[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
sheds

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 12977)
Message
File  []
close
britfags camwhore.jpg
129771297712977
>> ID: 132035 No. 12977 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 3:57 am

ID: 132035
12977 spacer
Locked
I believe that the mods are overpowered in their ability to delete posts. Genuine criticism gets stifled and it's unfair that the poster who went to the trouble of making the post, gets his work removed. Now I can understand why you would want to delete raid posts or ones that contain illegal content, but recently seeing a bunch of perfectly acceptable posts disappear because the mods didn't agree with them is just abuse of their powers. There has been drama in the past over deleted threads and it's annoying I know but this is a discussion we need to have.
Expand all images.
>> ID: 4e1356 No. 12978 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 4:19 am

ID: 4e1356
12978 spacer
Have you considered being less of a humongous homosexual? No? Okay then.
>> ID: a8a9f6 No. 12983 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 6:58 am

ID: a8a9f6
12983 spacer
>his work

>this is a discussion we need to have.

Have a fucking word with yourself.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 12985 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 8:28 am

ID: bb87c7
12985 spacer
>>12977
I believe you're making shit up in a bid to spread disquiet. Maybe this is something you're concious of or you're a bit of a nutter. I also believe that you're going to have to try a lot harder if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Fun fact: I'll complain about the moderators sometimes just because I think it's vaguely amusing. See, we're all delusional sometimes.
>> ID: 132035 No. 12992 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:15 am

ID: 132035
12992 spacer
>>12985
If you mention anything about the deleted posts, it gets deleted. You can see evidence of this in the /shed/ thread about yellow cards. You see, if a topic comes up that annoys the political stances of the modteam, they hush it up or just delete the thread altogether and claim it's a boring thread.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 12994 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:19 am

ID: bb87c7
12994 spacer
>>12992
No, I can not see evidence of your claims in that thread. That person had his posts deleted because he was flaunting his ban evasion. He started doing so after being banned temporarily only from shed.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 12995 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:21 am

ID: bb87c7
12995 spacer
>>12992
It's a bit silly to point to a screenshot a mod or admin posted and then claim it demonstrates them suppressing its contents. Like I said, you must try harder.
>> ID: 132035 No. 12999 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:33 am

ID: 132035
12999 spacer
>>12994
Well I can't show you other examples but I have definitely seen threads pop up and then disappear. Perhaps the OP changed his mind about posting it but these threads were usually on the subjects of race or gender which the mods seem dedicated to crack down on even though they lead to good discussions.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13001 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:37 am

ID: bb87c7
13001 spacer
>>12999
Well, I can see what gets deleted by moderators. I'm sure it's fairly normal for an entire week to pass without a thread getting deleted. Let me check. Over the past month, four threads were deleted. Excluding the one in /test/, they had a single reply between them. Run along now.
>> ID: 132035 No. 13003 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:40 am

ID: 132035
13003 spacer
>>13001
Oh right, I suppose I'm just going to have to take your word on it. This place is already slow enough as it is without the mods pruning out topics that their student union wouldn't allow.
>> ID: bd5968 No. 13013 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 4:25 pm

ID: bd5968
13013 spacer
>>13003

Out of the hundreds of race and/or gender threads I've seen here over the last 6 years exactly one of them was constructive and it was because it was in /emo/. A lad who was ignorant about trans people asked a question, a post similar to the one in the Jenner thread was made, more questions were asked and they were quite reticent when prompted what they thought. They admitted they thought trannys were mentalists, but had changed their mind, then a lad came in and started a cunt off about it and the thread got locked.

I suspect you are annoyed that you cant troll this site by posting a thread under false pretenses, and replying to it yourself with immflamatory garbage. You really should just admit that and stop this.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: e7e088 No. 13017 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 6:12 pm

ID: e7e088
13017 spacer
>>13003
If >>13001 is, as I suspect, his purpleness then yes, you do have to take his word for it. It's his bloody site, and he's earned a certain level of trust from us over the years.
>> ID: 37558b No. 13018 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 6:56 pm

ID: 37558b
13018 spacer
I was b& for calling one out on their naive student outlook. Fuck whichever mod that was.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13025 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 8:44 pm

ID: bb87c7
13025 spacer

320x240[1].jpg
130251302513025
>>13017
I'll say this one last more time. I'm not purple. To repeat a user's description of me, I am Riker to his Picard. Only my facial hair isn't nearly as good.
>> ID: aa8fee No. 13026 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:09 pm

ID: aa8fee
13026 spacer
>>13018

It was me you "called out" and I'm not a mod, so go figure. Maybe you just have a bannable face, although who am I to get in the way of your tinfoilhattery. Carry on.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13027 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:25 pm

