[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
news

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 16120)
Message
File  []
close
image.jpg
161201612016120
>> No. 16120 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 5:55 pm
16120 spacer
Huddersfield grooming gang jailed for abusing vulnerable girls

Twenty members of a “vile and wicked” grooming gang have been convicted of trafficking, drugging and raping vulnerable girls in a harrowing campaign of abuse across West Yorkshire. It can now be reported that the ringleader of the group, 35-year-old Amere Singh Dhaliwal, was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 18 years after being found guilty of 54 offences, including countless rapes of children.

Judge Geoffrey Marson QC said the crimes against 15 girls far exceeded anything he had previously seen. The gang’s “persistent and prolonged” offending, he said, was “at the top of the scale” of severity.

Details of the case, believed to be Britain’s single biggest grooming prosecution, can be disclosed after a judge agreed to lift reporting restrictions on Friday, following a legal challenge by media groups including the Guardian. One of the trials had previously almost collapsed when the anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson filmed defendants in a live Facebook video outside Leeds crown court.

Jurors in the three trials heard how the men, mostly from Huddersfield, plied girls as young as 11 with alcohol and drugs before sexually abusing them in car parks, hotels, takeaways, snooker halls, on moors and by reservoirs across the region.

Fifteen severely vulnerable girls fell victim to the gang between 2004 and 2011. One girl, aged 11 or 12 at the time, was abducted from a care home and supplied ecstasy before being made to perform sex acts, Leeds crown court heard. Many of the victims described how they were plied with drink and drugs at house parties then raped “one by one” by the men, who used plastic bags as condoms.

Dhaliwal was at the heart of the group, who referred to each other using nicknames including “Dracula,” “Beastie” and “Chiller” in monikers that were used in the three trials.

The girls were deliberately targeted for their vulnerabilities. All had troubled home lives, including one whose mother was unable to care for her due to drink and drug addictions.

Two of the girls had mild learning disabilities. At least one girl attempted suicide and another had an abortion, jurors heard. One of the girls was thrown out of a moving car outside her home. She had bruises all over her face and was under the influence of alcohol and drugs. They were made to feel special by flattery, going to parties, having rides in cars and given presents, the judge said. Many thought the men were showing them genuine affection.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/19/yorkshire-grooming-gang-jailed-rape-abuse
Expand all images.
>> No. 16121 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 6:03 pm
16121 spacer
>>16120
Yeah I read it on BBC News mate, no need to post it here.
>> No. 16122 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 6:27 pm
16122 spacer
>>16121
We shouldn't post the news in /news/ because we can read about it in the news?
>> No. 16125 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 6:48 pm
16125 spacer
>>16122
No, not if there is nothing to say about it. Or are you suggesting this thread breaks new ground for .gs?
>> No. 16128 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:09 pm
16128 spacer
>>16125
They gave themselves nicknames like Dracula and used carrier bags as condoms. Why would you not want to take the piss out of this?
>> No. 16129 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:20 pm
16129 spacer
>>16128
Is this really a laughing matter?
>> No. 16130 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:22 pm
16130 spacer
>>16129
We could have a cunt-off over Islam or justice for Are Tommeh if you'd prefer?
>> No. 16131 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:38 pm
16131 spacer
>>16128 >>16129
Since when has casual mockery of child abusers been acceptable around here?
>> No. 16132 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:47 pm
16132 spacer
>>16131
Should we say nice things about them instead?
>> No. 16134 Anonymous
19th October 2018
Friday 7:48 pm
16134 spacer
Yeah but some woman in a hijab baked a cake on the BBC so it's ok.
>> No. 16143 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 12:32 am
16143 spacer
>>16130
I think I'd made it abundantly clear I'd prefer not to have this thread at all.
>> No. 16144 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 1:39 am
16144 spacer
>>16125
You make me laugh.
There's plenty to say, you just won't like any of it.
>> No. 16145 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 5:15 am
16145 spacer
>>16131

If I recall right since around 2009 carpet-baggerlad
>> No. 16146 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 7:49 am
16146 spacer
>>16145
It's always been acceptable. I remember joking about kiddie fiddlers in primary school.
>> No. 16147 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 8:06 am
16147 spacer
>>16143
It's a sad indictment you feel child sex grooming gangs are so commonplace that you have been thoroughly desensitised to them and feel that the single largest prosecution for it isn't noteworthy.
>> No. 16148 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 8:27 am
16148 spacer
>>16147

The problem is that threads about grooming and sexual abuse of children always attract paedolads who will then tell you all sorts of things about how it's not that bad, and that childfuckery should even be legal and can be consensual and all that sort of thing. And before you know it, that's the kind of debate you will have on here.

