How do I apply for jobs online? What sites should I use and which should I avoid? I don't anything about nothing, man, and I'm just looking to apply for everything and anything.
In my experience a lot of companies have their own career sites (Google [company] careers) that you have to sign up for and apply through there. Then there're job boards like Indeed, Monster, Reed etc that you can put your C into and apply through there.
I spent most of the last year applying for hundreds of jobs and that required registering with and filling out the same information dozens of times on a bunch of sites of varying degrees of ease of use.
There's also Indeed and monster. I'd stay away from recruiters because they tend to be deceitful cunts second only to estate agents. But if you're desparate you could try Reed. LinkedIN might be worth a shout if you're a professional, I've heard mixed results.
Direct employer is probably best, the NHS is the largest employer in Britain, so try them and your local council website too. And as >>12808 says.
If you're confident, you can drop into businesses and ask if there are any vacancies. Something like 40% of jobs aren't advertised. I actually got a job this way. It turned out to be shite, but that's besides the point.
Failing all that, walk around randomly saying 'gizza job' and "I can do that!".
>>12813 I think we have been infiltrated by department for work and pensions black ops. If any asks 'So fellow anonymous poster how do you commit YOUR benefit fraud?' Keep it shtum.
>>12821 So you reckon Monster donated their source code to competitor Adzuna? You think they shared data but forced everyone to reregister, reupload their CVs and repost job ads for the fun of it? They shared data and yet no user was able to see any evidence of this.
Or is it that you don't have a fucking clue but feel entitled to argue anyway using ridiculous analogies?
>>12822 >You think they shared data but forced everyone to reregister, reupload their CVs and repost job ads for the fun of it?
It involves the DWP so that is in no way an unreasonable assumption.