[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 78788)
Message
File  []
close
36220.jpg
787887878878788
>> No. 78788 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 12:51 pm
78788 The bad comedy of the Scottish ''National'' Party
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY3wkEyAjeY

After seeing this on the news today I finally got the joke known as the SNP. The joke is that the SNP is the antithesis of a nationalist party. She is a blatant Westminster style Marxist globalist who, if she ever managed to secure scotlands independence, would sell it to the EU in a heartbeat. It's like I'm living in an Orwellian state where everyone is the opposite of who they claim to be

Nationalism is Globalism
Independence is EU
Multiculturalism is Nationalist

I would be struggling for breath right now if I did not realise that idiots actually believe the SNP is a nationalist party. Can't she have the decency to rebrand it as the Scottish Globalist Party or something?
Expand all images.
>> No. 78789 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 1:01 pm
78789 spacer
Schizolad returns....
>> No. 78792 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 1:41 pm
78792 spacer
>>78789

at least respond intelligently spacklad
>> No. 78796 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 3:32 pm
78796 spacer
>>78792

I can recommend a couple of books on the use of punctuation, capitalisation and general use of the English language required well before one would sit a GSCE, if you would like, lad.
>> No. 78799 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 3:53 pm
78799 spacer
>>78789
How's he going to feel come 2019 when his map of Europe will need altering?
>> No. 78800 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 4:00 pm
78800 spacer
>>78799

Well, by then he will either have done the world a favour and topped himself, or done his family a favour and started listening to the doctors.

Either/or really.

My money is very much on the former, should anyone which to take a little flutter. Call it a tenner each way.
>> No. 78801 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 4:09 pm
78801 spacer
>>78800
You can't go each way in a two horse race.
>> No. 78802 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 4:16 pm
78802 spacer
>>78801

Really? Tell that to the Far East betting syndicates...
>> No. 78803 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 4:59 pm
78803 spacer
>>78788
I wish people who didn't know the history of the SNP wouldn't talk about it.

The SNP has always recognized the UK is the hardest union to extricate Scotland from, because Scotland isn't recognized as sovereign by the UK. Their position on the EEC/EU has developed over time in light of this. In 1975 they advocated a "No" vote to demonstrate Scotland was different from the UK. This position slowly developed as the EEC moved towards the EC and they realized that it could act as a power above the UK to which they could plead their case in the event the UK government gave them the cold shoulder. Their position since then has definitely been uncritical, but it's largely because they can afford to be apathetic to it in light of their primary cause - leaving the UK. It has the bonus of making them look more progressive overall (because Scotland has been more used to the pro-EU consensus than the north of England, and despite free movement already being in place has seen little immigration overall: ~95% white and something like 90% white British.)

Look at it this way, to get a referendum on independence the Scottish government had to:
Ask the UK government for permission
Rely on the UK government to pass an act giving the Scottish parliament the temporary power to call a referendum.
Pass their own act in the Scottish parliament to grant a referendum
Hold a referendum.

To get a referendum on independence on the EU, the UK government had to:
Pass an act in Westminster to grant a referendum
Hold a referendum

A much simpler process. Now that the UK has left the EU, it does remain an outside possibility the SNP's unquestioningly pro-EU strategy might pay off for them. Even if the EU itself doesn't aid them, it can be the one party that can actually complain about leaving with a straight face (as they offer an option that might let Scotland stay, while Labour goes "Yes, we love the EU... but gotta stay in the UK!")

That's before you get into any fuckery about Scottish national identity, "New Scots" and the like. The fact that there are more Scots outside of Scotland than in it and that sort of thing. Overall the SNP's nationalism could be narrowed down into caring about the overall construct of the nation-state instead of the raw individuals of the nation. Scotland is the area from Shetland to Berwick, and it is the independence of that area from the area from Berwick to Land's End (and er... Belfast to... Somewhere) that matters.
>> No. 78804 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 5:04 pm
78804 spacer
>>>78796

>GSCE

Nice bit of sophistry there. I wouldn't have expected anything less.

