[ rss / options / help ]
post ]
[ b / iq / g / zoo ] [ e / news / lab ] [ v / nom / pol / eco / emo / 101 / shed ]
[ art / A / beat / boo / com / fat / job / lit / map / mph / poof / £$€¥ / spo / uhu / uni / x / y ] [ * | sfw | o ]
logo
politics

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]

Posting mode: Reply [Last 50 posts]
Reply ]
Subject   (reply to 92282)
Message
File  []
close
EuCdG7VXMAEbuhg.jpg
922829228292282
>> No. 92282 Anonymous
12th February 2021
Friday 8:11 pm
92282 spacer
Perhaps the problem with Labour wasn't actually Jeremy Corbyn?
499 posts omitted. Last 50 posts shown. Expand all images.
>> No. 93937 Anonymous
9th June 2021
Wednesday 4:06 am
93937 spacer

E1meKp-WEAc-TzN.jpg
939379393793937
There's not much point in making a distinction about the North versus the rest of the country. The social attitudes in the so-called red wall are in line with the rest of the country; the main difference has been the historical "I'm voting Labour, just like me Dad" tradition that had been weakening.

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/05/17/stereotypical-image-red-wall-residents-accurate
>> No. 93938 Anonymous
9th June 2021
Wednesday 12:01 pm
93938 spacer
>>93937
I like how they conveniently neutered the free speech question to the degree that both answers can be interpreted as the same thing. And the the school history question isn't in line with any national debate. Suppose it doesn't matter so long as they can make it into the paper though and get more people signed up to watch ads for them.

If you use YouGov you're a patsy for corporate interests. There are ways to structure electronic engagement that Taiwan leads on, people need to stop thinking this is it.
>> No. 93939 Anonymous
9th June 2021
Wednesday 12:23 pm
93939 spacer
>>93938
>There are ways to structure electronic engagement that Taiwan leads on, people need to stop thinking this is it.
Sorry, I don't really understand what you mean by this and it comes across as a very puzzling outburst. Could you explain further?
>> No. 93940 Anonymous
9th June 2021
Wednesday 12:37 pm
93940 spacer
>>93938

>And the the school history question isn't in line with any national debate.

There was a parliamentary petition last year to make lessons on colonialism and slavery part of the national curriculum, which kicked up a small amount of fuss in the tabloids.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/324092
>> No. 94139 Anonymous
22nd June 2021
Tuesday 12:50 pm
94139 spacer
>Keir Starmer’s closest aide, Jenny Chapman, is to be removed from her role as political secretary after significant criticism from MPs, but will move into the shadow cabinet taking responsibility for Brexit. Chapman’s departure is another major change to Starmer’s top team and follows a sideways move for Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, and the departure of his two most senior communications staff, Ben Nunn and Paul Ovenden.

>The move will be formally announced as part of a substantial shakeup of Starmer’s team after the Batley and Spen byelection on 1 July, the Guardian understands. That is likely to coincide with the arrival of Labour’s new director of strategy, the pollster Deborah Mattinson, who brings long experience, having previously worked for Gordon Brown.

>Labour sources say Starmer believes it is a natural moment for change, after a year in the leadership, and as Covid restrictions finally lift. However, the departure of Chapman and McSweeney’s move follow a series of complaints from MPs that Starmer’s office is aloof and uncommunicative. McSweeney will remain in the leader’s office but will focus attention on rebuilding the party machinery for the next general election.

>Despite a barrage of private criticism of Chapman from MPs, Starmer and his closest aides had seemed determined to defend her because of the key role she had played in his leadership campaign. Chapman had once said she would occupy his office until he stood for leader. MPs blamed her for the decision to make Paul Williams the Hartlepool byelection candidate despite his remainer credentials in the pro-Brexit constituency. Labour humiliatingly lost the seat last month. “I have never encountered someone so difficult to deal with and I went through the Corbyn years,” one senior official said. “Relations seriously deteriorated over the Liverpool mayoral selection and the Hartlepool selection.” They also blamed Chapman for some of the disastrous messaging around the reshuffle after the byelection loss, when briefings that Starmer was planning to sack his deputy, Angela Rayner, from her elections role were met with fury by her team.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jun/22/labour-leader-keir-starmer-axes-chief-aide-jenny-chapman
>> No. 94163 Anonymous
22nd June 2021
Tuesday 5:56 pm
94163 spacer
>>94139
>who brings long experience, having previously worked for Gordon Brown.
Why does nobody ever hire experienced people who actually won? Both in Labour and the Conservatives there's this awful trend of going "Oh, we've got this adviser, he's really good, he was on the Clinton campaign" and I just think - why are you hiring these people? Why are you bragging that you've picked up someone with a track record of humiliating failure? When looking for a personal driver, you'd never go "Oh yeah, you've probably heard of him, he's the one who caused the 17 car pileup on the M6, so we know he's got experience with a car!"

