[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
Subject   (new thread)
File  []
>> No. 84895 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 8:13 am
84895 spacer
Jimmy Saville: My new Brexit party stands ready to defend democracy


'Thousands of Tory party members' to defect to Jimmy Saville's Brexit Party as it gets official approval


Rebel Labour MPs set to quit party and form centre group

820 posts and 108 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 86333 Anonymous
13th July 2019
Saturday 5:57 am
86333 spacer
Everyone knows you never go full racist.
>> No. 86334 Anonymous
13th July 2019
Saturday 8:09 am
86334 spacer

>They don't have to go full racist, just Islamaphobe

It's the gays they need to target. People have had enough of them.
>> No. 86335 Anonymous
13th July 2019
Saturday 10:03 am
86335 spacer
Aren't you lads just talking about the BNP? They weren't particularly successful in elections.
>> No. 86336 Anonymous
13th July 2019
Saturday 10:04 am
86336 spacer
If it wasn't for the BNP would we have had Brexit?
>> No. 86337 Anonymous
13th July 2019
Saturday 12:19 pm
86337 spacer
That was EPIC lads, well done, some really braindead shit.

Maybe, but if it weren't for the financial crash we mightn't have had Brexit, or the coalition government, or a string of World Cup humilations for England, or the crimes of Jimmy saville (the real one not saville).

>> No. 83382 Anonymous
27th August 2017
Sunday 9:19 am
83382 spacer
Beleagured Theresa May 'to quit as Prime Minister on August 30, 2019 in a bid to stop a leadership challenge' - as she tries to calm rivals with a prosecco party at Chequers

Theresa May is said to have revealed the date she will quit as Prime Minister - giving herself two years to see Brexit through first.

She has chosen Friday August 30th 2019 as the day she will step down from 10 Downing Street, it has been reported.

It comes amid a major charm offensive by Mrs May in a bid to win the support of her MPs and avoid an awkward leadership challenge.


This man is going to become Prime Minister on 1st September 2019 and it's going to be fucking awesome.
190 posts and 25 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 86297 Anonymous
24th June 2019
Monday 6:39 pm
86297 spacer
Is there any reason why Scots seem to hate Bojo more than the other candidates? Apart from the Old Etonian thing, I mean.
>> No. 86298 Anonymous
24th June 2019
Monday 7:23 pm
86298 spacer
Because he's obviously going to win making the others at least doubly irrelevant.
>> No. 86299 Anonymous
24th June 2019
Monday 7:27 pm
86299 spacer
It's just the standard Sweaty chip on shoulder mentality.
>> No. 86316 Anonymous
27th June 2019
Thursday 10:19 pm
86316 spacer
Sweet fucking Jesus one of these cunts will be PM.
>> No. 86317 Anonymous
28th June 2019
Friday 6:44 am
86317 spacer
>>86316 not for long. I think the only way Boris will be able to not deliver Brexit will be to force a losing GE.

>> No. 51150 Anonymous
8th October 2013
Tuesday 9:23 pm
51150 spacer
Young adults in England have scored among the lowest results in the industrialised world in international literacy and numeracy tests.

A major study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows how England's 16 to 24-year-olds are falling behind their Asian and European counterparts. England is 22nd for literacy and 21st for numeracy out of 24 countries.

Unlike other developed countries, the study also showed that young people in England are no better at these tests than older people, in the 55 to 65 age range. When this is weighted with other factors, such as the socio-economic background of people taking the test, it shows that England is the only country in the survey where results are going backwards - with the older cohort better than the younger.


Cue lots of finger pointing and nothing changing.
418 posts and 17 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85833 Anonymous
23rd May 2019
Thursday 7:45 am
85833 spacer
>Most families do not choose to send their children to their nearest school, shows the biggest ever study of state secondary school choices in England. More than 60% opt for a school that is further away - usually because it is higher achieving.

>"Contrary to a widely-held belief, only a minority of parents choose their local school as their first option," say researchers.

>It also debunks the idea that richer families are more engaged with choices. Despite any assumptions about the "sharp elbows" of middle-class families, there was no significant difference in behaviour between wealthier and more disadvantaged parents.

