I ask people "why?" when they've said some stupid shite and are clearly too much of a braindead pissbaby to back it up with anything substantive. Not me in the workout thread though, but that too seems like quite a reasonable use of the question "why?", given that the badgrammarlad just sort of told him to do something contrary to the advice of others with no real insight into, well, why.

>>15259
Not seen this, but I would certainly like to subscribe to your newsletter. We have been hit with just as many bots and astroturfing as anyone else.

>>15262

>astroturfing

SHueley not?!

Oh tell me why...
Do we build castles in the sky?
Oh tell me why...
Are the castles way up high
Please tell me why...
Do we build castles in the sky?
Oh tell me why...
Are the castles way up high

>>15259
Why?

>>15246
The moral of the story: don't add stupid word filters. Particularly those that link back to domain names. Even more if that domain name is now full of bad stuff.

Mods = Not Sods.

>>15254
You can't get the staff these days.

>>15256
Well luckily I'd paid for the .gs enterprise support contract, which provides support at weekends too.

>>15254

WHOOPS

>>15235

That isn't a counter argument unless you consider "no it isn't" to be one.

This is someone performing a transaction with people they have never met. It isn't revenge porn anymore than sharing copyrighted porn owned by a company is revenge porn.

>>15236

When I did "you show me yours I'll show you mine" on snapchat with your mum it was someone performing a transaction with someone they've never met but it would still be revenge porn if I posted the screenshots.

>>15234
Go on, lad. Cavort with Madame Palm and her five lovely daughters.

>>15233

Guess what though, if you posted a thread with links to torrents for Star Wars films, we'd delete that too.

>>15239

mods = boring sods

>>15222
Oh well done! I doubt it but will have a look.

>>15213
Thought you were taking the piss, sorry, there really is a setting to fix this.

All these wasted years - cheers lad.

So the take away from people complaining about bans they didn't like was to start doing hidden bans is it? Smart.

>>15218

U wot?

>>15219
It has to be a continuation of what I said in >>15172. The numbers are hitting 2015 levels already.

>>15218
I'm not so sure we were complaining of bans, rather comments and questions regarding our culture.

>>15153

We did have that, it must have been a while ago as I remember it made my laptop overheat every time I visited. Good times.

>>15153
We had it regularly, but as the lad says, needed its own graphics card ten years ago.

I actually found the snowflake code again - bit late now.

>>15215
You could integrate it with some kind of weather forecast API to automatically enable it if significant portions of the UK have snow.

>>15215

Could we just have the ability to turn it on for individual users? Like a ban but far, far worse.

(I know already that we definitely can't have that but imagine a world where we could)

>>15121
/o/

Wonderful, thank you.

>>15108
The ones where the two people who (sometimes, not that often) maintain the code come from.

>>15109
Wrong.

>>15112
Nah, the other was never me. It was for the lad who had a TV career.

>>15113
Ah....

I remember the numbers being mentioned a while back, could've been years, but it was around 100 then so that sounds about right. Tried to post this in London the other night btw but someone's been playing silly buggers and the IP was banned.

My apologies to whoever post it was in /beat/ - the videos weren't rendering so I deleted it. Star seems to be acting a little weird, will take a look.

>>15085
The date isn't the interesting thing, it's the post numbers. Those posts clearly aren't from the same thread.

>>15090
I'll be in IRC after work tomorrow if you've not fixed it by then.

>>15091
Yeah Star is mixing up a thread in /beat/ with a thread in /nom/ - interesting.

>>15092
Looks like you fairly recently killed the IRC? Don't blame you.

>>15068
/shed/ is on /sfw/, you silly sausage.

>>15071

You want us to let you put nsfw images on /sfw/ because you want /sfw/ to be safe for work?

I don't understand. Have you had your brain squeezed by too many meaty thighs?

>>15078
None of these images are NSFW, though? I didn't realise Mary Whitehouse posts here.

>>15079
>None of these images are NSFW, though?
In your opinion, maybe.

A message for you, thighlad:

Posting like that directly affects all other readers, and breeds further disease.

Personally they should be banned for as long as it takes a person to learn how to write. Two years?

>>15031
Kurskmerk sits unfinished and you think you’re getting a new banner? I envy your optimism.

Define Kurskmerk

>>15033
It's part of the prophecy that came to one of the (now) mods in a dream.

>>15033
It's coming soon

http://britfa.gs/6/

>>15025

That's pretty fucking tasteless.

>>15019

Shit :(

>>15019
If it's the one the image invokes, then my deepest condolences. A light that burned too bright for the world to bear snuffed out too soon.

>>15015
Awful news.

>>15025
F's in the chat.

I only remember one female from IRC. She was lovely. Having said that, I don't remember her being a mod. I do remember trying to set her up with another lad in the IRC once.

I never did know the gender of some of the other posters, but I did like them all. So whoever has died, I'm sorry to hear it.