And when I say pick a winner: for the love of god, no, not increasingly decrepit Blairite holdovers. Get on the phone to the ALP, who at least win state elections. Get on the phone to the Canadian Liberals if you must. Ideally, get on the phone to Ardern's team. If Labour has any hope whatsoever of winning the next election it's going to take another byelection and then nicking their strategy of anointing a new leader that people actually like 15 minutes before the election.
>> No. 94167 Anonymous
22nd June 2021
Tuesday 6:40 pm
94167 spacer
>>94163
"Pick a winner, dammit!"

"No, not those winners!"
>> No. 94168 Anonymous
22nd June 2021
Tuesday 6:50 pm
94168 spacer

halloween-decoration-skeleton-coffin-halloween-dec.jpg
941689416894168
>>94167
Let's take this logic to its conclusion: Grab a shovel and meet me on the Isles of Scilly, we're digging up Harold Wilson. Like the Blairites he's actually won an election and is completely unaware of how the internet works, like the Brownites he's got a ready-made excuse for not being associated with the Iraq war, having been dead for 8 years when it broke out, and unlike either of them he's not associated with any of Labour's current utterly useless factions.
>> No. 94211 Anonymous
25th June 2021
Friday 7:27 am
94211 spacer
>Labour has given the strongest sign yet that it has gone back on its new leader’s pledge that he would introduce free social care if his party won power, after a shadow cabinet member said such a policy would be too expensive.

>Thangam Debbonaire told female party members at a meeting last weekend that introducing free social care for disabled and older people would “give the Tories a stick to beat Labour with”, Disability News Service (DNS) has been told. She apparently claimed that such a policy would cost “£100 billion” and would cost more than the annual budget of the NHS. She also said that right-wing newspapers would attack the policy and that it would lose Labour the next election.

https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/labour-says-calling-for-free-social-care-would-just-give-tories-a-stick-to-beat-us-with/
>> No. 94213 Anonymous
25th June 2021
Friday 9:33 am
94213 spacer
>>94211
I've said it a thousand times, but this is what irritates me most of all about these centrist types: they aren't even very good at politics on top of having no real beliefs.

Of course the Conservatives are going to beat you with sticks over this, they're going to beat you with sticks over everything the party does because that's how politics works and doubly so when it's the Tories. What policy does Debbonaire (Jesus Christ) think Labour could come up with that would make the Tories stand up in Parliament and say "wow, great idea, well done"? If she knows what this cost-free silver bullet policy is I'd love to know as it sounds like quite the boon to the public's and Labour's fortunes.
>> No. 94238 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 12:37 pm
94238 spacer
>Angela Rayner has been forced to deny any immediate plans to challenge Keir Starmer for the Labour leadership, amid feverish speculation at Westminster as voters in Batley and Spen go to the polls.

>Labour still has hopes of winning the hard-fought byelection; but many MPs are already discussing what might happen if they were to lose it. The Guardian understands that allies of Rayner did make tentative approaches to potential supporters after May’s Hartlepool byelection, which Labour lost, and believed at the time they could have mustered the 40 MPs necessary to launch a challenge. But they insist she does not want to stand now, preferring to try to shape Labour policy, and they are concerned about the risk to her reputation if she wields the knife against a sitting leader.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jul/01/angela-rayner-forced-to-deny-plans-for-labour-leadership-bid

I fucking hope not. I watched her being interviewed the other day and she said "in crued" instead of "accrued" because she's thick as pig shit.
>> No. 94239 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 1:25 pm
94239 spacer
>>94238
She'd be great. Thick, uneducated, incompetent at politics. Mildly socialist. I'd imagine her handlers would have a turnover rate measured in Hertz. Jezza as her deputy (or chancellor) for maximum japery.
If we're going to have an ineffective opposition, why not go the whole way, blow another few months on a divisive and destructive leadership campaign, then fuck up the GE.
god I'm depressed.
>> No. 94240 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 1:30 pm
94240 spacer
>>94239
How can one be 'mildly socialist'? Support some kind of timeshare arrangement between the workers and the capitalist class?
>> No. 94241 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 1:50 pm
94241 spacer
>>94239
Don't worry, if anything it will make the Tories massively overconfident so they try and push an unpopular yet necessary policy that collapses their support base. If you set yourself on fire and run around like a madman there's chance you can set others on fire who might burn more veraciously.
>> No. 94242 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 5:00 pm
94242 spacer
>>94241
Now you've got me imagining a timeline where Corbyn is defenestrated in 2016 so when the Conservatives throw in the dementia tax in 2017 or 2020, instead of opportunistically exploiting it Labour fumbles the issue trying to look "responsible." (after all, what if Labour said they wouldn't do anything similar and looked like they'd mismanage the public finances?) Perhaps even going so far as to explain, better than the Conservatives, why the Tory policy wasn't actually so bad and so isn't a major issue. (unlike Labour's fully costed plan for means tested kicks in the teeth)
>> No. 94243 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 8:31 pm
94243 spacer
George Galloway is apparently going to pull it off.
>> No. 94244 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 9:05 pm
94244 spacer
>>94243
I'm going to pull his fucking head off.
>> No. 94245 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 10:01 pm
94245 spacer
>>94243
>George Galloway is apparently going to pull it off.
I'll be tuning into the Commons again then.
>> No. 94246 Anonymous
1st July 2021
Thursday 10:41 pm
94246 spacer