If you must debate this kind of news story, then everybody is probably better off if you just go to the Daily Mail's web site. Paedo or not.
>> No. 16149 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 8:51 am
16149 spacer
>>16148
We shouldn't discuss something because of something that clearly hasn't happened in this thread. Are you sure you don't have an ulterior motive here, lad?
>> No. 16150 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 9:00 am
16150 spacer
Why did my post from the other day get deleted, modlad? Touch a nerve?
>> No. 16151 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 9:03 am
16151 spacer
>>16125
Reposting this.

There's plenty to say on it, you just won't like any of it.

Ps, mods are FULL GAY.
>> No. 16152 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 9:55 am
16152 spacer

Screenshot_20181020-095430.png
161521615216152
>>16150>>16151
It's still there, you bloody arseclown.
>> No. 16153 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:28 am
16153 spacer
The insta-cunt off in this thread about fuck all is quite amusing.

The story is just fucking grim.
>> No. 16154 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:37 am
16154 spacer
>>16153
This topic is always a guaranteed cunt-off.
>> No. 16155 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:45 am
16155 spacer
>>16153
On the one hand, we've got a few sensitive souls who believe that brown people are beyond reproach and any criticism of the abusers can only be because of racism, so they're trying to pre-empt this by saying we shouldn't even be having the thread because the potential for racism is making them uncomfortable; you will note that their discomfort is brought about by their concerns of possible racism rather than the treatment of the victims themselves, which is similar to how Rotherham was enabled.

On the other hand, we have a massive edgelord who is so convinced that the mods are stopping him from saying what he wants to say, despite the fact he hasn't actually said anything yet, that he's imagining his posts are being deleted. Our self-appointed straight talking champion of free speech boldly soldiering on against the PC crowd trying to silence him from saying exactly how things are.
>> No. 16156 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:58 am
16156 spacer
>>16155
>their discomfort is brought about by their concerns of possible racism rather than the treatment of the victims themselves, which is similar to how Rotherham was enabled.
The victims probably wouldn't want to talk about it much either I'm guessing.
>> No. 16157 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 12:02 pm
16157 spacer
>>16156
They're council estate slags, it's not like they really matter.
>> No. 16158 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 12:48 pm
16158 spacer
>>16155
>On the one hand, we've got a few sensitive souls who believe that brown people are beyond reproach and any criticism of the abusers can only be because of racism

Said literally fucking no one.
>> No. 16159 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 12:58 pm
16159 spacer
>>16158
You've got to read between the lines.
>> No. 16160 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 1:02 pm
16160 spacer
>>16154
Yeah. That's why I've been saying since the start this thread is a blight.
>> No. 16161 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 1:55 pm
16161 spacer
>>16160
I've noticed for a while now that cunt offs are most frequently initiated by the narky cunt who thinks he's able to get ahead of them and fend them off by announcing their imminent arrival. It's usually an invitation worse and ultimately more tedious than what would have happened otherwise.
>> No. 16162 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 1:59 pm
16162 spacer
>>16161
It's all one lad from Alfreton who's having a teary in case he has to read something he doesn't like rather than just hiding the thread.
>> No. 16166 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 6:15 pm
16166 spacer
>>16159
>You have to preten people said the thing you want them to say so you can be smarter than them.

This SoB has one rhetorical trick to win every debate, Socrates hates him!
>> No. 16167 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 7:10 pm
16167 spacer

tescobag.png
161671616716167

>> No. 16168 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:24 pm
16168 spacer
It's all in Al-Mu'minoon, particularly verses 5 and 6 . As an exmuzlad who escaped the bullshit I can confirm within the 'community' a girl is seen as a woman from puberty based on I s lam. These beliefs run in masjids and the 'community'. There is a code of silence where gangsters are allowed to do what they do because they are 'from a certain religion' they are untouchable.

Many people despise this but at the same time are less reactive as it is a core tenet of belief that sex is ok at puberty as you are a woman. You need to be married to a girl who's hit puberty to have sex with her and you can beat her if your wife doesn't obey. Slave girls you can do what you want with them.