>Both were similarly engaged in using choices to seek more desirable school places for their children. Parents in poorer areas were more likely to opt for schools further away - with researchers suggesting this was because richer families were more likely to live close to high-performing schools.

>> No. 86300 Anonymous
25th June 2019
Tuesday 3:11 pm
86300 spacer
This is more a personal observation than anything, but a few months ago when I watched that 'They Will Not Grow Old' documentary by Peter Jackson, I couldn't help but notice just how articulate all the old WWI vets were. They certainly didn't sound as though they were upper-crust or anything, they just sounded like regular blokes from across England and Scotland; only one or two of them sounded like officers.

Now, these were old men, so they've had a lifetime of experience to become more nuanced in their speech, but for me, it put to bed this silly notion that we're 'more' educated nowadays than we used to be because of technology. You'd think with all the text people read on a daily basis because of their phones, they'd be more literate, but it's the opposite.
>> No. 86301 Anonymous
25th June 2019
Tuesday 3:35 pm
86301 spacer
There are a lot of things that could have effected why the Tommies in those interviews sounded the way they did though. It's possible the researchers at the time thought the working class ones with inpenetrable regional accents weren't telly material, or that all of them died at the age of 40 from being so poor and smelly. I haven't seen the film though I might be way off on both ideas.

I definitely think literacy is taking a hit though, or at least the levels of quality literacy. Undoubtably more people can read and write than ever before, but not everyone's secretly a *NAME OF FAMOUS AUTHOR*. Sorry, I don't know many books.

Oh, Sara Pascoe, she did a book.
>> No. 86302 Anonymous
25th June 2019
Tuesday 5:42 pm
86302 spacer

I think it's sort of more that the way people spoke back then was more polite and proper; or at least, it bloody well was if you were going to be on the film. That will have been a big deal for gentlemen of their generation, and I imagine they'd have asked for their Sunday best and treated it like a formal occasion.

I don't think it necessarily has to do with education in terms of intellect, but certainly education in terms of how to conduct and present oneself. We've almost entirely retired that concept these days. Nowadays people might read and write more than ever before, technically, but most of them don't spend their time on a board like this for anoraks and shed enthusiasts. The quality of their reading material counts for far more than the quantity, because 90% of online communication is utter dreck.

I will type more words now because I have just obtained a mechanical keyboard and I am enjoying the noises it makes. They are pleasant, but I feel the trend towards them recently is a bit overrated. If my old one hadn't have broken I don't think I would have consciously "upgraded" to a mechanical one at any point soon.
>> No. 86303 Anonymous
25th June 2019
Tuesday 6:04 pm
86303 spacer
>I don't think it necessarily has to do with education in terms of intellect, but certainly education in terms of how to conduct and present oneself.

This. Back then people seemed to have a greater sense of pride or, more accurately, a greater sense of shame. I'm not entirely sure when picking up your children from school wearing pyjamas, slippers and a dressing gown became a thing but I'd wager it coincided with an increase in people having no sense of shame.

>> No. 86259 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 3:20 pm
86259 spacer
post results

10 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 86275 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 8:28 pm
86275 spacer
Since you clicked on it, and I haven't, the other five must be him admiring his own work.
>> No. 86277 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 9:41 pm
86277 spacer

Hate to disapoint you but it is a mirror of another video that I couldn't find.
>> No. 86278 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 9:53 pm
86278 spacer

so you don't care about the proud 1.4k pop of Tokelauans with their thousand year old traditions and incurring the wrath of the great and powerful Tui Tokelau in his tropical paradise. But your heart bleads for the 14 Commercial sealers who are sitting there right now freezing their bollocks off in constant darkness listeing to the BBC world service and planning who to bugger next.
>> No. 86279 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 10:17 pm
86279 spacer
Maybe it's different now. A decade or so ago a tk domain was free but the domain didn't actually point by DNS to your server. It used a frameset and loaded your real URL in a frame. This meant the address bar wouldn't change or show your individual page URLs.
>> No. 86280 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 10:19 pm
86280 spacer
They're 14 British Commercial sealers who are sitting there right now freezing their bollocks off in constant darkness listeing to the BBC world service and planning who to bugger next, thank you very much.