2/10
>> No. 78806 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 5:20 pm
78806 spacer
Haven't Scotland got little chance of the EU, anyway? I'm sure the Spanish said they'd veto any attempt for them to join because they don't want their uppity separatists getting ideas.
>> No. 78808 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 5:26 pm
78808 spacer
>>78806
As i understand it, that's a meme.

While Spain obviously prefer Scotland to stay away (and make wooly "Oh, that might be a bit tough" statements to that effect) I believe their position is that if the UK government recognizes Scottish Independence, Spain will follow. If Scotland hypothetically went unilaterally Spain would theoretically veto it if everyone else accepted this independence, but in practice UDI means British tanks outside Holyrood. If Scotland was generally recognized as an independent state, Spain's remaining rational option would be to poker-face it and go "Ah... Well Catalonia, you see, that's different, the UK is allowed to do that under their unwritten constitution of "fuck it why not" while we're not allowed to give you a referendum under our proper constitution."

This is semi reflected in their position on Bosnia - "Not independent because Serbia says so" while other ex-Yugoslav states are fine.
>> No. 78810 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 5:36 pm
78810 spacer
>>78806

They've got all the entry criteria.

Rubbish economy, high rates of unemployment....
>> No. 78813 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 5:53 pm
78813 spacer

ca.jpg
788137881378813
I like Scotland, we must do more to stop it's cultural appropriation.
>> No. 78819 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 6:42 pm
78819 spacer
>>78799
It's okay as long as all of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is one colour. Ireland really pisses me off though.
>> No. 78820 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 6:56 pm
78820 spacer
>>78799

Maps have been altered all the time throughout history, what makes your map so special? Only a few hundred years ago we were living under the Danelaw map. So what.
>> No. 78831 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 7:20 pm
78831 spacer
>>78820
We went through centuries to get the good map we have now. I won't have some silly fucking alcoholic smackheads throw all of that into jeopardy. Good thing they chose otherwise. So you can go fuck off to one of the islands on the Pacific too small to be seen on a map two feet away. Fucking soppy cunt.
>> No. 78850 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 8:42 pm
78850 spacer
What is this some kind of bitter e-sociopath meet and greet? What is wrong with you subhumans?
>> No. 78851 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 8:52 pm
78851 spacer
>>78850
>some kind of bitter e-sociopath meet and greet
The .gs tagline.
>> No. 78852 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 8:53 pm
78852 spacer
>We went through centuries to get the good map we have now. I won't have some silly fucking alcoholic smackheads throw all of that into jeopardy. Good thing they chose otherwise. So you can go fuck off to one of the islands on the Pacific too small to be seen on a map two feet away. Fucking soppy cunt.

Sophistry Alert
BIKINI STATE AMBER
>> No. 78856 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 9:19 pm
78856 spacer
>>78852
I, for one, don't even own a bikini.
>> No. 78865 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 11:25 pm
78865 spacer
I'm not sure why anyone's making much of a fuss over the whole second referendum thing. She can bring in as many bills as she likes. The reality is that Theresa May can veto it by simply refusing to put the matter to Parliament. She can even use her new favourite catchphrases about how she will deliver Brexit, and how a second referendum would be Scotland remaining by the back door.

As evidenced by the referendum result, Scotland clearly wants to stay in the EU, and as we all remember, Callmedave made it clear that Scotland's best chance for that was to remain in the UK. Less than two years down the line, it's not hard to see how many north of the border would see that as being cheated. Cameron allowed the first referendum in part because he was confident that he would win it. May surely would not allow a second referendum in part because she can be confident there's a good chance she'd lose it.
>> No. 78866 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 11:30 pm
78866 spacer
>>78851

POTY
>> No. 78867 Anonymous
13th October 2016
Thursday 11:31 pm
78867 spacer
Can't be bothered with Scotcunts anymore.
>> No. 78874 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 1:45 am
78874 spacer

ami.jpg
788747887478874
>>78856

In mus lamic state, burkini owns you.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 78875 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 8:53 am
78875 spacer
>>78874

You're allowed to say "Muslamic" here, lad. Or are you one of those oddballs who writes Islam when commenting on the DM in garbled l33t because you think their mods won't notice that way?
>> No. 78878 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 12:29 pm
78878 spacer

rexfeatures_1661889a-e1449278924296.jpg
788787887878878
Ah yes the EU beggar party, watching them bow and scrape to mamma Merkel tickled the cockles of my black heart.

