I saw this earlier on and assumed it was a piss-take.

It must be a piss-take, right?

>>4918
This letter was only meant for Suarez.

I've never been sure whether half-caste and coloured are meant to be offensive or not. I've definitely never heard them used anywhere near offensively, if a police asked me for someones description I'd consider half-caste to be perfectly acceptable to say. Same for handicapped, I'd even go as far as to say it's more polite than disabled.


Rent-boy isn't offensive, it's a job description. I'm sure our government would agree with this.

>>4918
>It must be a piss-take, right?

I don't know, this is Liverpool after all.

Bloody euphemism treadmill. Look at half-caste, coloured, cripple, and handicapped on there, they don't belong. And 'man up'? Sure, gender stereotyping, but offensive in only very specific contexts. And when did gypsy become a term of abuse?

Lists like these make me angry - not that people shouldn't be protected from offence, but that people choose to use them to offend, and be offended by them, in the first place.

>>4920
>I've never been sure whether half-caste and coloured are meant to be offensive or not.

I don't think the words themself are offensive, but they're archaic and the historic connotations they have mean you'll be painted as an ignorant bigot if you use them. It's why it's acceptable to say Brit but it isn't to say Paki.

>>4920
Half-caste is racist, you racist buffoon. I dare you to say it to my face. You racist twat.

>>4924
Why should I say it when you play like a girl, you pikey midget!

>>4924
Yeah yeah. Wha yu mean when yu say half-caste. I'll tell you what I fucking mean - mixed race. Nothing else. Isn't it your own problem if you perceive racism where there's none?

>>4925
To be honest, I didn't even know half-caste was racist until someone in maths class called me half-caste and the teacher flipped her shit. But yes, it is offensive thanks to glorious British history and racism. It simply means half pure.

>>4926
Mate it is racist but good on you for telling me, a half-caste, what is and what isn't a racist term. The all knowing white Englishman sure schooled me. It is your destiny, your burden, the white man's burden, to educate us less pure fools.

>>4928
How dare you call me an Englishman, you fucking racist.

Man up? Really?

inbred paddy cunts.

>>4930
Yes. If you feel the urge to chastise divers and players feigning injuries then you need to check your privilege, cis scum.

>>4933
>check your privilege, cis
Well judging by the context you're using them in you haven't got a clue what these mean, have you?

I was unaware "spic" was in common usage here.

Also my aunt is still convinced "coloured" is fine to say.

>>4935
Spic? It isn't common but the owners of Liverpool are American. So...

>>4934
_{I do, but I couldn't think of a funny word to use instead of 'cis', check your priviledge scruples-scum?}

>>4937
What does privilege have to do with anything?

>>4938
_{Because people who don't dive and play-act are more privileged than those who do and should therefore check their privilege before they criticise them.}

>>4935
My Grandad thinks 'wog' is acceptable because it stands for 'western oriental gentleman'.

He's a good person, really, but my word...

>>4940
Your word wwhat?

>>4940
It's better than calling them Chinky, Nip, Gook, Ricer or slanty-eyed bastard.

My friends told me off when I said one of them had yellow fever for fancying a Chinese lass. Madness.

>>4942
Ladmate, do you know what wog means and where the "Western Orient" is pertaining to?

I mean, you're quite right in that it would be better than calling them a chink but that's only because you'd have to be a pretty shit racist to confuse the two. Or, come to think of it, a really good one; "they're all just fucking foreign to me".

>>4943
I thought wog was short for golliwog and meant for black people, but I naively assumed Western Oriental Gentlemen meant Chinkies that have moved here. Sorry for not being au fait with my racist vernacular.

>>4945
https://www.youtube.com/v/pWmf3Waio9E

>>4944

I'm pretty sure my elderly relatives use "wogs" to mean black people.

They're Irish and they were bemoaning the fact that when they first moved to London, most houses to let said "No Irish" and the ones which accepted Irish people were "all full of wogs."

>>4947
That's hilarious.

>>4940
>My Grandad thinks 'wog' is acceptable because it stands for 'western oriental gentleman'.
I hope you set him right on that one.

>>4949
Too fucking right. They're many things, but one thing they ain't is gentlemen.

>>4919
It's quite funny how the bin-dippers are asking for loyalty from Suarez while they've just shipped off Reina to Napoli on loan without letting him know.

Fuck knows why Arsenal have bid £40,000,001 for him. At first I thought they were doing it as an exercise to show they're willing to spend big money this summer, but it now looks as if they're being serious and actually want to sign him.