>> No. 85961 Anonymous
27th May 2019
Monday 7:05 pm
85961 Rory Stewart
I think Rory is a pretty cool guy.
91 posts and 17 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 86254 Anonymous
19th June 2019
Wednesday 10:56 pm
86254 spacer
>If leaving the EU means parliament becomes more accountable
The delusion is strong in this one.
>> No. 86255 Anonymous
19th June 2019
Wednesday 11:01 pm
86255 spacer
It means the government have lost a major scapegoat and the past three years have shown that our political system is so broken that we may end up with PR sooner than I'd otherwise hoped.
>> No. 86256 Anonymous
19th June 2019
Wednesday 11:19 pm
86256 spacer
>It means the government have lost a major scapegoat
If only it were that simple.
>> No. 86257 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 1:09 am
86257 spacer

I don't share your optimism. If we can no longer blame the EU for all our failings, things could get really ugly for whichever ethnic minority takes their place.
>> No. 86258 Anonymous
20th June 2019
Thursday 1:49 am
86258 spacer
The Scots give as good as they get, it'll be fine.

>> No. 86042 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 2:36 pm
86042 spacer
This woman is going to be the next Chancellor of Germany and it's going to be fucking awesome.
6 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 86049 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 8:27 pm
86049 spacer

She's German m8, they don't really do flirting - she'd either ask you flat out if you want to have sex, or tell you to piss off.
>> No. 86050 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 8:29 pm
86050 spacer
I'd go in Baerbock with her, IYKWIM.
>> No. 86053 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 8:34 pm
86053 spacer

Germans still flirt, they're just not vague about it.
>> No. 86054 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 8:37 pm
86054 spacer

Is there such a thing as non-vague flirting?
>> No. 86058 Anonymous
1st June 2019
Saturday 9:29 pm
86058 spacer

Yes, of course there is. "Nice cock, can I suck it?" is quite direct.

>> No. 85774 Anonymous
22nd May 2019
Wednesday 9:57 am
85774 Election
It's coming lads. Dawn of a new era.
69 posts and 11 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85892 Anonymous
23rd May 2019
Thursday 10:44 pm
85892 spacer


>There has been a loss of confidence in the two major parties because they currently have shit leaders

Do you really think that's all it is ladm9? Come on now.
>> No. 85893 Anonymous
23rd May 2019
Thursday 11:23 pm
85893 spacer


>> No. 85939 Anonymous
25th May 2019
Saturday 11:41 pm
85939 spacer


>> No. 85940 Anonymous
26th May 2019
Sunday 10:43 pm
85940 spacer
The North East have declared: 2 seats for Brexit Party, 1 for Labour.
>> No. 86028 Anonymous
30th May 2019
Thursday 11:12 pm
86028 spacer

Voting intention 28-29 May 2019-01.jpg


EU boiz.jpg
>> No. 85447 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 4:50 am
85447 lmao brexit
Here's your future British Isles bro

(A good day to you Sir!)
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85451 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 12:44 pm
85451 spacer


The bikers.
>> No. 85455 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 9:12 pm
85455 spacer
That's a fair point. It's a protectorate with its own currency, it isn't a member of the UK. I imagine they'd probably vote to become independent though if the pound crashed through the floor, as their interests might be better served by Holyrood or Stormont at that point. The Scots have vastly more experience at accommodating the needs of island communities, so that would be my guess.

Assuming the above is an inevitability.
>> No. 85456 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 11:24 pm
85456 spacer
Nah, that place is going to us Hindists


Bikers are allowed, but never shall his sacrifice be forgotten.
>> No. 85457 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 11:27 pm
85457 spacer

RIP doctor Hinds. Road racing will never be the same without him.
>> No. 85728 Anonymous
20th May 2019
Monday 6:49 am
85728 spacer
I think it's down to Wales whether or not they want an independence vote.
There's still mixed views so far, the majority voted to leave the EU although there's been a growing movement for independence since the protest in Cardiff.

