>>6149
They have other things going on besides being overweight. Like you have things outside of being a sneering web-weirdo to keep you alive. You do have other stuff going, yeah... ?

>>6153
Calm down, fatty.

>>6153

Are you alright mate? Do you want a nice pie? Come on mate, we'll get you a lovely pie from the chippy, that'll get you right.

>>6154>>6155
Huh?

>>6156
It would seem they're mocking you for having the gall to defend yourself/fat people.

Is this a tailored suit or a bespoke suit? And what purposes do you see yourself using the suit for? If you are just going to buy a dull all purpose suit, I wouldn't see the point in paying the extra for something you could buy a decent version of on the high street.

The point of getting a tailored or bespoke suit is not about a quality of manufacturing but a choice of materials and style.

If all you are doing is getting the suit made to measure are you sure it is justified? Without knowing what you will be paying is it worth that over the regular store suit?

To justify a suit like that, it has to be something special.

>but they're Americans and the service there might be different, or there might better options here.

As a general rule people looking for suits from abroad get them from east Asia as a normal Joe you can afford to pay a skilled tailor for their valuable time there rather than one in America.

It depends. If you can find a decent fit by having a high street suit altered, it's not really worth the risk and hassle of ordering online. If you're a weird shape and have always struggled to find a good fit, I can wholeheartedly recommend one of the cheap MTM tailors.

If you do go for it, I'd strongly recommend paying a local seamstress to measure you up - it shouldn't be too expensive and you'll avoid the risk of cocking up your own measurements.

>paying a local seamstress to measure you up
THE DREAM

Is that foreign chap who used to post ads in Private eye still going?

As others have said, unless you're a particularly odd shape, buying off the peg then getting it fitted at a seamstress is likely a much better idea and will look exactly as good.

Even with accurate measurements to give, I don't think I'd want to rely on a suit being sent to me I've never tried on - even the worst alterations shop will at least be able to see how a suit wears on you in real life, and can adjust accordingly.

Unless you're really set on the idea of choosing your own fabrics and so on, I'd advise against it.

Whichever way you go though, I'd also recommend getting your shirts fitted too. That was a game changer for me.

>>6131
Don't really understand how anyone could "like" someone like Gavin McGinnes. He just seems like such a fuckwitted, brain wormed yank grifter cunt. How on earth you could derive any value from his "CONTENT" is beyond me.

He just seem to be a genuinely detestable, pathetic and hypocritical human being with no sense of self awareness. All those videos posted are (to use internet parlance) cringe asf mate.

Just awful yank shite. Get too fuck.

sagesagesage

>>6133

I think you linked to the wrong post lad.

>>6134
Yep. Ah well, you get the idea.

>>6132
>half a dozen XXL hoodies all of which are about 20 years old and way too big for me.
Depressingly, I now fit my old XXL hoodies rather well. They are still comfy as fuck, those gym rats can keep their lycra as far as I'm concerned.

>>6140
Once I hit my late 30s and had a bit of a mid-life crisis, I went the opposite way. The sudden realisation that I was creeping up to 22 stone and getting married, was the kick up the arse I needed to lose weight. I am at the heaviest I have been in 5 years at 16 stone, but at my lightest I was 14 and a half.

>>6092
From what I've seen it's more of a ladies forearm thing. A bird tried using it on my leg but it managed fuck all and overall seems like very tedious work.

>>6094

How long did you use it for? It says you need about 8 treatments.

>>6084

I wet shave my balls and the irritation really isn't that bad - it's definitely worth the extra sensitivity. I think the mistake most people make is not applying a liberal amount of skin cream directly afterwards, along with in the morning and evening. Everywhere else I just trim short with an electric razor.

>>6092

I've been doing some research and apparently they work quite well. I might get one for xmas.

This thread gives me the shivers.

>>6076
Thanks lad.

>>6077
Admittedly I haven't looked in somewhere like Savers or Bodycare but when I looked elsewhere is was about £4.50 for a 150ml container when you can get clay for much cheaper than this.

>>6075
Just wipe down your face with a dedicated and frequently cleaned face towel. Soft enough not to flay you but rough enough that it'll take the layer of dry skin and grease off your face. Change your pillow cases whenever you wash your face towel and you're golden.

Other than that, a cheap facial cleanser (I use Boots' own brand) should be enough.

If you spend loadsamoney then you're a daftie.

Drink down that aqua shit all day every day.

>>6079
>with a dedicated and frequently cleaned face towel


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T58D467HagM

>>6081
A dirty brush is a useless brush.

>>6067
You even dated a trans person! Gosh, how lucky they were.

Very right-on you are.

>>6069
That's just what models do.

>>6068 Craigslist, back when the personals section was still there. fabguys.com is where I would look now, maybe fetlife.