What about Bongo Bongo Land?

>>4952
It's offensive only if you miss 'the', you racist twat.

>>4953
Bongo the Bongo Land?

>>4954
I don't know, either.

There's nothing racist in using 'Bongo Bongo Land'. It says more about the people inferring that it's offensive. There must be people who spend their spare time Googling words to see if they have any negative connotations, no matter how tenuous, so they can explode and get offended on someone else's behalf if some unsuspecting soul uses them.

>>4955
I don't know, Bongo Bongo land stinks of Victorian explorers running after some black people to enslave in the forests of Africa somewhere.

>>4955
"Bongo Bongo land" is right out of the same dictionary as "fuzzy-wuzzy" or "jungle-bunny", a long-established piece of classically racist language dating back at least a hundred years or so. Essentially it comes from a faux-ignorant position of lumping places like Sudan and Ghana all into the same pot because "they all look alike and their names all sound the same".

>>4956
Victorian explorers, those notorious slavers.

Just because you erroneously think something sounds racist doesn't actually make it racist, bwana. It's just a lazy excuse to have a pop at UKIP when there's enough legitimate reasons to do so.

>>4959
Have a look at >>4958 lad. Nobody is having a pop at UKIP, they aren't doing themselves any favours by letting their racism leak out every once and again.

Isn't this guy a liability?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Bloom#Views_and_controversies

>>4960
I didn't see that, I posted mine first as >>4957 but deleted it and reposted because of a typo. I can usually get away with it on the slow boards.

>>4961
>Bloom was ejected from the Mansion House in 2009 for heckling Lord Turner for giving staff a bonus after the massive regulatory failure of 2008/9. According the Daily Telegraph he was the first man to be ejected since John Wilkes in the late 18th century. Bloom also signed the petition in disgust at the knighthood for the failures of Hector Sants
>In October 1992 Bloom launched a campaign to help people avoid mis-selling of pension schemes. It was very warmly welcomed by the press, particularly the Observer. It was the very first indication of the problem. An employee tape of the advice was produced for all human resource departments as part of a redundancy package.
>Bloom claims that most MEPs have "little or no business experience" and do not understand the consequences of their actions.
>Bloom told an interview that, "no self-respecting small businessman with a brain in the right place would ever employ a lady of child-bearing age."[12] Around the same time, he said that "I just don't think [women] clean behind the fridge enough" and that "I am here to represent Yorkshire women who always have dinner on the table when you get home."[11][13] Bloom told BBC Radio 4's Today that his comments were "said for fun" to illustrate a more serious point, that equal-rights legislation was in fact putting women out of work.[11]
>Bloom was filmed at the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen congratulating the French for bombing the Rainbow Warrior, a Greenpeace ship, in 1985.

It's quite mild, really. In some of these you can argue he's right. However, I live in East Yorkshire and whenever he's in the local media he comes across like a complete knobhead.

On another note, from looking at the Wikipedia page history for their entry on Bongo Bongo Land it seems it was only created because of his comments. It's still awaiting a citation that it's derogatory and on speculation that the name comes from bongo drums.

>>4963
You appear to have omitted a bunch of ^{[citation needed]} tags there.

>>4964
>a bunch
The only one I missed copying was one at the end of the mis-selling of pensions schemes.

>>4958
>"Bongo Bongo land" is right out of the same dictionary as "fuzzy-wuzzy" or "jungle-bunny", a long-established piece of classically racist language dating back at least a hundred years or so.

Utter bollocks. You are posting absolute bollocks. Complete twaddle.

Jungle bunny is a racist American term from the 60's. Fuzzy wuzzy was a nickname for a Beja tribe that's no worse than referring to Germans as The Hun or Jerry during the First World War. If the term Bongo Bong Land is a 'long-established piece of classically racist language' then you should be able to easily prove it; it is not an antiquated term from the days of Are Empire. To quote an earlier post in the thread:

>Just because you erroneously think something sounds racist doesn't actually make it racist

>>4966
Mate, you can use it. I doubt whether the word is racist or not would really change your mind anyway.

The Graun fluff pieces about Bloom are dire and they have, quite rightly, been savaged BTL.

Insulting other team's fans online is now against the law.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/aug/23/football-fans-prosecution-online-hooliganism

>>4970
No, the police have decided to start enforcing long-standing laws that criminalise a crippling lack of imagination.

>>4968
Another 'fluff piece' for you.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-mep-godfrey-bloom-disparages-women-drivers-feminists-and-mildmannered-men-8777141.html

This man lives in a timewarp. Do you defend him because you too want to return to his jolly old era?

