[ Return ]
>> | No. 70505
70505
Why does every photo of Sarah Everard look like a GAN-generated image? |
>> | No. 70506
70506
FM6cAAaXsAAZ1Fr.jpg The ones they use in the media all have this uncanny valley shit about them. |
>> | No. 70507
70507
"Longstanding issues with women" |
>> | No. 70508
70508
>>70507 |
>> | No. 70509
70509
>>70508 |
>> | No. 70510
70510
wayne.jpg >>70509 |
>> | No. 70511
70511
Most of you lads do get a bit... chronic when anything about women is discussed. |
>> | No. 70512
70512
>>70511 |
>> | No. 70514
70514
|
>> | No. 70515
70515
>>70507 |
>> | No. 70516
70516
InterFaceGAN.jpg >>70515 |
>> | No. 70517
70517
She's the most generic white woman imaginable. I don't think I could describe her to a police sketch artist in any useful way, she's just got no distinguishing features. I don't even know what her hair colour is - in that photo she's strawberry blonde, in others it looks more blonde or brunette. |
>> | No. 70518
70518
avatar-24a54533b8c7f79cd0058cbd193b0498.jpg >>70517 |
>> | No. 70519
70519
Her mouth is very icky to me in the other picture of her. It's too thick and pouty. It looks like a fist. And that's the picture they almost always use of her. Madeleine McCann had the same problem, where there are two or three pictures of her and I really hated the one they used most often. |
>> | No. 70520
70520
>>70519 |
>> | No. 70521
70521
>>70520 |
[ Return ]
Delete Post [] Password |