>> No. 85279 Anonymous
20th March 2019
Wednesday 8:45 pm
85279 spacer
I think the UK has become like one of those girlfriends that's always threatening to dump you, but never does.
109 posts and 11 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85581 Anonymous
11th April 2019
Thursday 9:46 am
85581 spacer
>The legal minimum amount of time needed for a referendum in this country is 26 weeks.
Where do you get that number from? The only number that's enshrined in law is 10 weeks from announcement of the poll.
>> No. 85582 Anonymous
11th April 2019
Thursday 9:54 am
85582 spacer
The ever reliable source; it's what someone who follows these things told me. LSE suggest that the entire process could be shortened to 24 weeks which is why, until now, most commentators have suggested that a General Election was far more likely than a second referendum.

>Allowing one week between passage of legislation and the start of the regulated campaign, and a 10-week regulated campaign period, would take the total period from start to finish to 24 weeks.

>> No. 85583 Anonymous
11th April 2019
Thursday 10:11 am
85583 spacer
While I understand the point about the Electoral Commission, bear in mind that we just had a bill rushed through all stages in the Commons with a lot of debate and a number of contentious votes in a little under five hours.

Plus I think that if the decision were taken to stage a referendum on the deal, the EU would happily grant a further extension, since it would be abundantly clear what we were going to do with it.
>> No. 85584 Anonymous
11th April 2019
Thursday 7:34 pm
85584 spacer
The referendum seems like a catch 22, sure it would give Parliament an answer (?) but on the other it requires Parliament to actually pass a bill on having a referendum.

>Plus I think that if the decision were taken to stage a referendum on the deal, the EU would happily grant a further extension, since it would be abundantly clear what we were going to do with it.

That depends on how much we mess about. The Multiannual Financial Framework happens in 2020 and decides the EU budget commitments for the next 7 years - obviously we'd want to have fucked off by then.
>> No. 85585 Anonymous
12th April 2019
Friday 1:28 am
85585 spacer
The EU has shown they've been more than reasonable. If a referendum bill is put forward and held up at the last stage for the EC to do their thing, but the statutory periods run past the Halloween deadline, they'd certainly react a lot better than they have done. Remember, the main objection from the European side was that we were asking for an extension without any hint as to what we were seeking the extension for. Indeed, I believe both Juncker and Tusk have explicitly said as much.

>> No. 85368 Anonymous
23rd March 2019
Saturday 10:09 pm
85368 How accurate is this article?
I'm not British, sorry about that. Is this editorial at all within the realm of reality or is it just character assassination?

“She was dealt a bad hand.” “She took a poisoned chalice.” From a great distance, it is possible to feel sorry for British Prime Minister Theresa May. She seems so dignified. She seems to be trying so hard. The circles beneath her eyes have grown so much deeper since she became prime minister back in 2016, following the surprise result of the Brexit referendum, the resignation of her hapless predecessor, David Cameron, and an ugly leadership squabble, during which several of her male colleagues metaphorically stabbed one another in the back. Since then, she has always seemed to outsiders the sensible person in the room, the adult who knows what she is doing, the sane person in a madhouse.

Alas, she is not any of those things. She is not sensible, she does not know what she is doing, and, increasingly, she doesn’t seem to be entirely sane either. Outside of Westminster, the extent of May’s responsibility for this crisis might not be fully appreciated. But in truth, almost everything about Brexit — from the nature of the deal she negotiated to the divisions in her party and her country — is very much her fault. The latest development — European leaders have told her that the United Kingdom can have a Brexit extension until May 22, if May can get her withdrawal agreement passed in Parliament, but must crash out of all of its trading arrangements on April 12 if not — underlines this bitter truth. She is not to be pitied: She is the worst prime minister in living memory, presiding over a crisis of her own creation.

