>>445900
You could, but you run the risk that the hitman sees what's going on and decides to subcontract the job to another hitman, who subcontracts to another hitman, etc. and before you know it you and five hitmen are all going to jail.

>>445901
Is it against the law to pay someone to euthanise you?

>>445901

Why would they do that? For a hitman it's the perfect job, the only witness is also the mark, no loose ends.

Unless you have existing contacts, how do you expect to find a "hitman" who will do as they say instead of taking your money and running for the hills? After all, unlike women of the night there's no way for you to tell when the job's done and there's definitely no legal recourse.

>>445902
Very much so.

>>445904

You leave the fee to them in your will. They don't get the money unless they pull off the job. You've got to think a step ahead in this game, remember. I believe it was David Mustaine summed up the industry rather poetically:

Ten thousand up front, ten thousand when I'm through. And I know just what to do. Then I'm coming back for you.

>>445907
Won't leaving them money in your will create an audit trail?

>>445908

That's their problem, you'll be dead.

>>445909
Would they agree to it, though? I can't imagine any hitman worth his salt would agree to be paid in that way. Some estates take years to be distributed.

>a completely unexpected time

Wouldn't you be expecting it given you just jumped through all the hoops to book it? Your last days would be abject terror as you jump at every noise, you eventually calm down only to have your death by piano wire flash into your mind followed by the sound the hitman cursing under his breath.

Plus there's plenty of ways you can get a hitman for free. Piss off the Italian mafia for instance.

>>445902
Like all things, it's only a crime if you get caught. With hitmen, there is an expectation that they won't get caught. Doctors, meanwhile, are more likely in my opinion to not disappear into the shadows once you die.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUo8W_tbGtE

>>445913
We need to find the next Harold Shipman?