>Is this site accurate?

The sources are *right there* on the same page.

The fuck is this? It's like that South Park episode where angry men go on a rampage until the government redraws the statistical bands so everyone is classified as having a large penis.

According to this site I'm almost freakishly girthy. I haven't had any complaints but also nothing to lead me to believe it is as remarkably thick as the site suggests.

>>29303

Did you have it set on inches and then enter centimeters?

I posted about this about four times this year for those of you paying attention; but yes, the average dick is a lot smaller than you probably think. It's only about five and a bit, but the variance isn't as wide as you'd think either- Anything over seven is almost a statistical anomaly.

TL;DR porn has given you unrealistic expectations and women are shit at judging what's what. Enjoy having a big dick.

95th percentile length, top 1% girth master race reporting in.

>>29305
>women are shit at judging

I dunno. Women know the difference between a show-er and a grow-er. I've also met women who have been out with the odd male who is super hung and many of them recoil at the thought.

>>29306

Nah, they are. Consider what I mentioned about variance- Relatively speaking, cocks under 5" are exceedingly rare, as are cocks above 6".

That only gives them a single inch to visually (or manually, iykwim) assess on the majority of men. As we all know from watching a woman try to reverse a car at any point in our lives, they can't visually determine three feet, let alone one inch.

Like with a lot of aspects of sexuality, though, most of the time it doesn't matter- If someone is bullshitting you usually go along with it, because indulging each other's fetishes and fantasies is completely normal and desirable part of sex. If you ever meet a bird who goes "Erm, hang on a minute mate, don't be giving me all that big dick dirty talk. I know full well you're only a third of an inch off the lowest quarter percentile" then you're probably taking advantage of someone with special needs level autism.

>>29307
> Consider what I mentioned about variance- Relatively speaking, cocks under 5" are exceedingly rare, as are cocks above 6".

In my experience women care about / notice penis size a lot less than us blokes. I've posted on here before that I've been with a number of women who've slept with more men than I've had hot dinners and none of them complained about my shamefully average knob.

Essentially you fit into one of three groups: too big (anything much over 7"), to small (anything much under 5") and "this is a normal dick, it gets hard, doesn't hurt, and it does the job". Most people fall into this group. most Women really, really, aren't obsessing over whether you're 5.25" or 5.75". All cocks within the normal range might as well be the same cock, it's the bellend who's using it that makes the difference.

>>29306
> I've also met women who have been out with the odd male who is super hung and many of them recoil at the thought.

I think almost every bird I've been with has an anecdote about a monster cock and it's either always that they ended up hurt or hurting in some way or that the poor bloke had trouble staying hard for long enough for a proper shag.

Inb4 someone chimes in with "cope harder, dicklet".

>>29309

There is such a thing as a size queen, mind you.

I've had both extremes in my time, my first proper girlfriend thought she was broken and suffered quite a bit of body image self doubt because she couldn't handle my knob (didn't help that she was a virgin at first), whereas my most recent ex was obsessed with going on about how massive I was and telling me that I'd ruined her vagina. In fairness though she had absolutely zero pelvic floor game, she really did end up like a bucket after I'd been going at her for a while. I didn't really see it as a good thing, but evidently that's what got her off so fair play to her.

Sage because this sounds like a brag post, but really I just intended to point out different people vary wildly (and that birds are strange).

I saw a thread on reddit where this guy was insecure because his girlfriend wanted a massive dildo. Something like a XL Chance off of Bad-Dragon.

When it gets to to that point, I don't really think there's much to be insecure about. Yes, she could date a 5 year old shire horse, but the conversation wouldn't be very good.

Got a small Crackers sheath from that site and it's surprising how much it feels like you're just having completely normal sex. The interior is pearled and when fully lubed it's basically like fucking a fleshlight, plus your full head is exposed and so you get all the sensation there.

Did make me feel a bit sad that I'd never hear a woman say 'Holy fuck that's so fucking big' and watch their eyes roll back in their head while they try and fit it, but with the sheath it feels like a team effort that I'm a decent part of.

ON A MUCH MORE SERIOUS NOTE

Does anyone know if being a prolific wanker from the age of 12 would have had an impact on the size of my knob? I never got as bad as to death-grip it, but still you've got to wonder about 30-60 minutes of pressure on the organ daily having an impact.

>>29312
>massive dildo
>Something like a XL Chance
I mean it's a bit long but there's barely any girth to it.

>>29312

>I saw a thread on reddit where this guy was insecure because his girlfriend wanted a massive dildo.

I can kind of relate, I mean how would most birds feel about you wanting a fleshlight? Stuff like that is a very literal kind of objectification I think, and no matter how kinky you are in the bedroom it's hard to escape the fact that these are masturbatory aids, above all else. In an ideal world nobody would be bothered by it, but stuff like that is pretty deeply ingrained in us sometimes I think.