17 times the 'recital' refers to boiling water as torture but not once mentions sterilisation through boiling.
>> No. 16170 Anonymous
20th October 2018
Saturday 11:28 pm
16170 spacer
>>16166

There is this thing called subtext. Threads about this sort of thing have happened a lot here over the years, with ARE SI declaring it a eskimo problem. so if the topic of rape pedophile gangs come up and it is all eskimos as it usually seems to be people will double down and pre-emtively treat the thread like it is BNP propaganda.
>> No. 16171 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 12:03 am
16171 spacer
>>16170

It has the added effect of demonstrating to any BNPist that even reporting the bare facts about a crime commited by a non-white person is enough to brand you a racist, further cementing their view of the world.
>> No. 16172 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 12:15 am
16172 spacer
>>16170

BNP died when Nick Griffin was allowed on Question Time. The reason why people voted BNP wasn't because they were neo nazis, it's because the BNP were against mslim rape gangs. Tommy Robinson joined the BNP because of the BNP approach to rape gangs , he fucked them off when he turned up with his black mates at the BNP meeting when they weren't allowed in.
>> No. 16173 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 1:12 am
16173 spacer

army.jpg
161731617316173

>> No. 16174 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 3:24 am
16174 spacer
Personally I think most of these lads are heading to hell anyway for letting a filthy kafir lead them.
>> No. 16175 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 8:26 am
16175 spacer
>>16170
The problem with this sort of approach is that it allows the likes of the BNP to gain mileage.

Channel 4 made the documentary Edge of the City in 2004 about social services in Yorkshire, which featured two mothers claiming Asian men were grooming their daughters. The broadcast was initially withdrawn after pressure from the likes of UAF that it would drive up racial tensions and would lead to people voting BNP at the local and European elections that year. Unsurprisingly the BNP went full on with their propaganda.

In the end the BNP were proven right. Children were being groomed en masse. There was a cover-up in places like Rotherham. People didn't speak out because they were more concerned with being politically correct than the welfare of these girls. It means that the BNP gain credibility despite the fact they'll have really made matters worse.

Now Tommy Robinson is doing exactly the same about Huddersfield. He's been found in contempt of court but he's been able to portray himself as the only person to speak out and act as if the establishment wanted to hush up who the perpetrators are; for all we know the only reason the likes of the Guardian made the legal challenge to lift the reporting restrictions is because they knew exactly what Robinson's game was. The real reason for the media blackout was because there were so many defendants that there were several trials and they didn't want the outcome of the first ones to influence the later ones, but that doesn't matter to Robinson as he was allowed to shape the narrative with his video outside of court watched by hundreds of thousands.

Griffin. Farage. Robinson. They are all different cheeks of the same arse. They love to paint themselves as victims. The voice for the voiceless. Standing up against the system that wants to silence them. Pointing out things others are afraid to say. Getting their followers to eat out the palm of their hands, to the point that they're blindly followed when they start adding their bullshit to the mix. What happens when you ignore these people? Brexit.
>> No. 16176 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 8:28 am
16176 spacer

Screenshot_20181020-084326.png.gallery.jpg
161761617616176

>> No. 16177 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 9:55 am
16177 spacer
>>16175
It's funny how, reading about Edge of the City, the UAF only got involved after the BNP started promoting the documentary in advance of its broadcast and calling it a "party political broadcast". The way you've written it is to suggest well-meaning people were allowing the BNP to exploit it by pre-emptively campaigning against it, when the BNP were exploiting it anyway.
>> No. 16178 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 10:06 am
16178 spacer
>>16177
Oh, we're on to semantics. Fantastic.
>> No. 16179 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 11:55 am
16179 spacer
>>16178
No, as I said, >>16175 is arguing that 'banning discussion of controversial topics allows the far-right to gain ground', and I'm undermining that facile premise by pointing out they have their facts wrong.
>> No. 16180 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 12:19 pm
16180 spacer
>>16179
Channel 4 made clear that they did not delay broadcast because of the BNP bandwagoning. It was due to lobbying from the likes of UAF and eventually the police. It's semantics due to your interpretation twisting what was said solely to suit the point being made.

You're being incredibly myopic by only focussing on the documentary. The BNP were making a lot of noise about child grooming for the better part of a decade before the Rotherham scandal was unveiled. It was barely discussed in the meantime and it's exactly this what the far-right look to exploit; it gives them unwarranted credibility. It is exactly the same tactics Tommy Robinson is disingenuously using over Huddersfield. You do not give these people the opportunity to paint themselves as victims.
>> No. 16181 Anonymous
21st October 2018
Sunday 3:51 pm
16181 spacer
>>16179

>is arguing that 'banning discussion of controversial topics allows the far-right to gain ground', and I'm undermining that facile premise

Details of this particular example aside, this is EXACTLY how grassroots movements build. People become far more interested in politics, and entrenched in their views, when they feel they're being suppressed. It adds a lot of momentum.

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password