The list of her mistakes is not short. She did not have to trigger Article 50, the legal mechanism for leaving the European Union, before making a plan on how to do so: That decision set a two-year clock ticking and has resulted in the cliff edge the country would have reached on the 29th of this month if an extension had not been granted. She did not have to call an unnecessary parliamentary election in 2017, one which resulted in the loss of her majority and forced her to rely on a small, radical, Protestant Northern Irish political party, as well as the extreme anti-European faction within her own party, in order to stay in power.

But her errors go even deeper. In fact, all of the events of the past two years have been shaped by a decision she made, by herself, following bad advice, at the very beginning of this process. Remember that the British did not vote for any particular form of Brexit: Thanks to Cameron’s simplistic, open-ended referendum question, they chose to “Leave” the European Union but did not express any view on what should happen next. When she took office, May could have observed that the vote was very close, that Britain’s commercial and political ties to Europe were strong, and that it would make sense for the United Kingdom to stay within the single market, the pan-European free-trade zone that Britain itself did so much to create — or at the very least within a customs union.

Instead, she chose to leave both of those institutions, a decision that immediately triggered the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, which was eliminated thanks to E.U. trade treaties but will, if customs barriers are put in place, need to be built back. Her decision also created potential problems for anyone who trades with Britain or works with Britain — and for Brits who trade and work in Europe. But she was not sorry: She accompanied her decision with a speech that called “a citizen of the world” nothing more than “a citizen of nowhere” and immediately alienated a large part of the country.

She went on to alienate almost everyone else. Until this week, nearly three years after the referendum, she made no effort to reach across the aisle and include opposition parties in the planning for this momentous national change. Although the E.U. has been entirely transparent about its negotiating goals from the beginning, she kept hers secret. She tried, and failed, to prevent parliamentary scrutiny of her deal. She does not respond to pleas, advice, suggestions. Columnist Matthew Parris has described her as “the Death Star of modern British politics,” a black void that sucks in people and ideas and never provides a response.
Her secrecy and incompetence have created ill will in Europe, and real anger in the House of Commons, some of whose members have belatedly tried to take control of the Brexit process. They have begged her to try a series of votes, to try to find one version of an exit plan that could pass the entire chamber. John Bercow, speaker of the House of Commons, produced a decree from 1604 in an attempt to prevent yet another vote on her deal, after two had already failed. But she seems to take none of it in. On Wednesday evening, she made a bizarre, crypto-populist appeal, over the heads of Britain’s elected representatives, to the nation: “You the public have had enough,” she declared. “You are tired of the infighting. You are tired of the political games and the procedural rows” — as if the political games and procedural rows were not all entirely her fault. “It is high time we made a decision,” she said — as if she were not the one preventing Parliament from doing exactly that.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
31 posts and 2 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85478 Anonymous
28th March 2019
Thursday 10:32 pm
85478 spacer

>Huel powders

I think you'll find yourself opting for long pig pretty quickly. That stuff is like drinking someone else's puke.
>> No. 85479 Anonymous
28th March 2019
Thursday 10:37 pm
85479 spacer

It doesn't really taste like anything to me, even with the flavouring powders. I'd get bored of it, not disgusted.
>> No. 85480 Anonymous
29th March 2019
Friday 12:48 pm
85480 spacer

Hope your hiding behind a VPN, if the rozzers see your comment you rapidly won't have a firearms license
>> No. 85481 Anonymous
29th March 2019
Friday 12:48 pm
85481 spacer

Hope your hiding behind a VPN, if the rozzers see your comment you rapidly won't have a firearms license
>> No. 85482 Anonymous
29th March 2019
Friday 12:51 pm
85482 spacer

I don't have one anyway. This is the internet, mate.

>> No. 85439 Anonymous
25th March 2019
Monday 10:11 pm
85439 spacer

This is a nice site. I feel like I should probably be moaning about the welfare state a bit more, but the rest I am fine with.
2 posts omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85442 Anonymous
25th March 2019
Monday 10:50 pm
85442 spacer
I thought it a bit off that the UN wasn't on that but as it turns out we've forgotten to pay our subscription.