>>4972
Judging by the quotes, he didn't say anything outrageous except for this bit about feminism. It is undeniably true that many men are dirty pigs with no concept of hygiene and many women are not very tech-savvy.

>>4971
You won't be saying that after they throw you in the gulags for posting on a forum that Chelsea are a plastic club with plastic fans or for Tweeting that Rio is a bit of a cunt or that Torres dives like a girl.

>>4972
What's wrong with that? Women only get mad at the toilet seat being left up because they don't always look before sitting down and sometimes fall in. Nowt to do with hygiene.

>>4975
It is, actually. If you flush with the lid up specks of shit and wee come flying out of the toilet.

>>4976
We're talking about the seat, not the lid.

>>4977
Well aye but you don't sit around for the bog to finish its work before repositioning the seat/lid do you?
Lid should always be down on a toilet lest it's in use tbh..

I’m loath to enter Godfrey Bloom’s childish world of stereotypes (“Ukip MEP disparages women drivers, feminists … and mild-mannered men”, 21 August) but just to make a point I played in three consecutive rugby league Universities Athletic Union finals, am still involved widely in many sports, and also support the goals of feminism.

I admit I leave the toilet seat up, but my wife (probably known to Mr Bloom as “the little woman”) also refuses to conform to stereotype and never mentions it. Neither of us have knowingly had sand kicked in our faces.
--Michael O’Hare, Northwood, Middlesex

Gosh, a real man reading The Independent (letter, 22 August)? What next?
--Godfrey Bloom MEP (Ukip, Yorkshire and the Humber), Wressle, East Riding of Yorkshire

He's such a prick.

>>4978
Nope, that just ensures that whatever godawful stench you made in the toilet bowl only sticks around to greet the next person who uses the loo. Smells don't dissipate without ventilation. Leave the lid up.

>>4979
That's a bit unfair on pricks, don't you think?

>>4980
There's no stench unless you leave skidmarks or your toilet is defective. If you take a shit you should make a quick check and use the brush if necessary. The basin should have some toilet duck put in it at least once a fortnight too.

/ocd

But really I hate selfish toilet users.

>>4983
Or the residents of the house you're staying in are male and apparently make godawful shits of such a reek that you can most definitely smell it hours after you know the toilet was last used? Admittedly their house isn't spotlessly clean and their toilets are a bit gross to begin with, but my housemate does it to my scrupulously clean toilet and the toilet always smells more when he's left the lid down on it.

Furthermore, the brush is not for cleaning shit out of the toilet. It's for scrubbing the toilet with once you've chucked a load of cleaner down it; the idea of using a toilet brush to rid a loo of stubborn skidmarks and then putting it back in the holder without first dumping it in a load of bleach makes me fucking shudder.

I bet you do that, don't you? You wipe your shit all over a toilet brush and then just put it straight back in its little holder, for your shit-germs to colonise and multiply among the bristles.

"/ocd"? Fuck off.

>>4984
No, I scrape with the brush, hold it in the basin for a second mini flush then put it back in the holder which is a well of disinfectant.

>>4978
>Lid should always be down on a toilet lest it's in use tbh..
Christ on a bike. Literally, christ on a bike.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/lest?q=lest

>>4986
Sorry.

>>4979
He admits that he enjoys winding up Guardianistas and the like because they always take the bait. It's just IRL trolling.

>>4988
That just makes him a different kind of prick.

>>4985
Acceptable, but I'd still only live with you if you changed that disinfectant at least every two weeks.

>>4990
Fuck off we can take turns. I'm not being sole toiletfürer.

>>4984
Just put some Oust in there.

>The Football Association has warned that any fan chanting the word "Yid" could face criminal charges.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/sep/11/fa-tottenham-hotspur

It's all getting rather silly.

>>5037
Really? I can't say it any more? How is Yid Army negative? I will say it when I get there.

>>5038

It's not really about Spurs fans saying Yid, it's about Chelsea fans doing gas chamber impressions. Ajax have a similar co-opted Jewish association, which has led to some very ugly scenes with rival fans chanting "We hate the Jews" and giving the Nazi salute. There's a very real risk that football rivalries can normalise anti-Semitism.

>>5039
Just like there's a very real risk that schoolkids drawing swastikas on school desks will start world war three I assume.

>>5039
How exactly do you do a gas chamber impression?

Tsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss?