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-06-28/scottish-mep-begs-eu-dont-let-scotland-down/

"But please remember this: Scotland did not let you down. Please, I beg you, do not let Scotland down now."

Pathetic servile trash indeed
>> No. 78880 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 4:06 pm
78880 spacer

504162763_cb06e095ac.jpg
788807888078880
>>78878

Much better to be prostrate at the feet of the Yanks.

We have a special kind of relationship, you wouldn't understand.
>> No. 78882 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 5:31 pm
78882 spacer
>>78880
I don't get it.
>> No. 78883 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:00 pm
78883 spacer
>>78788
>Westminster style Marxist globalist
Well now. Where to even begin?
>> No. 78884 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:16 pm
78884 spacer
>>78882

If we're not part of the European experiment we'll be the 51st - or is it 52nd? - state of the Union. Then we'll see just how much the old country counts for in Pax Americana.

If all else fails, we'll make a splendid airstrip for the Yanks.
>> No. 78885 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:27 pm
78885 spacer
>>78884
Ok.
>> No. 78886 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:49 pm
78886 spacer

IB.jpg
788867888678886
>She is a blatant Westminster style Marxist globalist

Yes, more globalism please. I welcome it.

Although I am confused about why the word "internationalist" is no longer used? It seems perfectly fine still. Perhaps it's because, in fact, internationalism has had such an honourable history - the labour, environmental and anti-war movements have all put inter- before the national? And that how is Alex Jones supposed to wave all that away without bamboozling his audience? Globalism, conversely, has no reputation but the one the reactionaries had made for it.

Anyone who has been to a border knows how arbitrary it is (I wouldn't be surprised to find most Brexit voters haven't even ventured that far). All borders do is breed nationalism and foster dolphin rape, two of the greatest of all human ills.

However, I'm getting the distinct impression that many Brits have grown a little too fond of their pathologises and pet hates. There appears to be no talking them out of it: they wave facts away, and shudder at the sight of an expert. We may need to consider some re education camps later down the line.

Also: I'm a part-time Marxist and I can just tell you, no one is the Commons is even Marx-ish. Mores the pity.
>> No. 78888 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:58 pm
78888 spacer
>>78886
Internationalism has decidedly socialist connotations.

And McDonnell is definitely of a Marxist bent, probably uniquely so even amongst the parliamentary hard left.
>> No. 78889 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 6:59 pm
78889 spacer
>>78887

>And McDonnell is of a decidedly Marxist bent

That's true. I wrongly overlooked him.
>> No. 78893 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 7:53 pm
78893 spacer
>>78884
Yeah, I think I preferred being the seventh state. It's a bit of a drop from there down to the fifties.
>> No. 78921 Anonymous
14th October 2016
Friday 11:00 pm
78921 spacer
>>78886
Globalism is international finance capitalism wrapped in the clothes of internationalism so that the soft-left are drawn to defend it under the banner of anti-dolphin rape. The two are not the same thing.

Perhaps this will make a global revolution genuinely possible as conditions become shit for everyone, but being somewhat of the SNP-bent, I'm more inclined to believe all it will do is mean national governments are severely limited in their ability to make things slightly less shit for some people. As a matter of practical, pragmatic reality for example - the Scottish border is entirely arbitrary, but without that arbitrary border nobody in the UK would get free tuition, and everyone would have to suffer the stupid policy decisions of the Blair (and following Cameron) administrations.

As international finance continues to grow in power (and the jet-setting international rich don't have to worry about the affairs of individual nations too much, since if the UK degenerates into riots they can just convert all their money to Euro and fuck off) and national governments weaken, all I can see is untold suffering since any attempt at even moderate reform results in "the markets" destroying the national economy.

