They drank reindeer piss and went on a vision quest to your mum's house.

Your mum's mass is so great she bends light 25,000 years into the past.

Maybe she was a novelty like a freak show.

People would come from miles around to see her and to throw mammoth (in both senses) pies at her. And they sold little Venuses in the gift shop. Maybe It was like an educational trip for the kids where they learned about nutrition, why you shouldn't eat too much and where food comes from, they had probably had one of those interactive workshops to demonstrate how to make flour from grass.

Probably women of breeding stock were well looked after, and might not have had to do much other than sit around and have kids. Food was plentiful then, just more difficult to catch.

This would explain the link with fertility.

>>4296

It's also possible they had thyroid problems. Not that they'd have known what that meant.

There's a name for the gene that's responsible for the big arses on certain races of black people but I don't know what it is.

>It seems people were pretty well-fed back then.

Well they were. Remember that we're talking about unspoiled wilderness, stories of early fishermen in the Americas having giant fish practically jumping in their boat and mammoth size lobsters are not just tall tales. Even today the few remaining hunter-gatherer societies living on pretty inhospitable land only need to work a few hours a day.

You can think of humanity in the late Paleolithic as a post-scarcity society in terms of food. Grandparents also emerge to help care for the kids beginning the time honoured tradition of fucking them off to the parents over the weekend while you go carve erotic statues with ridiculous proportions.

I saw this article recently, which suggests (with photo evidence) that such figures may be distored because they were made from the point of view of pregnant women looking at their own bodies.

https://steemit.com/science/@deeallen/self-portraits-of-fertility-symbols-venus-figurines-of-upper-paleolithic-eurasia-nudity

Another reason could be that they were idealised versions of women (i.e. this is what the people making them considered most attractive even if such people rarely existed).

>>4300
>Another reason could be that they were idealised versions of women (i.e. this is what the people making them considered most attractive even if such people rarely existed).

I feel like at this point analysis becomes invalid and is just projecting. It would be like if someone found a peanuts cartoon in a thousand years and decided Lucy's must be an idealized version of femininity the people of the 20th century held. Surely it is more logical to assume pure artistry, or incompetence of an individual then that a wobbly bobbly figurine represented a paragon of the society of the time.

>>4299

Jesus, I... Phwoar. I've never got this turned on by an inanimate object. It's perfect.

>>4301
If Lucy actually met the objective criteria of fertility you might have something but she doesn't. Yes, archeology has some guesswork and common sense involved but, frankly I don't care what time period you're from, if you're over the age of 25 and going 'ugh' to curvy women you don't have a dick.

>>4303

You missed his point by a mile there lad.

>>4303

If pic related is what you call curvy then I'm sorry lad, you're already well into fetish territory.

Yes, I know it's shopped.

>>4305

It's shopped? Oh bollocks.

>>4306
Not by a great deal

>>4307

PHWOAR!

>>4304

Of course because he has an overwhelming irrational insecurity about his attraction to fat chicks he has to mentions how it is unnatural not to like them with no prompting what so ever. Because really he is seeking validation for something he doesn't feel comfortable with.

>>4303
>objective criteria of fertility

I don't think you have any understanding of the word objective. There is nothing objectively fertile about a figurine, or an obviously edited photo, that a cartoon drawing doesn't hold, they are all barren mate. You can jizz on any of them as much as you like they won't get prego. They are all objectively infertile.

I could equally show you a really hot likable tranny and fugly disease ridden cis unlikable woman. One of them is objectively fertile the one isn’t. The fact on of them is objectively fertile and the other isn’t wouldn’t influence your ideal of beauty.

>>4307
I have no say in this discussion but I would like to request sauce on that woman please. Thank you.

>>4311

I'm sure there are many sauces but the one she probably prefers is full fat mayonnaise.

>>4311

>>4313
I bet she can't wipe her own arse.

>>4310
Right, big hips aren't an indicator of fertility.

>>4314
I'd wipe her arse, IYKWIM.

>>4316
Scat fetishists are weird.

>>4314
I reckon she does the under method. Curious to note that the last thread on /x/ concerning this highly scientific topic just became a cunt-off.

>>4315

objectively no. Hip structure sure, but that isn't what you are arguing for, you are arguing for fat chicks, You just like fat chicks, which is fine, but don't act like there is some sort of great wisdom to it.

>>4319
Let's face it, really mate, he likes fat chicks (which is almost all chicks, especially in Swindon), and you like little kids.

>>4318
I'm not going to lie, I love fat birds. Especially ethnic ones, but I always feel disgusted after the fact because I'm sure they can't wipe their own arse. It's like the recoil you feel after having a wank x10.

>>4299
Sneaky.

>>4320

Oh I understand the problem, you think only women who can't wipe their own arses can be sexy.

No that isn't a prerequite for me, so their are loads of women I like that aren't either of those.

>>4319

Liking fat girls is like a cheat code for life, because you get the pick of the litter. You're absolutely spoiled for choice.

>>4324
> you get the pick of the litter

I dunno, lad. There's a lot of chubby chasers out there. I know a few fat lasses who have quite high opinions of themselves, despite them being far from lookers, because of the number of blubber worshippers after them.

Quite a few people I went to school with have ended up with single mums, who'd usually be well out of their league if it wasn't for the whole having a child thing.

>>4324
>you get the pick of the litter
As the owner of a house cat I can say this is not much of an advantage.

>>4325

I've said this before, but it's just bravado from a vocal minority. Conventionally attractive people don't bang on about body confidence, because it goes without saying. It's a different story at chucking-out time in Spoons or the dog-end of Tinder.

25% of the British population are obese. I don't know what proportion of men are chubby chasers, but it's nowhere near one in four. Fat women are used to being approached by blokes who are obviously desperate and embarrassed. You get an enormous amount of credit for being neither of those things.

>>4319
It seems you don't understand that curvy doesn't mean obese. It's perfectly possible for God to curse a woman in such a way that she has neither arse, hips nor tits regardless of bodyweight.

What's it like falling for the propaganda?

>>4328

Curvy isn't obese but some obese women use curvy as an excuse for being a fatty. Curvy isn't unhealthy but being obese is.

>>4291

That is one chunky Cro Magnon with no arms, how did we evolve

>>4292

BISMILLAH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHH4r-j7zPw

>>4328

I understand it perfectly, but most obese people don't.

>>4331
Back a bit early from the SU aren't you m7?

>>4328

Why blame a made up sky fairy on genetic diversity

>It's perfectly possible for God to curse a woman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nIRJVmZ4K8

>>4333

Nah blud been growin a beard an listenin Stormzy

>>4291
I'm getting a little sweaty under the old helmet here lads ooohhh ddddearrrr she's larger than average in my mind.