>>5039
It is bullshit. You can't cure racist in football because the fans themselves are racist scums and the dregs of society. All these laws are trying to do is making football more middle-class. This has been the case since the 80s.

>>5040

You only have to look to Italy to see that it's a serious concern. Two Spurs fans were stabbed in Rome last year in an attack that the Italian police treated as an anti-Semitic incident. Paolo Di Canio is covered in fascist tattoos; In 2010 he attended the funeral of Paolo Signorelli, a fascist terrorist who had been convicted for his involvement in the Bologna massacre in which 85 people died.

There were clear historical links in Britain between football firms and groups like the National Front and Combat 18. Do you not remember when banana throwing and monkey chants were commonplace in British football?

>>5043
I don't think you have any idea how the word yid and tottenham hotspur are related.

>>5043
Why should I give a shit whose funerals Paolo Di Canio goes to?

>>5043
Fans are always getting stabbed in Rome. They're notorious arse stabbers.

>>5046
You shouldn't, it was flavour of the month in the media when he got the Mackems job. The only people who care are those who have no interest in football, like when Richard Keys and Andy Gray were sacked.

>>5048
Thought as much.


Now if you'll excuse me I'm going to go and protest about Kyle Walker and his promotion of recreational drugs.

You can't even call a slut a slut anymore.

PC gone mad.

>>5061
The fact that you didn't sage this makes me think you're serious. I really hope that's not the case.

>>5062
Sluts aren't gonna shame themselves.

>>5061
Yet again ARE GODFREY gets a bum deal.

Though, since we're on /spo/, I suppose the rainbow laces thing deserves some mention. Right behind gay footballers. Personally, I don't mind being right behind gay footballers, but quite frankly if you haven't worked out the punchline by now there's really no hope for you.

>>5064
I have no idea how many clubs wore them. It looked like a very poorly organised gimmick.

Di Canio has gone. It was likely to end in tears, but the Director of Football buying a load of shite didn't help.

>>5073
Yaaay! No more bigoted, fascists managing the team now.

>Manchester United has apologised after a 'swastika-style' logo was sent out to fans in a newsletter alongside the Nazi affiliated title "New Order". The similarities between the logo, which spelt out the letters MUFC, and the Nazi symbol were pointed out after United Uncovered was issued via email.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-24691368

What similarities? Crying racism has become its own industry.

>>5137
I saw that, I fucking hate this world, I really fucking do.

>>5137

I was just scrolling down /*/ and I have to admit that on my first pass I did think that was some kind of swastika.

Sage for footy-plebs.

>>5137
What does Rio think? It's not racism until he says so.

>>5140
Wrong way around mate, it is racism until Rio says it isn't.

>>5139
Same. I thought it was some new right-wing magazine/newsletter.

>>5139>>5142
But then you stopped to actually look at it and realised it's nothing like a swastika? It's certainly not something worth apologising for, this stinks of Baddiel.

This one looks a lot like swastika. When you tilt your head and squint. And scroll past it on a webpage. When will Pope finally apologise for this poor design decision?

>>5142
That would make three of us, then.

BAN THIS SICK FILTH, I say.

>>5144
No mate that looks like a cross.

>>5146
Well, swatika has a cross in it. What else do you need? Also, "One Lord, one faith, one baptism" sounds really similar to "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer" to me.

>>5147
>What else do you need?
A bunch more lines.

If you want to call the pope a nazi that's fine with me, mind.

>>5144
Kinda crazy how thousands of people wear a representation of a method of execution on little necklaces.

>>5148
Well, MU's logo needs way less lines to look remotely like swastika. It didn't stop people from complaining.

>>5149
If you're bad at grasping very simple symbolical meanings, yes.

>>5150
Why are you being so defensive about this? It does obviously look a bit like a swastika, as several people here noticed. Some idiot complained. Who the fuck cares?

>>5151
People who are concerned about people's attitudes.

>>5143
Yes. I suppose that's the problem. Maybe they did it on purpose so that people look at it a second time, more carefully. Anyway, why are you so hung up on this? It does look like a Swastika, a bit.

It doesn't look anything like a swastika - what made people make the connection is that it has the same form as a swastika. Straight, bold, diagonally parallel black lines in a vaguely square formation.

>>5154
How is that different?

>>5155
I just described how it's different.

The Wright Brothers plane has the same form as a Boeing 747 but it looks nothing like it.

Another month, another racism story.

>>5295
But he's clearly glorifying drug use.

>>5295
>West Brom's Nicolas Anelka faces a minimum five-match ban if found guilty by the Football Association of making the controversial "quenelle" gesture.

