>>15737

I didn't want to say it, but yes, I am fucking sick of her. I am prepared to take direct action to end this menace if necessary.

Interesting.

What's the point in finding transparant PNGs and contributing to quality content when they don't even show up properly.

>>15901
You're not Britfa.gsing right.

>>15902
Perhaps it's my script blockers to blame. I'm sorry.

First they came for the Patel posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not into hatefucking.

Then they came for the Millican posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not a chubby chaser.

Then they came for the Vorderman posters, and I did not speak out-
Because I am not into excessive plastic surgery.

Then they came for me-
And there was no one left to speak for me.

>>15895
I agree. If you can't subvert a thread discussing something a woman has done by making lewd comments about said woman, then this is the beginning of the end for Britain's preeminant discussion forum, and I won't be renewing my membership.

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells

This isn't quite what this thread is for, but I was trying to post from the cinema (the film hadn't started, I'm not a monster) the other week, but I was perma-banned, so I was wondering, did one of you lot work in a cinema at some point? Or was it some kind of "range ban" which I don't really understand, but whatever.

>>15898
Well was it on the cinema's Wifi, or on your mobile data?

>>15896

>Then they came for the Millican posters

I must have missed that.

>>15886
>Where us 3 are from

http://britfa.gs/sentry/

>>15888
Yeah, good luck with that. Here's all the places I am, given a quick trawl of some geolocators. Who needs VPN when I'm hidden behind 10 CGNATs ?
Napton on the hill, Pop:1100 maybe?
Great Bolas? Pop:340
Ah, one day maybe I'll have an address to call my own. (Where's my fucking Starlink, Elon?)
Anyway, OP - you may find analytics interesting, but beware the poisoned data.

>>15888
I had forgotten about sentry. It's dangerous because looking down the list of yank posts makes me want to commit the faux pas of asserting that I know one of them.

>>15886
I used to do that a load, but nobody ever cared and nobody ever believed. Three of us.

>>15892
That's nice but if your GP won't prescribe CGNAT it's probably for the best.

Are we getting webms or going to be able to upload the likes of webp or avif images any time soon?

>>15878
What is the point of .webp? It's a Google image format, and is therefore inherently untrustworthy, and other formats work just fine for viewing images anyway. It's not like .webm which can play sound and can be paused and assorted other advantages over gifs. The webp format adds nothing, surely.

>>15879
Be that as it may, it's a format that exists and is in common use, and it's not going away any time soon.

>>15880
All the more reason to tell it to fuck off, it's a format for people who don't try.

>>15865
Doesn't that make it one of the most recent threads?

>>15865
Two examples in a month = every other week.

Can't you lads just vary up your cunt-offs a bit more?

>>15867

Then where are the examples from last month, or the month before last, and so on?

>>15868
They'll be around.

>>15865
My post here >>/v/23708 might be an example? I said I enjoy the work of Graham Linehan despite him turning out to be totally unhinged; someone asked what I meant; someone else explained; and then yet another lad showed how little he cares but ranting about how little he cares, and the thread went into a mini cunt-off.

That being said, I don't support wordfiltering and don't recognise the OP's depiction of the boards.

Real men browse with /*/ and the sage does nothing.

>>15786
You don't mean to say we're simply not that interesting here?
Horror.

>>15787
We're three blokes in sheds, but we're interesting enough to each other and that's what counts.

>>15786
I use /sfw/ just in case the munter thread has been bumped on /x/.

>>15786
Indeed. Why would I browse individual boards when the site as a whole gets about 30 posts a day? /map/'s got posts from 2018 on the front page, not exactly warp speed posting over there.

>>15720

I believe the wordfilters are just PHP strcmp()/str_replace() calls. It'd be nice if they used preg_replace() for things like this but I don't see it happening.

>>15723

Actually if I'm right then putting the reddit.com filter before the reddit filter would work, while having reddit before reddit.com would break.

>>15724
The filters arrange themselves according to some vaguely unfathomable logic. I can't change which comes first.

>>15725
> The filters arrange themselves according to some vaguely unfathomable logic.

Somehow that seems totally appropriate. Actually trying to migrate the system to preg_replace() would probably suck the entire site and the shed it lives in into the void like in that YubYub gif.

I don't even know where rudgwick came from or why. I assume I missed a hilarious joke somewhere. or maybe I did it when I was full of pain pills that one week and don't remember

>>15631
Is he still around? I always found his ever more subtle attempts at introducing his 'ideas' to be amusing.

>>15632

Pretty sure it was him the other day arguing about when the "magic responsibility switch" or whatever it was goes off in people's heads.

>>15633
No, that was me. I just want kids to be tried as adults, and for capital punishment to be brought back. How does that make me a seppo?

>>15631
>It's not worth walling the whole of the US
I couldn't disagree more.

>>15631
I agree - there are far fewer US posters than you think, it's the yoof who have adopted their speaking/posting habits most of the time.

Yeah. I get this too, but only on /cash/

I think it has always been this way. I'm not no computer fixer man, but I've deduced that brian probably doesn't like the currency symbols.

>>15605
It worked until about 6 months ago.

>>15606

I did say I was no computer fixer man.

>>15588
You what mate?

You're using a garbage old browser. Modern browsers block auto-playing audio by default.

There's a "cum zone" and I wasn't invited? Tossers.

>>15591
So you say, but both versions of Chrome (stable and canary) I tested allowed it.

Not sure if this documentation remains current. Gs doesn't seem to have crossed the MEI threshold and has the "Automatic (default)" permission for Sound.

https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2017/09/autoplay-policy-changes#mei

>>15593
It didn't work on my Chrome variant or FireFox so thanks, if you hadn't let us know it did work for you I'd have assumed it didn't work and never bothered doing it again.

>>15546
I'm sure he'll be along soon, even if it's just to explain why he can't.

>>15546
Whitelisting individual IPs is a pain in the arse, apologies.

Let me do a bit of research and I'll let you know. Not convinced I want to open up Germany for one person, but let me look at some logs and consider.

Thank you modm8s.

You could always stop being a cunt shitting up the rest of the boards.

There already is, is this a phone posting problem?

>>15507
Yeah - certain browsers don't see the colour.

hello.jpg

Hello?

Not without knowing what IP it is.

>>15463

I'll make a note of it if the ban message pops up again, but it seems this current IP is working now. I don't know if Giffgaff varies them or if you lifted it. Thanks, modlad.