ID: d9e759
13027 spacer
I'm confused about what is going on. Anyone fancy giving me a summary?
>> ID: a8a9f6 No. 13028 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:48 pm

ID: a8a9f6
13028 spacer
>>13027

It's the annual britfa whingefest.
>> ID: 720b83 No. 13029 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 9:51 pm

ID: 720b83
13029 spacer
>>13027
We're mad at the mods because they've deleted something, I think.
>> ID: 639179 No. 13030 Anonymous
13th June 2015
Saturday 10:19 pm

ID: 639179
13030 spacer
It's taking a tremendous amount of willpower not to delete this thread.
>> ID: 132035 No. 13048 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 1:44 am

ID: 132035
13048 spacer
So mods deleting three threads in the space of a few hours is totally allright?

More mods than users around this place I reckon. No wonder why it isn't funny anymore like it used to be in the old days. All of the 'cool' users, the ones who weren't arselicking mod groupies have all left, so they can't regale us with their interesting tales.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13049 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 1:49 am

ID: d9e759
13049 spacer
>>13048
What threads? When did this happen?
>> ID: 4e1356 No. 13051 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 2:37 am

ID: 4e1356
13051 spacer

Deleted thread.png
130511305113051
>>13049
A thread was removed from /news/ for not being news, then there was this from the same poster. There was also a thread in /test/ that was deleted by its OP.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13052 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 2:54 am

ID: d9e759
13052 spacer
>>13051
Why is he being an obsessive cunt? Sigh.
>> ID: fa5909 No. 13053 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 4:41 am

ID: fa5909
13053 spacer
>>13048

I think Britain's slide into boozeless, tepid mediocrity has more to do with that. The batshit tales I've heard from before I was born confirm a general downward trend in zany shenanigans.
>> ID: 01828e No. 13055 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 6:40 am

ID: 01828e
13055 spacer
But... But... But... If you don't let us have the same debate about UKIP, Pakis and immigration ad nauseum then you're fascists who hate free speech and want to kill off this place.
>> ID: b767dd No. 13056 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 9:39 am

ID: b767dd
13056 spacer
Why was this thread deleted? It was an innocuous thread about the future of Russia.

http://britfa.gs/pol/res/63678.html
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13058 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 10:43 am

ID: bb87c7
13058 spacer
>>13056
You'll have to ask the OP. Honestly, this idea that we're deleting a lot of anything is just ridiculous.
>> ID: fdba62 No. 13059 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 10:59 am

ID: fdba62
13059 spacer
I have had posts deleted in the past, whinged about them and subsequently got those deleted too with bans saying things along the lines of 'fuck off'.
>> ID: 24f7ba No. 13060 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 9:32 pm

ID: 24f7ba
13060 spacer
>>13056
There was a slightly nationalistic post about Russian conservatism in the thread so I assume this is what upset modlad/lass. If this isn't some sort of policy against a certain kind of politics, I don't know what is. Someone do something about the out of control mods.
>> ID: 4e1356 No. 13061 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 9:41 pm

ID: 4e1356
13061 spacer
>>13060
Do you know what Poe's law is?
>> ID: ada81f No. 13062 Anonymous
15th June 2015
Monday 10:16 pm

ID: ada81f
13062 spacer
>>13060
>Someone do something about the out of control mods.

haha.
>> ID: 49c0b3 No. 13229 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 1:52 am

ID: 49c0b3
13229 THE MEMORY CHEATS
whizzkid.jpg
132291322913229
>>13048
>No wonder why it isn't funny anymore like it used to be in the old days.

"Although I never got to see the early days, I know it's not as good as it used to be but I'm still terribly interested!"
>> ID: 49c0b3 No. 13230 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 2:56 am

ID: 49c0b3
13230 spacer
Yeah...I've been lurking and occasionally posting recently after a very long absence. Reading these complaints, it seems the mods are still up to the same old shit they've always been up to, and that just reminds me why I left. The final straw for me was when we started seeing bans for any sexist jokes, stereotyping of women etc...it was very obvious the mods had added a woman to their number but they reveled in denying it - claiming a very feminist ladmod was behind it. Yeah, sure.