>The striker made the sign, described as an inverted Nazi salute, after scoring against West Ham on 28 December. Anelka was given a 34-page document detailing the allegations and has until 18:00 GMT on Thursday to respond.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25823368

34 pages. How do you fill 34 pages on what was originally an anti-establishment gesture about how far your hand is up someone's arse?

Christ. They've got David Baddiel whining about it on Newsnight. He should go back to trying to wind up Spurs fans.

Sol's now saying if he was white he'd have been the England captain for over a decade, instead of Shearer - Beckham - Terry. I don't think he's ever going to run out of things to cry racism about.

Ian Wright and Steve McManaman on BT Sport accused Andre Marriner of being racist for sending off Gibbs instead of the Ox because THEY ALL LOOK SAME TO ME, BRUV.

Was watching the game with my mate's, they started saying it was racist too. Fucking annoys me, he's a bit brown but he's not black as the night and he didn't see his name and number, so the obvious way of identifying someone is his looks.

Fucking WACISTS

>>5497
>mate's
Sorry about that, phone thinks it knows what's good fir me.

>>5497
It's probably racism through ignorance of not being able to tell the difference between two young mixed-raced men who are the same size and have the same haircut in the blink of an eye from a distance, or whatever they like to call it when they cry about it.

>>5499
The FA can certainly put it right, as there is precedent for this. Preston had the wrong man sent off, and the FA overturned the red card and banned the other guy. That case was even more painful, because the other guy had gone on to score the winning goal in the game.

>>4917

>hehehehe that's gay

(A good day to you Sir!)

>Hull's Yannick Sagbo and QPR loanee Benoit Assou-Ekotto are facing possible bans after they were charged with improper conduct for social media posts relating to the 'quenelle' gesture.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26841690

>Assou-Ekotto went on Twitter after Anelka's salute to post what translates from French as "I congratulate you on the beautiful quenelle". Sagbo also took to the social media network in the aftermath of the incident, posting a picture of Anelka's celebration and a message of support for both the striker and Dieudonne.

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11714/9243946/yannick-sagbo-and-benoit-assou-ekotto-charged-over-quenelle-tweets

It never ends. Nasri and Sakho also received warnings, but they're playing for big clubs so it doesn't matter.

>A footballer who made a homophobic gesture to Brighton and Hove Albion supporters has been found guilty. Colin Kazim-Richards mimicked pulling his shorts down and put his left arm behind his bottom at the match last February, Brighton magistrates heard.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-26960629

Is putting your hand on your bottom homophobic or is this being classed as homophobic purely because it's Brighton?

>>5559
Who's the gay answer to Rio Ferdinand, and what does he think?

>>5560
Sol Campbell?

>>5561
Despite appearances to the contrary, the Honourable Sulzeer J. Campbell is not actually a bumder.

>>5562
Could Mr. Campbell be said to be so black he's purple?

>>5592

Purple Sol sounds like a micro-brewed lager.

Apparently wanting a proper investigation into whether the decision to award Qatar the 2022 World Cup was corrupt is racist.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/archaeology/27762435

>>5747
Whoops. Fuck knows how archaeology came into it:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/archaeology/27762435

>>5562
I don't know, lad. Phones don't end up inside arses by themselves.

Bollocks to this.

>>5748

It's a wordfilter for foot­ball. I deleted my post when I realised what was happening, sorry about that. If anyone wants to read it just change the word archaeology.

>>5750
I fixed the problem on our end.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27762435

Was the word filter because of the teenlads on /job/ moaning about pedestrian conversations?

>>5752

I believe it was put in place quite a while ago due to a humorous discourse on "Imagine if every day when you went into work everyone was talking about archaeology, and there was an archaeology results bit at the end of the news every day" and so on and so forth. It was rather good.

>>5753

Indeed google helped me out - http://www.tickld.com/x/how-football-sounds-to-people-that-just-dont-care-T

>>5752
>>5754
This is similar to how I feel about sex. It's fucking everywhere.

>>5755
That's because sex is great. What are you, asexual? Bloody poof.

Speaking of Rio, I don't think his decision to go into music after leaving United was a wise one.

https://www.youtube.com/v/HkMNOlYcpHg

>>5759

Whenever I see Psy music videos I can already picture them in retrospective talking head shows about the noughties/teens.

>An England fan had his ear bitten off in a vicious attack by another supporter after the national side's World Cup loss to Uruguay.

