>How come it seems like almost every high street shop is either in administration or on the brink of it?
How much did you spend on Amazon and Ebay last month?

>>18915
The square root of fuck all. I did order a pair of trainers from ASOS, but that's only because my local Sports Direct don't stock K Swiss and when I went in JD Sports the lights were too bright, the music was too loud and the staff only seemed interested in talking to one another so I promptly left.

Department stores are just a completely dead model and a lot of the high street simply isn't responding to the rise of commerce effectively.

I recently went in the local Debenhams (as the local Sports Direct was hiding inside it) - I mean that classic thing of the ground floor being full of beauty products and suchlike - it was completely empty (on a Saturday). People don't want to shop like this anymore.

>>18917
>I mean that classic thing of the ground floor being full of beauty products and suchlike

Where else will people go to get make-up tips from women caked in orange?

>>18918
Have you heard of this wee website called YouTube?

>>18919
I have. Is it popular with bright orange department store beauty assistants?

>How come it seems like almost every high street shop is either in administration or on the brink of it?

Why would anyone go to a physical shop for the goods they sell when things arrive at their door for cheeper?

How could anyone afford the rent and staff on a space that big without charging more then online shops?

The answer to the question is very simple really. The high street market for their products is dead.

(A good day to you Sir!)

Is there such a thing as social internet shopping?
A veneer website that lets a group of friends (and possibly a bot / fleshbag assistant) roam websites, with voice chat, interaction, pushing coupons / bargains / influencer bollocks? Skim a few percent off purchases through affiliate links, sell it as the online high street.
Seems like the sort of shite that ought to exist, but I've not heard of such a thing.

All high street shops will sell exclusively fast food, key cutting, haircuts and spray tans within the next 3 years.
Also probably shoes because it does help a lot to be able to try those on. And alcohol.
Nothing else.

>>18921
When the cost difference isn't massive I sometimes go to a physical shop because I'm too impatient for online shopping. They're probably not going to make a profit on that alone, but you'd think with some argos-y integration (but with more allowance for showrooming) that would be a possible moneymaker.

There's got to be some irony to the fact that while the internet has rapidly reduced our tolerance for delays in communication, obtaining media, etc, we've somehow become much more tolerant of waiting for products to be delivered versus just going to the store and buying them.

>>18924

I think it's more about time expended than waiting times. If you go into town to buy a shirt from Debenhams, it takes a big chunk out of your day. You need to get there, find somewhere to park, find the right bit of the shop, wait in a queue to get served and drive home.

You can order something off ASOS whenever and wherever you like - while you're watching telly, while you're sat on the bus, while you're having a big shit. It'll be at your door or waiting for collection at your local corner shop the next day.

It's a difference of perhaps two hours versus a few minutes. There aren't many circumstances where I absolutely need something from the high street today rather than tomorrow, but there are a lot of circumstances where I just don't have the time or the energy for a shopping trip.

There's also the issue of choice. Online, it's easy to find a button-down shirt in XXS or a bra in 48J. It's easy to find a classic pair of Sta-Prest or a rare pair of Yeezys. The kind of stuff you used to have to hunt down is now just a couple of clicks away.

>>18923

Don't forget frothy coffee. Gallons and gallons of frothy coffee.

>>18922

Watch your missus use Facebook/Whatsapp/Whatever. I'll bet that she's constantly sharing links to stuff.

>we've somehow become much more tolerant of waiting for products to be delivered versus just going to the store and buying them.

There is a cost difference vs effort required vs speed of gratification ratio turns out we care more about how little something costs and not getting off our arses then waiting half a week for delivery.

>>18923
A fund manager explained to me a year or two ago that town centres are increasingly becoming places you go out for a social experience; to go to the cinema, bowling, for a meal, an escape room, etc.

Many large retailers are keeping a high street presence as effectively a marketing exercise; they're hoping that when people go into town they'll see their branding and that'll stick in their heads for when they go home and do their online shopping. It's why the likes of Argos are massively reducing the size of their physical stores.

>>18923

Greater Manchester towns which turned into suburbs of Manchester have high streets which consist mainly of pound shops, charity shops and phone shops. Pound shops are still a decent model because they can undercut Amazon, considering the postage cost.