If you want to stick around here for any length of time, always remember: The Mods Lie

They *will* delete topics/posts and claim they haven't
They *will* let their own views/sense of humour determine what content stays or goes regardless of the users and if the posting has merit
They will* blanket ban any meme the userbase have generated and are perpetuating, no matter how popular, if they don't find it funny (in the past they have done this and justified it by claiming a single user was responsible for forcing the meme, so they don't come across as cunts); similarly, the mods will come up with memes and, if the users instantly find it annoying, force it for months
*Contradict themselves, usually deliberately, occasionally by accident (when Nepal Lad was forcing the Pie Master meme and the userbase were sick of it, one mod claimed that there was more than one person in Nepal - despite a different mod having confirmed in shed that there was only one user in Nepal and that user alone was forcing the meme)
*the IRC 'clique' will arrange stuff there, to troll the users here

This site exists only to amuse the handful of mods. There is practically zero concern for the users. Always remember this.

>>13048
>All of the 'cool' users, the ones who weren't arselicking mod groupies have all left, so they can't regale us with their interesting tales.

I was never cool, but I do have a lot of great stories. But that would be "bringing up old drama" and the mods would get pissy. We were never really 'cool', but we were definitely characters. That's something you'll never see again here - again, the mods get pissy. It's fun, and harmless, but they don't like it. If I can use an analogy, the mods attitude to content here is like how Steve Jobs was about Apple devices having Adobe product like Flash - HE had a personal beef with them, therefore his customers did not need or want to use Adobe products. Except they did.

I will be banned for this post. Guarantee it.

>>13017

>he's earned a certain level of trust from us over the years

HAHAHAHA no. Modlad detected (or just a really obvious and poor troll)
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13231 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 3:02 am

ID: d9e759
13231 spacer
>>13230
Mate, the mods are extremely lenient. You should see someone about your paranoia.
>> ID: 06fae6 No. 13232 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 3:10 am

ID: 06fae6
13232 spacer
Yeah. Seriously. The amount of shitposting I do, and I've only ever been banned for spelling mistakes and starting a post with Our Lord and Saviour.
>> ID: 6fa594 No. 13233 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 4:00 am

ID: 6fa594
13233 spacer
>>13230

Holy shit. You're taking this very seriously.

Mods don't delete stuff because they don't agree with it. Ever. You might get a ban for stuff but I've seen 'political' bans overturned quite often.

It's worth noting that overzealous modding is definitely something that is dealt with. I don't know how specific I can be, but mods get into trouble for overmoderating.

>This site exists only to amuse the handful of mods.

The mods are mods because they're heavy users. You get modship for being here all the time and 'getting' the site. If the site is entertaining to the mods, it's almost certainly entertaining to the users, as they're one and the same.
>> ID: 10c652 No. 13235 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 4:44 am

ID: 10c652
13235 spacer

image.jpg
132351323513235
>>13230

As far as I know, only one girl mod would let personal issues interfere with rational and competent moderation.
>> ID: 10c652 No. 13236 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 5:06 am

ID: 10c652
13236 spacer
>>13232

Why would you start a post with that?
>> ID: 3fb7e6 No. 13237 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 6:52 am

ID: 3fb7e6
13237 spacer
>>13236
Starting a post with 'Christ, lads' is one of the easiest ways to rile at least one lad here, nearly as easy as posting a Daily Mail link.
>> ID: 4e1356 No. 13238 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:44 am

ID: 4e1356
13238 spacer
>>13230
It's like you're living in some private dystopia.
>> ID: ce2e2f No. 13240 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 8:06 pm

ID: ce2e2f
13240 spacer
I got banned, which is fair enough because I was being a cunt, but then the ban message was in reference to something I had said in a different post from a few hours (or a day) before. I found it awkward because it seems like I'm not really anonymous if all my posts are visible to mods, and they can build some sort of profile on me. I felt naked.

I suppose this website is meant to be a middle ground between anonymous imageboards like 4chan and semi anonymous websites like Reddit.
>> ID: 73747e No. 13241 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 8:41 pm

ID: 73747e
13241 spacer
>>13240
That's pretty shit, I'm sorry the mods are keeping tabs on you like that, especially after they promised they didn't.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13242 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 8:57 pm

ID: bb87c7
13242 spacer
>>13241
We promise we don't because we don't. We're just not interested in snooping and we believe in anonymity as much as most of you do. Another thing we sometimes do is post screenshots of sentry, which in mod mode can list all posts submitted from the same IP address over the last three calendar days. When you're selected for a ban the quality of your very recent post history influences the ban length. I'll usually spend less than 10 seconds assessing it.