>A video which appeared on the Sunday People website shows the victim's neck covered in blood after he was set upon by a fellow England fan following the team's 2-1 defeat to Uruguay. With his left ear horrifically injured, he turns and tells the camera: 'He bit my ear off and called me a black ****.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2673531/John-Terry-is-at-it-again

Chances are we'll see some anti-semitism this season.

>>6188
Couldn't resist for some reason.

>>6188
Surprised he's not gone to Totenham really.

>Tssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss...

>>6190
Careful, lad, or you'll have David Baddiel on to us.

>>6191
But he doesn't support Spurs.

>>6192
He's the go-to guy for anti-semitism in football. Plus, he keeps trying to wind Spurs fans up by getting the word yid banned.

>>6193
Christ, what a fucking Jew.

On the arrival of South Korean international Kim Bo-Kyung:

"Fkn chinkys. Fk it. There's enough dogs in Cardiff for us all to go around."

On football agent Phil Smith:

"Go on, fat Phil. Nothing like a Jew that sees money slipping through his fingers"

On transfer target list:

"Not many white faces amongst that lot but worth considering."

On a player's female agent:

"I hope she's looking after your needs. I bet you'd love a bounce on her falsies."

On an official at another club:

"He's a snake, a gay snake. Not to be trusted"

To members of Cardiff's staff:

A picture entitled 'Black Monopoly' - where every square was a "Go to Jail" square

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/malky-mackay-alleged-texts-between-7650710

New season, new drama.

>>6242
I'm surprised that's all there is. You'd think there'd be something in there about Tan. I can only assume the Mail didn't report it because it's hard to get outraged about it when the victim is as deserving as he is.

>>6243
The Mail have posted some of them, but most of it is pictures of the lovely falsies you'd love to have a go on. She should have got a forehead reduction instead, you could land a jumbo jet on that.I can't handle all this banter.

>>6244
>lovely falsies you'd love to have a go on
They do have a point. There's no way those teeth are natural.

"I'm not homophobic, I'm not racist, I'm not antisemitic...".

No, you just say homophobic, racist and antisemitic things with absolute serenity.

>>6246
Is calling someone a gay snake homophobic?

>>6247

Yes, of course. It's a very clear attempt to use someone's sexuality to undermine them.

>>6249
I'm not sure most people know enough about the sexual orientations of snakes to be able to figure that out.

>>6249
Is it any different than smelly snake, hairy snake, etc?

>>6242
Haha! He's funny. I feel bad for feeling bad for him when he got bullied by Tan. He deserved it.

>>6251

Because the hairy and smelly of this world are very rarely beaten and shunned by society for being as such, and the Judeo-Christian culture in which we live has almost never gone out of it's way to condemn the smelly and hairy. And if the smelly and hairy are so maligned they can always think about having a shave or buying a new deodorant, whereas the homosexual can at best subject themselves to a futile and profoundly damaging "conversion therapy".

Wanna' fire off another slow one, champ? I can knock these for 6 all evening.

>>6250

Indeed, as a snake biologist I often bemused at the unwillingness people display to garner even the slightest iota of understanding regarding snake biology.

How did Cardiff get a hold of all these messages? Should I delete my texts? I'm scared.

>>6253
>Because the hairy and smelly of this world are very rarely beaten and shunned by society for being as such
You've never actually had to deal with someone hairy and smelly, have you?

Purps, how does "hairy and smelly" sound as a word-filter for "gay" and the like?

>>6243
>You'd think there'd be something in there about Tan. I can only assume the Mail didn't report it because it's hard to get outraged about it when the victim is as deserving as he is.

Backpage of the Daily Mail today is the headline that he called Tan a chinky. He handled it terribly, but you can't blame for Tan treating him the way he did considering the way Mackay squandered his money; £600k agent fees on a £600k transfer and authorising payments to agents when there's no actual evidence they were involved in the deal.

You've got to admire the way he's got his revenge. Remind me never to cross him.

>>6257
>Backpage of the Daily Mail today is the headline that he called Tan a chinky.
Really? That's the worst he said about him? Surely he deserved far worse than that.

>you can't blame for Tan treating him the way he did considering the way Mackay squandered his money; £600k agent fees on a £600k transfer and authorising payments to agents when there's no actual evidence they were involved in the deal.
Do we know that this happened and hasn't been made up after the fact by Tan? It's just that if it is true then in effect you're asking us to have sympathy for a Bond villain. For some time the thinking had been that a miscommunication somewhere along the line was responsible for the supposed overspend, namely over whether the transfer budget included additional expenses or not.