>>18925

You don't have to contend with crowds, homeless people and charity muggers in the run up to using ASOS.

The problem with places like Debenhams is that they're selling products that no one wants at prices no one wants to pay and in places no one wants to go.
I used to pop into one where I use to live because I could cut through it on the way to the main high-street. But the selection was complete bollocks. They had decent enough shirts and jeans, but nothing ever particularly stylish or eye catching. Nothing wrong with it but the type of people who would go for those styles are far more likely to get something from Sainsburys or Asda for a third of the price.

>>18931
I get work shirts from there when they're in the post-Christmas sales. Everything else seems aimed at middle aged people.

>>18928
That's every highstreet in the country

I remember my mum used to take me there when I needed new clothes in those big sale nights they had. I once bought a pair of sunglasses there when I was about 21 that I was proper chuffed with as well, but they broke within a few weeks and it taught me the harsh life lesson that you're never allowed nice things.

It's not entirely surprising that places like Debenhams and BHS have gone bust. They've been increasingly irrelevant since at least the late 90s. The higher end ones like Harvey Nicks or John Lewis etc will keep chugging along on the vague sort of prestige they have- Their clientele doesn't mind paying over the odds because that's practically the entire point of shopping there. But the ones aimed at ordinary folk are going to struggle.

Next up is probably Marks and Sparks. It pretends to be a posh department store but everyone knows it isn't, it's the sort of place tossers go to try and make themselves feel a bit more upper class.

I wonder what's going to become of shopping centres and retail parks in twenty-third years time. Will those once great cathedrals of consumerism fall into ruin or is there always going to be a place for retail? Is it specifically "high street" retail that's suffering?

>>18935

A giant Cancer Research charity shop "superstore" has opened in my nearest retail park. The size of it really diffuses that charity shop smell.

>>18936

Their books are all 50p. It's nearly like a library, if all books accrued a 50p fine but you can keep them for as long as you want, including forever. It's less faffing about than the real library and worrying about getting things back for a certain time.

>>18935

The blue cross sale. I remember it well.

>>18935

>It's not entirely surprising that places like Debenhams and BHS have gone bust. They've been increasingly irrelevant since at least the late 90s.

BHS hasn't been pushed out by changing market forces, Primark is just better at being them.

>Next up is probably Marks and Sparks. It pretends to be a posh department store but everyone knows it isn't, it's the sort of place tossers go to try and make themselves feel a bit more upper class.


If you've identified a sterotypical audiance, then they obviously have an audiance, and one I don't see going away any time soon.

M&S I think is considerably less likely to disappear, they have diversified their portfolio as an upper end supermarket,specifically the place white collar workers go to buy their lunch and again they aren't going away anytime soon.

Maplin took the piss with prices but they sold things you'd be struggling to get anywhere else on the same day.

That should have been their motto.

>We take the piss with prices but sometimes you need something on the same day.

>>18947
I believe that's the motto of WHSmith.

>>18948
No, that would be:
>We take the piss with prices but sometimes you need something but can't leave the premises.
Cunts wanted £2 for a bottle of water at the airport and they were the only place you could buy one after the gates you aren't allowed to bring fluid through.

>>18949
Jokes on you. That's why I fill up on water beforehand and piss it out into bottles once I'm through the gates; if you drink enough then it comes out as water at the other end. You won't see me getting my pants pulled down.

>>18949

I remember having a simular experience buying lighters from them at airports on my way out.

>>18950
What if they use one of their imaging machines to determine there's water inside your body?

>>18952
Blast it with piss.

>>18949
I know it's not true of every airport but at Heathrow and Gatwick they have drinking fountains in the waiting area on the other side of the gates. The rules say you're not allowed to take X amount of liquid through, they don't say anything about empty bottles.

>>18954
This was a smaller airport. It was that or take your chances with the taps in the bogs with NOT DRINKING WATER signs next to them.

>>18947
I know someone who worked for Maplin as an installer. They were encouraged to take stock home with them so they could test it out and be familiar with it for their day jobs, but the company didn't keep tabs on it. When it went tits up the administrators wrote out to them all saying that they understood they had stock but didn't know what, so could they either return it or confirm what they have, keep it and pay for it. Most people played dumb. He had thousands of pounds worth of stock; laptops, tablets, CCTV systems, camera doorbells, etc.