The ban reason was "We'll see who's lenient." You can work out which post that references because it's in this thread. I thought I was making a friendly joke with someone who well understood the dynamics of this site and the relationship between mod and user. Clearly, it doesn't take much for us to be seen as the bad guys.
>> ID: f698c4 No. 13243 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:09 pm

ID: f698c4
13243 spacer
>>13242
I have been persecuted by the mods before for saying things they decided wasn't politically convenient. My IP was the same but after bans had finished, I'd get other ones and they too would make fun out of my previous posts. It's the usual case of your lot lying and just flat out getting rid of things you don't like. Missing threads have become more common and there are more than the usual number of whiners. Let's face it, .gs has jumped the shark and has mismanaged it's user base. The number of high quality posts have dropped drastically and the mods have just drove away posters who just get bored of their unfunny antics.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13245 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:20 pm

ID: bb87c7
13245 spacer
>>13243
Off you pop then. We don't keep records of expired bans and so the only way what you describe is possible is if you were so exceptionally persistent in your shit posting that we just came to memorise your hostname or IP address by accident because we saw it so often.

I'm struggling to believe that all these similar-sounding complaints are emanating from so many different people. Explaining why I might think that is tricky. Suffice to say that people will make stuff up because it entertains them.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13246 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:29 pm

ID: d9e759
13246 spacer
>>13242
I did find it funny mate.
>> ID: 73747e No. 13247 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:37 pm

ID: 73747e
13247 spacer
>>13242
To be fair, the idea that you were making a friendly joke with someone as you banned them makes my head hurt a bit. Maybe I don't understand 'the dynamics' but I've never really been banned in good humour - if I've ever found a ban message amusing that mood quickly sours when I note the length of my banishment.

Then again he did say he deserved his ban, and I rarely feel that way.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13249 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:42 pm

ID: d9e759
13249 spacer

dnb.png
132491324913249
>>13247
Sometimes you have to realise you are being a cunt by sitting on the naughty step. After I have a good think about it, I realise I was being a cunt.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13250 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:43 pm

ID: bb87c7
13250 spacer
>>13246
No worries. It does occasionally frustrate me to read these accusations from disaffected individuals looking to stir up trouble. It seems like most of you can see through it or at least retain perspective, so it's not so bad. It's actually amusing how backwards this narrative is - how it contrasts with the evolution of the mod team in reality. I'll save the look behind the curtain for another day. We prefer to be left to oppress you in peace.

>>13247
From a single board, for a single day.
>> ID: 73747e No. 13252 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:55 pm

ID: 73747e
13252 spacer
>>13250
I pretty much always think a whole day is excessive. I mean, let's say you banned >>13249 for an hour for his cunt-offs. If, as you say, you have that system where you can see the last few posts someone has made, then you'll be able to tell if he's persisting in cunting off once unbanned, which would then necessitate a longer ban. Y'know, like sentencing guidelines. But when I'm banned for something like a whole day out of the blue, it really fucks me off because I usually forget about what I was banned for long before that.

Look, I don't want to go on and on at you about how you mod, I'm just saying I disagree on a few points. I'm not accusing you of being vindictive.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13253 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:56 pm

ID: d9e759
13253 spacer
Can you lads see posts that the author deletes?
>> ID: 82cfe3 No. 13254 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:56 pm

ID: 82cfe3
13254 spacer
>>13249

It is a special kind of person who does their online banking whilst listening to Marron 5, jerking off to an extreme pussy train and educating themselves on religious festivals...

Apparently they browse this board
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13255 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 9:58 pm

ID: bb87c7
13255 spacer
>>13253
Yes.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13256 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:00 pm

ID: d9e759
13256 spacer
>>13255
Oh... mate...
>> ID: 49c0b3 No. 13257 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:02 pm

ID: 49c0b3
13257 spacer
>>13243

See this is typical mod behaviour - making out that only one or two people are responsible for something they're not happy about, after having just in the sa.e post reminded us all that they can see that its not just one or two culprits.


Contradictions and Lies. Translate that into Latin and you have the mods motto
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13258 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:04 pm

ID: d9e759
13258 spacer
>>13257
Contradictionum et mendaciis.

But that lad is paranoid. I sometimes feed his paranoia, but honestly I think he has a screw lose.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13260 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:12 pm

ID: bb87c7
13260 spacer
>>13252
So you're asking us to keep a closer eye on users to monitor them for repeat offences? The funny thing is I expect you're entirely sincere.

If you feel like you can't do without gs for a single day then maybe a ban is precisely what you need. Even bookies will deny problematic gamblers. Alternatively you could evade the ban so long as you don't flaunt what you're doing.