I don't understand how this is antisemitic, aren't they saying if you support Spuds and use not a bumder then you're a pussy?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29283118

>>6289
>Warning: There is a picture near the bottom of this story containing words which some readers may find offensive.
Fantastic.

>>6289

Hats off to the Partizan fans, they've put the effort in.

>>6290
I liked it when they censored the imaginary minges in this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/29256334

>>6292

Were their fannies in the SAS?

>Ched Evans should be allowed to play football again when he is released from prison, says Professional Footballers' Association chief Gordon Taylor.

>The Wales striker, 25, was jailed for five years for rape in April 2012 but is due to be released early this month. More than 90,000 people have signed a petition calling on Evans' former club Sheffield United not to re-employ him.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29541498

There's going to be a shitstorm coming on this one.

In other news, Are Sol is considering standing for the Tories. I think he'll do anything to put off getting those coaching badges, which Sol seems to think are less important than race in actually securing a coaching job.

>>6292

Have you seen the original?

>>6304
Are you saying they were right to censor it?

>>6305

It looks worse the smaller the image is. At the resolution the BBC had it, it may have attracted complaints because it certainly looks indecent at fist glance.

>>6306

No, maybe, would, no, no, would.

>>6302
>There's going to be a shitstorm coming on this one.

ITZ

The veteran TV presenter said: "He's served his time. The rape and I am not, please, by any means minimising any kind of rape - but the rape was not violent. He didn’t cause any bodily harm to the person."

Judy went on: "'It was unpleasant, in a hotel room, I believe, and she was – she had far too much to drink. And you know, that is reprehensible, but he has been convicted and he has served his time.

"Now when he comes out, what are we supposed to do? Just actually refuse to let him do his job? Again, even though he has already been punished?"

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/judy-finnigan-branded-disgusting-after-4430546

Are Judy should have known better than trying to be rational when discussing a rape case.

>>6314

Well, that's her career finished.

>>6315
I think it's actually the first thing she's done since Richard and Judy finished in 2008. You don't go on Loose Women and have the temerity to say that criminals should be able to try and contribute back into society and lead productive lives instead of being shunned for the rest of their lives or, failing that, flogged and hanged.

>>6309
I'd agree with this, though #2 might require a few pints first.

>>6316

I was going to explain how you're wrong, but then I observed your claim that footballers contribute to society, and I realised just how thick you really are.

>>6318
Professional footballers are paid wages. They pay tax on those wages. They contribute towards merchandise sales, on which VAT is payable. They contribute towards a team performance that affects gate receipts. Even the silly money spent on transfers is taxed. If that's not contributing to society, complain to the government for pissing all that revenue away.

>>6318

footballers get paid millions to cheat while ARE nurses work 100 hours a week for nuffink!

lyk if you cry evrytym!

>>6319>>6320

It's more over that it's a massive cultural gutter, completely devoid of decency, and a bastion for thugs, imbeciles and, oh yes, rapists.

Of course, from my last point you could argue it brings people together, but the only time people of that caliber ought to be bundled together is right before they're all pushed off a cliff into the raging ocean. Their racial slurs muffled by the endless smashing of sea onto rock...

>>6318
Either prisoners are rehabilitated and you let them integrate back into society or you just don't bother releasing them.

What Ched Evans did is no worse than Luke McCormick, current captain of Plymouth, who killed two children while driving drunk or Lee Hughes, who also killed someone driving and then fled the scene but has been welcomed back because he's got a good goalscoring ratio.

>>6321
I always find it amusing when people advocate genocide for racists. They never see the irony.

>>6321
I'm just passing by and I share you sentiments exactly.

I chuckled about the previous two posts, one claiming that they pay tax. Any rich sleazy cunt with half a brain will try to alleviate the tax on their gains in anyway they can. They get most of their earnings from sponsorships anyway, cheap whores ready to shill away any shred of dignity they had to get another floor on one of their mansions.

>>6325
Careful of those edges, teenlad.

>>6326

Come on, you may be Footy-Scum, but you're better than that.

>>6325

I suppose all sportsmen and women who take sponsorship money are shills as well, are they?

>>6325
Take your shilling and shill off back to shillchan.

>>6328

I wouldn't use the word "shill", but do people really deserve gwibdillions of pounds for peddling really fast and way long?

>>6330

Don't move the cricket stumps, answer the question.

>>6330
Yes, because they generate enough money to justify it.

>>6325
>They get most of their earnings from sponsorships anyway, cheap whores ready to shill away any shred of dignity they had to get another floor on one of their mansions.

