|>>|| No. 92245
Since this is a shite low-effort thread, I'm going to unleash my brainfarts for you all to smell.
Capacity for violence is still very much concentrated in the U.S., which has more bases around the world than any other country and unmatched military technologies to pursue its interests.
China and India will absolutely continue to grow and change, but unfortunately we might see more conflict as a result of that unless both submit to the current U.S. hegemony. India is already heading down that path, China not so much.
The tech 'entrepreneur' crowd are eccentrics from elite schools with a disproportionate cultural influence because their job (especially Musk) is to play a media role. Musk sells the idea of his companies over specific products or research. I forget the exact figure, but in a recent year, Tesla matched Toyota's profits despite selling 300,000 cars to Toyota's 11 million, mainly through investment and belief in the cult of Musk.
These figures can get enormously rich in their own right, but the majority of the world's wealth is still concentrated in old areas like energy (petrol), the derivatives of military (i.e. publicly funded) research like aerospace engineering and weapons, finance, and so on. People in these sectors don't get as much attention, but I would argue have far more influence than a Bezos or Musk.
If I had to predict the future, I would say that we're going to see increasing social unrest in Western countries as the U.S. clings to its power through force. We'll see increasingly bizarre and unacceptable justifications for violent foreign policy with ever greater advances in surveillance and weapons technologies. It will also become apparent that we'll pay increasing costs for climate change, but action will only be taken when it starts hitting the bottom line for the most powerful in society -- unless there is tremendous public pressure to do more sooner.
I understand the pandemic has shit everyone up and frightened people, but I have to admit to being disheartened by how people react disproportionately to certain things. Climate change and war (especially an all-out conflict; nuclear weapons still exist) are the twin existential threats of our time, but people are talking about the 'upheaval of their lives' due to the relatively short-term circumstances of the lockdown. Even with horrifying government opportunism and mismanagement, the real effect of COVID-19 on daily life for most people will last a few years, at most.
I don't take the pandemic lightly, but there are pressing issues right now that pose far greater risks to us, but media is frightening people with objectively smaller issues.