I wonder whether purple had the right idea in ignoring all this.
>> ID: 1f676b No. 13261 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:12 pm

ID: 1f676b
13261 spacer
>>13243
>The number of high quality posts have dropped drastically
Yeah, that guy who would pop in to every thread to remind us all that wanting to fuck 14 year olds is normal really added to the quality of this place.
>> ID: 73747e No. 13262 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:13 pm

ID: 73747e
13262 spacer
>>13259
>If you feel like you can't do without gs for a single day then maybe a ban is precisely what you need.
To be frank that is pretty condescending. 'How dare you use our website regularly, that is unacceptable behaviour?'
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13265 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:17 pm

ID: bb87c7
13265 spacer
>>13262
Do you not understand that some people who contribute to our web site make it worse?
>> ID: 73747e No. 13266 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:21 pm

ID: 73747e
13266 spacer
>>13265
Well, I think most people who contribute to the site make it better, and therefore when they post some banworthy bollocks should be given lenient reprimands. I do find it hard to believe you have a difficult time identifying repeat troublemakers, but OK, I'll take your word for it.
>> ID: bb87c7 No. 13267 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:26 pm

ID: bb87c7
13267 spacer
>>13266
Think about how many posts the average person would submit to any given board in a day. None? One? Maybe three? That's what you're protesting about and it really doesn't matter. The site will continue and nobody will notice. This is precisely the attitude I refer to when I suggest some people have lost perspective.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaiWCS10C5s
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13268 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:27 pm

ID: d9e759
13268 spacer
>>13266
I'm already paranoid enough, why do you want the mods to keep folders of posts we made, neatly categorized by IP addresses, indefinitely? Fuck off to Reddit or something. It beats the purpose of anonymity. I doubt all the lads posting everywhere would relish the idea that all the /emo/ posts they made can be linked to them.
>> ID: 82cfe3 No. 13269 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:31 pm

ID: 82cfe3
13269 spacer
>>13258

>Contradictionum et mendaciis.

People called Romanes they go the house?!
>> ID: 73747e No. 13270 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:31 pm

ID: 73747e
13270 spacer
>>13268
>why do you want the mods to keep folders of posts we made
Ugh, I'm not fucking suggesting that. You don't have to spy on people to notice patterns of behaviour. Anyway I'm not changing anyone's mind so I'll stop posting about this.
>> ID: d9e759 No. 13271 Anonymous
5th August 2015
Wednesday 10:34 pm

ID: d9e759
13271 spacer
>>13270
I would much rather prefer a free for all, but then the savages would wreck this place, so we need the mods. But keeping a list of our posts to "find out who is being a cunt by reading out all their posts one by one?" Count me the fuck out. Cancerous bastards like you is what is wrong with this country. Forever offended and trying to ban someone somewhere.
>> ID: 4e1356 No. 13272 Anonymous
6th August 2015
Thursday 12:07 am

ID: 4e1356
13272 spacer
>>13271
Yeah.

Look, we do care about the quality of the board, and the users experience. The stuff 49c0b3 gives as evidence of lying, I read as us not being telepathically connected and not agreeing on our interpretations of the same data. Not even the same data; we're not omniscient. Yes, there have been female mods but I can tell you for a fact they're not the ones who have banned people for being egregiously sexist. Maybe because they're smart enough not to do that. Generally, if someone has posted something potentially banworthy that has offended me personally, I wait and let another mod deal with it, because I don't want to be unreasonable.
Of course we fucking contradict ourselves sometimes, we're human beings.
This thread is complaining both that we spy too much on you and simultaneously don't spy enough. That's absurd, but whatever course of action we take, someone is going to bitch about it. I have better things to do than spy on you; for example, picking my nose. Masturbating. Watching paint dry. The list goes on.
Simultaneously, if I didn't believe in the value of anonymity, I wouldn't be involved in running an anonymous imageboard. For those reasons, ban lengths are fairly arbitrary and mostly hinge on how much I want to get back on with whatever I'm doing at the time. I might flick through what you've posted recently to try and determine if you're just permanently trolling and then I may make some reference to something you've posted in the ban reason. If you think there's some sort of IRC clique going on then you're outdated as fuck regarding what goes on in there. Feel free to join and see for yourself.
Yes, reporting something to individual mods in IRC will get a faster response simply because when we get IRC notifications, we'll see them as soon as we sit down at our computers and before we get around to checking the reports page. I check the reports page occasionally, but IRC makes shit flash on my desktop so I look at that right away.
If you've been acting consistently like a twat then your ban reason will reflect that, but we probably won't publicise the fact to the general userbase. Unless you're a really *massive* twat in which case we'll probably make fun of you.

Incidentally, the number of active mods has dwindled recently so if you're confident you're not a massive knob and have something positive to contribute, get on the IRC and get involved.

People will whinge about you, too.

Return ] Entire Thread ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password