That's probably true for top, top players. Would you class Ched Evans as a top, top player?

>>6320
My favourite is the one along the lines of 'A footballer gets tapped on the ankle and goes down like he's been shot. A soldier has all his arms and legs blown off and still carries on. A soldier earns £18,000 a year. A footballer earns £18,000 a second. Share if you think this is a disgrace, 99% of you won't have the guts to.'

>>6334
Starting shit between football hooligans and militarists, this is a brilliant idea. Everyone wins.

>SARAH VINE: Judy's right. Some rapes ARE worse than others

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2793302/sarah-vine-judy-s-right-rapes-worse-others.html

Here we go, although I doubt Sarah Vine will have people defending her the same way they did about Dawkins when he made similar remarks.

>>6333
No and I don't know who he was until I googled him. A rapist no less. Give him a raise! Luckily he's in prison, getting different kinds of scores to the back of his net.

>>6338
Careful you don't hurt someone with that jetting knee.

>>6339
I may as well become a footballer then.

>>6338
>A rapist no less

Alleged rapist. He still maintains his innocence and every discussion I've seen on the matter thinks it's an odd case - Evans and his mate (another footballer) fuck a drunk lass and when she wakes up the next day, naked and confused, she can't remember whether she consented or not. Evans is found guilty but his mate, who did the exact same thing to her, is acquitted.

Either way, he's served his sentence and should be able to work for any football club which chooses to employ him.

>>6340

Rapist.

>>6342
Only if I get my 6 trillion for that lays/doritos/durex/LG deal.

>>6343
>Lays

Do they have Walkers on the continent or is just Seppos who have Lays?

>>6341
I can't say whether or not he really is innocent, but certainly either his conviction was highly questionable or the other guy got away with rape. By the admission of everyone involved, both defendants and the victim, there wasn't room to get a fag paper between what the two of them each did in that hotel room.

More importantly, as you say his conviction stands and his sentence is deemed served. It's time to let him get on with his life.

Doesn't sound like rape, to me.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2794715/predatory-soccer-stars-drunken-girl-seedy-night-premier-inn-richard-pendlebury-revisits-disturbing-events-led-rape-trial-ched-evans.html#article-2794715

>>6346

I'm too old for this shit.

Sheffield United have apparently offered h a two-year contract worth £500k.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2798069/rapist-footballer-500-000-deal-sex-offender-ched-evans-walks-straight-prison-two-year-contract-old-club-apologise-first.html

People are mad that his family have had a bouncy castle party to celebrate his release. Also, Sheffield United fans have been warned after chanting "Super, super Ched Evans, he does what he wants" during yesterday's game against Bradford.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/convicted-rapist-ched-evans-celebrates-4457634

>>6344
They have Lays in France and Germany for sure, I'd assume it applies to the rest of Europe (sans UK).

>>6351
The CCRC are going to fast-track their review of his case.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29679563

>>6353
I assume the people being mean to him in the Daily Mail comments will be banged up for 'trolling'.

>>6351

I was actually at the game as it happens (Bradfudlad). They were singing "he rapes who he wants" not "he does what he wants". Lovely lads the Blades fans.

>>6355
Quick! Arrest them for _{oh right, I see someone else made that joke already.}

Sheffield United are appalled at the vitriol they've received for allowing the Chedster to train with them.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/16/sheffield-united-appalled-abuse-ched-evans

>>6391

No redemption for anyone, any criminal ever should be shipped off to Mars.

Fucking hell.

>>6392
I don't think believing that a convicted rapist shouldn't be able to walk straight out of prison and into the role of a successful and respected public figure is quite the same as saying "any criminal ever should be shipped off to Mars", mate.

>>6391
Nonsense. You're seriously misrepresenting their statement. Notice how the example recipient of possibly criminal abuse in your article is Jessica Ennis, who threatened to disassociate herself from the club if they gave him a contract. All they're doing is warning their fans to behave themselves.

http://www.sufc.co.uk/news/article/20141115-statement-2085871.aspx

>>6393
Yeah, what we need is is more celebrities with no prospects AND to burden business and individuals with more regulation.

>>6392
It's probably the same crazy feminists who made that scientist cry for wearing a shirt with cartoon women on, which his kinky friend had made especially for him.

If he gets acquitted on his appeal there will be an absolute shitstorm.

>>6393
>convicted rapist
Yes, I suppose technically he's a rapist, in much the same way that if you drunkenly lend someone a CD then regret it the following morning they're a thief.