[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ]

Posting mode: Reply
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 84456)
Message
File  []
close
35001.jpg
844568445684456
>> No. 84456 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 8:38 pm
84456 Ban anonymous accounts, Angela Rayner tells social media firms
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/23/ban-anonymous-accounts-angela-rayner-tells-social-media-firms

>The shadow education secretary, speaking at a Labour party conference event, said social media firms should take greater responsibility for their users and noted in particular that Facebook seemed to have indicated that politicians should accept a higher level of abuse.

>Rayner, at a fringe event organised by the Guardian, conceded that insisting on real names wouldn’t stop abuse, but “it would certainly help a little bit. I think they should do more – they do have a responsibility for online.”

I... kind of like Angela Rayner, but this is a truly awful idea that seems to have had absolutely no thought put into its implementation or wider affects on freedom of expression. Technically almost every single account commenting on The Guardian is an "anonymous" social media account because why would you use a real name for such a thing.

I really hope this doesn't gain any kind of traction.
Expand all images.
>> No. 84457 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 9:04 pm
84457 spacer
At least when Rayner abuses people she does it under her own name.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/mps-star-wars-r2-d2-10409810

She's always struck me as a bit thick. I know it's her schtick of "I was a teenage mum and I didn't have a proper education so I'm not right good with words" but she often seems to struggle when she's questioned on details.
>> No. 84458 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 9:48 pm
84458 spacer
>>84456

My mate has his name on FB set the same as his PSN name and has done since before they forced you to choose a real name, so when they did ask he just made it two words and now it wont let him change it to his real name as they have an ad portfolio for him now that will be invalidated if he did.

Should he banned from FB? Probably, but not for that.
>> No. 84459 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 10:01 pm
84459 spacer
>>84458

I'm in the very same boat, but I'm more than happy with it. My real name is boring. I wish we could all be known by our daft online handles instead of "Peter" or "Norman" or "Tracy".
>> No. 84460 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 10:18 pm
84460 spacer
>>84459

Someone's bound to ask what teacock means eventually, though.
>> No. 84461 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 10:27 pm
84461 spacer
>>84460
Long after they've queried crabkiller and auntifucker, though.

I've been curating spare online aliases for a couple of decades now. I know that, in theory, FB can ask for real ID, but they seem perfectly happy with a plausible and mildly humorous, but entirely false, name. Why wouldn't they be? How much would it cost them to vet everyone? I guess I might bother to forge a scan of a passport - they don't ask for the real thing, do they? Is it even a crime?
>> No. 84462 Anonymous
23rd September 2018
Sunday 11:27 pm
84462 spacer
>>84461
>Long after they've queried crabkiller and auntifucker, though.

Those seem fairly self-explanatory.

Semi-related, there's someone who writes for Vice under the name "Hydall Codeen", which can't be a real name. Assuming it's not, where would that kind of thing lie under these proposals?
>> No. 84463 Anonymous
24th September 2018
Monday 1:58 am
84463 spacer
>>84462
Anyone who wishes to write under a pseudonym may submit their proposal to do so to Westminster along with photographic ID of their real identity and await a response before proceeding. Anyone who can't/won't do this is obviously hiding something to begin with, innit?
>> No. 84464 Anonymous
24th September 2018
Monday 2:40 am
84464 spacer
>>84463
Exactly. NUFFINTUWIDE NUFFINTUFFIR innit.
>> No. 84465 Anonymous
24th September 2018
Monday 2:50 am
84465 spacer
I honestly think people like this just don't understand the internet enough to know the implications of what they're suggesting or supporting.

If you started calling it a ban on pen names, that might get through their skulls.
>> No. 84466 Anonymous
24th September 2018
Monday 3:18 am
84466 spacer
>>420602
Shut the fuck up about dogs. It's literally boring at this point.>>84456
>> No. 84467 Anonymous
24th September 2018
Monday 7:04 am
84467 spacer

maxresdefault.jpg
844678446784467
>>84466
Nice one, ladmate.

