Literally this took me one minute I was possessed by the central bank

Can you smell burned toast?

He looks like Ed Milliband has been dipped in coffee. It's really unnerving.

Honestly, I don't mean this in that racialist facial features way Nazilad did in the other thread, but he just looks like a white bloke wearing make up. It triggers the uncanny valley effect for me.

>>94352
Ed Miliband doesn't look like a white person.

>>94353
Up early or not been to bed, Nazilad?

>>94354
Miliband looks more like a pale Indian than Sunak looks like a white person dipped in coffee. That's not a controversial statement.

>>94355
I think it's a very odd statement. It's the kind of statement that would rightly breed unease in most who hear it.

>>94356
Why is 'Rishi Sunak looks like a white person dipped in coffee' fine but 'Ed Miliband looks like an Indian person dipped in milk' offensive?

>>94357
I don't recall making a statement to that affect.

>>94358
You said that Sunak doesn't look like an actual brown person and looks more like a white person wearing make-up, that he's Ed Miliband dipped in coffee.

I'd say the opposite is actually true, but you're more familiar with Miliband over Sunak because he's been in the public sphere a lot longer so he's your baseline. Rishi Sunak looks like an actual brown person whereas Ed Miliband looks like a brown person who is wearing make-up to appear whiter.

The likeness between the two has been noted here before.

>>94359
No, I didn't say that, that was someone else.

>>94360
So why do you feel uneasy with it being pointed out that Ed Miliband looks like a brown person but didnt feel uneasy when it was pointed out that Rishi Sunak looks like a white person?

>>94357
It's okay to disparage ethnic conservatives because under socialism everyone's background should determine who they are. You can't say that Miliband though because he's on the right team and the family might murder a kitten if you upset them.

>>94361
Because I was asleep when the other thing happened.

>>94362
What?

>>94356

>It's the kind of statement that would rightly breed unease in most who hear it.

The only thing you'll breed is unease.

>>94361

Miliband is Jewish. Jews aren't an ethnic minority, because that would make Corbyn a racist and Corbyn can't be a racist because Corbyn is an anti-racist.

>>94365

Go to bed, Netanyahu.

>>94364
If you can explain why I've upset you so then I'm all ears. However, it's not my fault you got confused and failed to realise there might be more than one other person in the thread, indeed, there are two or maybe even three people replying to me by now. It's quite reasonable to imply someone's a racist when they go around complaining Jews aren't white or Asians look too white and entirely correct to say this kind of talk would make most people uncomfortable. Not the kind of troglodytes you're pals with, maybe, but most people.

>>94365
If Miliband is Jewish then why did he eat bacon?

>>94367
>If you can explain why I've upset you so then I'm all ears.
Don't think you upset them mate, that's why they called you a virgin in an offhand comment.

>Jews aren't white or Asians look too white and entirely correct to say this kind of talk would make most people uncomfortable.
Yeah, same kind of people who were unable to point out that that lad in the sensitivity session was black when asked to describe him.

>>94369

Were they unable to or is that just something that seems like an obvious trick question in the context?

>>94370
Surely it could only be considered to be a trick question if you thought 'black' was a wrong answer.

Fucking hell. I agreed with both of you on the physical appearance quips, but you seem to be going pretty barmy when people make non-appearance quips.

I have noticed that I, personally, do spot far more lookalikes than most people. Maybe I just only have four or five faces in my head and everyone else has more, and so I am much more susceptible to people saying X person looks like Y.

>>94372
>I agreed with both of you on the physical appearance quips
While I'm loathe to point this out, that wasn't me. And if it was, I'd never admit it. But it wasn't.

For some reason I've spotted at least one lookalike of my brother about once a month this year, but only since coming to London, never anywhere else. And he's the same colour as me so it can't be racist.

>>94373
How do you know that it's not your brother keeping an eye on you, when is the last time you checked refrigerator for sausages/plant-anus?

>>94371
Yes, exactly. Not wrong, but a wrong answer. In the context. Nobody wants to be the one to point out someone has a certain characteristic that the whole seminar, or whatever it is, is about. Obviously it looks like a set up.