>>18956

Same here. The difference is I wasn't encouraged to take it home and test it, I just hid it in the cardboard bin and put it in my car at the end of a shift, then wrote it off about a week later as shoplifting shrinkage. Internal theft was endemic in that place, but they really were asking for it. That company is a prime example of incompetent management tanking an otherwise very robust business- Investors taking over and trying to force it into a different market. If they had left it alone the place would still be ticking along selling resistors and aerial connectors to this day.

The same is happening with one of my favourite pubs at the moment. The "brewery", who are really just a property management company, are forcing a refurbishment and a commitment to a food menu, on a dingy back alley pub that's been a cornerstone of the city's alternative scene for decades. Never-mind that there's a massive Wetherspoons next door to compete with, nevermind the fact it'll kill years of carefully cultivated regular trade and word of mouth reputation overnight, they must have another cosy family gastropub and their spreadsheet says that should be the one. Anyone with common sense would be able to tell them it's a barmy decision that's only going to hurt business, but these cunts can only see in projections and market trends.

It's this short sighted kind of business mindset that's killing high street chain after high street chain.

>>18956
>>18957
I'm told that in some places they installed search buttons that you were supposed to press on your way out, and if you got a red light you were supposed to be checked to make sure you weren't nicking anything. Understandably this was difficult to enforce against the staff when the managers themselves were pulling the same scam.

>>18957

>The same is happening with one of my favourite pubs at the moment. The "brewery", who are really just a property management company, are forcing a refurbishment and a commitment to a food menu

This is incredibly familiar. Anyone who works there under the new company we be constantly berated for not hitting targets until the place closes, and a director can blame it on the employees.

Is it Greene King?

Is it surprising though?

I can sit in my underpants looking for what I need and instantly read reviews of usually hundreds of people, or if not tens of people, easily compare prices, products and options. It will arrive at my house usually on a day I want or at a pick up point if I'm not in. Done deal.

If you go to the high street you have to sit in traffic to get there, find a parking space, pay ludicrous amounts for parking, have some overzealous parking attendant give you a ticket anyway, have some inconsiderate fellow shopper bash your doors in getting their kids in the car, fight through hordes of people who have no other plans for the day other than to wade through the shops as slowly as possible to pass the time, have polarised attendants who either are really psuhy or completely disinterested, then fight to get through the queues.

I find it an utterly depressing experience, I really do. I feel terrible for the people losing their jobs though.

>>18958
>I'm told that in some places they installed search buttons that you were supposed to press on your way out, and if you got a red light you were supposed to be checked to make sure you weren't nicking anything

They had these when I worked at Tesco. I don't know if they were planning on getting them anyway, it was a brand new store, but they were installed not long after someone was caught trying to take several bottles of whisky home with them before it was even open to the public.

I had to be searched a few times. The only occasional I had a serious grilling was when I had my university bag with me because it was full of textbooks and notepads. They weren't even taking the piss; the security guards were genuinely suspicious of having pads full of handwritten notes.

>>18958

It would also be literally pointless because nobody's thick enough to try stealing things by just sticking it under their coat on the way out at 5 o'clock.

One lass got caught at a nearby shop, but she was being thick enough to stockpile the things she was going to steal within the building, where they were inevitably found, prompting a review of the CCTV. She must have been slack because that particular branch was huge and had dozens of camera blind spots, because they only ever equipped shops with the naff £299 16 channel DVRs and £39 cameras they sold.

>>18963

One place I worked we found a stockpile, clearly the same thing, someone planning to sneak out with them later, of stuff like the cheapo staff room biscuits, fairy liquid, loo roll and tea bags. It was so crushingly depressing that I just put the money on the books myself and left the stuff there.

>>18987
No deal is better than a bad deal, everyone knows this.

>>18988

Just ask brexiteers

>>18993

>>18994
YOU SUCK MCBAIN

>>18996

>>18937

Interesting.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/salford-overdue-library-fines-scrapped-16371398