[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
grow

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 2807)
Message
File  []
close
4.jpg
280728072807
>> No. 2807 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 9:07 pm
2807 spacer
Have any other city slickers noticed that the sky is now both clearer and more vivid from the lack of smog? Ironically I've been spending more time outside during the quarantine than I did before it, simply because the sunsets have been looking so beautiful.

I want to ban all cars and marry Greta (when she turns of age) now.
Expand all images.
>> No. 2808 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 10:03 pm
2808 spacer
>>2807
>Greta
She is 17. You can marry her.
>> No. 2810 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 10:18 pm
2810 spacer
>>2809
Wasn't that the drawing of her getting raped?

Also, enjoy your permaban for ban evasion.
>> No. 2812 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 10:31 pm
2812 spacer
Probably more to do with that all strong wind we've had lately. My window has been banging like a knocking shop.

>>2809
Not him but wasn't it just her getting done from behind and the lad was hanging onto her locks? Still a bit noncey with the age limit for porn mind you.
>> No. 2813 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 10:53 pm
2813 spacer
Nice memory-holing, snowflakelad.

I don't see how it's CP when it's just a drawing of someone with pigtails with no explicit mention of her. Pretty sure Are Greta doesn't have a monopoly on that particular hairstyle.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 2814 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 10:56 pm
2814 spacer
>>2813
You admitted ban evasion, you can't act offended when you get banned again.
>> No. 2815 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 11:00 pm
2815 spacer
>>2813
>when it's just a drawing of someone with pigtails with no explicit mention of her

Apart from, you know, the massive tattoo saying 'Greta' on her back.
>> No. 2816 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 11:14 pm
2816 spacer
>>2813
Doesn't matter if you "see" or not, edgelad. It's an image of child abuse under UK law and given the implied rape, a severely punishable one.
>> No. 2817 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 11:35 pm
2817 spacer
>>2816

Amusingly if she was married it wouldn't be (although it'd still be illegal to distribute or publish). The law really sometimes is an ass.
>> No. 2819 Anonymous
30th March 2020
Monday 11:47 pm
2819 Not that lad
For the avoidance of doubt, the Canadian authorities examined it and determined it did not amount to CP. Either way, it's still casual bint-hatery to imply that the appropriate thing to do to a woman who disagrees with you is to rape her, and that implication alone is enough to get our benevolent dictator into serious trouble.
>> No. 2822 Anonymous
31st March 2020
Tuesday 8:13 am
2822 spacer
>>2819
>the Canadian authorities examined it and determined it did not amount to CP

An establishment cover up of CP? Who'd have thunked it?
>> No. 2823 Anonymous
31st March 2020
Tuesday 8:59 am
2823 spacer
>>2819
The Canadian authorities are not our authorities.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password