[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
literature

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 5111)
Message
File  []
close
googlewhack.jpg
511151115111
>> No. 5111 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 5:15 am
5111 spacer
Have you ever got a googlewhack or come close?

It's that game where you have to google two obscure real words without quotes and google only comes up with one hit. I thought I got one on two occasions but both turned out to be because of dodgy spelling. The closest I've come using legitimate words is about 200 hits.
Expand all images.
>> No. 5112 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 5:25 am
5112 spacer
One was

>Plantagenet rapprochement

but I managed to spell one of those wrong. I think Plantagenet's a bit iffy anyway if it's a name.
>> No. 5113 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 5:27 am
5113 spacer
I haven't tried this for years, but when I did I found loads pretty easily. Maybe the internet's too big these days. I think 'terpsichorean petawatt' worked back in 2007 but now it gets two results.
>> No. 5114 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 5:31 am
5114 spacer
>>5113

I think the original rules stated that word lists and glossaries don't count but that's a lot closer than I've ever come to one.
>> No. 5115 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 5:33 am
5115 spacer
I see googlewhack.com have stopped accepting submissions for their "whack stack". Maybe that's because it's too difficult these days.
>> No. 5117 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 9:26 am
5117 spacer
unreflected deontologicalism
>> No. 5120 Anonymous
1st May 2013
Wednesday 4:16 pm
5120 spacer
>>5117

That only comes up as one because google hides the rest as they're all identical. Pretty sure that doesn't count.

Also you guys do realise that as soon as you post them here they'll be indexed by google and literally no longer be googlewhacks? Someone think of the children!
>> No. 5137 Anonymous
14th May 2013
Tuesday 5:32 am
5137 spacer
>>5111

Just got it on my second try. "Hanukkah deontologicalism"
Thanks, >>5117

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password