Tracy Brabin.jpg
942469424694246
>>94243
Do you think Tracy Brabin regrets her decision to become West Yorkshire mayor?
>> No. 94251 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 10:40 am
94251 spacer
Fuck George Galloway.

>>94245
And fuck you too.
>> No. 94252 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 10:47 am
94252 spacer
>>94251
I find trainwrecks entertaining. Am I to assume you took my interest in seeing the man explode in the Commons as an endorsement of his policy?

Do you consider yourself easily seethed or just stupid?
>> No. 94253 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 10:54 am
94253 spacer
>>94252
>easily seethed
Huh?
>> No. 94254 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 12:43 pm
94254 spacer
>>94252
Not to worry lad. Kier is acting like he stormed to a historic victory personally, by just over 300 votes.
>> No. 94255 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 1:38 pm
94255 spacer
I, for one, look forward to our politicians returning focus to the issues that matter. Namely how we can make Londoners richer and to better represent their political beliefs over the commuter towns of Carlisle and Lerwick.
>> No. 94257 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 3:23 pm
94257 spacer
"Batley and Spen: Labour is back after by-election win, says Starmer"
Ok Starmer, really grasping at the straws now.
>> No. 94258 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 4:12 pm
94258 spacer
I saw someone call Galloway a carpetbagger on Twitter and thought it was a word filter.
>> No. 94259 Anonymous
2nd July 2021
Friday 5:44 pm
94259 spacer
>>94257

Go to bed George, see you at the next By-election (unless your own bitterness hasn't consumed you like something akin to necrosis before then).
>> No. 94284 Anonymous
3rd July 2021
Saturday 11:48 am
94284 spacer
>>94259
Not him, and Galloway is a cunt, but Starmer declaring Labour to be on some kind of resurgance, when they got their lowest vote share ever, when they just barely snatched victory from the jaws of defeat, is really stupid.

It's exactly the kind of arrogance that led so many (stupid) people to vote for Galloway. Labour should be showing some humility and seeking to address the issues that alienated the voters of Batley and Spen from them. Instead Starmer appears to be treating the previous by-election losses as just anomalous blips in an otherwise perfect record.
>> No. 94285 Anonymous
3rd July 2021
Saturday 12:31 pm
94285 spacer
>>94284
People like backing winners. Starmer and Labour need to start sounding like winners because all they've really done so far is talk about how people have been right to abandon Labour because they'd been taken for granted for too long, which has been massively unpopular because he's coming across like a right loser.

Labour also need to stop with the massive infighting. It's been funny watching the mental gymnastics by Corbyn supporters online before and after election day but this sort of shit is electoral kryptonite. Take the win, learn the lesson that local candidates are better than parachuting in some wonk and fucking build on it.
>> No. 94287 Anonymous
3rd July 2021
Saturday 4:44 pm
94287 spacer
>>94258
Carbetbagger is a fine insult that has been hideously co-opted by our benevolent masters.
>> No. 94288 Anonymous
3rd July 2021
Saturday 6:00 pm
94288 spacer
>>94284
>seeking to address the issues that alienated the voters of Batley and Spen from them
Swing voters are notorious for voting for who Sandra down the pub thinks looks least like a paedo. I don't think there is much more to it than Galloway wore a nice hat and purred like a kitten on Big Brother once after calling Micheal Barrymore a Jakey carpet-bagger.
>> No. 94311 Anonymous
18th July 2021
Sunday 5:38 pm
94311 spacer
Keir Starmer is preparing to support a purge of far-left factions that were vocal supporters of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership. After 15 months of being party leader, Starmer is expected to support a proposal before the party’s governing body on Tuesday to proscribe four named groups.

The proposal, first reported in the Daily Mirror, has angered leftwing members who believe this may be part of a wider purge of the party. Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee will be asked to proscribe Resist and Labour Against the Witchhunt, which claims antisemitism allegations were politically motivated, and Labour In Exile Network, which expressly welcomes expelled or suspended members. Socialist Appeal, a group that describes itself as a Marxist voice of Labour and youth, would also become a banned group. Anyone found to be a member of any these groups could be automatic expelled from the Labour party.


