Thinking of bringing the GIFs back.

>>14998

>>15124

>>15126

>>15121
/o/

Wonderful, thank you.

>>15082
>pulled
This fucking phone. Meant pielad.

I've received a permaban for >>/nom/13129 but I didn't actually make that post.

I'm assuming it was one of those inane "poo milkshake" type comments in the recipe thread but I haven't posted anything in that since the Choc Dip picture. Fair enough getting banned for my own shitposting, but it's a bit much receiving a ban meant for someone else.

>>15116
I'm so sorry. Dynamic IPs sometimes mean there is collateral damage like that.

>Mods, please, I beg of thee, you must bin both posts. They add nothing to the thread and are an obvious attempt to derail it.

I fully accept my ban and applogise both for my inappropriate and misguided contribution, and potential derailment of the thread (though i will say it wasn't intended). Perhaps such posts are best suited to /iq/.

I'm sorry :(

>>15118
Your politeness is a credit to you.

>>15108
The ones where the two people who (sometimes, not that often) maintain the code come from.

>>15109
Wrong.

>>15112
Nah, the other was never me. It was for the lad who had a TV career.

>>15113
Ah....

I remember the numbers being mentioned a while back, could've been years, but it was around 100 then so that sounds about right. Tried to post this in London the other night btw but someone's been playing silly buggers and the IP was banned.

My apologies to whoever post it was in /beat/ - the videos weren't rendering so I deleted it. Star seems to be acting a little weird, will take a look.

>>15085
The date isn't the interesting thing, it's the post numbers. Those posts clearly aren't from the same thread.

>>15090
I'll be in IRC after work tomorrow if you've not fixed it by then.

>>15091
Yeah Star is mixing up a thread in /beat/ with a thread in /nom/ - interesting.

>>15092
Looks like you fairly recently killed the IRC? Don't blame you.

>>15068
/shed/ is on /sfw/, you silly sausage.

>>15071

You want us to let you put nsfw images on /sfw/ because you want /sfw/ to be safe for work?

I don't understand. Have you had your brain squeezed by too many meaty thighs?

>>15078
None of these images are NSFW, though? I didn't realise Mary Whitehouse posts here.

>>15079
>None of these images are NSFW, though?
In your opinion, maybe.

A message for you, thighlad:

Posting like that directly affects all other readers, and breeds further disease.

Personally they should be banned for as long as it takes a person to learn how to write. Two years?

>>15031
Kurskmerk sits unfinished and you think you’re getting a new banner? I envy your optimism.

Define Kurskmerk

>>15033
It's part of the prophecy that came to one of the (now) mods in a dream.

>>15033
It's coming soon

http://britfa.gs/6/

>>15025

That's pretty fucking tasteless.

>>15019

Shit :(

>>15019
If it's the one the image invokes, then my deepest condolences. A light that burned too bright for the world to bear snuffed out too soon.

>>15015
Awful news.

>>15025
F's in the chat.

I only remember one female from IRC. She was lovely. Having said that, I don't remember her being a mod. I do remember trying to set her up with another lad in the IRC once.

I never did know the gender of some of the other posters, but I did like them all. So whoever has died, I'm sorry to hear it.

>>15006
Let me see what I can rustle up for you..

If only there were some way of knowing when the certificate was about to expire ...

>>14910
Like I read emails.

No idea if this is the right thread but is there a way to get rid of this Not secure warning every time I try and get on?

It's a right pain and I have the technical capability of a GP receptionist.

>>15003
https://britfa.gs/*/

>>15004

Well that's fucking embarrassing.

Thanks.

>>14971

Excellent idea.

>>14972

Actually, I don't know that I needed to delete that post after screenshotting it.

http://vimeo.com/24191501

Got myself a new 4k screen. Might have to make the images bigger again lads.

>>14999

Have we finally reached a point where we can fit Narkiss's fanny on a screen without zooming out?

>>15000
Let's hope so.

>>14962
POTY

>>14962
I glanced over your post whilst scrolling down the /shed/ and immediately thought about that speech.
Thanks for living up to my expectations.

Fuck's sake. I was just about to post in the workplace annoyances thread on /job/ and it's locked. We don't need a new thread; I doubt someone is going to read the entirety of the dream thread, but the workplace annoyances thread certainly has its moments.

>>14975

It's odd to me that we're locking all the one-topic megathreads yet keeping weekend/weekday megathreads going - surely that is the wrong way around?

>>14976
Exactly. Lock the weekend and weekday threads after, say, four weeks but leave the megathreads alone.

>>14897
Are you on a mobile or a normal line? What image type was it? Try posting it again in this thread, please. Can't see anything wrong, but if you can repeat it...

>>14898
On mobile, and it failed in this thread as well. It's a JPEG.

>>14899

It's not that fucking frog, is it?

>>14900
I should hope not, unless it's a master of disguise.

That's all folks

(A good day to you Sir!)