[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
sport

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 6212)
Message
File  []
close
heaven.png
621262126212
>> No. 6212 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 3:47 pm
6212 spacer
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/28796590

>The Premier League has told Newsbeat they're going to clamp down on fans posting unofficial videos of goals online.

>"It's a breach of copyright and we would discourage fans from doing it, we're developing technologies like gif crawlers, Vine crawlers, working with Twitter to look to curtail this kind of activity."

>He added: "I know it sounds as if we're killjoys but we have to protect our intellectual property."

>Sky Sports and BT Sport paid a record £3bn pounds to show three seasons' worth of live Premier League football.

>The Sun and The Times bought the online rights and they don't want people to be able to see the action for free.
Dean Scoggins from The Sun. It costs users £7 a month to use their goals app

>It costs £8 a month to subscribe to Sun+ which features Premier League goals.

This all sound very trivial
Expand all images.
>> No. 6213 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 3:51 pm
6213 spacer
>Premier League
It is shit. I hope they start losing revenue and fans. I'd much rather watch games from the continent.
>> No. 6214 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 3:51 pm
6214 spacer
>>6212
Poor choice of image. That cat is nowhere near as far up that arse as these people are up their own. Fucking rent-seekers.
>> No. 6215 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:07 pm
6215 spacer
How come people still like football? It just seems like people having an extended argument about their favorite soft drink to me.
>> No. 6216 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:09 pm
6216 spacer
>>6215
Why don't you want to belong to a gang, bound together by a shared experience of watching a very boring sport on the TV? What's wrong with you?
>> No. 6217 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:10 pm
6217 spacer
>>6215
How come people like anonymous imageboards? It just seems like a bunch of autists arguing over nothing.
>> No. 6218 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:12 pm
6218 spacer
>>6217
>seems like
>> No. 6219 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:14 pm
6219 spacer
>>6216>>6217

I'm being serious here, I genuinely don't understand how you can stomach such a cynical exercise in money making. Didn't Hull or somebody just hire back a convicted rapist?
>> No. 6220 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:18 pm
6220 spacer
>>6219
Sheffield United are about to welcome back a player who was convicted of rape on shaky grounds - including the fact that the victim appeared to have given consent, and his co-defendant who nobody disputed also participated in the intercourse was acquitted, presumably because the sex with him was more satisfying.
>> No. 6221 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:21 pm
6221 spacer
>>6219
Your honestly can't comprehend how people could enjoy something you don't? Fucking hell.
>> No. 6222 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:22 pm
6222 spacer
>>6221
*You

Sorry, phone posting.
>> No. 6223 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:26 pm
6223 spacer
>>6220

That's not how convictions work, m8. A convicted rapist is a rapist. Rape claims are notoriously difficult to get convictions on, so whilst not knowing the ins and outs of this case I can make a reliable judgment that the grounds were not at all "shaky".

No one ever disputes fraud or burglary convictions like they do rape convictions.
>> No. 6224 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:29 pm
6224 spacer

Old Bailey.jpg
622462246224
>>6223
>A convicted rapist is a rapist.
And a convicted terrorist is a terrorist, right?
>> No. 6225 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 4:31 pm
6225 spacer
>>6223
> A convicted rapist is a rapist.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/06/texas.exoneration/index.html

And before you start saying that's just one case, there are plenty more where that came from.
>> No. 6226 Anonymous
15th August 2014
Friday 5:59 pm
6226 spacer
>>6220
This. He's no Marlon King, Lee Hughes, Nile Ranger, Ravel Morrison, Joey Barton, Luke McCormick style thug; he's convicted on the basis that a woman decided her drink was spiked instead of admitting that it may to be do with the large quantities of alcohol she ingested and the subsequent gaps in her memory. I'll never understand how one can be innocent and the other guilty when they both shagged her.
>> No. 6227 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 10:42 am
6227 spacer
>>6223
>Rape claims are notoriously difficult to get convictions on
What are you on mate, there's stories all the time from people who have been locked up based on accusations alone and released after lengthy appeals that found there was no evidence
>> No. 6228 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 12:20 pm
6228 spacer
>>6227
Isolated incidents are always in the papers, it must be true!
>> No. 6229 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 1:03 pm
6229 spacer
>>6228
Tumblr's that way, m8.
>> No. 6230 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 1:09 pm
6230 spacer
>>6229

What has an awareness that British news papers are prone to sensationalism got to do with Tumblr?

Have you ever even been on Tumblr? Most of it's just gifs of Doctor Who and amateur pornography FFS.
>> No. 6231 Anonymous
16th August 2014
Saturday 1:22 pm
6231 spacer
>>6230

Or amateur Doctor Who pornography.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password