Crash. Neuromancer, Altered Carbon, most of the cyberpunk canon just seem a bit gay. I'm interested in Seveneves by Stephenson, if anybody has an opinion to provide.

My favourite sci-fi novel is Ender's Game. I've tried two other Orson Scott Card books from the "Enderverse" and they're utter shite.
>> No. 6724 Anonymous
23rd December 2017
Saturday 5:23 pm
6724 spacer
>>6723
> I enjoyed the first half of Snow Crash. Neuromancer, Altered Carbon

What stopped you from reading the second halves, or were the second halves magically universally shit?
>> No. 6725 Anonymous
24th December 2017
Sunday 8:20 pm
6725 spacer
>>6724

He wouldn't know, would he?

whiteline
Delete Post []
Password  
Previous[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]