[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
mph

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 2763)
Message
File  []
close
roadway.png
276327632763
>> No. 2763 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 3:31 pm
2763 Who has right of way?

Expand all images.
>> No. 2764 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 3:41 pm
2764 spacer
Fairly sure the pedestrian has right of way if he's already started crossing (whereas the car and cycle haven't started turning). If he wasn't there I'd assume the cycle being turning left gives him right of way but I don't know this.
>> No. 2765 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 4:29 pm
2765 spacer
>>2763
The car. The other two cunts should be shot for being on the car's property.
>> No. 2767 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 5:56 pm
2767 spacer
>>2763
Pedestrian > cyclist > motorist. The motorist is turning right and gives way to oncoming traffic, which includes the cyclist. Pedestrians uniquely are unregulated and therefore have right of way everywhere that isn't obstructed (e.g. a gated path to someone's house) or where the law specifically withdraws right of way (e.g. motorways).
>> No. 2768 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 6:26 pm
2768 spacer
While I know >>2767 is the correct answer, I also know >>2765 to be the right one.
>> No. 2769 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 6:37 pm
2769 spacer
>>2768
In reality, what will happen is that the cyclist will round the corner screaming at the pedestrian to GET OUT OF MY WAY SLOWPOKE, and will get anally aggrieved when they inevitably get hit by the car following them.
>> No. 2770 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 7:48 pm
2770 spacer
>>2769
If I was the cyclist I'd just turn. Being in those positions means that unless the pedestrian is sprinting he's never going to reach me in time to hit me, and even if he did, well oh no a grazed knee!
>> No. 2771 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 8:01 pm
2771 spacer
>>2770
What if I run you down like the dog you are, with my car? "Oh no, a bruised brain."
>> No. 2772 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 8:09 pm
2772 spacer
>>2771

Then you'll be financially indebted to supporting me and my family the rest of your life, some of which will be spent in gaol. Do you stab people who're queuing in front of you at the shops, too?
>> No. 2774 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 9:01 pm
2774 spacer
>>2772
No, just people who walk slowly in front of me. If ever law and order breaks done in this country, I am going to go on a bikecunt-hunt.
>> No. 2775 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 9:09 pm
2775 spacer
>>2774
Some people can have such irrational hatred for cyclists.
>> No. 2776 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 9:41 pm
2776 spacer
>>2775
It is not irrational. Cunts who pay no taxes are allowed to dictate how drivers drive. They should all face a firing squad.
>> No. 2777 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 9:47 pm
2777 spacer
>>2776

That tax is for emissions you fucking moron.
>> No. 2778 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 9:52 pm
2778 spacer
>>2776
You poor boy. Do you need a hug, or something.
>> No. 2779 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 10:08 pm
2779 spacer
>>2776

http://ipayroadtax.com/
>> No. 2780 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 10:19 pm
2780 spacer
Is this just going to turn into another cyclist vs drivers thread? If so I'll just hide now.
>> No. 2781 Anonymous
11th October 2013
Friday 11:21 pm
2781 spacer
>>2777
That's like saying VAT is a tax on money.
>> No. 2782 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 1:54 am
2782 spacer
>>2781

Except for the fact that it really isn't.
>> No. 2783 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 2:29 am
2783 spacer
So many bikecunts on here. What's the matter? Too poor to buy a car? You are cancerous twats and everything wrong with the world. I won't be the only one to hunt you down when ITZ happens. I won't listen to your bollocks about tax on emission or whatever other bullshit. You can fuck right off.

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 2784 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 2:49 am
2784 spacer
>>2767

This post is where this thread should have ended.

I tend to avoid the cyclist debate, it's just not worth it. I do pride myself as a cyclist on knowing the laws of the road inside and out, because plenty of coppers can be just as clueless as angry drivers. I have been stopped for not wearing a helmet before.

All I know is that I follow the rules of the road, I cycle mostly in the city so I'm often faster than cars, so I'm not in anyones way, and I hate cunt cyclists who see red lights as mere suggestions for them. I hope those lot all die. I really do feel the frustrations most car drivers express with these wankers, so when someone shouts at me to use the pavement, it's very hard not to just dive head first through their passenger window and throttle them.

A week or so ago I was at some lights, and I was in the middle lane as the left lane was for turning left only. Since I wasn't turning left, I was pretty surprised when a woman in her car shouted at me to get out of the middle of the road.
>> No. 2785 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 8:38 am
2785 spacer
>>2783

This isn't funchan lad - no-one gives a fuck about you or your 'edgy' opinions.

"I was just takin' the piss m8!" Fuck off.
>> No. 2786 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 8:49 am
2786 spacer
>>2782
Which is precisely my point. The vehicle licence really isn't a tax on emissions, just like NI isn't a tax on jobs and the passport fee isn't a tax on travel.
>> No. 2787 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 9:58 am
2787 spacer
>>2784
>the cyclist debate
Debate? There's no debate. Motorists, cyclists, Sinclair C5s - all are legitimate road users and shouldn't be having a go at each other for no reason.
>> No. 2788 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 10:27 am
2788 spacer
>>2786

The rate of Vehicle Excise Duty is directly proportional to CO2 emissions, in the same way that the alcohol duty paid on a bottle of spirits is directly proportional to the alcohol content. It is perfectly reasonable to call it a tax on emissions, for the obvious reason that cars with no emissions don't have to pay it.
>> No. 2789 Anonymous
12th October 2013
Saturday 11:32 am
2789 spacer

article-0-01E7C47F000004B0-255_468x286.jpg
278927892789
>>2788
>The rate of Vehicle Excise Duty is directly proportional to CO2 emissions
A valiant attempt, but ultimately I'm with Craig on this one.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password