Anyone fancy chucking £20 in before they send the bailiffs round?
>> No. 85444 Anonymous
25th March 2019
Monday 10:58 pm
85444 spacer
I know we're all just LARPing here, but it's odd how many of us are top tax bracket. Maybe we should start a prize fund for POTY.
>> No. 85452 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 5:43 pm
85452 spacer

I don't know, we do have a lot of arseholes. I've noticed that having too much money is often a big contributing factor towards being an arsehole, so it kind of makes sense.
>> No. 85453 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 6:25 pm
85453 spacer

I was an arsehole long before I had money, though.
>> No. 85454 Anonymous
26th March 2019
Tuesday 7:31 pm
85454 spacer
I'd be nicer if I had money.

>> No. 84569 Anonymous
12th December 2018
Wednesday 7:57 am
84569 spacer
Theresa May to face leadership challenge

UK Prime Minister Theresa May will face a vote of no confidence in her leadership later on Wednesday.

Conservative MPs will vote between 18:00 GMT and 20:00 GMT.

The challenge to Mrs May's position comes after the required 48 letters calling for a contest were delivered.

175 posts and 15 images omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85271 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 7:08 pm
85271 spacer
What now then? Shit's weird.
>> No. 85272 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 7:58 pm
85272 spacer
We're not getting Meaningful Vote 3: Vote Meaningfully With a Vengeance until there's some substantial change on the table, so after the EU summit at least. Literally any and all options are on the table, up to and including a tactical nuclear strike on Luxembourg.
>> No. 85273 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 8:41 pm
85273 spacer
You've got my vote.
>> No. 85274 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 8:47 pm
85274 spacer
At this rate, we're basically fucked, so all we need to figure out is whether we stay or go. I say we relocate to the Costa del Sol since it already might as well be a British colony and we'd be bringing jobs to Iberia which already has crippling unemployment. Obviously we salt these islands before the Germans inevitably try planting a towel in them.
>> No. 85275 Anonymous
18th March 2019
Monday 9:30 pm
85275 spacer
He's going on some nutter's list, that's for sure. I like that we have this rule though.

Like the Huns and the Vandals? Just roam around the nice bits of the EU ruining them for everyone else? I'll get my vacuum flask.

>> No. 51753 Anonymous
11th November 2013
Monday 11:24 pm
51753 spacer
Switzerland will hold a vote on whether to introduce a basic income for all adults, in a further sign of growing public activism over pay inequality since the financial crisis. A grassroots committee is calling for all adults in Switzerland to receive an unconditional income of 2,500 Swiss francs ($2,800) per month from the state, with the aim of providing a financial safety net for the population.

Under Swiss law, citizens can organize popular initiatives that allow the channeling of public anger into direct political action. The country usually holds several referenda a year. In March, Swiss voters backed some of the world's strictest controls on executive pay, forcing public companies to give shareholders a binding vote on compensation. A separate proposal to limit monthly executive pay to no more than what the company's lowest-paid staff earn in a year, the so-called 1:12 initiative, faces a popular vote on November 24.



I'm not entirely sure what to make of these. I reckong that if they tried the 1:12 thing over here then the lowest paid members of staff in some large organisations would end up being made redundant and replaced with contractors.
165 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 85259 Anonymous
17th March 2019
Sunday 9:18 am
85259 spacer
Y'know, even if he didn't mean that, it's not a terrible idea. During the credit crunch, quantitive easing was essentially printing new money. However if that money was given to the poor, who are more likely to spend it immediately than the rich, it would have a much more stimulatory effect on the economy, for a negligible effect on inflation. It's only printing money repeatedly to fund routine infrastructure or to pay debt, that doesn't work.
>> No. 85261 Anonymous
17th March 2019
Sunday 12:04 pm
85261 spacer
>who are more likely to spend it immediately than the rich, it would have a much more stimulatory effect on the economy

What would happen is that all the local / Northern shops would just put their prices up. This is capitalism / economics 101. Your printing-money idea would only work if there were similar, compensating controls on pricing and supply; otherwise this would balance out any benefit of doing it in the first place.

