[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
>> | No. 92649
92649
>The UK "no longer" has a system rigged against people from ethnic minorities, a review set up by No 10 says. |
>> | No. 92650
92650
Yep. |
>> | No. 92651
92651
>>92649 |
>> | No. 92652
92652
>>92649 |
>> | No. 92654
92654
Geography and then class. |
>> | No. 92655
92655
>>92654 |
>> | No. 92657
92657
If black people are poor because of racism, then it's our fault for being racists. If they're poor because of the economy, then it's the government's fault for mismanaging the economy. This report feels like a very subtle comment that the Conservatives have spent the past decade failing at every stage of the one thing they're supposed to be good at. If you read it that way, it's slightly easier to get behind. |
>> | No. 92658
92658
I heard that much of today's divisive racial and identity politics escaped the fringes and started entering the mainstream during the days of Occupy Wall Street. I never paid much attention to OWS, but emphasising mundane nonsense like one's race or sexual orientation certainly seems like a good way to drive a wedge between people who share the same economic interests. |
>> | No. 92659
92659
>>92658 |
>> | No. 92660
92660
>>92659 |
>> | No. 92661
92661
>>92659 |
>> | No. 92662
92662
>>92658 |
>> | No. 92663
92663
>>92658 |
>> | No. 92664
92664
mummy_culture.jpg ![]() ![]() ![]() >>92657 |
>> | No. 92665
92665
The hyper-wealthy should be killed without trial. |
>> | No. 92666
92666
>>92657 |
>> | No. 92667
92667
>>92664 |
>> | No. 92672
92672
>>92667 |
>> | No. 92682
92682
Social mobility is a bit of a euphemistic term, I feel, that basically means "I want to have people beneath me." It's the same psychological sleight of hand that makes people prefer to see bennies cut than their own wages going up. |
>> | No. 92683
92683
The BMJ says the report's fundamentally wrong anyway |
>> | No. 92684
92684
>>92683 |
>> | No. 92685
92685
>>92684 |
>> | No. 92686
92686
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/race-report-boris-johnson-authors-b1825516.html |
>> | No. 92687
92687
>>92683 |
>> | No. 92689
92689
>>92687 |
>> | No. 92690
92690
>>92687 |
>> | No. 92691
92691
>>92689 |
>> | No. 92692
92692
>>92691 |
>> | No. 92693
92693
>>92687 |
>> | No. 92695
92695
>>92693 |
>> | No. 92696
92696
>>92695 |
>> | No. 92701
92701
>>92692 |
>> | No. 92702
92702
>>92701 |
>> | No. 92703
92703
>>92702 |
>> | No. 92704
92704
>>92703 |
>> | No. 92710
92710
>>92696 |
>> | No. 92711
92711
>>92687 |
>> | No. 92712
92712
>>92711 |
>> | No. 92713
92713
>>92711 |
>> | No. 92714
92714
>>92710 |
>> | No. 92715
92715
>>92714 |
>> | No. 92716
92716
>>92711 |
>> | No. 92717
92717
>>92716 |
>> | No. 92718
92718
>>92715 |
>> | No. 92719
92719
>>92716 |
>> | No. 92721
92721
>>92715 |
>> | No. 92722
92722
>>92716 |
>> | No. 92723
92723
>>92722 |
>> | No. 92725
92725
>>92723 |
>> | No. 92726
92726
>>92725 |
>> | No. 92727
92727
>>92723 |
>> | No. 92728
92728
>>92727 |
>> | No. 92729
92729
>>92725 |
>> | No. 92730
92730
>>92728 |
>> | No. 92731
92731
>>92726 |
>> | No. 92732
92732
>>92726 |
>> | No. 92739
92739
>>92682 |
>> | No. 92745
92745
The oligarchy would much rather have a race war than a class war, and depending on how well the system currently rewards you, you might just find yourself feeling the same way. Pretty much all there is to it. |
>> | No. 92746
92746
>>92739 |
>> | No. 92747
92747
>>92746 |
>> | No. 92748
92748
>>92747 |
>> | No. 92749
92749
>>92748 |
>> | No. 92750
92750
>>92749 |
>> | No. 92751
92751
>>92750 |
>> | No. 92752
92752
>>92751 |
>> | No. 92753
92753
EyAIen_WUAEb1Cu.jpg ![]() ![]() ![]() This one's even funnier in the context of you always harping on about how the financial times is unbiased because the readers need facts to be greedy. |
>> | No. 92754
92754
44jvls.jpg ![]() ![]() ![]() >>92752 |
>> | No. 92755
92755
>>92754 |
>> | No. 92756
92756
>>92753 |
>> | No. 92757
92757
>>92756 |
>> | No. 92920
92920
So it's coming out now that the government rewrote the original report to make it look better. |
>> | No. 92921
92921
>>92920 |
>> | No. 92922
92922
>>92921 |
>> | No. 92923
92923
>>92922 |
>> | No. 92924
92924
>>92923 |
>> | No. 92925
92925
>>92924 |
>> | No. 92926
92926
>>92923 |
>> | No. 92927
92927
>>92926 |
>> | No. 92928
92928
>>92927 |
>> | No. 92929
92929
>>92928 |
>> | No. 92930
92930
>>92929 |
>> | No. 92931
92931
>>92927 |
>> | No. 92932
92932
>>92931 |
>> | No. 92933
92933
>>92932 |
>> | No. 92934
92934
>>92933 |
>> | No. 92935
92935
>>92934 |
>> | No. 92936
92936
>>92935 |
>> | No. 92937
92937
>>92936 |
>> | No. 92938
92938
>>92936 |
>> | No. 92939
92939
>>92938 |
>> | No. 92940
92940
>>92937 |
>> | No. 92941
92941
PBF-Skub-1.png ![]() ![]() ![]() Fundamental questions: what evidence would persuade advocates of the structural racism theory that their theory is wrong? What benchmark could we use to measure the extent of structural racism and the effectiveness of efforts to reduce it? What would society need to do to convincingly eradicate structural racism? |
>> | No. 92942
92942
>>92941 |
>> | No. 92943
92943
significant.png ![]() ![]() ![]() >>92942 |
>> | No. 92944
92944
>>92940 |
>> | No. 92945
92945
>>92943 |
>> | No. 92946
92946
>>92943 |
>> | No. 92948
92948
>>92946 |
>> | No. 92949
92949
Those who are continuing to claim that the UK is racist are they themselves the racists. Not in a traditional sense but the tendency to analyse everything in it's relation to race despite the myriad of other factors which are far more contributory to the problem seems pretty racist, no? |
>> | No. 92950
92950
>>92949 |
[ Return ] [ Entire Thread ] [ First 100 posts ] [ Last 50 posts ]
Delete Post [] Password |