Freely convertible currencies were a mistake. Stop that, and you tether the rich more closely to their homelands, you make exporting a business for tax reasons more difficult, etc, etc. Of course this requires international agreement amongst major economies to impose currency controls, otherwise you just commit economic suicide, and you'll never get such agreement so: Untold suffering it is.
>> No. 78939 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 6:48 pm
78939 spacer

kor.jpg
789397893978939
>Anyone who has been to a border knows how arbitrary it is (I wouldn't be surprised to find most Brexit voters haven't even ventured that far). All borders do is breed nationalism and foster dolphin rape, two of the greatest of all human il

Go on then, cross over to North Korea where you'd be most welcome.
>> No. 78952 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 8:14 pm
78952 spacer
>>78939

Thanks for reiterating my point:

>All borders do is breed nationalism and foster dolphin rape
>> No. 78953 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 8:34 pm
78953 spacer
Borders are certainly not arbitrary.
>> No. 78954 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 8:42 pm
78954 spacer
>>78953
Tell that to the Indians and laplanderstanis and Bangladeshis after the Raj pal.
>> No. 78955 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 8:49 pm
78955 spacer
>>78954
Yes, it's because they're not arbitrary that shit went own.
>> No. 78956 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 8:53 pm
78956 spacer
>>78954

Check out this geographic shitshow:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@26.3284709,89.0430915,12z
>> No. 78958 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 9:02 pm
78958 spacer
>>78953
The Middle East, along with several western states in the US, would like a word with you.
>> No. 78961 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 9:08 pm
78961 spacer
>>78953

>Borders are certainly not arbitrary

This is the single stupidest thing I've read all day, and I've just been reading about British policy in Ireland.
>> No. 78965 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 9:29 pm
78965 spacer

abrain.jpg
789657896578965
>This is the single stupidest thing I've read all day, and I've just been reading about British policy in Ireland.

Tell me about it.
>> No. 78969 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:02 pm
78969 spacer
>>78965

I was reading about various periods, but mainly the British suppression following the Easter Rising. The independence movement wasn't all that popular among the "ordinary" citizenry up until that point, which surprised me. It was mainly a topic isolated to intellectuals or the self-exiled.

James Connolley, a little known but brilliant Irishman, was condemned to death following his capture. A very, very short bio: Connolley, completely self-taught, claimed to uncover a native socialism - if not communism - in the country's Celtic roots, and spent most of his adult life union organising on both sides of the Atlantic. He was one of the few Irishmen of his time who was a feminist too, and was particularly pissed off with Catholicism's role in oppressing women.

On the day of his execution he was so badly wounded that he needed to be brought out on a stretcher and tied to a chair for the shooting. His final exchange with his wife (who was later shunned by many in Dublin) went:

>[Upon hearing of his execution in the morning] “But your life, James, your beautiful life.”
>“Well, Lillie,” he answered, “hasn’t it been a full life, and isn’t this a good end?”

I particularly like Connolley because he was a committed internationalist and atheist. Not like the awful insular Pope-fearing crowd who followed him.

Because of something I'm writing at the moment I've also been looking at Churchill's role in all this. He helped form the Black and Tans and competed with Lloyd George on how harshly to respond to the Irish Question: his solution was pretty much "hang 'em all!"

I had a great uncle who was victim to the British restoring order in Dublin. He was hung by his feet under the Liffey Bridge for quite a while. Needless to say, he never recovered physically or mentally.

Sorry, that's all a bit messy and garbled. But I assure you it's worth reading into if you get a chance.
>> No. 78971 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:33 pm
78971 spacer
>>78969
>James Connolley, a little known
Hahaha what?
>> No. 78972 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:33 pm
78972 spacer
>>78969
They brought it on themselves. It was wartime. Rightly or wrongly, we were shooting our own men in France for desertion. Morale would plummet if we shot our own men for desertion while letting usurpers and secessionist rebels off with prison sentences. It isn't as simple as 'bullying England’, there was no choice but to be harsh.
>> No. 78973 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:36 pm
78973 spacer
>>78969
>I've also been looking at Churchill's role in all this. He helped form the Black and Tans and competed with Lloyd George on how harshly to respond to the Irish Question: his solution was pretty much "hang 'em all!"
Churchill actually argued in favour of Home Rule in Belfast in 1912. His role is rather complicated.