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jul/18/keir-starmer-expected-to-back-purge-of-far-left-labour-factions
>> No. 94312 Anonymous
18th July 2021
Sunday 5:50 pm
94312 spacer
>>94311

As this article explains, the right sees the success of Corbyn and Bernie as being the result of an upswing in left-wing politics in the youth, and one that isn't going to move to the right any time in the near future.
https://iea.org.uk/media/67-per-cent-of-young-brits-want-a-socialist-economic-system-finds-new-poll/
So it's very strange that Starmer is doing his best to disown it.
>> No. 94313 Anonymous
18th July 2021
Sunday 6:26 pm
94313 spacer
>>94311
You know who else had widespread purges after becoming leader of his party? Stalin. What a bloody hypocrite.
>> No. 94314 Anonymous
18th July 2021
Sunday 6:50 pm
94314 spacer
>>94311
Expelling the first two for antisemitism is an easy sell, fair enough, but getting rid of the completely irrelevant Socialist Appeal feels like sad middle aged NOLSies trying to roleplay as Neil Kinnock by attacking the few remaining coffin dodgers who opposed him the first time around.
>> No. 94315 Anonymous
18th July 2021
Sunday 7:22 pm
94315 spacer
>>94312
Lad, it's from the IEA and talking about children having socialist political beliefs.
>> No. 94324 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 1:51 pm
94324 spacer
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jul/19/labour-could-cut-up-to-a-quarter-of-its-staff-in-cost-saving-push
Why is it that the Labour leaders most afraid of a national budget deficit tend to be the ones who leave the party with gigantic budget deficits?
>> No. 94325 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 2:27 pm
94325 spacer
>>94324
I actually remember John Prescott warning that the party was facing bankruptcy in 2010. As far as I can tell their finances have been in dire straights since the Iraq War, although there's no chance they'd go bankrupt it does make you wonder of the continual pressures that's been having behind the scenes.
>> No. 94326 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 2:36 pm
94326 spacer
>>94325
>Labour is Britain's richest party – and it's not down to the unions
>Aug 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/aug/22/labour-coffers-make-party-richest-in-britain
>> No. 94327 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 2:45 pm
94327 spacer
>>94325
They need to stop pissing it away on legal action resulting from infighting.
>> No. 94328 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 3:33 pm
94328 spacer
>>94325
I know it was to skirt the rules on declaring donations, but Blair was still a right idiot to sell honours for loans at commercial rates of interest rather than for cold hard cash when the party was broke. Not like Lloyd George, a proper crook who not only sold honours, but let the money rest in his own account and used it quite successfully for factional purposes.
>> No. 94329 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 3:46 pm
94329 spacer
>>94326
>another paid £12,500 to have home-cooked dinner with the environment secretary, Michael Gove, and his wife, Sarah Vine.

Being a rich political donor must be hard. You can't just give money to get your back scratched, you end up getting all sorts of dinner party invites and have to spend time hobnobbing with leaders.
>> No. 94330 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 9:10 pm
94330 spacer
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if I gave, say, three grand to the Green Party instead of spunking it on Bitcoins that immediately lose 60% of their value. Would they just accept it? Or would I get a favour in return? If I just donated it for fun, would they ring me up and ask me if I want anything? If I donated it to Labour instead, would the local Labour MP help me get some land to build a house on?
>> No. 94331 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 9:20 pm
94331 spacer
>>94330
You'll probably get better returns on the buttcoins, TBH.
>> No. 94332 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 10:07 pm
94332 spacer
>>94330
What are you hoping they'd offer you?
>> No. 94333 Anonymous
20th July 2021
Tuesday 10:35 pm
94333 spacer
>>94332
I think that's the 'oestrogen infusion' tier.
>> No. 94335 Anonymous
21st July 2021
Wednesday 1:20 am
94335 spacer
>>94332
A large plot of wasteground that I can build a mansion on. There are plenty around here. I would happily pay 10 grand straight into an MP's pocket to receive such a thing, and nobody else wants them (or at least, they haven't had this brilliant idea).
>> No. 94340 Anonymous
22nd July 2021
Thursday 11:40 pm
94340 spacer
>>94335
Have you considered offering this money to a landowner instead?
>> No. 94341 Anonymous
23rd July 2021
Friday 7:32 am
94341 spacer
>>94340
It's difficult to conceive of a less deserving person.
>> No. 94342 Anonymous
23rd July 2021
Friday 1:35 pm
94342 spacer
>>94341
You could throw it my way. I can't guarantee any political favours, but you'll definitely get an intimate dinner for two at a Harvester of your choice (from a list of two).

Return ] Entire Thread ] First 100 posts ] Last 50 posts ]
whiteline

Delete Post []
Password