Angela Rayner's puppies won't no wots hit 'em. I bet you'd love to smack them around a bit.
>> No. 84471 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 3:41 pm
84471 spacer
>>84467
Now I wish I didn't look up her full height photo.
Bugger.
>> No. 84472 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 4:40 pm
84472 spacer
>>84471

Were you expecting her to have massive jugs and a 22" waist? She's nicely proportioned and carries her weight well.
>> No. 84473 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 5:59 pm
84473 spacer
>>84471
Since when has casual objectification of women been acceptable around here?
>> No. 84474 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 6:07 pm
84474 spacer
>>84473
Since at least 2010.
>> No. 84475 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 6:38 pm
84475 spacer
>>84473

I'd casually objectify her IYKWIM.
>> No. 84476 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 6:44 pm
84476 spacer

angele-rayner-with-corbyn-jug.png
844768447684476
>>84472
>She's nicely proportioned and carries her weight well.

She's a bit council. Also her level of attractiveness varies considerably depending on the angle of the picture.
>> No. 84478 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 7:07 pm
84478 spacer
>>84476

She's more than a bit council - she left school at 16 with no GCSEs and an unplanned pregnancy.
>> No. 84481 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 7:24 pm
84481 spacer
>>84478
Doesn't the Labour Party have unspoken selection criteria that ought to prevent this kind of thing?
>> No. 84482 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 7:31 pm
84482 spacer
>>84481
Momentum probably target people like that. Only uneducated dolescum support Comrade Corbyn.
>> No. 84483 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 7:32 pm
84483 spacer
>>84481
What, select against dim birds with massive tits? They're their greatest hope. Until, of course, it all gets out of hand, as with Diane Abbott, and even thick voters start worrying.
>> No. 84484 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 8:01 pm
84484 spacer
>>84476

GILF.
>> No. 84485 Anonymous
25th September 2018
Tuesday 8:04 pm
84485 spacer

serveimage.jpg
844858448584485
>>84483

Corbyn has traded her in for a newer model.
>> No. 84489 Anonymous
27th September 2018
Thursday 3:22 pm
84489 spacer
>>84476
>>84478

>a bit council

Snide anti-working class prejudice in action.
>> No. 84490 Anonymous
27th September 2018
Thursday 4:37 pm
84490 spacer
>>84489
>council
>working

Good one, ladmate.
>> No. 84846 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 4:48 am
84846 spacer
Oi you got a license for that shipost?

(A good day to you Sir!)
>> No. 84864 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 6:51 pm
84864 spacer
Wouldn't it be easier to just ban politicians from Facebook?

>>84476
In a way I think every man dreams of being that mug. Filled to the brim with Irish and spilling all over the knockers of a gigantic woman.

>>84485
I miss the old Corbyn like in >>84467 where he's dressed like a substitute Maths teacher. Did they kill that one off?
>> No. 84865 Anonymous
23rd January 2019
Wednesday 7:07 pm
84865 spacer
>>84864
He's now dressed as a regular private school Maths teacher. Psychological warfare against the Tories. Get their Pavlovian reflexes going.
>> No. 84880 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 8:41 am
84880 spacer
>>84472
> Were you expecting her to have massive jugs and a 22" waist?
I've met a few ladies like that or almost like that.
Captivating sight.
>> No. 84881 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 10:43 am
84881 spacer
>>84473
I'm sorry but how on Earth have you missed the ascot ladies day threads every year? It's one of our grandest traditions.
>> No. 84882 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 11:19 am
84882 spacer
>>84881
Honestly it's starting to feel played out.
>> No. 84883 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 4:07 pm
84883 spacer
>>84882

Agreed. I'm not even sure why they bother bringing the horses anymore.
>> No. 84884 Anonymous
31st January 2019
Thursday 6:25 pm
84884 spacer
>>84881
That months old post wont know wot hit it.
>> No. 85068 Anonymous
1st March 2019
Friday 9:00 am
85068 spacer
>>84467

I'd love to slap my man meat in between them, that's for sure.

and then piss all over them after I'm done

Return ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password