>>6070 Thanks, I try ;)

Getting some faint homo vibes ITT

right hand side one reminds me of tim sharky but skinny

It works out a hell of a lot cheaper, you can get a better shave, but there is a learning curve. A multi-blade cartridge razor is designed to give you a decent shave even if you're completely cack-handed, but it takes a bit of practice to shave well with a safety razor. You don't need to spend a fortune - this kit costs less than £15 and is perfectly good to try out DE shaving. There are loads of decent tutorials on YouTube.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Shaving-Factory-SF289-Double-Safety/dp/B004EG24HI/

>>6056
> Are they really better?
Somewhat.
The razors are cheaper than cartridges, sometimes drastically.
Using a straight razor requires slightly more agility than the multi-blade thingy - it's easier to nick yourself.
I find that it shaves cleaner than the multi-blade, I don't have to make several passes over most areas of my bony face.

Sage because I usually don't faff with it, electric shaver does the job even if it's not quite perfect.

>>6049

Plastic microbeads are bad, but you can get grainy bits made from apricot stones or rice.

>>6050
I'm not rubbing rice on my face. I don't want to turn Chinese.

>>6051
May be a smart move post-no-deal though.

Washingup liquid readily cuts through facial grease. Squeeky clean!

>>6054
You're better off using it as shampoo.

The teeth in the top left look better than the ones bottom right. They look like they'd glow in the dark.

>>6036

Indeed I'm sure most people who have teeth as white as the before picture wouldn't bother. Those of us who don't however might want whiter teeth. So let's cut the straw man 'you alreadyy look great' bullshit.

>>6036
He did?
Maybe it was a second image, how do you know.

>>6040
I'm his dentist.

>>6031

currently going through the process of whitening via dentist, steps as such:

got a mould made of my teeth at the dentist
come back 2 weeks later, get personalised kit with teeth whitening gel, syringe things and my plastic mould to squirt gel in
every evening before i go to bed i squirt gel in the mould and put it on my teeth overnight (but often i can only last four hours before it gets too burn-ey), it's quite uncomfy to wear and very strongly acidic so it hurts like a bitch if your teeth are at all sensitive (mine are a bit so i have to alternate nights).

the results have been quite good so far tbh, i wasn't expecting like jurgen klopp results but then again i think the creepy whitening shit is done via veneers which are like 10 grand a tooth so you'd prob go down my route which cost me 290 quid for the mould and the set of gel and syringes (and dental advice).

(A good day to you Sir!)

>>6025

The picture's Nike because that kind of reads like I'm implying that's Vans.

I'm going to go to the beach to see if I can pick up a pair of Nikes for free.

>>6027

I don't get it.

>>6028
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48464664

>>6021
Crocs are apparently great in tropical climes if you're tramping around humid wilderness.

>>6002
It's all old Jags and Volvos.

Depends on the car.

My fabia does over 50mpg at 50mph on the motorway.
At 70 it's more like 40-45mpg.

With a 6-speed gearbox it wouldn't drop as quickly when you get above 50.

>>5999
Why did you post this in /poof/, you berk?

>>5999

The question is utterly meaningless without knowing what you are driving. Different engines have different levels where they are most efficient in outputs, different shape vehicles have different wind resistance.

It would be like asking 'at what temperature and how long should I cook?' without mentioning the food.

>>6006

This.

In my current car, there's only about 100rpm difference between 70 and 80 in 6th gear. In my last one it was close to 1000, so significantly different results.

Drive your car in top gear at 70 and 80 then get back to us. Or just post your make, model and year here.

It slightly reminds me of a flapper hat.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=visor+beanie

>>5997

thanks

>>5986
Seconded.
Rice just doesn't do a great job of absorbing moisture from air.
Just get some silica gel, you can get a huge bag for a few quid. That will absorb humidity down to a few percent RH, and it will get the watch bone dry.

>>5987
You clearly haven't seen your mum on heat.

>>5988
From where?

>>5990
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/200-Gram-bag-Self-Indicating-Orange-To-Green-Silica-Gel/162254220157?epid=1757235035&hash=item25c71aeb7d:g:EvcAAOSwk5FU0PmB

Still not quite done, though that might be because it looks like when I left it there this morning I forgot to take the crown back out. Doesn't look like there's much moisture left though. Can't imagine that the silica pack the size of my hand is anywhere near saturated yet.

>>5971


I asked you if you were a judgemental prick, but now that we have accepted you are, what are we going to do about it. Because I think you would be more happy and less insecure if you weren't.

>>5972

You can still just admit you didn't read the comic before you made a judgement about me based on what I said and what you didn't know.

>>5973
I had read the comic previously and had skimmed over it the 'ugly' part my mistake. I admit that.

I still don't think the comic is a bad message, as my stance about the expression of the persons personality stands. But I understand your perspective better.

>>5974

Okay then, that's fine. Clearly the guy is well intentioned, I just find the situation a little unintentionally iffy.

>>5949

Looks alright to me.