>>78972
You can fuck off.
>> No. 78974 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:46 pm
78974 spacer
>>78972
>They brought it on themselves. It was wartime

That was the mentality of the authorities, sure. I would've thought that obvious.

But, seeing as truisms apparently need to be stated: the revolutionaries weren't going to put their ambitions to one side because the British had decided to enter the great imperial meat-grinder in mainland Europe.

They had been told countless times, as a people, that they had to put English (upper class) interests before their own - and I'm not going to condemn those men who rose up said, "we're not going to be spoken to like that anymore".

(And, in case its not obvious, I would also support the English who refused to fight that pointless war.)
>> No. 78975 Anonymous
15th October 2016
Saturday 10:58 pm
78975 spacer
>>78973

>Churchill actually argued in favour of Home Rule in Belfast in 1912. His role is rather complicated

As is everything he got involved in, irritatingly. One of Connolley's essays confronts the fact that Churchill may have spoken harshly of Orange violence (one of his meetings in Belfast had to be moved due to threats against his life from that lot), he actually did nothing about it. As soon as nationalist - or independent or Catholic or whatever - forces kicked off, he called for a suspension of the rule of law, and sent ex-cons with guns beyond the Pale.

It is complicated though. He was a canny politician for the most part, occasionally a ferment ideologue.
>> No. 78977 Anonymous
16th October 2016
Sunday 12:27 am
78977 spacer
>>78974
>a ferment ideologue.

Hopefully someone clever will invent a stupid detecting laser guided barrel bomb to blow up your head.
>> No. 78981 Anonymous
16th October 2016
Sunday 9:42 am
78981 spacer
>>78977

You seem unaware of his raving defenses of empire? How he came to justify chemical attacks, indiscriminate murder and mass execution - all in the service of British order. Even when it was clear to everyone else that Pax Britannia was definitely on its way out. You'd have to be more than a little committed to the idea of Anglo Saxon supremacy to act like that (his handling of the Benghal Famine led one former ally to compare him to Hitler, to take just one example).

His Fulton speech alone, with its paranoia and hysteria, should be enough to convince you. This was someone who would risk nuclear war to maintain a hegemony of what he called "responsible white men".

But, it seems, you're a committed adherent to the Churchill Cult, so maybe not.
>> No. 78982 Anonymous
16th October 2016
Sunday 10:27 am
78982 spacer
>>78958
Along with the Koreas, Germany between 1945 and 1990, the Nordics (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/28/norway-finland-move-mountain-halti-halditsohkka-highest-peak), and the Low Countries (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/belgium-and-netherlands-agree-to-swap-land-almost-200-years-after-borders-were-drawn-up-a6790781.html) to name a few more.
>> No. 79535 Anonymous
6th November 2016
Sunday 4:02 am
79535 spacer
Sturgeon is a wee ginger that stinks of fags so much so as to kill the smell of her baggy kipper fanny.
>> No. 79536 Anonymous
6th November 2016
Sunday 4:35 am
79536 spacer

sat-o.henry.pun.off[1].jpg
795367953679536
>>79535
I thought she was SNP?
>> No. 79537 Anonymous
6th November 2016
Sunday 6:50 am
79537 spacer
Sturgeon has made a career out of finding ways Scotland can differentiate itself from Westminster. The better or worse for the Scottish people doesn't concern her.
>> No. 79539 Anonymous
6th November 2016
Sunday 7:16 am
79539 spacer
>>79537
Sturgeon has made a career out of being Salmond's underling. I have serious doubts she'd have won 2007 (and she did stand for leader at the time, withdrawing to let Salmond in), even against a government as shite as the Labour administration of the day. (One must remember there was only one seat in it.)

Though I have been reminded of perhaps my favourite quote from a Labour representative.
Lord Foulkes: The SNP are on a dangerous tack at the moment. What they are doing is trying to build up a situation in Scotland where the services are manifestly better than south of the border in a number of areas.
Colin MacKay: Is this such a bad thing?
Lord Foulkes: No, but they are doing it deliberately.

Boy George then tried to amend the Scotland bill to bugger free tuition. Nice chap.

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password