>>15536
If anything it just proves that we're not paying enough attention to be playing favourites, and that's a good thing for a community.

I agree and gave up trying to point out that the whole ban-by-number-of-seconds thing is idiotic years ago now.

This does explain some of the slightly left-field accusations that have been made recently; if a mod has been over-tracking posts. Maybe look at /sentry/ less often, it's fairer if we only use it when we have to, puts us all on a more even keel.

>>15542
I usually check sentry after a report if I can't discern why I should be banning it at face value and only for that IP (which is, I assume, it's purpose) but I don't use it otherwise. What accusations are you referring to, btw?

It seems like something worth stamping down on, especially if people are trying to use sentry to dox each other or out Americans and Nepal lads as used to happen back in the day, but if that has happened to anyone recently it's slipped through the cracks.

>>15530
Please purple, fix this. I don't want to see the guilty would thread any more.

>>15544
Agreed, that lad has gone wrong.

>>15516
..How long have you been here, lad?

>>15519
Plenty long enough to have had joke bans, but they aren't usually a week and accompanied by the kind of comment that makes it sound like modlad just lost an argument with modmissus and is feeling passive aggressive.

>>15519
This attitude of 'everyone who gets banned is just a whinging cunt and deserves ridicule' is getting really tedious, teenlad. If you're a mod just unban him, I think everyone can do without the back-and-forth.

>>15521
I don't know if it expired or was removed but there was no such ban in the list at around 3pm.

>>15522
Yeah, I did check around that time too. I don't remember seeing that ban yesterday either.

You could always stop being a cunt shitting up the rest of the boards.

There already is, is this a phone posting problem?

>>15507
Yeah - certain browsers don't see the colour.

hello.jpg

Hello?

Not without knowing what IP it is.

>>15463

I'll make a note of it if the ban message pops up again, but it seems this current IP is working now. I don't know if Giffgaff varies them or if you lifted it. Thanks, modlad.

I hope the server password is in purp's will, too. I'll pay the fees but someone less thick will have to run it.

>>15415
All this made me realise that I literally have no way to contact you that isn't through a 3rd party. I'll have to remedy that at some point, but Corona cancelled the Bohemian Boogaloo.

Your efforts are not unseen, cheers for persevering bossm8.

I'll be honest, I accepted this place was dead after a few days so I'm having a hard time adjusting. This must be what it's like coming back from a war.

>>15429
Pictured: a poster returning to britfa.gs

>>15430
There wouldn't be any trouble if it wasn't for that king-shit mod! All I wanted was somewhere to post...

>>15410
Depends how bored you are. It's only slightly more active than the boards currently are.

>>15410
I barely ever post there but it seems reasonably chill. Might be worth having just in case this sort of situation arises again.

>>15409
That warmed my heart a bit. As well as all the lads finding various ways and means of crawling back to this small grey bolthole in the swarming fuckery that is the wider internet.

Glad to hear that purps realises that this place is actually a bit special in it's own understated way, if he reads this at some point his efforts are very much appreciated. Without wanting to be dramatic or overstate the case I reckon /emo/ may genuinely have saved a few lives. And the cunts offs can be fun as well.

Sage for soppyness.

>>15410

If you want to be part of the disgusting Mod/IRC clique.

>>15413
That joke worked better 10 years ago when it was IRC and no one under the age of 25 knew how to access the server. Discord is a click away.

Oh thank god, I thought this place had just died forever without warning.

Who gives a toss. Filter it, don't filter it - I've seen it in like four posts.

>>15370
>[-]
U wot?

>>15374

Those fatty fuckers don't like people announcing they are hiding their thread.

>>15373

Four posts is about 40% of daily posting, though.

It's hilariously* filtered on relevant boards anyway.

Some have called it a forced meme, but I thought it was pretty funny when I posted it in response to the ladyboy lads on about meaty she-cocks. In my head the joke was that I bet it was one of those lads who posted it in the chubster thread to begin with.

I am, why can't it be embedded everywhere?

You bastard, I clicked on the image to close the reply box I thought had popped up.

>>15347
>BTW fuck webp it's entirely useless.

It's a pretty good alternative to animated gifs, which are a bizarre inefficient dinosaur of a format.
But for stills though, yes it's utterly pointless. There's an argument that they save a bit of space when compared to an equivalent quality .jpg, but it's spare change in an age where every other website is packed full of autoplay videos.

>>15349

Up until now I had assumed it was just some sort of image format DRM that stops me being easily able to save images off Google to repost on imageboards.

>>15350

I'm not a computer magician but I think the only thing preventing them from working on Brian would be one line of code that contains the valid file types it will let you upload. Brian doesn't need to be able to decode the image itself, because that's done on our end in the browser, and that shouldn't be a problem for anyone who's updated their browser in the past 5-10 years.

Regarding DRM on images, one thing I've found that many websites do, either intentionally or otherwise, to stop people from being able to save images is to hide the image itself underneath a transparent layer so right clicking doesn't let you save the image. There is a workaround although it can be a bit of a pain in the backside, in Chrome, right click on the image and click "inspect", and using that function you can break the page down and find the url to the actual image.

>>15351

*I just thought, adding in a new file type could possibly bugger up the scaling for thumbnails maybe?

You can just delete the .webp bit, right? Is there another issue or am I posting on Mumsnet by mistake again?

>>15342

>>15342
The mods don't actually know how to unlock threads. Have you ever seen one unlocked?

>>15344
The Autoban 9000 broke free from purps shed and runs things now. I don't even own a web browser these days, I post using Alexa.

Go on.

>>15378
I'm fairly sure I unlocked it about a month ago but nobody noticed. I can't find it now so if you want to bump it I'll lock it again for you.

>>15335
Nature is healing.

I have the same thing, with Three? They seem to let it slide until I try to post something.

I'm not the admin but I'm willing to bet it's an ISP issue not a .gs one.

>>15302
Agreed, Three are always trying to tell me the content filter is on when it isn't.

>>15293
>on YouTube itself I frequently find it loads the wrong video until I refresh
I've had this too. Quite weird.

Just caught this happening on the front page of /*/. I now think it might have something to do with browser cache.

>>15297
What browser are you using?

>>15298
Firefox, same as the otherlad in the other thread. I'm almost certain it's firefox fucking up caching that's an issue.

>>15299
I see it in Chrome, desktop and mobile.