Then there's the fact that it's a bit different stuffing something massive in a fanny compared to using a tool to stimulate a penis. Women like to perpetuate the whole "it's naturally elastic!" thing but, let's be real, it's only elastic up to a certain point, and it requires active effort on the part of the woman to do kegels to get it truly back in shape. It takes time to recover, so if you're an average lad and your mrs is regularly stuffing a six inch wide Thor up her chuff, you're going to notice some slack developing.

>>29314

Kill two birds with one stone:

http://www.yuvutu.com/modules.php?name=YuGallery&action=view&set_id=281072

>>29313
Pictures don't do it justice. It's thicker than a can of coke, which is an important and well known benchmark for things to be bigger than anyone should be sticking up their orifices.
If that's still not thick enough there's always sleipner though.

>>29316

It's girthier than my (admittedly very skinny) arm.

Just got the old tape measure out.

16.5cm by 12cm. Wish I was girthier but by jove I'll take it.

>>29314

Sex is a headfuck man, so many people have so many different opinions, but whatever works for you and yours is what's important. Might just be because I attract degenerates of both sexes, but it's becoming about as taboo as a lass 'admitting' they've got a dildo.

The first time I met my current girlfriend, literally the first day, the managers called her into the office (bartending at a scummy nightclub) and I was standing outside. They asked her what the biggest cock she'd ever seen was, and she held her hands about 8-9 inches apart and went 'uh...maybe about this?' I had knowledge about her boyfriend at the time which indicated she wasn't lying. I'm 6.3 on a good day, but she says he was actually quite crap in bed and never bothered making her cum. Another dude she slept with had 8 or so on him but was very skinny, so again not too fussed by that.

It can be a real headfuck for some people though.

One bird I slept with asked me to fist her on the first night. That was interesting. Weird when you get the full thing in.

>>29315

Thanks for that. Will give it a shot.

>>29316 >>29317
They have an "actual size viewer" that you can calibrate with a credit card. I wouldn't pass comment without first doing my research.

I'm easily over 6 inches. Fat lot of good that's ever done me, but it's nice to know I've got something going for me.

>>29318

>Might just be because I attract degenerates of both sexes, but it's becoming about as taboo as a lass 'admitting' they've got a dildo.

It's getting there, but the double standard taboo on male sex toys has a way to go yet unless you're among like minded degenerates. Amongst the "normal vanilla folk" population I think we're firmly still in the sort of place where a lass with a dildo is normal, but a guy with a fleshlight is a loser. And, quite honestly (in my armchair sociologist opinion) it's at least partially because birds do get a bit jealous of a bloke having a rubber fanny he can fuck whenever he wants. Much more jealous than they'd admit to if you ask them.

Obviously we're all better off without jealousy of any kind. But I don't think it's difficult at all to empathise and understand why people do suffer from it.

Amongst the "normal vanilla folk" population generally they don't discuss or display their sex toys, you're not being judged for having them you're being judged for talking about them.

I should have known .gs attracted the "weird skinny blokes with massive cocks" kind of crowd, makes all the sense in the world now that I think about it.

>>29381
I don't know why, but I've heard a lot of people talking about skinny people with massive cocks recently.

>>29382

There is an obvious correlation between bodyfat percentage and that.

>>29372

I bought a rubber fanny from Japan, it broke after a few goes, was a bit small.

>>29378

>Amongst the "normal vanilla folk" population generally they don't discuss or display their sex toys, you're not being judged for having them you're being judged for talking about them.

Except that's just not true. Vanilla, normal people talk about sex as much as anyone else; their values about it are simply different.

Not being into PVC and pony play is not the same thing as being an uptight prude.

>>29387

>Vanilla, normal people talk about sex as much as anyone else; their values about it are simply different.

Normal people are just really crap at shagging. It's like someone who claims to like cooking but only knows one recipe. It's like someone who claims to like music but only owns two albums, both of which are compilations. They're not prudish, they're just boring.

>>29386

Fleshlight is the trusted brand here.

Rubber fannies are good, but perhaps require a bit too much maintenance. I have no shame, but it's still a bit offputting to know you have to go to the sink to rinse the jizz out of it when you're done.

>>29404

I use mine in the bath or shower.

>>29386
I bought a couple from "your friend in Japan" and you do get what you pay for, it seems. The tenga egg things hold up surprisingly well but they're basically just the poshest of posh wanks but I'd avoid any of the novelty ones that promise more than "it's a pleasing hole".

>>29404
It gets particularly annoying with toys that are closed on one end. You have to turn them inside out to clean properly and that just looks like a nasty prolapse.