If you wanted to help people like this, just give them stuff, don't fuck with the supply or value of money.
>> No. 85262 Anonymous
17th March 2019
Sunday 3:01 pm
85262 spacer

I get the feeling you don't know how the supply of money is dictated.
>> No. 85263 Anonymous
17th March 2019
Sunday 4:10 pm
85263 spacer
>If you wanted to help people like this, just give them stuff, don't fuck with the supply or value of money.
The people who say this line almost inevitably proceed to balk when you suggest going all robin hood. Assuming good faith, the fundamental problem is that this misses political economy. If I announce that I'm sticking up taxes and jacking up spending, the response - both on the markets and with the confidence of the general public - is going to be much higher than if I instruct the Bank of England to make some alterations to monetary policy which will have similar (if broader and less predictable) redistributive effects without overtly stating as much.

Frankly so long as whoever's in power isn't a complete idiot about it the risks would seem to be overstated. The 1970s were a total anomaly with disproportionate mindshare and almost every other country that has had major problems has already been a basket case before they went all macroeconomic populist. I'm not saying we should be the first ones to go out and try it and see what happens, it might still do bad things, but serious and sober minded people seem to be capable of thinking the UK could become Venezuela just because someone at the BoE had a shit day in the absence of any historical precedent.
>> No. 85264 Anonymous
17th March 2019
Sunday 5:23 pm
85264 spacer

While I agree that government should be looking at ways to shift away from our London-centric model I do question how effective it will be. At least in terms of how solutions are now being approached. The London economy is built precisely around it being a global capital with the manufacture parts moved out to places like Derby (for Rolls-Royce aerospace). Yes, the rents outrageous but much of the work done in the capital is location specific and can't easily be transplanted without just hobbling the city.

To go back to the point of the HMRC, they have been doing a fair amount of moving the administrative workers out to regional hubs but there still needs to be a core contingent of policy managers in London. It's looking at the problem backwards when the issue isn't that everywhere else is shit but that London is incredibly successful and now suffers from national policy built on fairness but which becomes unfair regionally.

The alternative I suggest would be to embrace Georgism and attach the majority of tax collection to property value. That might still hurt London by it would at least have the knock-on effect of closing down the property game.

>If you wanted to help people like this, just give them stuff, don't fuck with the supply or value of money.

I've long argued that governments should help address the stress of a downturn by buying everyone a pint. It's a bit like that tax holiday we had at the start of the Great Recession where sales tax was removed only rather than just a signal to consume it is one telling you to take some tlc.

Maybe we could go further and have public holiday camps with a special bank holiday in times of trouble. People could choose what kind of place they go (so I don't rub elbows with the riff-raff) but all would offer some greater public function like education or a special singles camp for bonking.

>> No. 84903 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 2:58 pm
84903 Turning Point UK
What do you lads think of this? Right wing youth movement, cringeworthy use of memes, roundly mocked by the left. My uni apparently has a chapter, but I've seen no evidence of it existing. Seems very pro-Israel, pro-free market, anti-Corbyn.
8 posts and 1 image omitted. Expand all images.
>> No. 84913 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 5:51 pm
84913 spacer
>In fairness, the name is a coincidence as the organisation began in the USA.

Doesn't matter - plenty of companies and organisations in the UK and Europe have different names from their US versions, just for this reason.
>> No. 84915 Anonymous
9th February 2019
Saturday 6:09 pm
84915 spacer

I doubt they bothered to even google the name before they registered it.
>> No. 84917 Anonymous
10th February 2019
Sunday 2:30 pm
84917 spacer
Any campaign relating to the UK politically is going to be targeted immediately now. US conservatives saw it right away. It's funny but it goes deeper than having a laugh.
>> No. 85241 Anonymous
16th March 2019
Saturday 4:15 pm
85241 spacer
The NZ shooter cited Turning Point's Candace Owens as one of his inspirations. Maybe Turning Point are more dangerous than I initially gave them credit for.
>> No. 85243 Anonymous
16th March 2019
Saturday 4:34 pm
85243 spacer


But you knew that already.

Delete Post []
Previous[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]